I predict Biden will criticize Israel for bombing the AP building in Gaza.

[Rigby5]

Bullshit

Learn to deal with facts and not expect media to be sycophants to your bias.

Instead they should be shills for your favorite ideologies? That's not how I see things.
Do you miss Pravda?

So, in your mind if the media isn't shilling for you bias it's shilling for someone else? s reporting of events and news ever not biased your sycophant's mind?

We know the media shills for the left and Muslim terrorists.

How can Muslims be "terrorists" when they are just defending their homelands?

Israel is not their homeland, moron.

WRONG!
Go read some history books.
Hebrew did not come from Palestine, but the Sinai.
Why do you think they went to Egypt for 400 years to escape a drought in the Sinai, if they came from Palestine, which never had a drought like that.
And why is it Palestine then was known of the Land of Canaan if it was the homeland of the Hebrew?
The Hebrew did invade around 1000 BC, but only ruled for a couple hundred years before being defeated and driven out by the Babylonians. They kept sneaking back, but were later defeated and driven out again and again, by the Assyrians and finally the Romans
The Hebrew never belonged there and were always illegal, brutal, invaders.
And they again were illegal foreign invaders in 1948.
They do not belong there.
It is NOT their homeland and never was.

Arguing with you is a total waste of time. It's easier to explain calculus to ants.

Afraid you might learn some of your preconceptions are just propaganda?
Just ask yourself why if Netanyahu is native to Palestine, then how come his native language is Yiddish, which is of Germanic origins?
Why is it the Ashkenazi were not Jewish until around 1150 AD?
And since they have been living in Poland and Russia for thousands of years, how could they possibly have any claim to the Mideast?

 

[Rigby5]

Bullshit

Learn to deal with facts and not expect media to be sycophants to your bias.

Instead they should be shills for your favorite ideologies? That's not how I see things.
Do you miss Pravda?

So, in your mind if the media isn't shilling for you bias it's shilling for someone else? s reporting of events and news ever not biased your sycophant's mind?

We know the media shills for the left and Muslim terrorists.

How can Muslims be "terrorists" when they are just defending their homelands?

Israel is not their homeland, moron.

WRONG!
Go read some history books.
Hebrew did not come from Palestine, but the Sinai.
Why do you think they went to Egypt for 400 years to escape a drought in the Sinai, if they came from Palestine, which never had a drought like that.
And why is it Palestine then was known of the Land of Canaan if it was the homeland of the Hebrew?
The Hebrew did invade around 1000 BC, but only ruled for a couple hundred years before being defeated and driven out by the Babylonians. They kept sneaking back, but were later defeated and driven out again and again, by the Assyrians and finally the Romans
The Hebrew never belonged there and were always illegal, brutal, invaders.
And they again were illegal foreign invaders in 1948.
They do not belong there.
It is NOT their homeland and never was.

Counter argument since YOU OFFERED NO LINKS...JUST your guesses.
Why is it so difficult to provide sources? As a result I assume you are guessing!

Israel's international "birth certificate" was validated by the promise of the Bible; uninterrupted Jewish settlement from the time of Joshua onward; the Balfour Declaration of 1917; the League of Nations Mandate, which incorporated the Balfour Declaration; the United Nations partition resolution of 1947; Israel's admission to the UN in 1949; the recognition of Israel by most other states; and, most of all, the society created by Israel's people in decades of thriving, dynamic national existence.​

Jewish Claim To The Land Of Israel

Encyclopedia of Jewish and Israeli history, politics and culture, with biographies, statistics, articles and documents on topics from anti-Semitism to Zionism.

www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org

That is easy to prove is lies.

First of all, lets establish that Joshua was a brutal invader who massacred the native Canaanite in Jerusalem, around 1000 BC.
Then lets prove the claim of uninterrupted Jewish settlement is a lie.
Did not the the Assyrians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 701 BC?
Did not the the Babylonians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 587 BC?
Did not the the Romans defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 70 AD?
Did not the Crusaders massacre any remaining Jews from 1099 on?

As for the Balfour Declaration, England did not own Palestine at the time, so was invalid.
But it never intended or gave any hint of Jewish ownership, only facilitated immigration.
Read the Churchill Whitepaper of 1922.

The Avalon Project : British White Paper of June 1922

{...

Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab deegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language, or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded `in Palestine.' In this connection it has been observed with satisfaction that at a meeting of the Zionist Congress, the supreme governing body of the Zionist Organization, held at Carlsbad in September, 1921, a resolution was passed expressing as the official statement of Zionist aims "the determination of the Jewish people to live with the Arab people on terms of unity and mutual respect, and together with them to make the common home into a flourishing community, the upbuilding of which may assure to each of its peoples an undisturbed national development."

It is also necessary to point out that the Zionist Commission in Palestine, now termed the Palestine Zionist Executive, has not desired to possess, and does not possess, any share in the general administration of the country. Nor does the special position assigned to the Zionist Organization in Article IV of the Draft Mandate for Palestine imply any such functions. That special position relates to the measures to be taken in Palestine affecting the Jewish population, and contemplates that the organization may assist in the general development of the country, but does not entitle it to share in any degree in its government.

Further, it is contemplated that the status of all citizens of Palestine in the eyes of the law shall be Palestinian, and it has never been intended that they, or any section of them, should possess any other juridical status. So far as the Jewish population of Palestine are concerned it appears that some among them are apprehensive that His Majesty's Government may depart from the policy embodied in the Declaration of 1917. It is necessary, therefore, once more to affirm that these fears are unfounded, and that that Declaration, re affirmed by the Conference of the Principle Allied Powers at San Remo and again in the Treaty of Sevres, is not susceptible of change.
...}

And as for who does own Palestine, I suggest you refer to the Treaty of San Remo and Treaty of Sevres, which legally created the Moslem Palestine as agreed by the British for helping the Allies in WWI.
The British Mandate for Palestine was not a whim, but a contractual obligation to the Arab Moslems.

And finally, the hundreds of war crime resolution by the UN against Israel invalidate it utterly.
There has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel.

 

[healthmyths]

Bullshit

Learn to deal with facts and not expect media to be sycophants to your bias.

Instead they should be shills for your favorite ideologies? That's not how I see things.
Do you miss Pravda?

So, in your mind if the media isn't shilling for you bias it's shilling for someone else? s reporting of events and news ever not biased your sycophant's mind?

We know the media shills for the left and Muslim terrorists.

How can Muslims be "terrorists" when they are just defending their homelands?

Israel is not their homeland, moron.

WRONG!
Go read some history books.
Hebrew did not come from Palestine, but the Sinai.
Why do you think they went to Egypt for 400 years to escape a drought in the Sinai, if they came from Palestine, which never had a drought like that.
And why is it Palestine then was known of the Land of Canaan if it was the homeland of the Hebrew?
The Hebrew did invade around 1000 BC, but only ruled for a couple hundred years before being defeated and driven out by the Babylonians. They kept sneaking back, but were later defeated and driven out again and again, by the Assyrians and finally the Romans
The Hebrew never belonged there and were always illegal, brutal, invaders.
And they again were illegal foreign invaders in 1948.
They do not belong there.
It is NOT their homeland and never was.

Counter argument since YOU OFFERED NO LINKS...JUST your guesses.
Why is it so difficult to provide sources? As a result I assume you are guessing!

Israel's international "birth certificate" was validated by the promise of the Bible; uninterrupted Jewish settlement from the time of Joshua onward; the Balfour Declaration of 1917; the League of Nations Mandate, which incorporated the Balfour Declaration; the United Nations partition resolution of 1947; Israel's admission to the UN in 1949; the recognition of Israel by most other states; and, most of all, the society created by Israel's people in decades of thriving, dynamic national existence.​

Jewish Claim To The Land Of Israel

Encyclopedia of Jewish and Israeli history, politics and culture, with biographies, statistics, articles and documents on topics from anti-Semitism to Zionism.

www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org

That is easy to prove is lies.

First of all, lets establish that Joshua was a brutal invader who massacred the native Canaanite in Jerusalem, around 1000 BC.
Then lets prove the claim of uninterrupted Jewish settlement is a lie.
Did not the the Assyrians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 701 BC?
Did not the the Babylonians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 587 BC?
Did not the the Romans defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 70 AD?
Did not the Crusaders massacre any remaining Jews from 1099 on?

As for the Balfour Declaration, England did not own Palestine at the time, so was invalid.
But it never intended or gave any hint of Jewish ownership, only facilitated immigration.
Read the Churchill Whitepaper of 1922.

The Avalon Project : British White Paper of June 1922

{...

Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab deegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language, or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded `in Palestine.' In this connection it has been observed with satisfaction that at a meeting of the Zionist Congress, the supreme governing body of the Zionist Organization, held at Carlsbad in September, 1921, a resolution was passed expressing as the official statement of Zionist aims "the determination of the Jewish people to live with the Arab people on terms of unity and mutual respect, and together with them to make the common home into a flourishing community, the upbuilding of which may assure to each of its peoples an undisturbed national development."

It is also necessary to point out that the Zionist Commission in Palestine, now termed the Palestine Zionist Executive, has not desired to possess, and does not possess, any share in the general administration of the country. Nor does the special position assigned to the Zionist Organization in Article IV of the Draft Mandate for Palestine imply any such functions. That special position relates to the measures to be taken in Palestine affecting the Jewish population, and contemplates that the organization may assist in the general development of the country, but does not entitle it to share in any degree in its government.

Further, it is contemplated that the status of all citizens of Palestine in the eyes of the law shall be Palestinian, and it has never been intended that they, or any section of them, should possess any other juridical status. So far as the Jewish population of Palestine are concerned it appears that some among them are apprehensive that His Majesty's Government may depart from the policy embodied in the Declaration of 1917. It is necessary, therefore, once more to affirm that these fears are unfounded, and that that Declaration, re affirmed by the Conference of the Principle Allied Powers at San Remo and again in the Treaty of Sevres, is not susceptible of change.
...}

And as for who does own Palestine, I suggest you refer to the Treaty of San Remo and Treaty of Sevres, which legally created the Moslem Palestine as agreed by the British for helping the Allies in WWI.
The British Mandate for Palestine was not a whim, but a contractual obligation to the Arab Moslems.

And finally, the hundreds of war crime resolution by the UN against Israel invalidate it utterly.
There has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel.

And what is your expertise that requires us to take your subjective, personal opinions as factual?
I'd believe more of your comments if you linked so I can see the sources of your personal opinions.

 

[otto105]

Obama is silent, but we all know that he's cheering for the Muslims in Iran.

When is the last time anyone heard a democrat cheering for America or one of its allies to win?

When is the last time you heard a Democratic President cozy up with dictators and tyranny like the former president did?

Obama.

President Obama cozied up to who?

Let's start with the Castros. Then there's Imanutjob and Iran. Putin and Russia. Then there's Jinping and China. How old are you, anyway? You don't remember the Obama administration?

Your just throwing bullshit because your guy sucked up to tyrants and dictators.

An Obama supporter talking about sucking up to tyrants and dictators, I'm just laughing at you. Your self awareness is zero. It's what happens when you're not even smart enough to have a view of your own and you just think what Democrats tell you to think

Sure, please what actions the former president took against the Saudi dictator for murdering a journalist?

Please post what actions the former president took for Putin’s attempted murder of political rivals.

What actions did the former president take against the Turkish dictator for his purge of small d democracy.

None of that contradicts what I said. That doesn't make it that Obama, friend of dictators wasn't a friend of dictators

It makes everything you posted ass.

In your own big words, how did President Obama cozy up to Castro?

That proves what exactly?

If pictures prove something, what does this one prove?

Funny how you're completely silent when Democrat morons keep posting pictures of Nazis, LOL

Stop with distraction BS.

What do those pictures prove?

I'm not the one who posted the photos, jackass. I just mocked you for your hypocrisy

You didn’t mock anything. You jumped in with your typical conservative bullshit and claimed to have done something.

I’m asking what that something was and you got all butthurt.

Um ... yes ... pointing out your silence to Democrats who keep posting pictures as the hypocrisy that it is is mocking you for your hypocrisy. Try to keep up, you're slowing down the discussion. Curtsy while you talk, it saves time, my dear

You posted something about fascist Germany and acted like that meant something.

And now your still padding your own back.

Sure, Champ. You don't worship German Nazis, you worship Democrats. As long as you're fed dinner you'd say or do anything. You're a racist and a fascist

That crap plays better on 8klan knuckle dragger.

I image German fascist posts in that forum are in support.

Jew haters are the enlightened ones. Sure you are, Nazi. Nothing new about your wanting to kill Jews or the swastika you're wearing. You're just an old time racist and fascist

Don’t project your maga carnival barker bullshit on me dude.

That's just stupid. I suppose it sounded good to you.

You're advocating the death of Jews, but somehow what you say isn't your responsibility. Just like all the 10 year old girls you're getting raped on the southern border isn't your responsibility. Just like all the drug cartels you're funding isn't your responsibility.

I'm a Democrat, and I'm not responsible for what I do. If Democrats were honest, that would be your motto. It's what you sell to Democrats

Just those issues? Why not more from the idiotic brain of a child.

Can you even see light under your maga rock?

You're in propaganda mode again

Dude, propaganda mode? Are you trying to be the threads jester?

Try writing adult posts and get out of propaganda mode, brainless Democrat twat

Pot meet kettle...

 

[surada]

Bullshit

Learn to deal with facts and not expect media to be sycophants to your bias.

Instead they should be shills for your favorite ideologies? That's not how I see things.
Do you miss Pravda?

So, in your mind if the media isn't shilling for you bias it's shilling for someone else? s reporting of events and news ever not biased your sycophant's mind?

We know the media shills for the left and Muslim terrorists.

How can Muslims be "terrorists" when they are just defending their homelands?

Israel is not their homeland, moron.

WRONG!
Go read some history books.
Hebrew did not come from Palestine, but the Sinai.
Why do you think they went to Egypt for 400 years to escape a drought in the Sinai, if they came from Palestine, which never had a drought like that.
And why is it Palestine then was known of the Land of Canaan if it was the homeland of the Hebrew?
The Hebrew did invade around 1000 BC, but only ruled for a couple hundred years before being defeated and driven out by the Babylonians. They kept sneaking back, but were later defeated and driven out again and again, by the Assyrians and finally the Romans
The Hebrew never belonged there and were always illegal, brutal, invaders.
And they again were illegal foreign invaders in 1948.
They do not belong there.
It is NOT their homeland and never was.

Counter argument since YOU OFFERED NO LINKS...JUST your guesses.
Why is it so difficult to provide sources? As a result I assume you are guessing!

Israel's international "birth certificate" was validated by the promise of the Bible; uninterrupted Jewish settlement from the time of Joshua onward; the Balfour Declaration of 1917; the League of Nations Mandate, which incorporated the Balfour Declaration; the United Nations partition resolution of 1947; Israel's admission to the UN in 1949; the recognition of Israel by most other states; and, most of all, the society created by Israel's people in decades of thriving, dynamic national existence.​

Jewish Claim To The Land Of Israel

Encyclopedia of Jewish and Israeli history, politics and culture, with biographies, statistics, articles and documents on topics from anti-Semitism to Zionism.

www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org

That is easy to prove is lies.

First of all, lets establish that Joshua was a brutal invader who massacred the native Canaanite in Jerusalem, around 1000 BC.
Then lets prove the claim of uninterrupted Jewish settlement is a lie.
Did not the the Assyrians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 701 BC?
Did not the the Babylonians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 587 BC?
Did not the the Romans defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 70 AD?
Did not the Crusaders massacre any remaining Jews from 1099 on?

As for the Balfour Declaration, England did not own Palestine at the time, so was invalid.
But it never intended or gave any hint of Jewish ownership, only facilitated immigration.
Read the Churchill Whitepaper of 1922.

The Avalon Project : British White Paper of June 1922

{...

Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab deegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language, or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded `in Palestine.' In this connection it has been observed with satisfaction that at a meeting of the Zionist Congress, the supreme governing body of the Zionist Organization, held at Carlsbad in September, 1921, a resolution was passed expressing as the official statement of Zionist aims "the determination of the Jewish people to live with the Arab people on terms of unity and mutual respect, and together with them to make the common home into a flourishing community, the upbuilding of which may assure to each of its peoples an undisturbed national development."

It is also necessary to point out that the Zionist Commission in Palestine, now termed the Palestine Zionist Executive, has not desired to possess, and does not possess, any share in the general administration of the country. Nor does the special position assigned to the Zionist Organization in Article IV of the Draft Mandate for Palestine imply any such functions. That special position relates to the measures to be taken in Palestine affecting the Jewish population, and contemplates that the organization may assist in the general development of the country, but does not entitle it to share in any degree in its government.

Further, it is contemplated that the status of all citizens of Palestine in the eyes of the law shall be Palestinian, and it has never been intended that they, or any section of them, should possess any other juridical status. So far as the Jewish population of Palestine are concerned it appears that some among them are apprehensive that His Majesty's Government may depart from the policy embodied in the Declaration of 1917. It is necessary, therefore, once more to affirm that these fears are unfounded, and that that Declaration, re affirmed by the Conference of the Principle Allied Powers at San Remo and again in the Treaty of Sevres, is not susceptible of change.
...}

And as for who does own Palestine, I suggest you refer to the Treaty of San Remo and Treaty of Sevres, which legally created the Moslem Palestine as agreed by the British for helping the Allies in WWI.
The British Mandate for Palestine was not a whim, but a contractual obligation to the Arab Moslems.

And finally, the hundreds of war crime resolution by the UN against Israel invalidate it utterly.
There has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel.

And what is your expertise that requires us to take your subjective, personal opinions as factual?
I'd believe more of your comments if you linked so I can see the sources of your personal opinions.

This is basic history.. If you don't know any history, why argue?

 

[surada]

Bullshit

Learn to deal with facts and not expect media to be sycophants to your bias.

Instead they should be shills for your favorite ideologies? That's not how I see things.
Do you miss Pravda?

So, in your mind if the media isn't shilling for you bias it's shilling for someone else? s reporting of events and news ever not biased your sycophant's mind?

We know the media shills for the left and Muslim terrorists.

How can Muslims be "terrorists" when they are just defending their homelands?

Israel is not their homeland, moron.

WRONG!
Go read some history books.
Hebrew did not come from Palestine, but the Sinai.
Why do you think they went to Egypt for 400 years to escape a drought in the Sinai, if they came from Palestine, which never had a drought like that.
And why is it Palestine then was known of the Land of Canaan if it was the homeland of the Hebrew?
The Hebrew did invade around 1000 BC, but only ruled for a couple hundred years before being defeated and driven out by the Babylonians. They kept sneaking back, but were later defeated and driven out again and again, by the Assyrians and finally the Romans
The Hebrew never belonged there and were always illegal, brutal, invaders.
And they again were illegal foreign invaders in 1948.
They do not belong there.
It is NOT their homeland and never was.

Arguing with you is a total waste of time. It's easier to explain calculus to ants.

I dare you..

Khazaria.com - History of Jewish Khazars, Khazar Turk ...
www.khazaria.com
May 03, 2021 · Medieval Kingdom of Khazaria, 652-969 Over a thousand years ago, the far east of Europe was ruled by Jewish kings who presided over numerous tribes, including their own tribe: the Turkic Khazars.

 

[Rigby5]

Bullshit

Learn to deal with facts and not expect media to be sycophants to your bias.

Instead they should be shills for your favorite ideologies? That's not how I see things.
Do you miss Pravda?

So, in your mind if the media isn't shilling for you bias it's shilling for someone else? s reporting of events and news ever not biased your sycophant's mind?

We know the media shills for the left and Muslim terrorists.

How can Muslims be "terrorists" when they are just defending their homelands?

Israel is not their homeland, moron.

WRONG!
Go read some history books.
Hebrew did not come from Palestine, but the Sinai.
Why do you think they went to Egypt for 400 years to escape a drought in the Sinai, if they came from Palestine, which never had a drought like that.
And why is it Palestine then was known of the Land of Canaan if it was the homeland of the Hebrew?
The Hebrew did invade around 1000 BC, but only ruled for a couple hundred years before being defeated and driven out by the Babylonians. They kept sneaking back, but were later defeated and driven out again and again, by the Assyrians and finally the Romans
The Hebrew never belonged there and were always illegal, brutal, invaders.
And they again were illegal foreign invaders in 1948.
They do not belong there.
It is NOT their homeland and never was.

Counter argument since YOU OFFERED NO LINKS...JUST your guesses.
Why is it so difficult to provide sources? As a result I assume you are guessing!

Israel's international "birth certificate" was validated by the promise of the Bible; uninterrupted Jewish settlement from the time of Joshua onward; the Balfour Declaration of 1917; the League of Nations Mandate, which incorporated the Balfour Declaration; the United Nations partition resolution of 1947; Israel's admission to the UN in 1949; the recognition of Israel by most other states; and, most of all, the society created by Israel's people in decades of thriving, dynamic national existence.​

Jewish Claim To The Land Of Israel

Encyclopedia of Jewish and Israeli history, politics and culture, with biographies, statistics, articles and documents on topics from anti-Semitism to Zionism.

www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org

That is easy to prove is lies.

First of all, lets establish that Joshua was a brutal invader who massacred the native Canaanite in Jerusalem, around 1000 BC.
Then lets prove the claim of uninterrupted Jewish settlement is a lie.
Did not the the Assyrians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 701 BC?
Did not the the Babylonians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 587 BC?
Did not the the Romans defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 70 AD?
Did not the Crusaders massacre any remaining Jews from 1099 on?

As for the Balfour Declaration, England did not own Palestine at the time, so was invalid.
But it never intended or gave any hint of Jewish ownership, only facilitated immigration.
Read the Churchill Whitepaper of 1922.

The Avalon Project : British White Paper of June 1922

{...

Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab deegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language, or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded `in Palestine.' In this connection it has been observed with satisfaction that at a meeting of the Zionist Congress, the supreme governing body of the Zionist Organization, held at Carlsbad in September, 1921, a resolution was passed expressing as the official statement of Zionist aims "the determination of the Jewish people to live with the Arab people on terms of unity and mutual respect, and together with them to make the common home into a flourishing community, the upbuilding of which may assure to each of its peoples an undisturbed national development."

It is also necessary to point out that the Zionist Commission in Palestine, now termed the Palestine Zionist Executive, has not desired to possess, and does not possess, any share in the general administration of the country. Nor does the special position assigned to the Zionist Organization in Article IV of the Draft Mandate for Palestine imply any such functions. That special position relates to the measures to be taken in Palestine affecting the Jewish population, and contemplates that the organization may assist in the general development of the country, but does not entitle it to share in any degree in its government.

Further, it is contemplated that the status of all citizens of Palestine in the eyes of the law shall be Palestinian, and it has never been intended that they, or any section of them, should possess any other juridical status. So far as the Jewish population of Palestine are concerned it appears that some among them are apprehensive that His Majesty's Government may depart from the policy embodied in the Declaration of 1917. It is necessary, therefore, once more to affirm that these fears are unfounded, and that that Declaration, re affirmed by the Conference of the Principle Allied Powers at San Remo and again in the Treaty of Sevres, is not susceptible of change.
...}

And as for who does own Palestine, I suggest you refer to the Treaty of San Remo and Treaty of Sevres, which legally created the Moslem Palestine as agreed by the British for helping the Allies in WWI.
The British Mandate for Palestine was not a whim, but a contractual obligation to the Arab Moslems.

And finally, the hundreds of war crime resolution by the UN against Israel invalidate it utterly.
There has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel.

And what is your expertise that requires us to take your subjective, personal opinions as factual?
I'd believe more of your comments if you linked so I can see the sources of your personal opinions.

That is silly.
I just did that.
I just gave years and people as to when Jews were not living in Palestine, year and treaties when Palestine was legally established, the Churchill Whitepaper of 1922 that explains exactly how Palestine was NOT to be Jewish, etc.
There was not a thing mentioned that was subjective opinion.
It was all facts with names, years, and even links and quotes.
Did you look at any of it?
Were the Jews awful invaders who were kicked out constantly or not?
Did you read about the Zionist bombing of the King David Hotel and assassination of the UN Moderator?
Did you look at the Treaty of San Remo or Sevres?
Are you familiar with Lawrence of Arabia and how the British were legally indebted to the Palestinians?

Is there something more specific you want me to quote or link for you?
Because clearly I went over the top in providing facts, and your response seem way inappropriate considering.
Nothing I posted was "personal opinion".

 

[healthmyths]

Bullshit

Learn to deal with facts and not expect media to be sycophants to your bias.

Instead they should be shills for your favorite ideologies? That's not how I see things.
Do you miss Pravda?

So, in your mind if the media isn't shilling for you bias it's shilling for someone else? s reporting of events and news ever not biased your sycophant's mind?

We know the media shills for the left and Muslim terrorists.

How can Muslims be "terrorists" when they are just defending their homelands?

Israel is not their homeland, moron.

WRONG!
Go read some history books.
Hebrew did not come from Palestine, but the Sinai.
Why do you think they went to Egypt for 400 years to escape a drought in the Sinai, if they came from Palestine, which never had a drought like that.
And why is it Palestine then was known of the Land of Canaan if it was the homeland of the Hebrew?
The Hebrew did invade around 1000 BC, but only ruled for a couple hundred years before being defeated and driven out by the Babylonians. They kept sneaking back, but were later defeated and driven out again and again, by the Assyrians and finally the Romans
The Hebrew never belonged there and were always illegal, brutal, invaders.
And they again were illegal foreign invaders in 1948.
They do not belong there.
It is NOT their homeland and never was.

Counter argument since YOU OFFERED NO LINKS...JUST your guesses.
Why is it so difficult to provide sources? As a result I assume you are guessing!

Israel's international "birth certificate" was validated by the promise of the Bible; uninterrupted Jewish settlement from the time of Joshua onward; the Balfour Declaration of 1917; the League of Nations Mandate, which incorporated the Balfour Declaration; the United Nations partition resolution of 1947; Israel's admission to the UN in 1949; the recognition of Israel by most other states; and, most of all, the society created by Israel's people in decades of thriving, dynamic national existence.​

Jewish Claim To The Land Of Israel

Encyclopedia of Jewish and Israeli history, politics and culture, with biographies, statistics, articles and documents on topics from anti-Semitism to Zionism.

www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org

That is easy to prove is lies.

First of all, lets establish that Joshua was a brutal invader who massacred the native Canaanite in Jerusalem, around 1000 BC.
Then lets prove the claim of uninterrupted Jewish settlement is a lie.
Did not the the Assyrians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 701 BC?
Did not the the Babylonians defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 587 BC?
Did not the the Romans defeat the Jews and force them all to leave in 70 AD?
Did not the Crusaders massacre any remaining Jews from 1099 on?

As for the Balfour Declaration, England did not own Palestine at the time, so was invalid.
But it never intended or gave any hint of Jewish ownership, only facilitated immigration.
Read the Churchill Whitepaper of 1922.

The Avalon Project : British White Paper of June 1922

{...

Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab deegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language, or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded `in Palestine.' In this connection it has been observed with satisfaction that at a meeting of the Zionist Congress, the supreme governing body of the Zionist Organization, held at Carlsbad in September, 1921, a resolution was passed expressing as the official statement of Zionist aims "the determination of the Jewish people to live with the Arab people on terms of unity and mutual respect, and together with them to make the common home into a flourishing community, the upbuilding of which may assure to each of its peoples an undisturbed national development."

It is also necessary to point out that the Zionist Commission in Palestine, now termed the Palestine Zionist Executive, has not desired to possess, and does not possess, any share in the general administration of the country. Nor does the special position assigned to the Zionist Organization in Article IV of the Draft Mandate for Palestine imply any such functions. That special position relates to the measures to be taken in Palestine affecting the Jewish population, and contemplates that the organization may assist in the general development of the country, but does not entitle it to share in any degree in its government.

Further, it is contemplated that the status of all citizens of Palestine in the eyes of the law shall be Palestinian, and it has never been intended that they, or any section of them, should possess any other juridical status. So far as the Jewish population of Palestine are concerned it appears that some among them are apprehensive that His Majesty's Government may depart from the policy embodied in the Declaration of 1917. It is necessary, therefore, once more to affirm that these fears are unfounded, and that that Declaration, re affirmed by the Conference of the Principle Allied Powers at San Remo and again in the Treaty of Sevres, is not susceptible of change.
...}

And as for who does own Palestine, I suggest you refer to the Treaty of San Remo and Treaty of Sevres, which legally created the Moslem Palestine as agreed by the British for helping the Allies in WWI.
The British Mandate for Palestine was not a whim, but a contractual obligation to the Arab Moslems.

And finally, the hundreds of war crime resolution by the UN against Israel invalidate it utterly.
There has hardly ever been such a criminal country as Israel.

And what is your expertise that requires us to take your subjective, personal opinions as factual?
I'd believe more of your comments if you linked so I can see the sources of your personal opinions.

That is silly.
I just did that.
I just gave years and people as to when Jews were not living in Palestine, year and treaties when Palestine was legally established, the Churchill Whitepaper of 1922 that explains exactly how Palestine was NOT to be Jewish, etc.
There was not a thing mentioned that was subjective opinion.
It was all facts with names, years, and even links and quotes.
Did you look at any of it?
Were the Jews awful invaders who were kicked out constantly or not?
Did you read about the Zionist bombing of the King David Hotel and assassination of the UN Moderator?
Did you look at the Treaty of San Remo or Sevres?
Are you familiar with Lawrence of Arabia and how the British were legally indebted to the Palestinians?

Is there something more specific you want me to quote or link for you?
Because clearly I went over the top in providing facts, and your response seem way inappropriate considering.
Nothing I posted was "personal opinion".

No Links. Nothing. all unsubstantiated.
And again...what is your expertise? Most experts document their claims. Provide sources, etc. YOU? 0

 

[dudmuck]

Bullshit

Learn to deal with facts and not expect media to be sycophants to your bias.

Instead they should be shills for your favorite ideologies? That's not how I see things.
Do you miss Pravda?

So, in your mind if the media isn't shilling for you bias it's shilling for someone else? s reporting of events and news ever not biased your sycophant's mind?

We know the media shills for the left and Muslim terrorists.

How can Muslims be "terrorists" when they are just defending their homelands?

Israel is not their homeland, moron.

WRONG!
Go read some history books.
Hebrew did not come from Palestine, but the Sinai.
Why do you think they went to Egypt for 400 years to escape a drought in the Sinai, if they came from Palestine, which never had a drought like that.
And why is it Palestine then was known of the Land of Canaan if it was the homeland of the Hebrew?
The Hebrew did invade around 1000 BC, but only ruled for a couple hundred years before being defeated and driven out by the Babylonians. They kept sneaking back, but were later defeated and driven out again and again, by the Assyrians and finally the Romans
The Hebrew never belonged there and were always illegal, brutal, invaders.
And they again were illegal foreign invaders in 1948.
They do not belong there.
It is NOT their homeland and never was.

Counter argument since YOU OFFERED NO LINKS...JUST your guesses.
Why is it so difficult to provide sources? As a result I assume you are guessing!

Israel's international "birth certificate" was validated by the promise of the Bible; uninterrupted Jewish settlement from the time of Joshua onward; the Balfour Declaration of 1917; the League of Nations Mandate, which incorporated the Balfour Declaration; the United Nations partition resolution of 1947; Israel's admission to the UN in 1949; the recognition of Israel by most other states; and, most of all, the society created by Israel's people in decades of thriving, dynamic national existence.​

Jewish Claim To The Land Of Israel

Encyclopedia of Jewish and Israeli history, politics and culture, with biographies, statistics, articles and documents on topics from anti-Semitism to Zionism.

www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

There were Jews in the region before Islam was even a thing.
Crack a book sometime.
If anyone was driven away from Palestine, it was the Jews themselves.
And guess who did that?

Some of you imbeciles that defend Hamas' right to shoot hundreds of missiles onto the Israeli
civilian population ought to to at least learn what you are defending. You are real stupid!

 

[Issa]

America is Israel's bitch so are Americans (billions of tax payers money go to Israel).

You're an antisemitic bitch.

How am I? I'm actually a semite myself.
And if you referring to criticizing the policies of Israel, that doesn't make anyone who calls out their crime an anti semite. And the whole world knows America is Israel's bitch, we hand them billions and we fight their wars (Syria, iraq....)

Those who crticize Israel are invariably anti-Semites or Mar

Lol OK if it makes you feel better.
Israel has been stealing land, we call them on it and we are anti semite? Arabs are semite too, they are cousins.

 

[Issa]

America is Israel's bitch so are Americans (billions of tax payers money go to Israel).

You're an antisemitic bitch.

How am I? I'm actually a semite myself.
And if you referring to criticizing the policies of Israel, that doesn't make anyone who calls out their crime an anti semite. And the whole world knows America is Israel's bitch, we hand them billions and we fight their wars (Syria, iraq....)

Those who crticize Israel are invariably anti-Semites or Marxists.

The main critics of Israel are real Jews.
Israel is contrary to Judaism since according to Judaism, the loss against the Romans in 70 AD was due to the sins of arrogance and pride, and real Jews are supposed to be waiting for the coming of the Messiah.
Real Jews do not believe in even going to the Mideast, much less stealing homes from natives.
Zionists like Netanyahu are lying Ashkenazi who have no Mideast DNA and even admit to being Atheists.
They do not belong in the Mideast and are criminals.

Spot on. Many Ashkenazi jews I know are atheists but talk about Israel and you think they are orthodox.

 

[Issa]

Since Jews only make up 30% of the population of Israel and Palestine, Israel is the LEAST democratic country in the whole world!

Jews make up 75% of the state of Israel and Arabs only 20%

Demographics of Israel - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

She said Israel and Palesrine you bulb.

 

[JoeB131]

I'm calling you stupid because after discussing this for years you don't remotely have a clue what a small government libertarian is. You're literally mentally retarded. It's not that hard. I've explained it to you many times. You're just flat out stupid

yes, you've explained your child like view of the world many times, and I've patted you on the head and said,

In the real world, we need government, mostly to protect us from ourselves and each other.

And that requires laws and has to be paid for by taxes.

You see, it used to be Republicans understood that, and the argument was, which laws make sense and who should pay the taxes. Then the Koch Brothers dumped a bunch of money getting the Libertarian Man-Children a seat at the grownup table.

 

[JWBooth]

 

[dannyboys]

AP/AJ are huge Hamas/Iran supporters.
A child knows this fact.
These fuckers have been having lunch in the building every fucking day with Hamas leaders.
Israel showed Biden 100% proof that Hamas had been operating out of the building with the full knowledge of AP/AJ.

And why shouldn't the press be supporters of Hamas, the democratically elected representatives of Palestine?
The government of Palestine, operates out of almost all the commercial buildings in Gaza.
They run all the schools, utilities, libraries, etc.

Why did Abbas cancel the 'election' asshole?
B/c he KNEW he wouldn't get reelected.
That's why Iran told him to start firing off thousands of Iran supplied rockets into Israel. To distract from the FACT that the average Palestinian has fucking had it with living in a violent shithole sand dune. The Palestinian youth have the fucking internet and they fucking KNOW they are being controlled by a bunch of toothless stinking psychopaths who would rather buy bullets than buy food for their granddaughters AKA their future sex slaves.

 

[dannyboys]

Israel could absolutely start a war we will have to fight.

As could china, north korea and iran

Particularly iran since they are supplying the rockets that are falling on Israel

Wrong.
Gaza has no way to import rockets so they are home made.

So where the fuck is Hamas getting the fucking components to make the rockets?
From Amazon?
You're an idiot!

 

[RoccoR]

RE: I predict Biden will criticize Israel for bombing the AP building in Gaza.
SUBTOPIC: Rockets and SALWs Interdiction
※→ dannyboys, et al,

BLUF: Generally speaking, but not exclusively: Iran (IRGC-QF)

So where the fuck is Hamas getting the fucking components to make the rockets?
From Amazon?
You're an idiot!

(COMMENT)

This is like any other 5th Generation insurgency wherein a number of governments (wittingly and unwittingly) (as well as the UN) contribute to the Anti-Israeli•pro-Palestinian effort in confrontations.

The notion of smuggling weapons into the Gaza Strip is not new; yet, it has accelerated since Operation Cast Lead, since Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) have become keen on acquiring standard and "qualitative" weapons. Such weapons will enable them to achieve a significant triumph in public awareness in any future conflict with Israel, through a much broader strike of the Israeli home-front (including longer rocket ranges) as well as in confrontation with IDF (using Anti Aircraft weapons, etc.). (See more
SOURCE: Public Affairs Department of the Prime Minister's Office All rights reserved © 2020

Although the Shin Bet and the IDF (Navy) have had some spectacular successes, no real transit surveillance or border controls are 100% effective.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[kaz]

Obama is silent, but we all know that he's cheering for the Muslims in Iran.

When is the last time anyone heard a democrat cheering for America or one of its allies to win?

When is the last time you heard a Democratic President cozy up with dictators and tyranny like the former president did?

Obama.

President Obama cozied up to who?

Let's start with the Castros. Then there's Imanutjob and Iran. Putin and Russia. Then there's Jinping and China. How old are you, anyway? You don't remember the Obama administration?

Your just throwing bullshit because your guy sucked up to tyrants and dictators.

An Obama supporter talking about sucking up to tyrants and dictators, I'm just laughing at you. Your self awareness is zero. It's what happens when you're not even smart enough to have a view of your own and you just think what Democrats tell you to think

Sure, please what actions the former president took against the Saudi dictator for murdering a journalist?

Please post what actions the former president took for Putin’s attempted murder of political rivals.

What actions did the former president take against the Turkish dictator for his purge of small d democracy.

None of that contradicts what I said. That doesn't make it that Obama, friend of dictators wasn't a friend of dictators

It makes everything you posted ass.

In your own big words, how did President Obama cozy up to Castro?

That proves what exactly?

If pictures prove something, what does this one prove?

Funny how you're completely silent when Democrat morons keep posting pictures of Nazis, LOL

Stop with distraction BS.

What do those pictures prove?

I'm not the one who posted the photos, jackass. I just mocked you for your hypocrisy

You didn’t mock anything. You jumped in with your typical conservative bullshit and claimed to have done something.

I’m asking what that something was and you got all butthurt.

Um ... yes ... pointing out your silence to Democrats who keep posting pictures as the hypocrisy that it is is mocking you for your hypocrisy. Try to keep up, you're slowing down the discussion. Curtsy while you talk, it saves time, my dear

You posted something about fascist Germany and acted like that meant something.

And now your still padding your own back.

Sure, Champ. You don't worship German Nazis, you worship Democrats. As long as you're fed dinner you'd say or do anything. You're a racist and a fascist

That crap plays better on 8klan knuckle dragger.

I image German fascist posts in that forum are in support.

Jew haters are the enlightened ones. Sure you are, Nazi. Nothing new about your wanting to kill Jews or the swastika you're wearing. You're just an old time racist and fascist

Don’t project your maga carnival barker bullshit on me dude.

That's just stupid. I suppose it sounded good to you.

You're advocating the death of Jews, but somehow what you say isn't your responsibility. Just like all the 10 year old girls you're getting raped on the southern border isn't your responsibility. Just like all the drug cartels you're funding isn't your responsibility.

I'm a Democrat, and I'm not responsible for what I do. If Democrats were honest, that would be your motto. It's what you sell to Democrats

Just those issues? Why not more from the idiotic brain of a child.

Can you even see light under your maga rock?

You're in propaganda mode again

Dude, propaganda mode? Are you trying to be the threads jester?

Try writing adult posts and get out of propaganda mode, brainless Democrat twat

Pot meet kettle...

Otto: No I'm not, YOU are kaz, YOU are. I'm not, YOU are.

Any given playground, Otto may be there. Democrats operate at about an eight year old level. And that's just the right level for playground insults

 

[Indeependent]

Israel could absolutely start a war we will have to fight.

As could china, north korea and iran

Particularly iran since they are supplying the rockets that are falling on Israel

Wrong.
Gaza has no way to import rockets so they are home made.

So where the fuck is Hamas getting the fucking components to make the rockets?
From Amazon?
You're an idiot!

Rigby5 is mentally ill.