"I will not be bullied by you."

There's a time and a place for everything. That is a time and place to keep your cool.
Bondi didn't. She let the leftwing senator have it, and she's the better for it. I guess men aren't allowed to stomp women in these hearings, but the the opposite is OK.
 
Bondi didn't. She let the leftwing senator have it, and she's the better for it. I guess men aren't allowed to stomp women in these hearings, but the the opposite is OK.
She stood her ground through their verbal abuse Mash, but is biding her time until she's in , then these traitors are going to 'have it' big time.....


1737031638482.webp


~S~
 
There's a time and a place for everything. That is a time and place to keep your cool.

Trump Has Destroyed The Utility Of The FBI Vetting Nominees


Normally, transitions and administrations want desperately to know potential personnel vulnerabilities in advance. The entire point of a security check is to determine whether someone is already ethically compromised or has potential areas that an adversary could leverage to compromise them — from hidden affairs to gambling problems to substance abuse. At a fundamental level, a security check is about whether a potential nominee is worthy of public trust. You generally, as a point of good government, don’t want senior officials in sensitive positions open to compromise or blackmail.

The Trump administration, meanwhile, sees background checks differently — they want to hide and obfuscate the misdeeds, liabilities, weaknesses, conflicts-of-interest, corruption, and points of existing or potential compromise of their nominees until they’re safely ensconced in the highest level of the US government and already reading the nation’s most sensitive secrets.


It's one of many things he has destroyed..........and he's just getting started.
 
In an exchange between AG nominee Pam Bondi and Democratic Senator Alex Padilla during her confirmation hearing, Pam Bondi erupted stating "I will not be bullied by you."

Now, here is a textbook case of a male senator bullying a woman, but the left seemingly has no qualms with it. After all she's nothing but a Trump nominee, right? Here is the exchange below:



Why is this okay? And how does this further the public knowledge of her qualifications beyond "we don't like her" or "but Trump nominated her?"

She kicked his a$$ good-and-proper... I saw pieces of her testimony yesterday... I think she'll do just fine...
 

Trump Has Destroyed The Utility Of The FBI Vetting Nominees


Normally, transitions and administrations want desperately to know potential personnel vulnerabilities in advance. The entire point of a security check is to determine whether someone is already ethically compromised or has potential areas that an adversary could leverage to compromise them — from hidden affairs to gambling problems to substance abuse. At a fundamental level, a security check is about whether a potential nominee is worthy of public trust. You generally, as a point of good government, don’t want senior officials in sensitive positions open to compromise or blackmail.

The Trump administration, meanwhile, sees background checks differently — they want to hide and obfuscate the misdeeds, liabilities, weaknesses, conflicts-of-interest, corruption, and points of existing or potential compromise of their nominees until they’re safely ensconced in the highest level of the US government and already reading the nation’s most sensitive secrets.


It's one of many things he has destroyed..........and he's just getting started.
Trump has destroyed YOU.
🤡
 
She stood her ground through their verbal abuse Mash, but is biding her time until she's in , then these traitors are going to 'have it' big time.....


View attachment 1066162

~S~
Just like Hegseth she refused to directly answer pertinent questions. In her case about her loyalty to Dotard over loyalty to the rule of law. Hmmmmmmmm, now why was she so evasive?
 
In an exchange between AG nominee Pam Bondi and Democratic Senator Alex Padilla during her confirmation hearing, Pam Bondi erupted stating "I will not be bullied by you."
We need a strong AG
Someone willing to fight the tough fight

Not someone who cries that people are picking on her
 
In an exchange between AG nominee Pam Bondi and Democratic Senator Alex Padilla during her confirmation hearing, Pam Bondi erupted stating "I will not be bullied by you."

Now, here is a textbook case of a male senator bullying a woman, but the left seemingly has no qualms with it. After all she's nothing but a Trump nominee, right? Here is the exchange below:



Why is this okay? And how does this further the public knowledge of her qualifications beyond "we don't like her" or "but Trump nominated her?"

here, for the Senator


The provision is, that ‘all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.’ That means ‘subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof.’ What do we mean by ‘complete jurisdiction thereof?’ Not owing allegiance to anybody else. That is what it means.
 
Didnt hear Garland whining that people were picking on him
All Garland DID was whine! Look at any of his testimony in front of Congress and when he wasn't lying his skinny ass off he was whining about how he either didn't know about something happening or couldn't talk about it because it was an "ongoing investigation"! Pam Bondi is literally the polar opposite of Garland!
 
bullying is not used in job interviews. Questions are asked and the applicant gets to answer. No one gets preached to at a job interview. Funny how the demofks can't say the same thing at their interviewers.
She was asked to defend her positions and those of her new boss

Your boss has said this….will you do it?

That is not bullying
 
Back
Top Bottom