I understand that Trumps last defense against impeachment is going to be proving that there was legit corruption with the Biden/Ukraine situation. Problem is there is no evidence of laws being broken and this is a thing of the past that was out in the open. To me it is obviously a bad PR situation that Trump was looking to exploit in next years campaign.
To those who think it’s a legit concern... what exactly is left to be discovered about Hunter Biden’s board seat at Burisma?
Can somebody explain what they are looking for? Or what questions are still unanswered?
Burisma owner MZ had fled Ukraine by the time
Hunter joined the board
If Shokin was removed because he dropped the ball
on the money enrichment charges against MZ
and London unfreezed the money and it was returned to him
Why did Joe have a problem with Shokin not doing his job
but no problem with his son working for the guy
Shokin let 'get away'....does that make sense to you
Does it make sense that the VP son is working for
a Ukraine oligarch who has a slew of
criminal corruption cases pending and has fled the country
you make it sound like Hunter was hired by MZ and they would go into the office together to shoot the shit by the water cooler.
I don't know who hired Hunter directly,
but MZ was aware regardless
Furthermore, how you perceive
I'm making it sound like they go into the office together
to shoot the shit by the water cooler, is beyond me
MZ was on the run, a fugitive, on the Wanted List
and Hunter was never at Burisma his entire 'tenure'
Sweet, huh
In reality MZ owned several company’s, Burisma along with the Ukrainian gas and oil producers Aldea, Pari, Esko-Pivnich, and the First Ukrainian Petroleum Company and the investment group Brociti Investments.
Also he was a politician... the Minister of Ecology at the time he was accused of his crimes. This linkage between Hunter and MZ takes a few leaps to get there
Um, ok, what's your point
Regardless of when criminal investigations and charges started
they were still open and ongoing when Hunter joined a company,
he never physically was present, owned by an Ukraine oligarch
that was a fugitive and on Ukraine's Wanted List,
and it was because of Shokin's failure to prosecute corruption
that MZ's assets were unfrozen, returned and charges dropped
and THAT'S WHY Joe demanded Shokin be removed
and threatened to withhold money unless he was
The thing is, Shokin wasn't responsible
for the assets being unfrozen,
nor was he responsible for the charges
being reduced to tax evasion and dropped....
That was Lutsenko, the guy who took Shokin's place
after the Ukrainian Parliament amended legislation
requiring a law degree and 10 years experience to be a GP
Lutsenko had NO LAW DEGREE and no experience
yet, that's who they chose to prosecute corruption