I am inclined to look at the business side of the current situation. I hear player-union reps talking about how they don't want to go back until it's "safe." This can be taken to a neurotic extreme, which strikes me as counterproductive to the players.
Do they understand the ramifications of what they are saying? At some point, the players' compensation is going to take a HUGE hit, and the more the seasons are truncated the less these guys are going to make. If they think, for example, Garrett Cole is going to make 33 million this year...I think they are in for a disappointment. Maybe I'm wrong.
Not only are the seasons going to be shortened, but the butts in the seats are going to be far fewer for each game that is played. No business can take a 60% reduction in revenue and continue to pay 100% of the "normal" compensation. This is, from a contractual standpoint, force majeure.
I rarely watch an entire game (or match) on the telly, but I do miss watching snippets of baseball, basketball, hockey, and so on. I can't get my brain around the fact that there will be no Wimbleton, French Open, U.S. Open, or a golf Masters tournament. Kentucky Derby?