First of all I don't believe fact check,.. and second of all I don't believe that that it meant that it would also cover voter fraud and anything to be unconstitutional.
We have a long established system for challenging election results and dealing with voter fraud that does not involve the VP. Law enforcement, election officials, the DoJ, the lower courts, the Supreme Court.
And that system was never designed to detect much less prosecute massive fraud covering whole cities and states. In fact, last Winter showed our system is wholly INCAPABLE of dealing with it because when the question of fraud came up, instead of agreeing to check it out and look into it and let the proven facts speak for themselves, the Dems hunkered down, started lies and false claims, then attacked and criticized the Right for even asking. AFTER we spent 30 or 45 million dollars and three years looking for the Russians that stole an election from Hillary!
At every step, they have failed to find evidence of sustantive fraud.
Where did that happen? Last I checked, most every court approached with a tiny chunk of the issue simply declined to get involved and dismissed or declined to take the cases on technical grounds of standing or time of filing, etc. So rushed for time were the attorneys that in several instances, they made mistakes trying to meet the narrow window of even filing the case. At some point soon, I plan to present a GREAT DEAL of the evidence here you say was never found and let the evidence speak for itself. Do please share your evidence with us how the fraud was debunked when I start that thread.
Given that, asking the VP to attempt to overturn the election would be tantamount to treason.
That is one very real interpretation. If the law called for an execution and you were ordered to execute a prisoner but refused on personal grounds of ethics because you believed or knew the man innocent, would that make you a traitor (rule/law violator)?
Imagine if it were Democrats in 2016 attempting this
Steele Dossier, FISA Court, wiretapping, presidential leaks, media slandering, invisible whistleblowers nobody ever met, political mutiny, four investigations, two impeachments and one charge of insurrection trying to become a "dictator." -----We don't need to "imagine" anything.
, because after all Trumps winning margins were very narrow.
Not as narrow as Joe's heavy loses in all the swing states until democrats took a pause, sent all the GOP home, brought in trucks full of paper ballots with 100% Biden votes and started counting agan.
One side has decided, sans evidence, that the only way their candidate could have lost is by fraud.
BULLSHIT. One side, yours, has decided, sans evidence, three days after the election long before any courts, that this was the best and most pure election of all tme, then took up an attack, silence and ridicule campaign trying to destroy anyone even wondering! I've NEVER said there is no way Trump lost only by fraud, he could have lost because of his big, fat, dumb mouth! But I want to KNOW he lost, not be TOLD he lost by people who won't even let me look.
It is far less important who won or lost the election as it is to know that the election was fair and honest. Not just be TOLD it by people who couldn't popssibly know but have a stake in it going THEIR way. And even Jimmy Carter admitted that sixteen years ago! Why hasn't his recommendations ever been acted on?
The report of the Carter-Baker panel warned of absentee votes and chided the media for early calls, two things that marred the 2020 voting.
www.dailysignal.com
Therefore they will manufacture whatever evidence they need to "prove" it in the court of public opinion. A dangerous and destructive tactic to pursue.
Maybe a better idea would have been to really lay the election wide open and truly examine the evidence to see where the cards really fell! Including the 50 some people and shadow leftwing organizations that last winter, Time Magazine published as having taken credit for "saving" the election by working to "ensure" that Trump lost. That translates to mean they made an aggressively proactive partisan effort to make sure millions of people didn't just vote, but voted THEIR way. Influencing an election; sounds just like what democrats accused Russia of doing four years ago. In America, we call that a Banana Republic.
