Now we will discuss the 5th and 6th items in my list of the Magnificent 20 events which changed the world.
5. Sometime prior to America’s entry into WWI, Zionist leaders cut a deal with Great Brittan which, at the time was losing WWI, such that if England supported the establishment of a homeland for the Jews in Palestine, they would bring the United States into the war on the side of the allies.
and
6. In 1917, four months after the United States entered WWI, England issued its Balfour Declaration which stated it supported the establishment of a homeland for the Jews in Palestine.
Item #5, above, was revealed to us by Benjamin Freedman, a Jew who decided to tell the world about what the Zionists were up to. Unfortunately, other than Mr. Freedman’s sincere honesty, we have nothing which directly corroborates his revelations. However, despite this shortcoming we do have several other things that we know which makes it highly plausible.
First of all, prior to WWI, the United States was an isolationist nation which followed George Washington’s advice to us to have as little to do with the nations of Europe as possible. President Woodrow Wilson was elected to a second term of office in November 1916 on the campaign slogan, “He kept us out of the war”. Yet just 5 months later in 1917, America entered the war on the side of the allies and Woodrow Wilson, our isolationist president championed this “war to end all wars” and this “war to make the world safe for democracy”. What changed Mr. Wilsons mind so quickly?
It has been said that the reasons the United States entered WWI was because of Germany’s commitment to unrestricted submarine warfare which resulted in the sinking Lusitania were 153 American lives were lost. Another reason offered is the Germany apparently had approached Mexico to become its ally if America entered the war. While the drums of war were definitely beating within the United States over these incidents, the question is who was beating those drums; the media? Who owned the media? Furthermore, does an “if America entered the war” amount to a declaration of war on the United States by Germany? I do not mean to trivialize this loss of life, but does the loss of 153 Americans who were foolish enough to sail on a British liner after Germany had declared unrestricted warfare on England, justify turning what was essentially a European war into a world war inconsideration that this war cost this nation 22 billion dollars and the lives of 137,000 of our finest men and women? Does this make sense in consideration of the fact that Germany had issued a peace proclamation prior to Americas entry into the war on behalf of the Allies. No, there was more to our entry into WWI than meets the eye.
However, where the worm really turns on this one is revealed by Item #6, above. England issued its Balfour Declaration four months after the United States Entered WWI. Why? This is truly an astounding declaration. In the middle of a world war which had nothing to do with the Jews nor anything to do with Palestine and the Palestinians, why would England, all of sudden, issue a declaration which gave Palestine to the Jews? What motivated or gave England the right to do this? Benjamin Freedman answered this question for us and his revelation is the only thing which makes sense. England issued its Balfour Declaration because it had, indeed, cut a deal with the Zionists. The Zionists upheld their part of the bargain by bringing the United States into the war and the British demonstrated that they would honor their part of the bargain by issuing the Balfour Declaration. Is there anything else which makes sense given the facts we know to be true?
All that is necessary to find the truth about what I am saying is to access the following references:
The Amazing Warnings of Benjamin Freedman;
The Amazing Warnings Of Benjamin Freedman
The Balfour Declaration of 1917 - Wikipedia.org:
Balfour Declaration - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Zarcan Council Members may now provide their objections and criticisms to what has just been presented. Hopefully, Jake and Saveliberty will refrain from wasting more of our time by demanding proof or calling me names. What is called for is an explanation for what has happened which fits the facts better than what Mr. Freedman has offered. Hopefully, Jake and Saveliberty have finally learned something. Only time will tell.
