It's always nice when scientifically illiterate people gunk up science.And people like you need to stop lying about eggs and cum being alive and having identifiable DNA.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's always nice when scientifically illiterate people gunk up science.And people like you need to stop lying about eggs and cum being alive and having identifiable DNA.
My belief is that the government's formal position should be against taking any innocent life. As for life in the womb, the government position should that it has no authority to bring about any criminal action, but that the government, as always, is against taking any innocent life. In other words, the decision to take an innocent life is solely on the shoulders of the woman and the medical professional who agrees to perform the procedure. The government can take the position that it would make it a misdemeanor to the medical professional to perform the procedure after six weeks unless the physical life of the mother was in danger.It's probably surprising to you that I believe abortion should be a misdemeanor. It was for me.
So you know a puppy who was depressed his entire life because he missed one belly rub as a puppy. Yes, I did miss out on that and I've know many, many dogs.then you are missing out.
The difference: I was never "indoctrinated". I was testing and researching God while still a toddler. While you were sitting down being indoctrinated (probably bored out of your mind), I was out seeking in every way possible. I was having fun.My childhood indoctrination into believing failed. Yours succeeded very well. As well as any other member on this board at least.
I didn't spend sufficient time in the indoctrination process. If I had then they almost certainly wouldn't have failed. But I can say that I wasn't bored. I can't recall being scared, or any other feelings that I can remember.The difference: I was never "indoctrinated". I was testing and researching God while still a toddler. While you were sitting down being indoctrinated (probably bored out of your mind), I was out seeking in every way possible. I was having fun.
It appears you are still waiting for some kind of miracle to drop into your lap.
Ding being around is giving you courage to be rude with me. You can be yourself without him you know. Express your anger without fear.Don't hold your breath as that is precisely like sitting there waiting for a cherry tree to grow out of your ears because you swallowed a pit.
Sigh. I was not being obnoxious, I was teasing you! Any of my siblings would have picked up on it when they read the comment about cherry trees, and laughing at my toddler self. Further, look at you telling me what I am "really" doing. No, I am not reconsidering. There is nothing to reconsider. Learning, exploring the vast beyond continues. If I was "reconsidering" I would give up on the exploration. By the way, people keep imagining my imagining my emotions, and no one has been right yet. A discussion forum is thought provoking, it's not an emotional release--at least not for me. In between posting I am usually doing something--water colors, cleaning out drawers and cupboards, photography, genealogy, and religious research and study.I can only say that you lack the will to be obnoxious when you're thinking for yourself. And that leads me to believing that you certainly are still asking questions of yourself on reconsidering your beliefs on the god.
Sigh. I was not being obnoxious, I was teasing you!
To Donald H, to “reconsider your position” (as he says you should do) is to reconsider it and decide you agree with him. Sounds like an intolerant leftist to me - his way or the highway.Sigh. I was not being obnoxious, I was teasing you! Any of my siblings would have picked up on it when they read the comment about cherry trees, and laughing at my toddler self. Further, look at you telling me what I am "really" doing. No, I am not reconsidering. There is nothing to reconsider. Learning, exploring the vast beyond continues. If I was "reconsidering" I would give up on the exploration. By the way, people keep imagining my imagining my emotions, and no one has been right yet. A discussion forum is thought provoking, it's not an emotional release--at least not for me. In between posting I am usually doing something--water colors, cleaning out drawers and cupboards, photography, genealogy, and religious research and study.
He condescendingly believes I was "indoctrinated" (or brainwashed) into believing--i.e., accepting a set of beliefs uncritically, without testing them. Whenever someone attaches that label to me, I can't help but bursting in laughter, shaking my head--and realizing they will never have any awareness of who I am, never comprehend the journey, the study, the research, the testing, the assessing of both experiences and written material.To Donald H, to “reconsider your position” (as he says you should do) is to reconsider it and decide you agree with him. Sounds like an intolerant leftist to me - his way or the highway.
A point in particular that I’d like to draw out: one can indeed be a Jew, and a rather observant one at that, and still be an atheist. I know families who keep a strictly kosher home, go to Shabbat services (almost weekly), and do not believe in - or perhaps question the existence of - Gd. To them, it is our heritage and community which ties them to the Jewish people, and they have a strong identity as a Jew.He condescendingly believes I was "indoctrinated" (or brainwashed) into believing--i.e., accepting a set of beliefs uncritically, without testing them. Whenever someone attaches that label to me, I can't help but bursting in laughter, shaking my head--and realizing they will never have any awareness of who I am, never comprehend the journey, the study, the research, the testing, the assessing of both experiences and written material.
The problem with being critical is that it is similar to a rock slide where one can assume that way is blocked. For a number of years I had that difficulty with the Old Testament. I was puzzled by it because it did not align with what I had learned of God (some of it from the Old Testament) and my own experience of God. I had the good fortune to meet an atheist Jew whose first language was Hebrew. That language and his teaching parted that rock slide and opened up an understanding as broad as the sky--and also a side interest in etymology, plus a better understanding of the New Testament.
Imagine, an atheist Jew and a Catholic spending years on this and in the end, he remained an atheist Jews and I was still a faithful Catholic! Horizons are like that because there is so much to explore and investigate. I often compare the whole of it to a puzzle, where each one of us holds a piece that will one day complete the entire story/picture and thus understanding for all becomes complete as well. Anticipation! In the meantime, comes the awareness we all hold a piece--and therefore should be very cautious before (if ever) telling anyone to abandon the piece(s) they hold.
The core belief of the Catholic faith is there is One God, three inseparable persons, Father (Creator); Son (Word); and Holy Spirit. With God, His Word can go forth on its own and so can His Spirit. In these ways His existence is different and far greater than any human person. (We have to be present to speak our word; we can say, "I'll be with you in spirit" but our spirit remains within us.)A point in particular that I’d like to draw out: one can indeed be a Jew, and a rather observant one at that, and still be an atheist. I know families who keep a strictly kosher home, go to Shabbat services (almost weekly), and do not believe in - or perhaps question the existence of - Gd. To them, it is our heritage and community which ties them to the Jewish people, and they have a strong identity as a Jew.
On the flip side, can one be considered a Catholic and not believe in Jesus? My sense is that one cannot, but I’m not certain.
I got your point about the 'cherry tree'. It was your way of comparing and demeaning my childhood compared to yours. Now that you bring the cherry tree up again, I've paid closer attention to it and understand your purpose. It's out of character for you. Hence, Ding being close by.Sigh. I was not being obnoxious, I was teasing you! Any of my siblings would have picked up on it when they read the comment about cherry trees, and laughing at my toddler self. Further, look at you telling me what I am "really" doing. No, I am not reconsidering. There is nothing to reconsider. Learning, exploring the vast beyond continues. If I was "reconsidering" I would give up on the exploration. By the way, people keep imagining my imagining my emotions, and no one has been right yet. A discussion forum is thought provoking, it's not an emotional release--at least not for me. In between posting I am usually doing something--water colors, cleaning out drawers and cupboards, photography, genealogy, and religious research and study.
May I ask you who introduced you to god, and at what age?The difference: I was never "indoctrinated". I was testing and researching God while still a toddler.
Not at all true! You were every bit as critical as you toddler mind could have been, on what you were told. I've always commended your ability to think and reason.He condescendingly believes I was "indoctrinated" (or brainwashed) into believing--i.e., accepting a set of beliefs uncritically, without testing them.
You've suggested that you became a believer at a very young age. As a 'toddler', you suggest that you knew your god. Now we all know something more about you.Whenever someone attaches that label to me, I can't help but bursting in laughter, shaking my head--and realizing they will never have any awareness of who I am, never comprehend the journey, the study, the research, the testing, the assessing of both experiences and written material.
I think you should expect to be able to hold all the pieces to the puzzle. Doesn't anybody understand completely? I think that if you don't then there's little hope for anyone else on this board understanding!The problem with being critical is that it is similar to a rock slide where one can assume that way is blocked. For a number of years I had that difficulty with the Old Testament. I was puzzled by it because it did not align with what I had learned of God (some of it from the Old Testament) and my own experience of God. I had the good fortune to meet an atheist Jew whose first language was Hebrew. That language and his teaching parted that rock slide and opened up an understanding as broad as the sky--and also a side interest in etymology, plus a better understanding of the New Testament.
Imagine, an atheist Jew and a Catholic spending years on this and in the end, he remained an atheist Jews and I was still a faithful Catholic! Horizons are like that because there is so much to explore and investigate. I often compare the whole of it to a puzzle, where each one of us holds a piece that will one day complete the entire story/picture and thus understanding for all becomes complete as well. Anticipation! In the meantime, comes the awareness we all hold a piece--and therefore should be very cautious before (if ever) telling anyone to abandon the piece(s) they hold.
What other people do for their religious expressions of faith is not my business. I could'nt care less whatever people do with what they call faith. That being said, you are openly and brazenly an idolator by choice. I have no problem with you throwing your life in the trash seeking eternal life by doing exactly what God has forbidden under penalty of death.So everyone should convert to Judaism?