I Ran the C.I.A. Now I’m Endorsing Hillary Clinton.

So you really think the Saudis are funding her out of love of her persona?

She is such a truthful person, of course they would do just that!


Idiots like this person simply have no clue how politics works, it's sad really.

Who knows. You don't. You are speculating. Give me the facts Jack. Speculation is easy. As is assumption.

She's told her fair share of lies. All politicians have. All have taken dodgy donations. It's why the US system of govt sucks. Thanks Citizens United.
 
Niggra please.
When you can know the weight differential of someone you love before and after they've been hit with a 50 you might have be someone I'd listen to.
You aren't and you never will be.
Suck you up some bammy jizz and shut the **** up.

Oh, so you only rate people who know that??? You're a ******* retard.

Nope I'm not.
The point is that YOU don't know and for that I'd spit in your face because you are nothing more than a punk spitting out talking points.

Who on here does know "the weight differential of someone you love before and after they've been hit with a 50". You? So ******* what? You want a medal or a chest to pin it on Sparky...
 
So you really think the Saudis are funding her out of love of her persona?

She is such a truthful person, of course they would do just that!


Idiots like this person simply have no clue how politics works, it's sad really.

Who knows. You don't. You are speculating. Give me the facts Jack. Speculation is easy. As is assumption.

She's told her fair share of lies. All politicians have. All have taken dodgy donations. It's why the US system of govt sucks. Thanks Citizens United.

It's such a huge assumption to make that the saudis want a return for their investment. To a regressive liberal, it is.

Trump does not have any dodgy donations that I am aware of. Dodgy donations are the life-blood of Hillary. Once again a stupid regressive false equivalency.

falseequiv.jpg



She does lie a lot... you got that right, a lot more than even most politicians. I can tell you that it's a pretty bad situation when even a socialist is more honest than you.
 
[

It's such a huge assumption to make that the saudis want a return for their investment. To a regressive liberal, it is.

Trump does not have any dodgy donations that I am aware of. Dodgy donations are the life-blood of Hillary. Once again a stupid regressive false equivalency.

I don't know anything about her dodgy donations either.
No, Trump is just a really nice guy. Only four Chapter 11 bankruptcies leaving creditors dicks swinging in the wind. What a nice guy.
 
[

It's such a huge assumption to make that the saudis want a return for their investment. To a regressive liberal, it is.

Trump does not have any dodgy donations that I am aware of. Dodgy donations are the life-blood of Hillary. Once again a stupid regressive false equivalency.

I don't know anything about her dodgy donations either.
No, Trump is just a really nice guy. Only four Chapter 11 bankruptcies leaving creditors dicks swinging in the wind. What a nice guy.

Are you now claiming that Trump is unsuccessful?

The #232 richest man in the world is according to the regressive liberal logic unsuccessful.

Keep on dreaming in your echo chamber. This is just dumb...
 
[

It's such a huge assumption to make that the saudis want a return for their investment. To a regressive liberal, it is.

Trump does not have any dodgy donations that I am aware of. Dodgy donations are the life-blood of Hillary. Once again a stupid regressive false equivalency.

I don't know anything about her dodgy donations either.
No, Trump is just a really nice guy. Only four Chapter 11 bankruptcies leaving creditors dicks swinging in the wind. What a nice guy.

Better than 4 dead in Benghazi! But, I'm so bad bringing that shit up...again!
 
[

It's such a huge assumption to make that the saudis want a return for their investment. To a regressive liberal, it is.

Trump does not have any dodgy donations that I am aware of. Dodgy donations are the life-blood of Hillary. Once again a stupid regressive false equivalency.

I don't know anything about her dodgy donations either.
No, Trump is just a really nice guy. Only four Chapter 11 bankruptcies leaving creditors dicks swinging in the wind. What a nice guy.

Are you now claiming that Trump is unsuccessful?

The #232 richest man in the world is according to the regressive liberal logic unsuccessful.

Keep on dreaming in your echo chamber. This is just dumb...

you haven't a clue what he's worth dum dum. he hasn't turned over his tax returns.

no one has to say he's not successful. someone with his resources who bankrupts four companies and bilks thousands out of their money ISN'T successful. like mike bloomberg said... new yorkers know a con when they see it. dumb donald is a con. no matter how much you like his white supremacist trash talking.
 
Better than 4 dead in Benghazi! But, I'm so bad bringing that shit up...again!

Or 6500 dead in Iraq and Afghanistan based on a lie...
Didn't the Hildebeast VOTE for that, and even, if you'd like, I can post a video PRE WAR of her saying that Iraq has WMD!..... I'm sure you'd shut your ******* face, or look like the scunbag you are if I did that.... now MELT AWAY!...Oh ****, here's the video.....

 
Didn't the Hildebeast VOTE for that, and even, if you'd like, I can post a video PRE WAR of her saying that Iraq has WMD!..... I'm sure you'd shut your ******* face, or look like the scunbag you are if I did that.... now MELT AWAY!...Oh ****, here's the video.....


She did. Most Dems DIDN'T though. And the vast majority of repubs did.
 
[

It's such a huge assumption to make that the saudis want a return for their investment. To a regressive liberal, it is.

Trump does not have any dodgy donations that I am aware of. Dodgy donations are the life-blood of Hillary. Once again a stupid regressive false equivalency.

I don't know anything about her dodgy donations either.
No, Trump is just a really nice guy. Only four Chapter 11 bankruptcies leaving creditors dicks swinging in the wind. What a nice guy.

Are you now claiming that Trump is unsuccessful?

The #232 richest man in the world is according to the regressive liberal logic unsuccessful.

Keep on dreaming in your echo chamber. This is just dumb...

you haven't a clue what he's worth dum dum. he hasn't turned over his tax returns.

no one has to say he's not successful. someone with his resources who bankrupts four companies and bilks thousands out of their money ISN'T successful. like mike bloomberg said... new yorkers know a con when they see it. dumb donald is a con. no matter how much you like his white supremacist trash talking.

Yeah, I have no evidence for his wealth (except: Donald Trump), but you claim to know that he is a con, which I think would have come up 1000 times by now if it was true.

Dumb... regressive...
 
Didn't the Hildebeast VOTE for that, and even, if you'd like, I can post a video PRE WAR of her saying that Iraq has WMD!..... I'm sure you'd shut your ******* face, or look like the scunbag you are if I did that.... now MELT AWAY!...Oh ****, here's the video.....


She did. Most Dems DIDN'T though. And the vast majority of repubs did.

she was the senator from NY which had just been attacked.

i'll just point out for the rightwingnut losers..... the Iraq resolution didn't say "go to war". it said use diplomacy, wait for the final report of the UN inspector. it said baby bush, had to go back to congress before going to war.

baby bush violated the terms of the resolution. reality is that's far too complex for the wingers....

Text - H.J.Res.114 - 107th Congress (2001-2002): Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002
 
Didn't the Hildebeast VOTE for that, and even, if you'd like, I can post a video PRE WAR of her saying that Iraq has WMD!..... I'm sure you'd shut your ******* face, or look like the scunbag you are if I did that.... now MELT AWAY!...Oh ****, here's the video.....


She did. Most Dems DIDN'T though. And the vast majority of repubs did.

Senate

YEA

Democrats

Baucus (MT) Bayh (IN) Biden (DE) Breaux (LA)Cantwell (WA) Carnahan (MO) Carper (DE) Cleland (GA) Hillary Clinton (NY) Daschle (SD) Dodd (CT) Dorgan (ND) Edwards (NC) Feinstein (CA) Harkin (IA) Hollings (SC) Johnson (SD) Kerry (MA) Kohl (WI) Landrieu (LA) Lieberman (CT) Lincoln (AR) Miller (GA) Nelson (FL) Nelson (NE) Reid (NV) Rockefeller (WV) Schumer (NY) Torricelli (NJ)
 
15th post
Didn't the Hildebeast VOTE for that, and even, if you'd like, I can post a video PRE WAR of her saying that Iraq has WMD!..... I'm sure you'd shut your ******* face, or look like the scunbag you are if I did that.... now MELT AWAY!...Oh ****, here's the video.....


She did. Most Dems DIDN'T though. And the vast majority of repubs did.

she was the senator from NY which had just been attacked.

i'll just point out for the rightwingnut losers..... the Iraq resolution didn't say "go to war". it said use diplomacy, wait for the final report of the UN inspector. it said baby bush, had to go back to congress before going to war.

baby bush violated the terms of the resolution. reality is that's far too complex for the wingers....

Text - H.J.Res.114 - 107th Congress (2001-2002): Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002

And that's why she defends her vote FOR WAR.




How dumb are these regressive liberals, holy shit! She made a dumb vote, get over it.
 
Senate
YEA
Democrats
Baucus (MT) Bayh (IN) Biden (DE) Breaux (LA)Cantwell (WA) Carnahan (MO) Carper (DE) Cleland (GA) Hillary Clinton (NY) Daschle (SD) Dodd (CT) Dorgan (ND) Edwards (NC) Feinstein (CA) Harkin (IA) Hollings (SC) Johnson (SD) Kerry (MA) Kohl (WI) Landrieu (LA) Lieberman (CT) Lincoln (AR) Miller (GA) Nelson (FL) Nelson (NE) Reid (NV) Rockefeller (WV) Schumer (NY) Torricelli (NJ)


Republican votes in senate and house for war in iraq
Yeas

263
Nays
7

Democrat votes in senate and house for war in iraq
Yeas
111
Nays
147
 
Didn't the Hildebeast VOTE for that, and even, if you'd like, I can post a video PRE WAR of her saying that Iraq has WMD!..... I'm sure you'd shut your ******* face, or look like the scunbag you are if I did that.... now MELT AWAY!...Oh ****, here's the video.....


She did. Most Dems DIDN'T though. And the vast majority of repubs did.

she was the senator from NY which had just been attacked.

i'll just point out for the rightwingnut losers..... the Iraq resolution didn't say "go to war". it said use diplomacy, wait for the final report of the UN inspector. it said baby bush, had to go back to congress before going to war.

baby bush violated the terms of the resolution. reality is that's far too complex for the wingers....

Text - H.J.Res.114 - 107th Congress (2001-2002): Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002
HillBillyJilly doyou READ ENGLISH?...What does this say....Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002
 
Senate
YEA
Democrats
Baucus (MT) Bayh (IN) Biden (DE) Breaux (LA)Cantwell (WA) Carnahan (MO) Carper (DE) Cleland (GA) Hillary Clinton (NY) Daschle (SD) Dodd (CT) Dorgan (ND) Edwards (NC) Feinstein (CA) Harkin (IA) Hollings (SC) Johnson (SD) Kerry (MA) Kohl (WI) Landrieu (LA) Lieberman (CT) Lincoln (AR) Miller (GA) Nelson (FL) Nelson (NE) Reid (NV) Rockefeller (WV) Schumer (NY) Torricelli (NJ)


Republican votes in senate and house for war in iraq
Yeas

263
Nays
7

Democrat votes in senate and house for war in iraq
Yeas
111
Nays
147
The important part NOW is that the ***** that killed 4 in Benghazi voted for it!
 
Back
Top Bottom