The UNC Chapel Hill guide, published on Thursday, covers a wide range of menacing microaggressions — which are everyday words that radical leftists have decided to be angry or frustrated about.
Christmas vacations are a microagression, the public university pontificates, because “academic calendars and encouraged vacations” which “are organized around major religious observances” centralize “the Christian faith” and diminish “non-Christian spiritual rituals and observances.”
[photo deleted]
Read more:
UNC Chapel Hill: CHRISTMAS VACATION Is A 'Microagression' Now
Yeap, according to this woman up there, telling someone on campus that you are going on a golf outing on your Christmas vacation with your girlfriend are microagressions are in fact racist.
Yup.
Well, I'd like to read the source article that the
Daily Caller (DC -- the blog you linked) refers to, but I cannot. Upon
clicking on their link, I received the message noted below.
Not Found
Sorry, but the page you were trying to view does not exist. It looks like this was the result of either:
- a mistyped address
- n out-of-date link.
View attachment 79805
(This is DC's full link--http://api.viglink.com/api/click?format=go&jsonp=vglnk_146718647596816&key=e7609c039c08d3ae00aebd97e6f0bffd&libId=iq0jwtbg010110e3000DL47z6crjy&loc=http%3A%2F%2Fdailycaller.com%2F2016%2F06%2F25%2Funiversity-of-north-carolina-christmas-vacation-is-a-microagression-now%2F%23ixzz4CwoZn5fM&v=1&out=http%3A%2F%2Femployeeforum.unc.edu%2Fcareer-corner-understanding-microaggressions%2F&ref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.usmessageboard.com%2Fthreads%2Fi-love-your-shoes-are-microagressions-golf-outings-and-the-words-boyfriend-also.506441%2F&title=UNC%20Chapel%20Hill%3A%20CHRISTMAS%20VACATION%20Is%20Microagression%20Now%20%7C%20The%20Daily%20Caller&txt=entitled%20%E2%80%9CCareer%20corner%3A%20Understanding%20microaggressions%E2%80%9D)
I can't say much about the photo you pasted into your post other than that its source is noted as this:
http://ccli.unc.edu/files/2013/07/DSC00771.jpg. I see what appears to be a July 2013 date in the hyperlink, and the publication date on the DC post is 26-June-2016. You don't even cite the woman's name. Neither does the DC post, which, moreover, does not contain the photo you included in your OP.
I see multiple returns from a Google search for "career corner understanding microaggressions," which is purportedly, according to the DC, the document in which UNC:
- "instructs students that Christmas vacations and telling a woman “I love your shoes!” are “microagressions.”
- "identifies golf outings and the words “boyfriend” and “girlfriend” as microagressions"
The curious confluence of observations above lead me to ask:
- Is it just a matter of coincidence that the story no longer exists on UNC Chapel Hill's website, assuming it even did just a couple hours ago when you created this thread?
- In light of the newness of the DC post, I have to wonder just where the DC writer got their story.
- Is there even an actual source for the post's remarks? Is there even such a guide as the one the DC cites?
- Is the woman whom you've pictured even an academician, researcher, or administrator at UNC rather than merely a factotum in the school's employ?
