Let's do a little thought experiment.
Let's assume that on 9/11 2001 the terrorist attack did not occur on US soil. Let's say for the sake of argument that the planes were flown into the Petronas Towers in Kuala Lumpur by a cadre of 19 radical Christians from a fringe sect supported by massive wealth and resources who desire to destroy anything that brings wealth to Muslims and Islamic nations. In the attack over 2000 Indonesian Muslims die and it is a great national and international tragedy.
Now, 8 years later, the desire to rebuild the Petronas Towers is underway and out of the blue people realize that there are plans for a Christian Megachurch to be placed on the same location as the Petronas Towers. Of course the plan is being supported by people who don't directly support the terrorists but when you get them in private are ardent believers that what was done was the right thing. Of course in the name of tolerance, diversity and international friedship the project is okayed by the city council of Kuala Lumpur.
Should the church be built on the same site that was destroyed by Christian Radicals in the largest act of hatred towards innocent civilians in history?
Mosque supporters are encouraged to say why they believe why or why not this is right.
IMO, if we allow Catholics to build churches near schools, we should allow Muslims to build mosques near the WTC site
BTW -
they're not building on the site of the WTC and they're not building a mosque.
Once again, Sangha is either misinformed, stupid, or a liar.
A) No one is claiming they are building this on the site, only that they're building it NEAR the site, near enough that most rational people consider it to be part of the disaster area, because oh it actually was.
B) There most certainly will be a mosque inside this community center
