I am not into the truther movement but I have a question

[paulitician]

Agreed.


9/11 is the justification for all this accelerated police state crap we see now.

If you do not support all the police state crap then the puppetmasters say you are making us all vulnerable to a terrorist attack that could happen at anytime, anywhere, by anybody.

Yes, you're an "America-Hater" if you question Big Brother. It's a genius tactic though. It works. The indoctrination process begins early on for American Children. This video helps understand why we have a Nation of so many loyal Goose Steppers...


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okPnDZ1Txlo]SCHOOL SUCKS: The American Way - YouTube[/ame]

 

[daws101]

Doesn't matter to thinking folks with a working brain who aren't mentally or emotionally handicapped like you. The NIST report wreaks of BS, fudged/changed/hidden data, doesn't explain or put any of the controversy to rest, and instead creates more.
Like the resistance of the structure being a normal and expected observation and absolutely consistent with physical properties, but then oops a miracle happened, the massive structure offered no resistance for for 8 story's and free fall DID occur, and then no mention of it being consistent with physical properties in their revised report, no explanation offered, hide the computer data, shut up and move along?
**** you. You may be easily duped, because you want and need to be, while showing off your lack of intellect, and lack of respect for yourself and your country in the process, but
there are many of us who don't take BS and nonsense for answers.

I suggest you take a look at the works and writings of those who have serious objections to the NIST report, and make an effort to compare their grievances with NIST. There are many, with good valid points who point out the inconsistencies deceptions along the way.

the works and writing you speak of are from people suffering from the same delusions you are!

The reality is that it is people like you who are suffering from delusions and refuse to except the reality you were and are being lied to.
You can't face it, it's a mental problem you have and that is understood, so you resort to attacking their character to keep your delusion going.


BS, you resort to minimizing that many people don't believe the OCT, and this has been evidenced by various polls.

I doubt you have even looked at any in any earnest, objective way. Your mental state that includes a need to be comforted and coddled, wont allow that.
Besides if you truly did read or take their works and papers into consideration for serious study, you would post something within them as an objection, or observation, it's obvious you don't bother to, as you just ridicule them with BS one line statements, and BS.

I'd tell you to go **** yourself but that would be too little too late.

You're a hopeless idiot, 9-11 was not as it was explained to the US people or the world, and the nation needs people with the ability to think not merely follow and you're not needed so it is you that can go **** itself.

quote=daws101 extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence/ Carl Sagan.

So where is your extraordinary evidence that confirms NIST's BS, Dawgshit?

In an article for Psychology Today, Ilan Shrira wrote: "Conspiracy theories help us cope with distressing events and make sense out of them. Conspiracies assure us that bad things don't just happen randomly. Conspiracies tell us that someone out there is accountable, however unwittingly or secretly or incomprehensibly, so it's possible to stop these people and punish them and in due course let everyone else re-establish control over their own lives. Conspiracies also remind us that we shouldn't blame ourselves for our predicaments; it's not our fault, it's them! In these ways, believing in conspiracies serves many of the same self-protective functions as scapegoating."


By grasping at straws, and laying the blame on anything other than senseless, random violence - the very hallmark of al Qaeda's crusade - truthers are trying to make order where there is none, and in the end, the only people they want to make feel better are themselves.


© 2011 CBS Interactive Inc.. All Rights Reserved.

9/11 conspiracy theories won't stop - CBS News



btw this statement is bullshit " BS, you resort to minimizing that many people don't believe the OCT, and this has been evidenced by various polls." sister jones..


the largest percentage of us citizens to buy your bullshit was 1/3. and that was in 2005 ...it been in a steady decline since then.

 

[Mr. Jones]

]In an article for Psychology Today, Ilan Shrira wrote: "Conspiracy theories help us cope with distressing events and make sense out of them. Conspiracies assure us that bad things don't just happen randomly. Conspiracies tell us that someone out there is accountable, however unwittingly or secretly or incomprehensibly, so it's possible to stop these people and punish them and in due course let everyone else re-establish control over their own lives. Conspiracies also remind us that we shouldn't blame ourselves for our predicaments; it's not our fault, it's them! In these ways, believing in conspiracies serves many of the same self-protective functions as scapegoating."


By grasping at straws, and laying the blame on anything other than senseless, random violence - the very hallmark of al Qaeda's crusade - truthers are trying to make order where there is none, and in the end, the only people they want to make feel better are themselves.
© 2011 CBS Interactive Inc.. All Rights Reserved.
9/11 conspiracy theories won't stop - CBS News

Idiot, you are the mentally challenged dupes that have to resort to the most outlandish of conspiracy theories like 19 Muslim jihadists with box cutters so you can blame them instead of taking responsibility for your nations predicament by blaming yourself for not paying attention to who and what has infiltrated your country, and just who and what your stupid blind ignorant ass is "voting" for.

Be a man and open your eyes and mind to the reality of the situation your country is really in and the people you voted into power that facilitated this mess, instead of hiding behind the most outrageous and lunatic fringe conspiracy theory ever concocted by your
lying scumbag "leaders".
AlQaeda was created by the liars who you assume are telling you the truth and care about you and your welfare, you ******* dope. They are supposed to be the enemy of the US yet your government is supporting them in Syria, and Libya right in front of your face and yet you say nothing about it.
Hilarious, you don't even see that you subscribe and hide behind, and facilitate the spreading of the biggest conspiracy theory
with the most outlandish BS that even blindly dismisses science, physics, logistics, and facts, and even when the lies and inconsistencies are shown to you, with credible people to back them up, you come here and accuse others of subscribing to "conspiracy theories" for comfort?? To relieve mental anguish??

You truly are a sad sack of lost Dawgshit boy.

As for your statement concerning polls regarding 9-11 and people believing US government complicity losing ground since 2005-

Polls Show Widespread Doubt About Official Explanations

The results of polls on peoples’ beliefs about 9/11 around the world might surprise you:

In its January 2011 issue, the popular German magazine “Welt der Wunder” published the results of a poll conducted by the Emnid institute on 1005 respondents. The poll indicated that nearly 90% percent of Germans are convinced that the government of the United States is not telling the whole truth about the September 11 attacks

A new poll conducted in England by ICM shows that more UK residents agree than disagree that the official account of what happened on 9/11 might turn out to be wrong in important respects. Only 8% strongly agree that they have been told the full story of the 9/11 attacks

A new poll conducted in France by HEC Paris shows that 58% of French people doubt the official version of 9/11, and 49% believe the U.S. government might have intentionally allowed the attacks to happen

A Zogby poll conducted in August 2007 found that 51% of Americans want Congress to probe Bush/Cheney regarding the 9/11 attacks, two-thirds (67%) of Americans say the 9/11 Commission should have investigated the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7

A poll conducted by CNN-IBN in August 2007 found that only 2 out of 5 of those polled in India – the world’s second most populous country – believe that al-Qaeda is responsible for the 9/11 attacks

Indeed, a poll taken by World Public Opinion, a collaborative project of research centers in various countries managed by the Program on International Policy Attitudes at the University of Maryland, College Park, polled 16,063 people in 17 nations outside of the United States during the summer of 2008. They found that majorities in only 9 of the 17 countries believe Al Qaeda carried out the attacks. The poll showed that in the world’s most populous country – China – only 32% believed that Al Qaeda carried out the attacks.

9/11 and the War on Terror: Polls Show What People Think 10 Years Later - Washington's Blog

And in a poll of NYC residents, shows that 1 in 3 New Yorkers were unaware of Building 7′s collapse and, despite the importance of the events of that day, only 25% have ever seen video footage of Building 7 collapsing at free fall. Only 14% could identify the name of the skyscraper.
So out of sight out of mind but the reality is that it did happened and people need to be made aware, perhaps then any sliding poll numbers that you point to, that are based on ignorance, would go the other way in favor of getting to the truth.

New Poll: 48% of New Yorkers Support a New 9/11 Investigation into Building 7′s Collapse | 9-11 News | World for 9/11 Truth

July 2006, Time magazine discussing a Scripts Howard poll says that 36% of people polled that's over 1/3rd, about 108 million people...That's a lot of people...think it likely the US government in some way was complicit, or allowed it to happen.

"36% adds up to a lot of people, this is not a fringe phenomena, it is a mainstream political reality"-Time Magazine

The very same publication many of you lunatics tried to use as a debunking rag back then.
108 million people is more then 3 times the population of Canada.

And in 2006, a Zogby poll showed that half of NY'kers polled said they believed that the US leaders had impending knowledge of the attacks, and "consciously"failed to act".

...the new survey found that 77 percent say their friends and acquaintances have become angrier with government recently and 54 percent say they, themselves, have become angrier _ both record levels.
Third of Americans suspect 9-11 government conspiracy | ScrippsNews

But those that are willfully ignorant of facts and of history, and even shutting their eyes and minds to what is happening today, need the comfort of creating a belief in which their government is benevolent, caring and just, and live in that false illusion for fear of confronting reality that the opposite is in fact the truth.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlPweD6R3Cc]911 Polls - You Are Not Alone - YouTube[/ame]

 

[daws101]

]In an article for Psychology Today, Ilan Shrira wrote: "Conspiracy theories help us cope with distressing events and make sense out of them. Conspiracies assure us that bad things don't just happen randomly. Conspiracies tell us that someone out there is accountable, however unwittingly or secretly or incomprehensibly, so it's possible to stop these people and punish them and in due course let everyone else re-establish control over their own lives. Conspiracies also remind us that we shouldn't blame ourselves for our predicaments; it's not our fault, it's them! In these ways, believing in conspiracies serves many of the same self-protective functions as scapegoating."


By grasping at straws, and laying the blame on anything other than senseless, random violence - the very hallmark of al Qaeda's crusade - truthers are trying to make order where there is none, and in the end, the only people they want to make feel better are themselves.
© 2011 CBS Interactive Inc.. All Rights Reserved.
9/11 conspiracy theories won't stop - CBS News

Idiot, you are the mentally challenged dupes that have to resort to the most outlandish of conspiracy theories like 19 Muslim jihadists with box cutters so you can blame them instead of taking responsibility for your nations predicament by blaming yourself for not paying attention to who and what has infiltrated your country, and just who and what your stupid blind ignorant ass is "voting" for.

edited for waste of bandwidth ----------------

 

[Mr. Jones]

WTC 7 was not brought down by fire alone. NIST has not proven that, and there are many instances of NIST fraud in trying to make fire the only explanation.

 

[daws101]

WTC 7 was not brought down by fire alone. NIST has not proven that, and there are many instances of NIST fraud in trying to make fire the only explanation.

wrong! there are many unfounded allegations that nist has perpetrated a fraud.....but none have been found to be credible.

 

[Mr. Jones]

WTC 7 was not brought down by fire alone. NIST has not proven that, and there are many instances of NIST fraud in trying to make fire the only explanation.

wrong! there are many unfounded allegations that nist has perpetrated a fraud.....but none have been found to be credible.

BS. Prove they are not credible I dare you.

 

[daws101]

WTC 7 was not brought down by fire alone. NIST has not proven that, and there are many instances of NIST fraud in trying to make fire the only explanation.

wrong! there are many unfounded allegations that nist has perpetrated a fraud.....but none have been found to be credible.

BS. Prove they are not credible I dare you.

I triple dog dare you! ....
getting back to reality ..there is no need ...it's already been done ...

 

[Freewill]

Here is a site that directly addresses the video in the OP.

Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition - World Trade Center 7, Building 7

Take note, the most logical of all statements, why would the news be given prior notice of the collapse of WTC 7? My logical observation is why did they wait about one hour to pull it on WTC 1 and 2 and 7 hours until they "pull it" on WTC 7. Are we to believe that a chief in the NYFD was in on the conspiracy? That he was controlling the explosion? Really? The "conspirators" allowed the building, with the demolition charges already in place, to burn for 7 hours, and it did burn. Wouldn't they be at least a little concerned that the charges may ignite or that the detonation cords might be severed?

Quoting polls on what a whole bunch of uninformed people think is not very productive and proves nothing.

Does the government know more then it is releasing, maybe. Maybe there were warnings and maybe they were ignored like a multitude of warnings before and since were ignored for not being considered viable. That information may be withheld. As was stated in one of the more viral posts, 19 men pulling this off doesn't seem like it could happen. That poster doesn't believe it and all evidence points to that is what happened, imagine if he were told before 9/11what would happen. The poster would not believe it. What if the 2012 Mayan Prediction comes true what will people say then?

So this conspiracy theory goes the way of all conspiracy theories. Just like the JFK conspiracy theories 19 men killing so many isn't big enough. One loner with a gun killing JFK was not big enough. The paranoid want it to be bigger. Big crime needs a big criminal. Didn't happen so history must be revised to fit what the conspiracy theory advocates want to believe.

19 men took over a 4 planes as could be heard from the calls from those very planes. It is really time to see the real enemies.

 

[Againsheila]

Whow, the FBI, CIA, The whole of the Republican party, the airlines, the traffic controllers, the news feeds showing the airplanes striking the WTC, the families of the victims and now the BBC. What an incredible array of an conspiracy organization. All capable of keeping their mouths shut, amazing.

Not everyone you mentioned needed to be "in on it". A few rouge traitors in positions of authority, that no one thought, or dared to question, and their underlings just go about doing their jobs, unaware they were being used.
We can apply the same logic to Alqaeda..Such a huge elaborate plan...and no one talked?
Surely someone would have spilled the beans..no?

BTW, the BBC wasn't the only network that reported the premature demise of WTC 7.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHFdcPv3XXI]New: Fox News 5 reports WTC 7 collapse BEFORE it happens - YouTube[/ame]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2PqbGfCcef0]9/11 CNN Reports World Trade Center Tower 7 Collapse Before it Happens - YouTube[/ame]

There's another station, I have a video of that mirrored these reports I have to find it, but
this is really amazing when you consider the other hi-rise fires that burned longer and were more engulfed, and no one assumed they were going to "collapse".

What's more, Fox news tried their best to obfuscate this contradiction that suggest fore knowledge, by having a reporter claim, he was told by Con Ed,and police, that Larry Silverstein was on the phone with his insurance company, trying to get approval to allow a CD of the building. Which also suggest that the building could be rigged in short order, OR it was rigged sometime beforehand.

"To dispute the conventional historical account is intellectually dishonest and nonsensical.
I know this because I was working as a journalist for Gannett News at Ground Zero that day, and I remember very clearly what I saw and heard."

"Governor Ventura and many 9/11 “Truthers” allege that government explosives caused the afternoon collapse of Building 7. This is false."

"Shortly before the building collapsed, several NYPD officers and Con-Edison workers told me that Larry Silverstein, the property developer of One World Financial Center was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the building – since its foundation was already unstable and expected to fall.

A controlled demolition would have minimized the damage caused by the building’s imminent collapse and potentially save lives. Many law enforcement personnel, firefighters and other journalists were aware of this possible option. There was no secret. There was no conspiracy."

Shame On Jesse Ventura! | Fox News

So, by this account, Silverstein was involved in the CD of the WTC 7. Interesting....

A lot of the OCT does not make sense, when one examines it closer, there's no doubt to objective, rational observers, that it is BS.

You notice in that first video, after they said it had already collapsed, they saw it collapse and they didn't seem in the least bit surprised that they'd already said it was down. I don't get it.

 

[Freewill]

You need to go to the link I provided. The news outlets were told that WTC 7 was going to crash. On the day the SCOTUS announced their ruling CNN and FOX first reported that the mandates were ruled against, they were wrong.

Just use some logic, why would they be given prior knowledge? Has anyone interviewed those reporters as to how they could have known?

As for being in on it, the reporters would need to be in on it. The fire chief would need to be in on it. There are way too many to be in on it to keep it a secret.

 

[Mr. Jones]

You need to go to the link I provided. The news outlets were told that WTC 7 was going to crash. On the day the SCOTUS announced their ruling CNN and FOX first reported that the mandates were ruled against, they were wrong.

Just use some logic, why would they be given prior knowledge? Has anyone interviewed those reporters as to how they could have known?

As for being in on it, the reporters would need to be in on it. The fire chief would need to be in on it. There are way too many to be in on it to keep it a secret.

It was reported by an eye witness reporter in the link provided below, who was on the scene at WTC 7, who had been told by FDNY and others there, that Larry Silverstein was on the phone with his insurance company asking for permission to implode his own property. Thus this reporter is saying Silverstein saved lives yada yada, but what he idiotically doesn't reaslize in reporting this, is that such a massive 47 story hi rise could not be rigged in such short notice...while having isolated fires in it as well...

So this is where I believe the prior knowledge of imminent collapse came from, and was then spread to the news outlets only they left out the part of Silverstein talking with his insurance carrier about having the massive building imploded...

Shame On Jesse Ventura! | Fox News


Also, this operation did not need to have every single person involved in the plot. It only required people in top echelon positions of authority that the underlings would not think to question or second guess, as they were in positions of trust.

You can go back in history to find such plots and conspiracies were indeed kept highly secret like Operations Northwoods,and the Manhattan Project. All one need do is study the laws of conservation of momentum, the fuel loads in the WTC 7 complexes, and the free fall that occurred at the WTC 7 and close to it at the towers to realize something else was involved in bringing the towers down and the planes were just used as a side show diversion to cause shock and awe, as it probably assumed it would be easier to explain lax security and plane hijackings by Jihadist extremists as the cause of these buildings "collapsing" instead of lax security on a huge complex in the middle of Manhattan, that had already been the victim of a prior attack in 1993.

If planes weren't used as a diversion, the question would have been how did they sneak all the CD prep into such a heavily guarded building complex, but as it turned out that question was not avoided by critically thinking people that took the time to objectively research this terrorist
attack. Those who did found that security in the complexes and the airports were handled by Israeli connected firms and or people with Israeli loyalty.

If you dig into the 9-11 attacks with an open mind and take the time to do so, it will open your eyes to something sinister within a small segment in our own government who had an agenda to use military force to control the ME for natural and strategic resources. PNAC.


Anyway it has been posited that flight 93 was originally destined as the coup de grace of the aerial exhibition that day, by slamming into WTC 7, as this building was apparently pre-rigged, according to the reporter who was on scene, and was told about Silverstein's phone call to the insurance company. This theory is backed up by flight 93's flight, and the time it was "hijacked", as it was the last plane to be "taken over", and once the towers were down had a clear path to slam into WTC 7..

9/11 Shock Opera… Act 4

-Freewill- The "conspirators" allowed the building, with the demolition charges already in place, to burn for 7 hours, and it did burn. Wouldn't they be at least a little concerned that the charges may ignite or that the detonation cords might be severed?

It is highly possible that for such a high tech operation as 9-11 and the implosion of such massive buildings, that self consuming det cord initiated by remote was used. You would have read about this if you dug deeper concerning the allegations of the truth movement and knowledgeable people in such fields that are part of it, including CD experts, physicists etc.. They have put forward a very plausible theory that includes the fraud perpetrated by the government agency known as NIST. Do you actually think the perps would use conventional tactics and risk the chance of "det cord" and other evidence laying around the rubble piles? I'm sure they never thought people would take the time to analyze the dust for chemicals of explosives or incendiaries either. What started the snooping was the fact that the towers and building 7 exhibited many of the characteristics of controlled demolitions, and the rubble piles burned/smoldered for 3 months after the attacks despite efforts to finally extinguish them including using shit loads of Pyrocool.
Office combustibles would not have burned or melted steel for 3 months at all 3 locations.

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi/noframes/read/88138



I suggest that anyone who wants to seriously debate this issue take the time to learn what the truth movements knowledgeable people are saying about the 9-11 attacks in particular the demise of these huge buildings, and compare their opinions to what has been reported by NIST and the media.

-Freewill] -19 men took over a 4 planes as could be heard from the calls from those very planes. It is really time to see the real enemies.

Both the 19 Jihadists and the phone calls as being totally true are very debatable. Do a search on both, including the testimony of the FBI regarding the calls, and you'll see that the story has changed with thesis on the technology at the time siding with the calls being very unlikely to have been made, and many "hijackers" reported to have been still alive with their passports and ID's being stolen or lost.
I agree that we need to take the blinders off and see the real enemies, both foreign and DOMESTIC at work in our nation.

FBI says, it has “No hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11”

9/11 Commission Report: Why No Arab Names on Passenger List?

Five men detained as suspected conspirators

At Least 7 of the 9/11 Hijackers are Still Alive

ALL THE 9-11 AIRPORTS SERVICED BY ONE ISRAELI OWNED COMPANY

EDITORIAL: 9/11 cover-up - Washington Times


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFpbZ-aLDLY&playnext=1&list=PL6FCD384DA1DCA55C&index=8]NIST Report on WTC7 debunked and exposed! - YouTube[/ame]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDvNS9iMjzA]WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part I) - YouTube[/ame]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXTlaqXsm4k&feature=related]WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part II) - YouTube[/ame]

Evidence that contradicts NIST and the official story line is available, and contrary to what some on the USMB say, has not been explained or countered in any rational and scientific way. I find it laughable that when I ask these people to post any rational counter rebuttals they answer by saying that it has already been debunked, without ever linking to anything that advances their position and backs up their claim that the 9-11 attacks and the science of the massive building complex has already been explained adequately.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=19420

 

[paulitician]

Dare to question. Always question.


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_IZaUuK_d0]Everything You Ever Wanted To Know About The 9/11 Conspiracy Theory In Under 5 Minutes - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Freewill]

Building What? How SCADs Can Be Hidden in Plain Sight: The 9/11 "Official Story" and the Collapse of WTC Building Seven

I viewed the video of the man trying to say their time was off. It is not surprising that anyone when confronted with questions they were not prepared to answer or do not really understand would answer them badly. Sure looking back a the video it is easy to say what these guys should have said.

Anyway, here is an easy experiment for you to do. I viewed the video of the WTC 7 starting to fall. I see it start at the 32 second mark, but could have been sooner, and when it drops to just about where it can't be seen was about 37 seconds. This seems to be in line with what the NIST stated.

So to say either the NIST or the man commenting on the video is wrong is near impossible because it is subject to interpretation.

So let's do this. I got 5 seconds for the building to fall 18 stories, I didn't count them I just went by the video statement and when the building almost went out of sight. So that means in 5 seconds the building fell 180 to 270 feet. I again don't know the actual height of the stories so am guess 10 to 15 feet.

So using this calculator: Free Fall Calculator

For a free fall of 150 feet the time in seconds is 3.08, for 270 feet it would be 4.11 seconds well within anything that the NIST said. Not quite 40 percent different but not a few percent either. 39 percent for 150 feet and 18 percent for 270 feet.

So as you can see there are many factors that go into the calculation that the physics teacher may or may not have known. Certainly he would have access to a calculator it is just a matter if he had the right data to calculate.

Which brings us full circle and the conclusion I come up with is that this teacher is grading the NIST not necessarily proving anything. Whether or not the building free fell, which I don't see that it did, is not an indication of whether after 7 hours of burning they finally decided to implode the building. Even if the detonators were RF remote controlled that too could have been damage by fire and the initial blast from WTC 1 and 2 falling. Also with all the radio interference from emergency crews the demolition crew would be taking a big chance using RF.

Now, rationally ask yourself the very simple question that I posed in my first post. You do not need to rely on someone else's math. You don't need to rely on reports from unnamed reporters. All you need do is engage your logic. Why would the news reporters get information that the WTC 7 collapsed before it actually collapsed?

BTW, you posted this: "Evidence that contradicts NIST and the official story line is available, and contrary to what some on the USMB say, has not been explained or countered in any rational and scientific way. I find it laughable that when I ask these people to post any rational counter rebuttals they answer by saying that it has already been debunked, without ever linking to anything that advances their position and backs up their claim that the 9-11 attacks and the science of the massive building complex has already been explained adequately."

I did provide a link that completely demolished the theories you presented.

Here is another: http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/1227842

 

[Freewill]

Why would Israel want us to attack Iraq and Afghanistan?

 

[eots]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvFuRYyEkiU]Popular Mechanics Debunked with EASE! - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Freewill]

Structural damage

I've seem how structurally damaged buildings fall, none have like building 7 did.

What??? WTC 1 and 2 fell in almost the exact same way.

 

[eots]

Structural damage

I've seem how structurally damaged buildings fall, none have like building 7 did.

What??? WTC 1 and 2 fell in almost the exact same way.

hardly.the towers were from the top down dumb ass...and the fact still remains any building other than wtc 1-2 or 7 have never fallen in the manner either did from fire or structural damage

 

[Freewill]

OK, I listened to the first part of the link you provided. So tell me, when did they pull the building? The truth is that the building was never pulled as they did with WTC 4 and 5, it is in the video I provided. Another point is that one would have to believe that Silverstein was familiar with an antiquated demolition term and so was the Fire Chief. What I think your link did was cut out further responses from PS. That is a typical thing to do.

Anyway here is a defintion of pull it:

en.wikipedia.org
Is "pull it" an industry term?

The closest thing I could find to a citation on this was a comment on a forum from someone in the industry responding specifically to that allegation:[5]

"I've had enough. The term "pull it" means pull it over. The term isn't used much today, because of the modern equipment used by demolition contractors. Fifty years ago wrecking contractors were less affluent, they depended more on ingenuity in the work place than on equipment. This was especially true when large buildings were taken down with hand labor. In those situations most interior and exterior walls had to be cabled and "pulled" in onto floors. Before you "pulled" the walls you would place old truck tires on the floor to cushion the shook and maintain the integrity of the floor your working on. In those days wrecking contractors would often attach cables to trucks or a dozer to collapse a section of a building or whole buildings. With advent of backhoes, skid loaders you don't have the need for cabling that you did in those days"

So even if the PS answer was not great it doesn't change the facts that Pull it does not mean to implode the building by detonation. Again this is typical conspiracy theory stuff. Make a statement that most people would not question then keep repeating it over and over again.

Now for the hijackers. At least one call from the airplane describe the hijackers as Arab. Does it matter if the FBI got their names wrong? Does it matter if their names appear on the boarding list? No would be the proper answer. It is meaningless. Who in the hell is the government going to hire to fly planes into tall buildings? Where are the passengers?

 

[Freewill]

I've seem how structurally damaged buildings fall, none have like building 7 did.

What??? WTC 1 and 2 fell in almost the exact same way.

hardly.the towers were from the top down dumb ass...and the fact still remains any building other than wtc 1-2 or 7 have never fallen in the manner either did from fire or structural damage

Yeah, I win, you are calling me names. All three buildings fell from where they were damaged. In the case of the WTC 7 it was from the bottom and the 5 floor where the fire raged. In the WTC 1 and 2 it was from where the planes hit, and the fires raged. All the same. What other buildings have been hit as were those two? How about the damage to the the WTC buildings? Was that controlled demolition? Do you listen to yourself?

Again, insult, a typical conspiracy theory tactic, when they are losing, which is always.