Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Please provide specific examples of your first sentence: "The only cover-up I see is the reality that january 6th was pretty much staged by leftist in the fbi and antifa to make the right look bad."The only cover-up I see is the reality that january 6th was pretty much staged by leftist in the fbi and antifa to make the right look bad. At the time the violence that they were doing throughout our country was seriously starting to make the left look like crap. They needed a means to blame the right for the crap storm and this is what they did to achieve such.
No...Pelosi blocked any member of congress that supported Trump...she only allowed never Trumper republicans to participate and this is why the American people have tuned out....and why Adam and Liz will be voted out of Congress...The ONLY reason why this committee is "one sided" is because McCarthy refused to participate in the investigation format that gave Republicans equal membership, co-leadership, and subpoena power when Trump told him to scuttle it. That happened AFTER the House member McCarthy charged with negotiating the framework of the investigation got EVERYTHING McCarthy asked for.
You can't refuse to participate in the investigation and then complain the investigation is "one-sided" and not looking at your concerns. But your claims that the investigation is going to "crash and burn" is whistling past the graveyard.
Republicans are already crashing and burning over their obstruction of the Committee's work. When you attempt to cover things up, people want to know what it is you're covering up.
When someone takes the 5th Amendment, law enforcement quite rightly says "What crime would be incriminating themselves over?" and they start investigations, if they weren't investigating already. Especially when the guy taking the 5th, is a senior official at the Justice Department.
Taking the 5th is admitting you committed a crime. So what crimes did Bannon, Stone, Meadows, et al commit?
Clearly your lack of understanding "detailed and concise" is not fitting your response. As for voting for wars, the last war voted was in WW II:
The last time Congress passed joint resolutions saying that a "state of war" existed was on June 5, 1942, when the U.S. declared war on Bulgaria, Hungary, and Romania.
Well he is sourcing the know-nothing hack nose pickers at Yayhoo! and NBC.BTW, how is this hypocrisy? the second link doesnt even mention the word subpoenas.
Did the people mentioned receive a congressional subpoena? Did they testify freely?
Can you explain how this is "hypocrisy?"
Horrible OP
Mea culpa. I misunderstood your post. Reading it again I understand you were correct on the funding issues. However, that said the facts are The Congress didn't vote 100% on Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan or Iraq as well as other smaller events with much lesser casualties and costs.Your post warrants none other than a quick and exact response. Clearly, congress has appropriated monies toward foreign wars several times since WW2. Do you not understand that? In essence, that is their vote. They control the money and if they appropriate money for military excursions, they give their blessing. Regardless, if its an actual vote, declaration, blah blah, blah. No, congress is worthless because they allow this and never ending spending.
Both of you idiots have nothing to write, and that is your strength.Well he is sourcing the know-nothing hack nose pickers at Yayhoo! and NBC.
Shut up faggot. I post relevant shit and present my case and you ignore it.Both of you idiots have nothing to write, and that is your strength.
I also asked for you to explain the hypocrisy and you conveniently ignore that too.Ignoring Oddball and TNHarley who seem never to be on topic, due to ignorance and/or limited intelligence. Meadows is the hypocrite, that is the link to the OP, so lets have some thoughtful responses.
Jan. 6th. was a cover up. The false flag was to distract from the fraud and the real reason people were there. Meadows, Bannon, and Trump have the right to executive privilege.
Mark Meadows sues Jan. 6 committee after panel vows contempt proceedings
Former President Donald Trump's onetime chief of staff is refusing to cooperate with the committee, reversing an earlier decision to engage.www.yahoo.com
WASHINGTON — Former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows sued the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol just hours after the panel said it plans to move forward with contempt proceedings against him.
In the lawsuit, which names members of the Jan. 6 committee and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., as defendants, Meadows asked the court to invalidate two “overly broad” and “unduly burdensome” subpoenas that he said the panel issued without legal authority.
“Congress has no freestanding power to issue subpoenas. Instead, its investigative powers are ancillary to its legislative authority,” the lawsuit says. “Because of this tie between the investigative and legislative powers, Congress may only issue subpoenas that serve a valid legislative purpose.”
Rep. Meadows Seeks Answers at Benghazi Whistleblower Hearing, Questions State Department Witnesses
May 9, 2013. Includes video! Meadows: “The false narrative put forth by the Obama Administration about a video sparking the violence is inexcusable. In the investigation that followed, political appointees were protected. Witnesses at the highest level were not interviewed by the Accountability...www.hcpress.com
May 9, 2013. Representative Mark Meadows (NC-11) sought answers today in the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform’s hearing on Benghazi. The three whistleblowers from the U.S. Department of State testifying before the Committee included Mr. Gregory Hicks, Foreign Service Officer and former Deputy Chief of Mission/Chargé d’Affairs in Libya; Mr. Mark Thompson, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Counterterrorism; and Mr. Eric Nordstrom, Diplomatic Security Officer and former Regional Security Officer in Libya.
Meadows
“The powerful testimonies of these three witnesses clarified that senior officials knew right away this was a terrorist attack, not a protest,” Meadows said. “The false narrative put forth by the Obama Administration about a video sparking the violence is inexcusable. In the investigation that followed, political appointees were protected. Witnesses at the highest level were not interviewed by the Accountability Review Board (ARB), even though that level is where the decisions were made. Meanwhile, mid-level officials were wrongly blamed.
“After today, we see that the ARB report did more editorializing than fact-finding. As I told the whistleblowers and the families of the four Americans killed, the people back home are standing with them to get the truth and will not sit down until the questions are answered. I will continue, alongside my colleagues, to pursue the truth about Benghazi until we have answers for the American people and justice for those who paid with their lives.
Mr. Meadows needs to respond to this, it appears to be a clear case of dishonesty and hypocrisy.
Do you really believe this ^^^?Jan. 6th. was a cover up. The false flag was to distract from the fraud and the real reason people were there. Meadows, Bannon, and Trump have the right to executive privilege.
Still ignoring this Rye CatcherProbably why this new bill gives them the power to enforce subpoenas by civil action.
“(a) Cause Of Action.—The United States House of Representatives, the United States Senate, or a committee or subcommittee thereof, may bring a civil action against the recipient of a subpoena issued by a congressional committee or subcommittee to enforce compliance with the subpoena.
Weird how he is correct. The constitution does not give congress the power to enforce subpoenas.
Text - H.R.5314 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Protecting Our Democracy Act
Text for H.R.5314 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Protecting Our Democracy Actwww.congress.gov
Fuck our federal government.
Jan 6th...the insurrection that wasn’t.No one is watching CNN...but I bet a detailed look at their ratings would show a huge decline when they talk about 1-6....no one cares CNN...we see it for what it is....just another tool to bring down Trump....it's not working Nancy....every swing and miss at President Trump makes him stronger....
uncoverdc.com
Whether the courts believe it is the question. Obama did it for "Fast and Furious" Holder was charged with contempt but never arrested.Do you really believe this ^^^?
When executive privilege is invoked in litigation, the court should weigh its applicability by balancing competing interests. The Constitution is silent on the executive power to withhold information from the courts or Congress; the privilege is rooted in the separation of powers doctrine that divides the power of the United States government into legislative, executive and judicial branches.
United States v. Nixon, also known as the Watergate Scandal, has established that even a President has a legal duty to provide evidence of one’s communications with his aides when the information is relevant to a criminal case. By requiring the President to turn over recordings of private conversations that he had with his aides, the Court’s decision has helped frame how to define executive privilege in judicial setting. Even before the Nixon decision, however, some courts have required the executive branch to provide governmental records and documents prepared for the President
executive privilege
www.law.cornell.edu
Pelosi must be the one that orchestrated this false flag because she is directly in charge of the capitol police...then to use her false flag to impeach a president is treasonous in the extreme....Jan 6th...the insurrection that wasn’t.
Was the Capitol Riot a False Flag?
The national conversation coming from both sides of the aisle is atrocious. Even prominent Republicans like Arkansas Gove...
Obama and Holder didn't break into the Capitol Building and chant hang VP Pence either. You and the other's who continue with this false flag crap are easily led, aka biddable fools.Whether the courts believe it is the question. Obama did it for "Fast and Furious" Holder was charged with contempt but never arrested.
Either did Bannon, Meadows, or Trump. What a dumb thing to say.Obama and Holder didn't break into the Capitol Building and chant hang VP Pence either. You and the other's who continue with this false flag crap are easily led, aka biddable fools.
I assume you're not holding your breath on that onePlease provide specific examples of your first sentence: "The only cover-up I see is the reality that january 6th was pretty much staged by leftist in the fbi and antifa to make the right look bad."
Your entire post lacks any probative evidence to support your opinion. For your own credibility you need to fill in the facts to provide any piece of evidence to make your claim.
Why is the information about how many FBI agents and how many of their informants were there being withheld?I assume you're not holding your breath on that one
