edthecynic
Censored for Cynicism
- Oct 20, 2008
- 43,044
- 6,883
- 1,830
As I have pointed out before, CON$ lie in packs!No, you need to prove the government MANIPULATES the BLS numbers to favor Obama, and Gallup's numbers to favor Obama even more.As I said you're trolling. Truth don't matter can ask some really dumb questions but your question topped the most stupidest question she could ever dream to ask.
You want me to give proof that the government( obama's labor department and census bureau) control's the collection and release of the numbers. Really dumb ass who does collect and release the BLS numbers?
However, those who quit looking for work aren't counted as part of the total labor force, which also isn't accurately reflecting population growth, which basically allowed the government to yank 1.2 million out of the labor force in January.
Labor Market Contracts by 1.2 Million People, Zero Hedge ReportsI am not the only one who thinks it.I keep repeating that the BLS refuses to use the data embedded in income tax collections to be able to report real time jobs and wages. Why does it refuse? Could the reason it refuses to use real time data on jobs and incomes be because perhaps this jobs number is politically motivated? The entire world is looking at US job creation as a proxy on how well Obama is doing? Could the Obama administration be pressuring its economist employees to create the best possible new jobs number?
Bidermans Daily Edge 2/3/2012: Is BLS Data Skewed? - TrimTabs Money Blog | TrimTabs Money Blog
But none of them can show that the numbers were manipulated by anyone other than CON$, who manipulate the out of labor force number by including retired, dead, disabled, students, etc., as part of the labor force. The rationalization for their dishonest manipulation of the out of the labor force number is that people only leave the labor force because they are discouraged so they must be counted as part of the labor force no matter how dead, retired, disabled, etc., they might be.