I Don't Understand Why Democrats Keep Calling For Free Speech

The Democrats/Left played a significant role in the rise of this mess when they decided to weaponize PC/Identity Politics, which then morphed into Cancel Culture. The whole "woke" thing is a (maybe THE) primary driving force for MAGA, and that's all on the Dems.

Now, in response, the GQP is doing exactly the same thing, only they've elevated the behavior to the Oval Office and the DOJ.

Ideological Fundamentalism is killing us in real time. This isn't about Left vs. Right, it's about hardcore ideology vs. Freedom of Expression.
You must have an endless supply of cheese to go along with all that "whine".
 
Hating somebody enough to want them dead enough for you?
It's not against the law to have hatred for another person. Trump just announced at Charlie Kirk's funeral that he hates at least half of the U.S. voting population and doesn't want the best for them. Even wishing them dead is not unlawful.

On the other hand threatening to make them dead is unlawful. All you have is wishful thinking.
 
If tighter security isn't ever going to be possible in this country with laws to prevent this sort of thing from happening again any one of us Republicans can be next at any time
This has always been the case, not just for the Republicans but for most people who don't have Secret Service level private protection.
 
The Democrats/Left played a significant role in the rise of this mess when they decided to weaponize PC/Identity Politics, which then morphed into Cancel Culture. The whole "woke" thing is a (maybe THE) primary driving force for MAGA, and that's all on the Dems.

Now, in response, the GQP is doing exactly the same thing, only they've elevated the behavior to the Oval Office and the DOJ.

Ideological Fundamentalism is killing us in real time. This isn't about Left vs. Right, it's about hardcore ideology vs. Freedom of Expression.
If the Republicans keep playing the G rated game, the Progs X rated game will swamp and win out in a society with a five-minute memory.
 
Flynn wasn’t set up. He just lied.
Flynn said "he didn't recall" an answer that Hillary gave hundreds of times.
From your biased article:
“And so we placed a call to Flynn and said ‘Hey, we’re sending a couple guys over, hope you’ll talk to them.’ He said ‘sure.’ Nobody else was there, they interviewed him in a conference room at the White House situation room and he lied to them.”
Again, he said "he didn't recall". He should have had a lawyer there, but didn't. There was no reason for the FBI interview except to entrap Flynn.
 
Flynn said "he didn't recall" an answer that Hillary gave hundreds of times.

Again, he said "he didn't recall". He should have had a lawyer there, but didn't. There was no reason for the FBI interview except to entrap Flynn.

Why didn’t he ask for a lawyer? How could he not recall something that happened a few weeks ago as important as that phone call?

Flynn wasn’t set up. He chose to lie. It’s obvious.
 
Your inability to explain yourself isn’t my fault. It just means you’re dumb.

You’re talking about arresting them yet you can’t even articulate what they should be arrested for. That’s kind of an important detail that you’re over-looking.

Try again. But this time, try to be a little less stupid about it.

Why should I have to explain myself when I already did? It was hate thought, speech, and feelings that got Charlie Kirk assassinated. What are you not understanding about that any one of us Republicans can be next? Oh yeah that's right you're a democrat. Nobody wants you dead. So I shouldn't expect you to understand.

More like triggered.

Where was my lie?

No worries, I'm dealing with it. :)

I have that individual on ignore now but I read it while I was logged out so I want to know when did I ever threaten anybody?
 
Just let it be, my friend. People will accuse you falsely, but don't get riled up by it. :)


Okay but I want to make one other point here because when I was offline I also saw a comment about referring to Trump hating his enemies. Now although I strongly admit that it was in poor taste and he made his speech more about himself than Charlie Kirk, and that it's not what a true Christian would say, at least he was honest and I get why he feels that way.



People on here have posted videos of the demoncrats saying that if we have a MAGA hat on just give us a bullet to the brain annndddd nobody ever says anything, but the moment we say that we want the ability to defend ourselves against people who want us dead we're the criminals. That was my whole entire point of this thread.
 
They claim that it's free speech for them to celebrate the assassination of Charlie Kirk and unfortunately it is, but where was his free speech to disagree with their views? Why must they murder people who don't agree with them? Oh wait, I get it,... It's the only way they think that they're going to win by silencing the threat. The only thing is that Tyler Robinson didn't silence Charlie Kirk at all. His plan backfired because now his voice is louder than ever. Nobody ever did manage to prove him wrong. That's why he was assassinated.
As I continue to slide into Old Age I find myself more-and-more astounded at just how brainwashed the Left has become.

Life-long acquaintances, friends and relatives who vote (D) have oftentimes done all-but-excuse Kirk's death recently.

Many of those same people had no clue who Kirk was... indicative of living in a "safe-space" Liberal bubble in recent years.

Most of them who DO know who Kirk was believe that he was a Hater and Racist and Misogynist who fostered animosity.

God forbid that they step outside their "safe-space" Liberal bubble to objectively and honestly reconsider the evidence.

After all, Kirk used Free Speech to invade Liberal Academia in order to restore balance to Liberal Brainwashing Laboratories.

Free Speech exists primarily to convey Liberalism and Progressivism and Democratic Party doctrine, correct? :omg:

-----

Firing a college professor for saying that Kirk deserved to be killed - and good riddance - was an assault on Free Speech.


Not.
 
Last edited:
As I continue to slide into Old Age I find myself more-and-more astounded at just how brainwashed the Left has become.

Life-long acquaintances, friends and relatives who vote (D) have oftentimes done all-but-excuse Kirk's death recently.

Many of those same people had no clue who Kirk was... indicative of living in a "safe-space" Liberal bubble in recent years.

Most of them who DO know who Kirk was believe that he was a Hater and Racist and Misogynist who fostered animosity.

God forbid that they step outside their "safe-space" Liberal bubble to objectively and honestly reconsider the evidence.

After all, Kirk used Free Speech to invade Liberal Academia in order to restore balance to Liberal Brainwashing Laboratories.

Free Speech exists primarily to convey Liberalism and Progressivism and Democratic Party doctrine, correct? :omg:

-----

Firing a college professor for saying that Kirk deserved to be killed - and good riddance - was an assault on Free Speech.


Not.

I have to admit that at first I got nervous when I saw that you responded to this thread and then I remembered you left the demoncratic party. Actually scratch that, the demoncratic party left you. 😁
 
Why didn’t he ask for a lawyer? How could he not recall something that happened a few weeks ago as important as that phone call?
Flynn wasn’t set up. He chose to lie. It’s obvious.
Comey bragged he setup Flynn in the early days of the Trump administration while the WH was disorganized.
 
Comey bragged he setup Flynn in the early days of the Trump administration while the WH was disorganized.

That’s not what Comey said, that’s how the hacks at the Federalist described it.

He didn’t set him up.

He asked him a simple question and Flynn lied. No one made him do that. He did it because that’s what people who are beholden to Trump do. They lie.
 
15th post
They claim that it's free speech for them to celebrate the assassination of Charlie Kirk and unfortunately it is, but where was his free speech to disagree with their views? Why must they murder people who don't agree with them? Oh wait, I get it,... It's the only way they think that they're going to win by silencing the threat. The only thing is that Tyler Robinson didn't silence Charlie Kirk at all. His plan backfired because now his voice is louder than ever. Nobody ever did manage to prove him wrong. That's why he was assassinated.
Let's not assume left can do anything more than react perfectly free of truth, history and everything else. As a group theyre lunatics, and getting worse by the day.
 
That’s not what Comey said, that’s how the hacks at the Federalist described it.
He didn’t set him up.
He asked him a simple question and Flynn lied. No one made him do that. He did it because that’s what people who are beholden to Trump do. They lie.
There was no reason to question Flynn, unless it was to entrap him.
There was no investigation related to the questions, Comey admitted on video it was entrapment, duh.
 
There was no reason to question Flynn, unless it was to entrap him.
There was no investigation related to the questions, Comey admitted on video it was entrapment, duh.

Of course there was a reason. Flynn was out there lying to his superiors about the nature of conversations he was having with shady foreign officials.

You think someone with such a high level security clearance should be lying about stuff like that to the president and vice president without someone looking into it?
 
It's not against the law to have hatred for another person. Trump just announced at Charlie Kirk's funeral that he hates at least half of the U.S. voting population and doesn't want the best for them. Even wishing them dead is not unlawful.

On the other hand threatening to make them dead is unlawful. All you have is wishful thinking.
You gave him reason. With Progressives everything must be one way. If you get it in return you put on the shock act. You got near 40 months of Trump left. Even if you take congress in 2026. His EO's will not be an auto pen.
 
Back
Top Bottom