I will not Bow!

[Victory67]

They have a right to fight for self determination.

They also have a right to die for self determination.

And their militias do that exceedingly well, and in huge numbers.

At least the Palestinians managed to get something right.

If it wasn't for the 1st Intifada, Israel would have surely annexed the entire West Bank.

Sometimes violence does bring positive results. In this case it led to an Israeli military withdrawal from almost 50% of the West Bank and a decades long peace process.

We should all give our thanks to the 1st Intifada for cracking the wall of Israeli arrogance.

 

[Indeependent]

They have a right to fight for self determination.

They also have a right to die for self determination.

And their militias do that exceedingly well, and in huge numbers.

At least the Palestinians managed to get something right.

If it wasn't for the 1st Intifada, Israel would have surely annexed the entire West Bank.

Sometimes violence does bring positive results. In this case it led to an Israeli military withdrawal from almost 50% of the West Bank and a decades long peace process.

We should all give our thanks to the 1st Intifada for cracking the wall of Israeli arrogance.

The Intifada of the 90s led directly to today where the WBJs are being squeezed into a discomfort zone of their own making.
What a waste of potential brain power and contributions to mankind.

 

[Kondor3]

They have a right to fight for self determination.

They also have a right to die for self determination.

And their militias do that exceedingly well, and in huge numbers.

At least the Palestinians managed to get something right.

If it wasn't for the 1st Intifada, Israel would have surely annexed the entire West Bank.

Sometimes violence does bring positive results. In this case it led to an Israeli military withdrawal from almost 50% of the West Bank and a decades long peace process.

We should all give our thanks to the 1st Intifada for cracking the wall of Israeli arrogance.

**** your First Intifada...

And your Second...

And any Third your pissants care to dream up...

Because the Third will be the end of your miserable little pissant Palestinian militias...

The very end...

 

[RoccoR]

P F Tinmore, et al,

This is a Jihadist and Fedayeen point-of-view.

It is Palestine on both sides of the armistice lines. Which part of Palestine are the Palestinians not supposed to be?

(COMMENT)

West Bank and Gaza Strip. The other side is the State of Israel.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[RoccoR]

Victory67, et al,

Yes a POV...

Interesting POV. Occupied persons have the right to fight for self-determination but there are legal consequences to those actions if they involve violence.

(COMMENT)

Has there ever been a resistance movement that did not have consequences?

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Indeependent]

Victory67, et al,

Yes a POV...

Interesting POV. Occupied persons have the right to fight for self-determination but there are legal consequences to those actions if they involve violence.

(COMMENT)

Has there ever been a resistance movement that did not have consequences?

Most Respectfully,
R

My wife resisting my charm on rare occasions.

 

[P F Tinmore]

P F Tinmore, et al,

This is a Jihadist and Fedayeen point-of-view.

It is Palestine on both sides of the armistice lines. Which part of Palestine are the Palestinians not supposed to be?

(COMMENT)

West Bank and Gaza Strip. The other side is the State of Israel.

Most Respectfully,
R

You can refute what I said if you like.

Mere say so doesn't count.

 

[pbel]

Phoenall, in the matter of the Six Day War of 1967...

For whatever little it's worth, coming from someone such as myself who is so blatantly pro-Israeli, and so hard-line in conjuring answers...

In my own humble opinion, you've done all that need be done, to assume a 'win' between yourself and our colleague 'pbel', related to the casus belli, and nothing more should be required of you, unless it pleases you to continue dragging 'pbel's inadequate and exhausted 'guardhouse lawyer' automatic gainsay defense up and down the basketball court for a while longer - but, at some point, somebody has to invoke the Slaughter Rule and call an end to this embarrassing one-sided contest. Just sayin'...

He has lost, he knows he has lost and he shows it in true commie fashion by hurling insults. When he can conduct himself as a decent adult then I might put him in his place again.

Keep up the double talk...

Ask.com - What's Your Question?
Six-Day War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Source

The Six-Day War (Hebrew: , Milhemet Sheshet Ha Yamim; Arabic: , an-Naksah, The Setback or , Ḥarb 1967, War of 1967), also known as the June War, 1967 Arab–Israeli War, or Third Arab–Israeli War, was fought between June 5 and 10, 1967, by Israel and the neighboring states of Egypt (known at the time as the United Arab Republic), Jordan, and Syria. The war began on June 5 with Israel launching surprise str... Read More »
Go to: Ask Encyclopedia · Images · Videos

Browse Article: Background and summary of events leading to war · Military preparations · The fighting fronts · Conclusion of conflict and post-war situation · Casualties ·


Source: Wikipedia


Related Questions:

•

Who won the six day war?


•

Has the Israeli military declined in quality since the Six Days War and other successful actions?


•

What was the Six Day War?


View more Q&A »

 

[Indeependent]

Phoenall, in the matter of the Six Day War of 1967...

For whatever little it's worth, coming from someone such as myself who is so blatantly pro-Israeli, and so hard-line in conjuring answers...

In my own humble opinion, you've done all that need be done, to assume a 'win' between yourself and our colleague 'pbel', related to the casus belli, and nothing more should be required of you, unless it pleases you to continue dragging 'pbel's inadequate and exhausted 'guardhouse lawyer' automatic gainsay defense up and down the basketball court for a while longer - but, at some point, somebody has to invoke the Slaughter Rule and call an end to this embarrassing one-sided contest. Just sayin'...

He has lost, he knows he has lost and he shows it in true commie fashion by hurling insults. When he can conduct himself as a decent adult then I might put him in his place again.

Keep up the double talk...

Ask.com - What's Your Question?
Six-Day War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Source

The Six-Day War (Hebrew: , Milhemet Sheshet Ha Yamim; Arabic: , an-Naksah, The Setback or , Ḥarb 1967, War of 1967), also known as the June War, 1967 Arab–Israeli War, or Third Arab–Israeli War, was fought between June 5 and 10, 1967, by Israel and the neighboring states of Egypt (known at the time as the United Arab Republic), Jordan, and Syria. The war began on June 5 with Israel launching surprise str... Read More »
Go to: Ask Encyclopedia · Images · Videos

Browse Article: Background and summary of events leading to war · Military preparations · The fighting fronts · Conclusion of conflict and post-war situation · Casualties ·


Source: Wikipedia


Related Questions:

•

Who won the six day war?


•

Has the Israeli military declined in quality since the Six Days War and other successful actions?


•

What was the Six Day War?


View more Q&A »

It seems that everything Israel ever does is a surprise to their Arab neighbors.
How dumb can these Arab neighbors be?
Dumb enough to line up tanks along Israel's borders and not expect a preemptive attack.
Patton would be proud of the Arabs...NOT!

 

[aris2chat]

They have a right to fight for self determination.

They also have a right to die for self determination.

And their militias do that exceedingly well, and in huge numbers.

At least the Palestinians managed to get something right.

If it wasn't for the 1st Intifada, Israel would have surely annexed the entire West Bank.

Sometimes violence does bring positive results. In this case it led to an Israeli military withdrawal from almost 50% of the West Bank and a decades long peace process.

We should all give our thanks to the 1st Intifada for cracking the wall of Israeli arrogance.

OMG! The first intafada was sparked by a car crash at a gaza check point and went on for six years. It led to Jordan cutting ties with the west bank because if the PLO, Arafat come out of exile in Tunisia and it resulted in the Oslo accord.

 

[RoccoR]

P F Tinmore, et al,

This is not what I say, but what the Palestinians say.

This is a Jihadist and Fedayeen point-of-view.

It is Palestine on both sides of the armistice lines. Which part of Palestine are the Palestinians not supposed to be?

(COMMENT)

West Bank and Gaza Strip. The other side is the State of Israel.

Most Respectfully,
R

You can refute what I said if you like.

Mere say so doesn't count.

(OBSERVATION)

2. Key Facts

• The 1967 border is the internationally-recognized border between Israel and the oPt.
  .
• A basic principle of international law is that no state may acquire territory by force. Israel has no valid claim to any part of the territory it occupied in 1967.
  .
• The international community does not recognize Israeli sovereignty over any part of the oPt, including East Jerusalem.

SOURCE: Borders

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Victory67]

OMG! The first intafada was sparked by a car crash at a gaza check point and went on for six years. It led to Jordan cutting ties with the west bank because if the PLO, Arafat come out of exile in Tunisia and it resulted in the Oslo accord.

The First Intifada led to peace talks, the Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon, and the Israeli withdrawal from almost 50% of the West Bank. That's what I call "progress".

 

[Hossfly]

P F Tinmore, et al,

This is not what I say, but what the Palestinians say.

This is a Jihadist and Fedayeen point-of-view.


(COMMENT)

West Bank and Gaza Strip. The other side is the State of Israel.

Most Respectfully,
R

You can refute what I said if you like.

Mere say so doesn't count.

(OBSERVATION)

2. Key Facts

• The 1967 border is the internationally-recognized border between Israel and the oPt.
  .
• A basic principle of international law is that no state may acquire territory by force. Israel has no valid claim to any part of the territory it occupied in 1967.
  .
• The international community does not recognize Israeli sovereignty over any part of the oPt, including East Jerusalem.

SOURCE: Borders

Most Respectfully,
R

Rocco, Tinmore is so stuck on being belligerent, he would argue with Abbas.

 

[Indeependent]

OMG! The first intafada was sparked by a car crash at a gaza check point and went on for six years. It led to Jordan cutting ties with the west bank because if the PLO, Arafat come out of exile in Tunisia and it resulted in the Oslo accord.

The First Intifada led to peace talks, the Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon, and the Israeli withdrawal from almost 50% of the West Bank. That's what I call "progress".

And the second Intifada was caused by Sharon visiting the Mount.
Don't these stupid Jews realize the Mount is only for ARABS!
Man, those Arabs are racists!

 

[aris2chat]

OMG! The first intafada was sparked by a car crash at a gaza check point and went on for six years. It led to Jordan cutting ties with the west bank because if the PLO, Arafat come out of exile in Tunisia and it resulted in the Oslo accord.

The First Intifada led to peace talks, the Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon, and the Israeli withdrawal from almost 50% of the West Bank. That's what I call "progress".

military withdrawal from jericho and area A

 

[Victory67]

And the second Intifada was caused by Sharon visiting the Mount. Don't these stupid Jews realize the Mount is only for ARABS!
Man, those Arabs are racists!

The 2nd Intifada was a tragic mistake and I didn't support it.

The 1st Intifada? Totally justified expression of anger at injustice and war crimes.

 

[aris2chat]

And the second Intifada was caused by Sharon visiting the Mount. Don't these stupid Jews realize the Mount is only for ARABS!
Man, those Arabs are racists!

The 2nd Intifada was a tragic mistake and I didn't support it.

The 1st Intifada? Totally justified expression of anger at injustice and war crimes.

Especially since Arafat and Rajoub approved the plans for the temple mount visit weeks in advance. They set up Sharon and gave Arafat a way out of the peace deal. Sharon want to meet Arafat on the mount and shake hand. Arafat want to incite violence. Bus loads of rocks were move to the mount in advance.
Sharon had been to the mount several times before, as had many of the MK without incidence.

 

[pbel]

And the second Intifada was caused by Sharon visiting the Mount. Don't these stupid Jews realize the Mount is only for ARABS!
Man, those Arabs are racists!

The 2nd Intifada was a tragic mistake and I didn't support it.

The 1st Intifada? Totally justified expression of anger at injustice and war crimes.

Especially since Arafat and Rajoub approved the plans for the temple mount visit weeks in advance. They set up Sharon and gave Arafat a way out of the peace deal. Sharon want to meet Arafat on the mount and shake hand. Arafat want to incite violence. Bus loads of rocks were move to the mount in advance.
Sharon had been to the mount several times before, as had many of the MK without incidence.

People who are willing to die to regain their dignity have nothing to lose.

 

[aris2chat]

The 2nd Intifada was a tragic mistake and I didn't support it.

The 1st Intifada? Totally justified expression of anger at injustice and war crimes.

Especially since Arafat and Rajoub approved the plans for the temple mount visit weeks in advance. They set up Sharon and gave Arafat a way out of the peace deal. Sharon want to meet Arafat on the mount and shake hand. Arafat want to incite violence. Bus loads of rocks were move to the mount in advance.
Sharon had been to the mount several times before, as had many of the MK without incidence.

People who are willing to die to regain their dignity have nothing to lose.

dying is not dignity, living and helping other with grace is.

 

[Indeependent]

And the second Intifada was caused by Sharon visiting the Mount. Don't these stupid Jews realize the Mount is only for ARABS!
Man, those Arabs are racists!

The 2nd Intifada was a tragic mistake and I didn't support it.

The 1st Intifada? Totally justified expression of anger at injustice and war crimes.

Especially since Arafat and Rajoub approved the plans for the temple mount visit weeks in advance. They set up Sharon and gave Arafat a way out of the peace deal. Sharon want to meet Arafat on the mount and shake hand. Arafat want to incite violence. Bus loads of rocks were move to the mount in advance.
Sharon had been to the mount several times before, as had many of the MK without incidence.

Arafat had to sustain the hostilities in order to maintain his wife in her French Castle.