I hate to start a new Indiana thread, but how is their law different from 17 others

[PaintMyHouse]

People should take note.

I said from the beginning..one thing Christians will not do is RENOUNCE their faith. Trying to force businesses to endorse disgusting travesties of what we view as sacred religious ceremony will not wash. Christians won't do it, and they will die before they do. And what you are going to find is that the homo lobby is willing and happy to kill them if they won't.

There's no reason to kill them. They will simply go out, or be put out, of business.

Chick fil A.

Good luck.

They changed their policies so sharply even I eat there now, from time to time.

No, they really didn't, lol.

Yes, they did...

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The other laws are the individuals against the government. This law is the individual against another individual, and their religious beliefs aren't even required to be valid. The crazy Christian doesn't have to serve blacks not because they are black, but because in his mind they are Satanic. Under this law, that's valid The Indiana Religious Freedom Restoration Act An Analysis of Its Controversy IN Advance

ah. thank you. And Miss's law does provide the state cannot punish the baker.

Haven't read it but it's possible. The whole idea is you can hate the fags and refuse to serve them like others, and get away with it.

The fags get served.

Just don't expect Christian bakers to endorse their sacrilegious ceremonial ventures.

They aren't required to, just take the money and bake the cake.

It's art celebrating a sacrilegious ceremony. They don't have to do shit.

It's a cupcake, with a glandular condition. No one is asking them to paint this:

And the vandalism, rabid Catholics.

 

[2aguy]

that give cover for "the bakers?"

If anyone can answer, I'd be grateful

The other laws are the individuals against the government. This law is the individual against another individual, and their religious beliefs aren't even required to be valid. The crazy Christian doesn't have to serve blacks not because they are black, but because in his mind they are Satanic. Under this law, that's valid The Indiana Religious Freedom Restoration Act An Analysis of Its Controversy IN Advance

As it should be....we have religious freedom in this country, and that is enshrined in the First Amendment.....as to the lie about this Indiana law....the left hates this law because they want to destroy anyone who disagrees with them.....this law shields religious believers from having to participate in gay weddings....but it would also protect muslims, and Jews from having to serve ham at a catering function if they have a catering company....

The gay fascists are cowards....they target Christians because they know they can bully them....since gay fascists are true bullies who only pick on those are easily bullied.....notice they don't target muslim businesses....the cowards.....

 

[2aguy]

It's the majority asserting that they are not going to renounce their faith for the sake of the homo lobby.

Baking cakes for cash isn't faith there little one.

Baking a cake for a gay wedding in contradiction of their religious beliefs is....since the baker we reference had gay employess and baked goods for gays all the time...but in good conciense could not do so for a gay wedding service....and for that one item.....a wedding cake, the gays will take their business, their life savings and destroy them in any other way that they can.......over a cake....just a cake...again, they had gay employees, they made every other good for every other occasion for gays...just not a wedding cake....and for that they will be destroyed...

This law would protect them....that is why they hate this law......

 

[2aguy]

that give cover for "the bakers?"

If anyone can answer, I'd be grateful

The other laws are the individuals against the government. This law is the individual against another individual, and their religious beliefs aren't even required to be valid. The crazy Christian doesn't have to serve blacks not because they are black, but because in his mind they are Satanic. Under this law, that's valid The Indiana Religious Freedom Restoration Act An Analysis of Its Controversy IN Advance

ah. thank you. And Miss's law does provide the state cannot punish the baker.

Haven't read it but it's possible. The whole idea is you can hate the fags and refuse to serve them like others, and get away with it.

Actually, no.....but let's not let the truth get in the way of a lefty campaign of lies and destruction.....

 

[PaintMyHouse]

It's the majority asserting that they are not going to renounce their faith for the sake of the homo lobby.

Baking cakes for cash isn't faith there little one.

Baking a cake for a gay wedding in contradiction of their religious beliefs is....since the baker we reference had gay employess and baked goods for gays all the time...but in good conciense could not do so for a gay wedding service....and for that one item.....a wedding cake, the gays will take their business, their life savings and destroy them in any other way that they can.......over a cake....just a cake...again, they had gay employees, they made every other good for every other occasion for gays...just not a wedding cake....and for that they will be destroyed...

This law would protect them....that is why they hate this law......

What it protects is bigotry, hence the problem.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

that give cover for "the bakers?"

If anyone can answer, I'd be grateful

The other laws are the individuals against the government. This law is the individual against another individual, and their religious beliefs aren't even required to be valid. The crazy Christian doesn't have to serve blacks not because they are black, but because in his mind they are Satanic. Under this law, that's valid The Indiana Religious Freedom Restoration Act An Analysis of Its Controversy IN Advance

ah. thank you. And Miss's law does provide the state cannot punish the baker.

Haven't read it but it's possible. The whole idea is you can hate the fags and refuse to serve them like others, and get away with it.

Actually, no.....but let's not let the truth get in the way of a lefty campaign of lies and destruction.....

Sorry, that is the truth. Read up.

 

[2aguy]

It's the majority asserting that they are not going to renounce their faith for the sake of the homo lobby.

Baking cakes for cash isn't faith there little one.

Baking a cake for a gay wedding in contradiction of their religious beliefs is....since the baker we reference had gay employess and baked goods for gays all the time...but in good conciense could not do so for a gay wedding service....and for that one item.....a wedding cake, the gays will take their business, their life savings and destroy them in any other way that they can.......over a cake....just a cake...again, they had gay employees, they made every other good for every other occasion for gays...just not a wedding cake....and for that they will be destroyed...

This law would protect them....that is why they hate this law......

What it protects is bigotry, hence the problem.

No, it protects freedom of religion.....since the baker in question baked all sorts of goods for the gay couple in question, has gay employees, and had no problem baking for any other event...just not the wedding.....and for that wedding cake, the left will destroy them.........their will be total compliance with the left agenda.....and any who deviate in the slightest will be destroyed.........

 

[PaintMyHouse]

It's the majority asserting that they are not going to renounce their faith for the sake of the homo lobby.

Baking cakes for cash isn't faith there little one.

Baking a cake for a gay wedding in contradiction of their religious beliefs is....since the baker we reference had gay employess and baked goods for gays all the time...but in good conciense could not do so for a gay wedding service....and for that one item.....a wedding cake, the gays will take their business, their life savings and destroy them in any other way that they can.......over a cake....just a cake...again, they had gay employees, they made every other good for every other occasion for gays...just not a wedding cake....and for that they will be destroyed...

This law would protect them....that is why they hate this law......

What it protects is bigotry, hence the problem.

No, it protects freedom of religion.....since the baker in question baked all sorts of goods for the gay couple in question, has gay employees, and had no problem baking for any other event...just not the wedding.....and for that wedding cake, the left will destroy them.........their will be total compliance with the left agenda.....and any who deviate in the slightest will be destroyed.........

The freedoms of a business are limited, by law.

 

[2aguy]

It's the majority asserting that they are not going to renounce their faith for the sake of the homo lobby.

Baking cakes for cash isn't faith there little one.

Baking a cake for a gay wedding in contradiction of their religious beliefs is....since the baker we reference had gay employess and baked goods for gays all the time...but in good conciense could not do so for a gay wedding service....and for that one item.....a wedding cake, the gays will take their business, their life savings and destroy them in any other way that they can.......over a cake....just a cake...again, they had gay employees, they made every other good for every other occasion for gays...just not a wedding cake....and for that they will be destroyed...

This law would protect them....that is why they hate this law......

What it protects is bigotry, hence the problem.

No, it protects freedom of religion.....since the baker in question baked all sorts of goods for the gay couple in question, has gay employees, and had no problem baking for any other event...just not the wedding.....and for that wedding cake, the left will destroy them.........their will be total compliance with the left agenda.....and any who deviate in the slightest will be destroyed.........

The freedoms of a business are limited, by law.

But Freedom of Religion is not........that is why they are targeting it for destruction......

 

[Stephanie]

Oh man, you had to go and do it....lol

there is no difference.... these people just needed to hate on something and all the people who lives in a state because their Government passed a law and I guess THEY didn't storm the Governors mansion to STOP HIM...how dare they

You want to see real intolerance. look through all the threads on this this posted in the last week

 

[bendog]

Pence is a dick, and politically a dead dick

 

[Stephanie]

Pence is a dick, and politically a dead dick

oh well. a lot of people feels that way about Obama and many in the Democrat party

so what

 

[bendog]

Obama's retiring.

Pence and Indiana are getting hosed. LOL

 

[Ravi]

Obama's retiring.

Pence and Indiana are getting hosed. LOL

It looks that way and let us all hope it is true.

This law would allow our own dear Jeri to refuse service to Catholics because she believes they are the devil's handmaidens.

 

[Stephanie]

Obama's retiring.

Pence and Indiana are getting hosed. LOL

well here's a simple solution...DON'T move there if that's what you feel..see how that choice stuff works

 

[Lakhota]

I hate to start a new Indiana thread, but how is their law different from 17 others

The following link will help you understand.

Fox News' Dishonest Defense Of Indiana's Anti-LGBT "Religious Freedom" Law

 

[Stephanie]

I knew Indians was good at tracking. but throwing hissy fits. I just never saw that one in them

 

[koshergrl]

I knew Indians was good at tracking. but throwing hissy fits. I just never saw that one in them

Oh you haven't lived yet. They throw some whoppers.

 

[Stephanie]

I knew Indians was good at tracking. but throwing hissy fits. I just never saw that one in them

Oh you haven't lived yet. They throw some whoppers.

I don't know. I went out with one and he wasn't anything like that. He was a real manly man. full of crap but funny as all get out...