High Level Iranian Speaks Truth

[PoliticalChic]

Amir Hossein Motaghi, former media aide to Hassan Rouhani, the Iranian president, testifies that Obama and Kerry are simply mouth-pieces for the terrorist regime in Tehran.



1. "Pro-Hassan Rouhani Iranian editor defects while covering nuclear talks in Lausanne


2. Amir Hossein Motaghi, who managed public relations for Mr Rouhani during his 2013 election campaign, was said by Iranian news agencies to have quit his job at the Iran Student Correspondents Association (ISCA).

3. ... appeared on an opposition television channel based in London to say he no longer saw any “sense” in his profession as a journalist as he could only write what he was told.

4. ... Mr Mottaghi also gave succour to western critics of the proposed nuclear deal, which has seen the White House pursue a more conciliatory line with Tehran than some of America’s European allies in the negotiating team, comprising the five permanent members of the UN security council and Germany."
Pro-Hassan Rouhani Iranian editor defects while covering nuclear talks in Lausanne - Telegraph




Now pay attention, because the following reveals that Obama and Kerry are are traitors:

5. “The US negotiating team are mainly there to speak on Iran’s behalf with other members of the 5+1 countries and convince them of a deal,” he said."




Understand????

If you voted for Obama, ignoring all the warnings, all the evidence,....

....you voted to have an insane, homicidal regime with nuclear weapons.



Your apologies are no longer adequate.

 

[Moonglow]

Now you are loyal to the Iranians??
What's next, a true OP about North Korea?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Now you are loyal to the Iranians??
What's next, a true OP about North Korea?

I'm certain that there are numerous iterations of "moron".....

...so...for clarity, which sort of moron are you?

You actually posted "Now you are loyal to the Iranians??"


How did you determine that this gibberish could, in any way, shape,or form, be based on the OP?

 

[Moonglow]

Now you are loyal to the Iranians??
What's next, a true OP about North Korea?

I'm certain that there are numerous iterations of "moron".....

...so...for clarity, which sort of moron are you?

You actually posted "Now you are loyal to the Iranians??"


How did you determine that this gibberish could, in any way, shape,or form, be based on the OP?

Your final comments.....are the motivation, you know that reverse psychology or guilt by association??

 

[PoliticalChic]

Now you are loyal to the Iranians??
What's next, a true OP about North Korea?

I'm certain that there are numerous iterations of "moron".....

...so...for clarity, which sort of moron are you?

You actually posted "Now you are loyal to the Iranians??"


How did you determine that this gibberish could, in any way, shape,or form, be based on the OP?

Your final comments.....are the motivation, you know that reverse psychology or guilt by association??

So....you aren't ready to reveal what sort of moron you are?

 

[Moonglow]

Now you are loyal to the Iranians??
What's next, a true OP about North Korea?

I'm certain that there are numerous iterations of "moron".....

...so...for clarity, which sort of moron are you?

You actually posted "Now you are loyal to the Iranians??"


How did you determine that this gibberish could, in any way, shape,or form, be based on the OP?

Your final comments.....are the motivation, you know that reverse psychology or guilt by association??

So....you aren't ready to reveal what sort of moron you are?

I subscribe to the same moron journal as you....

 

[PoliticalChic]

You had the opportunity to retract, or explain...

....you couldn't, so I'll do it for you.


The post was your lame attempt to pretend that the OP wasn't a clear indictment of Obama.

 

[Moonglow]

You had the opportunity to retract, or explain...

....you couldn't, so I'll do it for you.


The post was your lame attempt to pretend that the OP wasn't a clear indictment of Obama.

From an Iranian, really, what sort of cad are you???

 

[Manonthestreet]

Which is why Obama has threatened 2 Allies over it and doesn't want to disclose contents or submit to Congress

 

[Moonglow]

Which is why Obama has threatened 2 Allies over it and doesn't want to disclose contents or submit to Congress

There is no final draft to disclose...

 

[PoliticalChic]

You had the opportunity to retract, or explain...

....you couldn't, so I'll do it for you.


The post was your lame attempt to pretend that the OP wasn't a clear indictment of Obama.

From an Iranian, really, what sort of cad are you???

This post defied the odds: even more inane than your first post.



"From an Iranian, criticism of the nuclear deal"???/
That's your point?????


Now pay attention, because the following reveals that Obama and Kerry are are traitors:
5. “The US negotiating team are mainly there to speak on Iran’s behalf with other members of the 5+1 countries and convince them of a deal,” he said."

 

[Manonthestreet]

Did I say there was........and conveniently there may never be a written accord even after its " agreed" to

 

[Moonglow]

Yes, all these folks that speak out against a deal that has yet to be finalized and what is on paper has not been released for consumption by the reader....Yet, lies abound by those that seek to destroy credibility or peace, those that are insane enough to call for war first and settlements later...

 

[Manonthestreet]

Yeah that's it...... Presidents own actions and words indict him. Saudis don't seem to trust him since they've entered the market looking for nukes.
Libs have been lying about this for a decade and then act shocked when people refuse to swallow more

 

[Mad Scientist]

John Kerry, the "Haircut in Search of a Brain".

Now you are loyal to the Iranians??
What's next, a true OP about North Korea?

You sound just like George Bush: "You're either with us, or you with the Terrorists".

 

[PoliticalChic]

Yes, all these folks that speak out against a deal that has yet to be finalized and what is on paper has not been released for consumption by the reader....Yet, lies abound by those that seek to destroy credibility or peace, those that are insane enough to call for war first and settlements later...

No....you indeterminate-moron.....this is the problem: any deal at all!!!!


Here are some of his statements on the subject, going back to his first campaign for the presidency:

June 5, 2008, in Cairo: "I will continue to be clear on the fact that an Iranian nuclear weapon would be profoundly destabilizing for the entire region.It is strongly in America's interest to prevent such a scenario."

June 8, 2008, to AIPAC: "The danger from Iran is grave, it is real, and my goal will be to eliminate this threat.... Finally, let there be no doubt: I will always keep the threat of military action on the table to defend our security and our ally Israel."

October 7 2008, in the second presidential debate: "We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. It would be a game-changer in the region. Not only would it threaten Israel, our strongest ally in the region and one of our strongest allies in the world, but it would also create a possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. And so it's unacceptable. And I will do everything that's required to prevent it. And we will never take military options off the table,"

November 7, 2008, press conference: "Iran's development of a nuclear weapon, I believe, is unacceptable. And we have to mount an international effort to prevent that from happening."

February 27, 2009, speech at Camp Lejeune: "(W)e are focusing on al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan; developing a strategy to use all elements of American power to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon; and actively seeking a lasting peace between Israel and the Arab world."

January 27, 2010, State of the Union address: "And as Iran's leaders continue to ignore their obligations, there should be no doubt: They, too, will face growing consequences. That is a promise."

July 1, /2010, at the signing of the Iran Sanctions Act: "There should be no doubt -- the United States and the international community are determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons."

May 19, 2011, speech on the Middle East: "Now, our opposition to Iran's intolerance and Iran's repressive measures, as well as its illicit nuclear program and its support of terror, is well known."

May 22, 2011, in an address to AIPAC: "You also see our commitment to our shared security in our determination to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.... So let me be absolutely clear -- we remain committed to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons."

October 13,2011, press conference after meeting with South Korean president:"Now, we don't take any options off the table in terms of how we operate with Iran."

November 14, 2011, press conference: "So what I did was to speak with President Medvedev, as well as President Hu, and all three of us entirely agree on the objective, which is making sure that Iran does not weaponize nuclear power and that we don't trigger a nuclear arms race in the region. That's in the interests of all of us... I have said repeatedly and I will say it today, we are not taking any options off the table, because it's my firm belief that an Iran with a nuclear weapon would pose a security threat not only to the region but also to the United States."

December 8, 2011, press conference: (In response to question about pressuring Iran): "No options off the table means I'm considering all options."

December 16, 2011, speech to the General Assembly of the Union for Reform Judaism: "Another grave concern -- and a threat to the security of Israel, the United States and the world -- is Iran's nuclear program. And that's why our policy has been absolutely clear: We are determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons...and that's why, rest assured, we will take no options off the table. We have been clear."

January 24, 2012, State of the Union address: "Let there be no doubt: America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve that goal."

March 2, 2012, interview with Goldblog: "I... don't, as a matter of sound policy, go around advertising exactly what our intentions are. But I think both the Iranian and the Israeli governments recognize that when the United States says it is unacceptable for Iran to have a nuclear weapon, we mean what we say."

March 4, 2012, speech to AIPAC: "I have said that when it comes to preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, I will take no options off the table, and I mean what I say That includes all elements of American power: A political effort aimed at isolating Iran; a diplomatic effort to sustain our coalition and ensure that the Iranian program is monitored; an economic effort that imposes crippling sanctions; and, yes, a military effort to be prepared for any contingency."

March 5, 2012, remarks after meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu: "... I reserve all options, and my policy here is not going to be one of containment. My policy is prevention of Iran obtaining nuclear weapons. And as I indicated yesterday in my speech, when I say all options are at the table, I mean it."

March 6, 2012, press conference: "And what I have said is, is that we will not countenance Iran getting a nuclear weapon. My policy is not containment; my policy is to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon -- because if they get a nuclear weapon that could trigger an arms race in the region, it would undermine our non-proliferation goals, it could potentially fall into the hands of terrorists.

March 14, 2012, remarks after meeting with David Cameron: "...And as I said in a speech just a couple of weeks ago, I am determined not simply to contain Iran that is in possession of a nuclear weapon; I am determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon -- in part for the reasons that David mentioned... We will do everything we can to resolve this diplomatically, but ultimately, we've got to have somebody on the other side of the table who's taking this seriously."http://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...bc1fce-071d-11e2-afff-d6c7f20a83bf_print.html

September 25, 2012, speech to the United Nations General Assembly: "Make no mistake: A nuclear-armed Iran is not a challenge that can be contained...the United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon."
Obama s Crystal-Clear Promise to Stop Iran From Getting a Nuclear Weapon The Atlantic

 

[Moonglow]

Yeah that's it...... Presidents own actions and words indict him. Saudis don't seem to trust him since they've entered the market looking for nukes.
Libs have been lying about this for a decade and then act shocked when people refuse to swallow more

The USA is not the only member of the nuclear agreement...

 

[Moonglow]

Yes, all these folks that speak out against a deal that has yet to be finalized and what is on paper has not been released for consumption by the reader....Yet, lies abound by those that seek to destroy credibility or peace, those that are insane enough to call for war first and settlements later...

No....you indeterminate-moron.....this is the problem: any deal at all!!!!


Here are some of his statements on the subject, going back to his first campaign for the presidency:

June 5, 2008, in Cairo: "I will continue to be clear on the fact that an Iranian nuclear weapon would be profoundly destabilizing for the entire region.It is strongly in America's interest to prevent such a scenario."

June 8, 2008, to AIPAC: "The danger from Iran is grave, it is real, and my goal will be to eliminate this threat.... Finally, let there be no doubt: I will always keep the threat of military action on the table to defend our security and our ally Israel."

October 7 2008, in the second presidential debate: "We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. It would be a game-changer in the region. Not only would it threaten Israel, our strongest ally in the region and one of our strongest allies in the world, but it would also create a possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. And so it's unacceptable. And I will do everything that's required to prevent it. And we will never take military options off the table,"

November 7, 2008, press conference: "Iran's development of a nuclear weapon, I believe, is unacceptable. And we have to mount an international effort to prevent that from happening."

February 27, 2009, speech at Camp Lejeune: "(W)e are focusing on al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan; developing a strategy to use all elements of American power to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon; and actively seeking a lasting peace between Israel and the Arab world."

January 27, 2010, State of the Union address: "And as Iran's leaders continue to ignore their obligations, there should be no doubt: They, too, will face growing consequences. That is a promise."

July 1, /2010, at the signing of the Iran Sanctions Act: "There should be no doubt -- the United States and the international community are determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons."

May 19, 2011, speech on the Middle East: "Now, our opposition to Iran's intolerance and Iran's repressive measures, as well as its illicit nuclear program and its support of terror, is well known."

May 22, 2011, in an address to AIPAC: "You also see our commitment to our shared security in our determination to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.... So let me be absolutely clear -- we remain committed to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons."

October 13,2011, press conference after meeting with South Korean president:"Now, we don't take any options off the table in terms of how we operate with Iran."

November 14, 2011, press conference: "So what I did was to speak with President Medvedev, as well as President Hu, and all three of us entirely agree on the objective, which is making sure that Iran does not weaponize nuclear power and that we don't trigger a nuclear arms race in the region. That's in the interests of all of us... I have said repeatedly and I will say it today, we are not taking any options off the table, because it's my firm belief that an Iran with a nuclear weapon would pose a security threat not only to the region but also to the United States."

December 8, 2011, press conference: (In response to question about pressuring Iran): "No options off the table means I'm considering all options."

December 16, 2011, speech to the General Assembly of the Union for Reform Judaism: "Another grave concern -- and a threat to the security of Israel, the United States and the world -- is Iran's nuclear program. And that's why our policy has been absolutely clear: We are determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons...and that's why, rest assured, we will take no options off the table. We have been clear."

January 24, 2012, State of the Union address: "Let there be no doubt: America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve that goal."

March 2, 2012, interview with Goldblog: "I... don't, as a matter of sound policy, go around advertising exactly what our intentions are. But I think both the Iranian and the Israeli governments recognize that when the United States says it is unacceptable for Iran to have a nuclear weapon, we mean what we say."

March 4, 2012, speech to AIPAC: "I have said that when it comes to preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, I will take no options off the table, and I mean what I say That includes all elements of American power: A political effort aimed at isolating Iran; a diplomatic effort to sustain our coalition and ensure that the Iranian program is monitored; an economic effort that imposes crippling sanctions; and, yes, a military effort to be prepared for any contingency."

March 5, 2012, remarks after meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu: "... I reserve all options, and my policy here is not going to be one of containment. My policy is prevention of Iran obtaining nuclear weapons. And as I indicated yesterday in my speech, when I say all options are at the table, I mean it."

March 6, 2012, press conference: "And what I have said is, is that we will not countenance Iran getting a nuclear weapon. My policy is not containment; my policy is to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon -- because if they get a nuclear weapon that could trigger an arms race in the region, it would undermine our non-proliferation goals, it could potentially fall into the hands of terrorists.

March 14, 2012, remarks after meeting with David Cameron: "...And as I said in a speech just a couple of weeks ago, I am determined not simply to contain Iran that is in possession of a nuclear weapon; I am determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon -- in part for the reasons that David mentioned... We will do everything we can to resolve this diplomatically, but ultimately, we've got to have somebody on the other side of the table who's taking this seriously."

September 25, 2012, speech to the United Nations General Assembly: "Make no mistake: A nuclear-armed Iran is not a challenge that can be contained...the United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon."
Obama s Crystal-Clear Promise to Stop Iran From Getting a Nuclear Weapon The Atlantic

So what you want to believe is anybody but Oblama, why be wordy and waste space?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Now you are loyal to the Iranians??
What's next, a true OP about North Korea?

Is loyalty to Obama automatically loyalty to Iran, Moonbat?

 

[Mad Scientist]

Americans are such f*ckin' idiots.