"I will not be bullied by you."

I don't know how many times I have posted this to you.


Currently, the lower house is being dominated by Trump's minions. The threat of being primaried has them in fear, mostly because of an electorate dominated by flippin asshole idiots like yourself. Trump also controls the SCOTUS as demonstrated by some of their horrendous rulings. Stare decisis thrown out the door. Ironically, this thread revolves around Senate hearings, the last bastion against despotism led by Trump.

That is by design. The founders were absolutely geniuses. They knew from the very beginning that this nation would eventually get to the point we are now. They put in place safeguards. But if the Senate fails in their responsibilities, and they might, then this Republic will cease to exist.
Who’s scared?
 
Lots and I've had lots too.

That's because you've never been interviewed for anything that carries huge responsibility.

Many interview processes for senior management roles over thousands of people spanning an entire continent and multiple time zones, are grueling, the candidates are placed under pressure to see how they behave.

She was an entitled snowflake, no class and no endurance.

In how many of your conducted interviews did you ask a question and then talk over their answer? I too have co ducted my fair share of interviews and can proudly admit 0 times did I talk over their answer. Want to know why? Cause the whole point of the interview is to learn about the candidate not try to show them up you dumb ass
 
Poor doggy
cute dog dogbreath retarded.webp
 

Trump Has Destroyed The Utility Of The FBI Vetting Nominees


Normally, transitions and administrations want desperately to know potential personnel vulnerabilities in advance. The entire point of a security check is to determine whether someone is already ethically compromised or has potential areas that an adversary could leverage to compromise them — from hidden affairs to gambling problems to substance abuse. At a fundamental level, a security check is about whether a potential nominee is worthy of public trust. You generally, as a point of good government, don’t want senior officials in sensitive positions open to compromise or blackmail.

The Trump administration, meanwhile, sees background checks differently — they want to hide and obfuscate the misdeeds, liabilities, weaknesses, conflicts-of-interest, corruption, and points of existing or potential compromise of their nominees until they’re safely ensconced in the highest level of the US government and already reading the nation’s most sensitive secrets.


It's one of many things he has destroyed..........and he's just getting started.
You still believe anything the FBI says? What a gullible moron.
 
That's another favorite word of the intellectual dummies on this forum, always shouting "projection" something else that clearly scares them.
Why are you yapping? This is an internal United States affair. You have no say in it, and your opinion is utterly worthless.

Don't go away mad. Just go away.
 
Why would any self respecting advocate for law and order, not be extremely concerned if the candidate for attorney general of the United States refused to answer questions truthfully?

When she lied and when Hegseth lied they lied to the American people whom they are meant to be serving.

Trump has appointed spineless yes men and to defend this as many here are is itself a disregard for law and order, hypocrisy.
Oh, go kiss the ass of Pakistani child rapists some more.
 
Back
Top Bottom