Hypocrite Hillary Clinton Paid Women Staffers 28% Less Than Men

[WelfareQueen]

She spent less government money and you're mad? What happened to personal responsibility? Weren't these slits supposed to ask for more cash? If she can get them cheap why should she pay more? You'd better make up your mind what you believe in little partisan. Are people responsible for getting their own paychecks or not?

Always playing games instead of admitting that Hillary is nothing but a hypocrite. She could have paid the men 28% less and then it would have saved money and ensured equal pay for men and women. But she didn't do that.

The issue at hand is equal pay for men and women. Hillary has done plenty of harping on the subject, but turns out she is guilty of treating them unequal.

HYPOCRITE!

I know what I believe.

People can ask for raises, but Hillary was more generous with men than women from the start. If you are qualified for a job and don't like what is being offered, go someplace else. Not all jobs are offered by hypocrites.

You're trying to attack me despite me never having said anything like what you are insinuating. You are just too chicken shit to slam Hillary so you deflect.

She paid the rates required to get them to work for her. When did it become her job to make life fair?

If she was aware of the women being paid less than the men for the SAME WORK then yes, she would be a part of the problem imho. And yes, men are more experienced (through osmosis if not directly) in negotiating salaries....and I honestly believe there should be a course in salary negotiation in high school and in college for women specifically....so we can get better at it!!!

Women should get equal pay for equal work. The fact both Hillary and Obama blatantly discriminate against women is shameful. No way women working directly for Hillary should make 72 cents on the dollar for what men are making. Utter bullshit.

 

[Clementine]

So making everyone equal is what you think is required? Good to know.

Who said make everyone equal? That is a leftie thing and it's impossible. People should be treated fairly and equally as human beings, but when you hire them you should have one pay scale based solely on ability and not gender or race.

Equal pay for equal ability is fair.

The left is quick to judge a company if they don't hire enough minorities or women and they seek to pretend everyone is equal when it comes to employment. That is trying to falsely elevate people. Why isn't Hillary in trouble for not following the liberal rules that companies are expected to follow?

Hillary is a liberal and she criticizes others for doing what she is doing. That makes her a hypocrite and you continue to twist words to avoid giving an opinion on Hillary.

Do you think Hillary is wrong and are you willing to address that? Or will you just play more childish games and try to take shots at the right?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

She spent less government money and you're mad? What happened to personal responsibility? Weren't these slits supposed to ask for more cash? If she can get them cheap why should she pay more? You'd better make up your mind what you believe in little partisan. Are people responsible for getting their own paychecks or not?

Always playing games instead of admitting that Hillary is nothing but a hypocrite. She could have paid the men 28% less and then it would have saved money and ensured equal pay for men and women. But she didn't do that.

The issue at hand is equal pay for men and women. Hillary has done plenty of harping on the subject, but turns out she is guilty of treating them unequal.

HYPOCRITE!

I know what I believe.

People can ask for raises, but Hillary was more generous with men than women from the start. If you are qualified for a job and don't like what is being offered, go someplace else. Not all jobs are offered by hypocrites.

You're trying to attack me despite me never having said anything like what you are insinuating. You are just too chicken shit to slam Hillary so you deflect.

She paid the rates required to get them to work for her. When did it become her job to make life fair?

Funny you don't take that tone when it's Republicans you're criticizing. Then everyone is supposed to be equal even if they don't have experience or a high school diploma. Are you saying keep the current minimum wage, or maybe lower it for some real losers?

Raise it. We need better cash flow at the bottom. And while the goal is equal pay for equal work the salary you demand is up to you, just like these women.

 

[WelfareQueen]

He thinks blatant discrimination against women is fine. PMH has been very clear that if Hillary has chosen to screw over the women employed by her she is simply a good capitalist and the women are stupid.

 

[Care4all]

So making everyone equal is what you think is required? Good to know.

Who said make everyone equal? That is a leftie thing and it's impossible. People should be treated fairly and equally as human beings, but when you hire them you should have one pay scale based solely on ability and not gender or race.

Equal pay for equal ability is fair.

The left is quick to judge a company if they don't hire enough minorities or women and they seek to pretend everyone is equal when it comes to employment. That is trying to falsely elevate people. Why isn't Hillary in trouble for not following the liberal rules that companies are expected to follow?

Hillary is a liberal and she criticizes others for doing what she is doing. That makes her a hypocrite and you continue to twist words to avoid giving an opinion on Hillary.

Do you think Hillary is wrong and are you willing to address that? Or will you just play more childish games and try to take shots at the right?

Is it the Senator who determines what staffers get paid? Do you know the answer to this question?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Do you think Hillary is wrong ...

No. And what I think is the little partisans are happy to say bad, bad Hillary while supporting 100% the very same thing for everyone else. You get paid what you cut a deal for and the little partisans wouldn't want it any other way because their masters sure as hell don't. That's capitalism, babies.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

He thinks blatant discrimination against women is fine. PMH has been very clear that if Hillary has chosen to screw over the women employed by her she is simply a good capitalist and the women are stupid.

I see you don't believe in personal responsibility, not when you can sling some shit around eh?

 

[WelfareQueen]

So making everyone equal is what you think is required? Good to know.

Who said make everyone equal? That is a leftie thing and it's impossible. People should be treated fairly and equally as human beings, but when you hire them you should have one pay scale based solely on ability and not gender or race.

Equal pay for equal ability is fair.

The left is quick to judge a company if they don't hire enough minorities or women and they seek to pretend everyone is equal when it comes to employment. That is trying to falsely elevate people. Why isn't Hillary in trouble for not following the liberal rules that companies are expected to follow?

Hillary is a liberal and she criticizes others for doing what she is doing. That makes her a hypocrite and you continue to twist words to avoid giving an opinion on Hillary.

Do you think Hillary is wrong and are you willing to address that? Or will you just play more childish games and try to take shots at the right?

Is it the Senator who determines what staffers get paid? Do you know the answer to this question?

Yes....The Senator picks their staff and determines salary. Each Senate is allotted a budget for staffing. All staff is paid out of that budget.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Hillary Clinton has long positioned herself as a champion of equal pay for women. Ironically, new reports show that the former Secretary of State is, herself, part of the problem.

During her time in the U.S. Senate, Clinton paid women in her office 72 cents for each dollar paid to men, according to a report by Washington Free Beacon.

Analyzing data obtained from official Senate expenditure reports, Free Beacon concluded that the median annual salary for female staffers was $15,708.38 less than the median salary for men, between 2002 to 2008.

That’s about a 28 percent gender wage gap:



Hillary Clinton Demands Equal Pay But Doesn’t Put Her Money Where Her Mouth Is

http://www.ijreview.com/2015/02/257200-hillary-clinton-paid-female-staff-28-percent-less-men/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=organic&utm_content=ijreview&utm_campaign=Politics

 

[francoHFW]

Total BS, of course. The men have more senior and important jobs DUH.

 

[WelfareQueen]

Total BS, of course. The men have more senior and important jobs DUH.

Why...because they're men? Where's the link to back up your false assertion?

 

[Care4all]

So making everyone equal is what you think is required? Good to know.

Who said make everyone equal? That is a leftie thing and it's impossible. People should be treated fairly and equally as human beings, but when you hire them you should have one pay scale based solely on ability and not gender or race.

Equal pay for equal ability is fair.

The left is quick to judge a company if they don't hire enough minorities or women and they seek to pretend everyone is equal when it comes to employment. That is trying to falsely elevate people. Why isn't Hillary in trouble for not following the liberal rules that companies are expected to follow?

Hillary is a liberal and she criticizes others for doing what she is doing. That makes her a hypocrite and you continue to twist words to avoid giving an opinion on Hillary.

Do you think Hillary is wrong and are you willing to address that? Or will you just play more childish games and try to take shots at the right?

Is it the Senator who determines what staffers get paid? Do you know the answer to this question?

Yes....The Senator picks their staff and determines salary. Each Senate is allotted a budget for staffing. All staff is paid out of that budget.

Ok, that makes sense to be given a budget...

but if a Senator chose to have a staff of 10 instead a staff of 30 and pay these 10 employees the entire budget,(3 times the amount that a normal staffer would make) can the Senator do such with the budget money or would that be a "no no"? Is there a government CAP on what staffers can make?

And are all staffer positions EQUAL WORK or are some staff positions more important than other staff positions?

My question is, does this bombshell of a Report, tell us whether she had 50% men working for her or just 1 man on her staff and that one man held the highest staff position, vs all the rest of the workers who were female and held lower positions?

How can we compare EQUAL PAY FOR EQUAL WORK if we don't know what positions the males verses females held?

Certainly ALL staff positions ARE NOT the same?

 

[WelfareQueen]

So making everyone equal is what you think is required? Good to know.

Who said make everyone equal? That is a leftie thing and it's impossible. People should be treated fairly and equally as human beings, but when you hire them you should have one pay scale based solely on ability and not gender or race.

Equal pay for equal ability is fair.

The left is quick to judge a company if they don't hire enough minorities or women and they seek to pretend everyone is equal when it comes to employment. That is trying to falsely elevate people. Why isn't Hillary in trouble for not following the liberal rules that companies are expected to follow?

Hillary is a liberal and she criticizes others for doing what she is doing. That makes her a hypocrite and you continue to twist words to avoid giving an opinion on Hillary.

Do you think Hillary is wrong and are you willing to address that? Or will you just play more childish games and try to take shots at the right?

Is it the Senator who determines what staffers get paid? Do you know the answer to this question?

Yes....The Senator picks their staff and determines salary. Each Senate is allotted a budget for staffing. All staff is paid out of that budget.

Ok, that makes sense to be given a budget...

but if a Senator chose to have a staff of 10 instead a staff of 30 and pay these 10 employees the entire budget,(3 times the amount that a normal staffer would make) can the Senator do such with the budget money or would that be a "no no"? Is there a government CAP on what staffers can make?

And are all staffer positions EQUAL WORK or are some staff positions more important than other staff positions?

My question is, does this bombshell of a Report, tell us whether she had 50% men working for her or just 1 man on her staff and that one man held the highest staff position, vs all the rest of the workers who were female and held lower positions?

How can we compare EQUAL PAY FOR EQUAL WORK if we don't know what positions the males verses females held?

Certainly ALL staff positions ARE NOT the same?

They are different positions and different levels of responsibility. The study may not be completely fair because it is likely not a straight up comparison. Still....a 28% gender difference in pay???

Something isn't right.

 

[Care4all]

So making everyone equal is what you think is required? Good to know.

Who said make everyone equal? That is a leftie thing and it's impossible. People should be treated fairly and equally as human beings, but when you hire them you should have one pay scale based solely on ability and not gender or race.

Equal pay for equal ability is fair.

The left is quick to judge a company if they don't hire enough minorities or women and they seek to pretend everyone is equal when it comes to employment. That is trying to falsely elevate people. Why isn't Hillary in trouble for not following the liberal rules that companies are expected to follow?

Hillary is a liberal and she criticizes others for doing what she is doing. That makes her a hypocrite and you continue to twist words to avoid giving an opinion on Hillary.

Do you think Hillary is wrong and are you willing to address that? Or will you just play more childish games and try to take shots at the right?

Is it the Senator who determines what staffers get paid? Do you know the answer to this question?

Yes....The Senator picks their staff and determines salary. Each Senate is allotted a budget for staffing. All staff is paid out of that budget.

Ok, that makes sense to be given a budget...

but if a Senator chose to have a staff of 10 instead a staff of 30 and pay these 10 employees the entire budget,(3 times the amount that a normal staffer would make) can the Senator do such with the budget money or would that be a "no no"? Is there a government CAP on what staffers can make?

And are all staffer positions EQUAL WORK or are some staff positions more important than other staff positions?

My question is, does this bombshell of a Report, tell us whether she had 50% men working for her or just 1 man on her staff and that one man held the highest staff position, vs all the rest of the workers who were female and held lower positions?

How can we compare EQUAL PAY FOR EQUAL WORK if we don't know what positions the males verses females held?

Certainly ALL staff positions ARE NOT the same?

They are different positions and different levels of responsibility. The study may not be completely fair because it is likely not a straight up comparison. Still....a 28% gender difference in pay???

Something isn't right.

It very well could mean that she put only Men in her highest positions and left the women by the wayside...? I don't know the details....

 

[francoHFW]

WHEN will the dupes figure out the Beacon, Fox, Heritage, Examiner, etc etc etc etc are totally fos?

 

[Clementine]

Raise it. We need better cash flow at the bottom. And while the goal is equal pay for equal work the salary you demand is up to you, just like these women.

Okay, are you willing to apply that to private companies? You say raise minimum, then turn around and say it's up to employees to demand more. So, does that mean government should stay out of it?

As for Hillary, wouldn't you expect her to offer equal pay for men and women on her staff? She would bitch loudly if a private company did that and you still won't admit she is a hypocrite.

Hillary is all talk. She needs to retire her old ass.

 

[S.J.]

Imagine a young woman who seeks to become an intern at Hillary's White House, thinking she can get next to Bill, the way Monica did, only to have Hillary approach her in the ladies room and tell her she wants to lick her lips.

 

[Clementine]

It very well could mean that she put only Men in her highest positions and left the women by the wayside...? I don't know the details....

That is just as bad. They are the ones bitching about women and minorities not being in better positions and they usually don't even care about qualifications.

There are many qualified people for jobs, but Hillary favors men. But then Bill preferred women in certain 'positions.' They just didn't get paid as far as we know.

And they are guilty of passing on women for positions in favor of men. And they do it while they point fingers at others. Hypocrites.

 

[Clementine]

Imagine a young woman who seeks to become an intern at Hillary's White House, thinking she can get next to Bill, the way Monica did, only to have Hillary approach her in the ladies room and tell her she wants to lick her lips.

Eewwww!

 

[Care4all]

Raise it. We need better cash flow at the bottom. And while the goal is equal pay for equal work the salary you demand is up to you, just like these women.

Okay, are you willing to apply that to private companies? You say raise minimum, then turn around and say it's up to employees to demand more. So, does that mean government should stay out of it?

As for Hillary, wouldn't you expect her to offer equal pay for men and women on her staff? She would bitch loudly if a private company did that and you still won't admit she is a hypocrite.

Hillary is all talk. She needs to retire her old ass.

Why do you keep using the term ''equal Pay" and NOT INCLUDE for equal work? EQUAL PAY FOR EQUAL WORK....

what is you AGENDA with this?

Without knowing how many men vs women work for her and in what positions they held, the contention that hillary has not given 'equal pay for equal work' with her staff falls flat.

You do realize this don't you? That if we don't know what positions the men vs women held and don't know if they held higher responsibility positions than the female staffer we can't compare equal work for equal pay...and you can't soundly and honestly and based in truth.... take the position that you did in your op...