I disagree with the Wisconsin Court, you shouldn't pay people to vote.

It discards the genuineness of the person's vote. I am totally not in favor of paying people to vote, it's wrong and is sacrilege to the entire process of voting. It would be like wanting to win someone over to Christ, but instead of sharing the message of the Gospel, you pay them a million bucks instead, they'll tell you "I'm a Christian" but are they? Did they really become a Christian of their own convictions, or because you paid them? Same concept with paying people to vote. It should be illegal, and I disagree with the judge who cleared the way for the process. It means now that leftist billionaires can engage in the same behavior all the same.
does that include welfare as pay to vote??
 
LOL....Being entered for a prize for signing a petition is not buying votes there Cheeto breath.
Uh...

Cheeto breath?

Anyways, you only confirm the interest in the petition was merely nothing more than people vying for a prize.
 
Not necessarily. If Trump were doing the same thing, you would be protesting.
Forgiving student loans? Uh... no, I would not. In fact, I would be shocked and would think that Trump is possibly.on his death bed and having a hypoxic episode.
 
does that include welfare as pay to vote??
Welfare is legal. But it's condemnable that it's used to buy votes. It should be illegal to use a legal government program as a means to garner votes for one candidate or another.
 
Left sure doesn't mind Soros doing it...or leftists through theft through USAID...but that's going to end God willing. How's the left gonna survive with their money spigot turned off? Thieving bastards.
 
Welfare is legal. But it's condemnable that it's used to buy votes. It should be illegal to use a legal government program as a means to garner votes for one candidate or another.
Which isn't happening. Calling it that doesn't make it so. If one party chooses to oppose helping Americans ("while screaming about helping Americans FIRST!, naturally), that's on them.
 
Welfare is legal. But it's condemnable that it's used to buy votes. It should be illegal to use a legal government program as a means to garner votes for one candidate or another.
Being on the public dole should disqualify voting rights.
 
Being on the public dole should disqualify voting rights.
Nah. It should disqualify the incumbent president from being able to run for a second term if he uses the program to get votes.
 
On the contrary, Trump has made it clear he will sink yo any depth. Believe him, when he says he does not plan to leave office.

It's a spoof..... Having the predictable results I might add. Causing a whole great big batch of crazy that just seems to self-combust.
 
15th post
It discards the genuineness of the person's vote. I am totally not in favor of paying people to vote, it's wrong and is sacrilege to the entire process of voting. It would be like wanting to win someone over to Christ, but instead of sharing the message of the Gospel, you pay them a million bucks instead, they'll tell you "I'm a Christian" but are they? Did they really become a Christian of their own convictions, or because you paid them? Same concept with paying people to vote. It should be illegal, and I disagree with the judge who cleared the way for the process. It means now that leftist billionaires can engage in the same behavior all the same.
It should be illegal to pay people to vote because that lends itself entirely to the probability of bribing people to vote for a specific candidate(s) And that in turn could corrupt the whole system depending on who is in power and holds the purse strings.
 
It should be illegal to pay people to vote because that lends itself entirely to the probability of bribing people to vote for a specific candidate(s) And that in turn could corrupt the whole system depending on who is in power and holds the purse strings.
Absolutely brilliant! Yes! YES! THIS^^^
 
Obviously.no, illegal bribes are illegal.

In fact, US citizens should be required by law to vote, with a tax penalty, if they not.
But now, you are compelling them to vote. And if my knowledge serves, that violates the 24th Amendment.
 
Maybe the real reason Musk is buying a judge isn't what the OP understands...

"Musk has a matter in Wisconsin courts as CEO of Tesla. In January, the automaker sued seeking an exemption from a state law that bans car manufacturers from selling directly to consumers — as Tesla does — instead of going through dealers"

 
Back
Top Bottom