- Thread starter
- Banned
- #101
I see there have been some arguments about those who wear black dresses in public pretending to be esoteric and *ruling* a certain way- I also saw a poster's response as "mu liberty"- as though that is erudite-
To start with- people who wear black dresses in public are pretentious and quite full of themselves- they seem to feel they have an esoteric knowledge or moral code, neither of which is true- they sometimes get their ruling correct, and quite often get a ruling desired by the lawyers involved, justice be damned- that citizens feel judges are special is sad- they ain't. They're just people. Period. They, like many on here, are blinded by not blind to- big difference.
Liberty is involved- like it or not- but, it's also about the moral ethics of forcing a belief. There is none.
Moral stops when the initiation of force is the tool of choice- legal has nothing to do with it. Legal and moral rarely meet-
Am I stubborn, as one poster said my avatar depicts? Yes. I'm 73, I've earned it. I'm also pretty sharp intellectually- I'm very cognizant as well. I don't trust experts and I especially don't trust known liars, i.e., gov't's and those employed by them including the msm- the US gov't and the msm have a history of lying, publicly, and that alone is enough to warrant questioning "official" falsehoods-
Say and do what you will- I have no problem with others exercising their liberty- until the feel they are entitled to force others to conform to their belief(s)-
ALL conflicts begin (and have since time began) when one forces his will on another- there is no getting around that truth- being an "official" force makes it no less immoral- will my beliefs kill me? No, but some idiot may feel he's entitled to kill me for his own good- I'm good with that. It works 2 ways. My way is the moral way- his way perpetuates immoral-
To start with- people who wear black dresses in public are pretentious and quite full of themselves- they seem to feel they have an esoteric knowledge or moral code, neither of which is true- they sometimes get their ruling correct, and quite often get a ruling desired by the lawyers involved, justice be damned- that citizens feel judges are special is sad- they ain't. They're just people. Period. They, like many on here, are blinded by not blind to- big difference.
Liberty is involved- like it or not- but, it's also about the moral ethics of forcing a belief. There is none.
Moral stops when the initiation of force is the tool of choice- legal has nothing to do with it. Legal and moral rarely meet-
Am I stubborn, as one poster said my avatar depicts? Yes. I'm 73, I've earned it. I'm also pretty sharp intellectually- I'm very cognizant as well. I don't trust experts and I especially don't trust known liars, i.e., gov't's and those employed by them including the msm- the US gov't and the msm have a history of lying, publicly, and that alone is enough to warrant questioning "official" falsehoods-
Say and do what you will- I have no problem with others exercising their liberty- until the feel they are entitled to force others to conform to their belief(s)-
ALL conflicts begin (and have since time began) when one forces his will on another- there is no getting around that truth- being an "official" force makes it no less immoral- will my beliefs kill me? No, but some idiot may feel he's entitled to kill me for his own good- I'm good with that. It works 2 ways. My way is the moral way- his way perpetuates immoral-