Hunter Biden

[colfax_m]

What legitimate news media? Name it. FB and Twitter are blatantly biased

FB and Twitter aren't news media, goof. Anyone who gets their news from Facebook is not terribly sophisticated.

 

[Faun]

There is no crime. Lying is not a crime. The crime is hypocrisy. If this were Trump and Don Jr. Twitter and FB would not block this. Colfax and his ilk would believe it and defend it. That’s the crux behind my laughter.

But this story isn’t about Trump and Don Jr. because credible news sources wouldn’t publish this story in the first place. This is coming via Giuliani, Bannon and through the NY Post. Not exactly the A list of integrity.

Again NYT is not any more or less credible than the NYP and again why would the informant lie? He reported this a year ago, before Biden was the nominee. How do you explain that?

The informant said that he was pissed about the impeachment of Trump. Since he is legally blind he can’t confirm that it was actually hunter Biden who dropped off the computer. Yet he took it upon himself to read through the emails and copy the data and then give it to political actors who held it until mid October before an election, which they then leaked to the press.

It doesn’t get any more obvious than that. Are we supposed to take this crap seriously?! Haha. Can you say yes with a straight face???

He is biased but that doesn’t change the fact that emails and pictures are legit. Picture says a 1000 words.

You do recognize this as a political hit job right? Not a serious crime or wrong doing??

This is the exact purpose of the disinformation campaigns that have been spreading all over the place. You get that right?

Yes. Yet when it happened to Trump no one cared. During the election or after he won. My issue is the hypocrisy. How many times do I have to repeat that to you? Please tell. How many times must I use the word hypocrisy? Honest question.

I think if your main complaint is hypocrisy when talking politics then you are in for a lot of complaining

Hypocrisy in people like you, Faun and Colfax

Oh? What hypocrisy on my part?

There is no crime. Lying is not a crime. The crime is hypocrisy. If this were Trump and Don Jr. Twitter and FB would not block this. Colfax and his ilk would believe it and defend it. That’s the crux behind my laughter.

But this story isn’t about Trump and Don Jr. because credible news sources wouldn’t publish this story in the first place. This is coming via Giuliani, Bannon and through the NY Post. Not exactly the A list of integrity.

Again NYT is not any more or less credible than the NYP and again why would the informant lie? He reported this a year ago, before Biden was the nominee. How do you explain that?

The informant said that he was pissed about the impeachment of Trump. Since he is legally blind he can’t confirm that it was actually hunter Biden who dropped off the computer. Yet he took it upon himself to read through the emails and copy the data and then give it to political actors who held it until mid October before an election, which they then leaked to the press.

It doesn’t get any more obvious than that. Are we supposed to take this crap seriously?! Haha. Can you say yes with a straight face???

He is biased but that doesn’t change the fact that emails and pictures are legit. Picture says a 1000 words.

You do recognize this as a political hit job right? Not a serious crime or wrong doing??

This is the exact purpose of the disinformation campaigns that have been spreading all over the place. You get that right?

Yes. Yet when it happened to Trump no one cared. During the election or after he won. My issue is the hypocrisy. How many times do I have to repeat that to you? Please tell. How many times must I use the word hypocrisy? Honest question.

I think if your main complaint is hypocrisy when talking politics then you are in for a lot of complaining

Hypocrisy in people like you, Faun and Colfax

Oh? What hypocrisy on my part?

If this were Trump and Don Jr you d be lauding this.

Now you’re just making more shit up from your overactive imagination.

Try quoting me actually saying something hypocritical...

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Yet they all stated Trump was guilty. Dodgy? Are you British?

This is a baseless statement but I imagine it's so ingrained in your belief system that you'll get extremely upset if I push you on it.

The NY Times did not state that Trump was guilty. Neither did The Washington Post. They published legitimate articles the vast, vast majority of which were true. For example, they broke the story about the Trump Tower Meeting. True. They broke the story about Clinton's private server too. True.

They did not publish the dossier because it was not anywhere close to being able to be verified. That's responsible media.

Yet the dossier and the FISA was used to spy. Interesting.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

What legitimate news media? Name it. FB and Twitter are blatantly biased

FB and Twitter aren't news media, goof. Anyone who gets their news from Facebook is not terribly sophisticated.

Yet that’s what the election interference is based on. FB ads. Who is the goof? You British? Yes or
No?

 

[Slade3200]

like i said - a troll with a few options added into the base model. but you still a troll.

have a day.

What benefit have you provided to this topic?

What benefit are you providing?

Really wanna play that game, troll boy?

Posting articles talking about reasons to be skeptical of this very fishy story.

It’s an attempt at a discussion.

I ask again, hypocrite, why did you believe the same questionable data on Trump?

In Internet slang, a troll is a person who starts flame wars or intentionally upsets people on the Internetby posting inflammatory and digressive,[1]extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into displaying emotional responses[2] and normalizing tangential discussion,[3] either for the troll's amusement or a specific gain.

A trolls someone who posts stupid shit they know is stupid to get a reaction and satisfy their sick jollies.

Mostly correct. It isn’t stupid to point out the odd characteristics of this story.

Biden put a lid on his campaign and they have admitted the emails are authentic. Everyone knows that Hunter got the gig because of his dad. I dont care. I do care that hypocrites vilify Trump and turn a blind eye to Biden. Weak sauce. Just admit you’re a hypocrite.

Can you show me where they have admitted the emails are authentic?

I don’t think Hunter Biden is a good person, but Joe Biden is. I’m not turning a blind eye to him, but the Russian driven narrative of political corruption doesn’t work on me. It’s not true. And it’s not because or a blind eye, it’s because I’ve read far more about this than the average person.

The Biden campaign does not dispute the authenticity of the emails published by the New York Post, which serves to confirm that they are real....

Emails are real but not sure what that really proves. We all knew Hunter was sketchy.

Joe Biden's campaign DENIES he met Hunter's Ukrainian business partner

Ukrainian gas executive Vadym Pozharskyi thanked Hunter Biden for 'an opportunity to meet your father' in an email sent in 2015, according to a stash of emails.

www.google.com

I’m still not seeing the crime here. What’s the supposed revelation? This all sounds like repackaged old news that amounted to nothing

There is no crime. Lying is not a crime. The crime is hypocrisy. If this were Trump and Don Jr. Twitter and FB would not block this. Colfax and his ilk would believe it and defend it. That’s the crux behind my laughter.

Ok fair statement. What’s the lie exactly?

Lie is that he never met with anyone from Burisma or ever discussed Hunters business dealings. Dorsey just came out and said that Twitter fucked up in blocking the NYP site. This is going to be huge. Big tech censorship

Not only did Biden never deny meeting with anyone from Burisma, we know he did...

... so you’re lying claiming he's denied meeting employees of Burisma.

And you’re lying about him lying about discussing Burisma with others as you've already admitted you don't know what they talked about, assuming they actually met.

He is on video denying discussing business dealings of Hunter Biden.

Ok good. What evidence is now out there that shows he discussed business dealings with Hunter?

It’s a political hit job it’s not about evidence. Same as it was with Trump.

I disagree. Trumps situations involved many more legit actions and reasons to accuse and investigate. I will say that there are also many lies and hyperbole aimed at trump as well, which is wrong

Many more? Nope. Dossier paid for by opposition research. Pretty blatantly biased.

So? What does that have to do with anything?

 

[skye]

just have a look.....have a look at that pathetic loser......money for nothing should be his song!

LOSER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! like his corrupt, greedy, demented father


what a POS!

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

like i said - a troll with a few options added into the base model. but you still a troll.

have a day.

What benefit have you provided to this topic?

What benefit are you providing?

Really wanna play that game, troll boy?

Posting articles talking about reasons to be skeptical of this very fishy story.

It’s an attempt at a discussion.

I ask again, hypocrite, why did you believe the same questionable data on Trump?

In Internet slang, a troll is a person who starts flame wars or intentionally upsets people on the Internetby posting inflammatory and digressive,[1]extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into displaying emotional responses[2] and normalizing tangential discussion,[3] either for the troll's amusement or a specific gain.

A trolls someone who posts stupid shit they know is stupid to get a reaction and satisfy their sick jollies.

Mostly correct. It isn’t stupid to point out the odd characteristics of this story.

Biden put a lid on his campaign and they have admitted the emails are authentic. Everyone knows that Hunter got the gig because of his dad. I dont care. I do care that hypocrites vilify Trump and turn a blind eye to Biden. Weak sauce. Just admit you’re a hypocrite.

Can you show me where they have admitted the emails are authentic?

I don’t think Hunter Biden is a good person, but Joe Biden is. I’m not turning a blind eye to him, but the Russian driven narrative of political corruption doesn’t work on me. It’s not true. And it’s not because or a blind eye, it’s because I’ve read far more about this than the average person.

The Biden campaign does not dispute the authenticity of the emails published by the New York Post, which serves to confirm that they are real....

Emails are real but not sure what that really proves. We all knew Hunter was sketchy.

Joe Biden's campaign DENIES he met Hunter's Ukrainian business partner

Ukrainian gas executive Vadym Pozharskyi thanked Hunter Biden for 'an opportunity to meet your father' in an email sent in 2015, according to a stash of emails.

www.google.com

I’m still not seeing the crime here. What’s the supposed revelation? This all sounds like repackaged old news that amounted to nothing

There is no crime. Lying is not a crime. The crime is hypocrisy. If this were Trump and Don Jr. Twitter and FB would not block this. Colfax and his ilk would believe it and defend it. That’s the crux behind my laughter.

Ok fair statement. What’s the lie exactly?

Lie is that he never met with anyone from Burisma or ever discussed Hunters business dealings. Dorsey just came out and said that Twitter fucked up in blocking the NYP site. This is going to be huge. Big tech censorship

Not only did Biden never deny meeting with anyone from Burisma, we know he did...

... so you’re lying claiming he's denied meeting employees of Burisma.

And you’re lying about him lying about discussing Burisma with others as you've already admitted you don't know what they talked about, assuming they actually met.

He is on video denying discussing business dealings of Hunter Biden.

Ok good. What evidence is now out there that shows he discussed business dealings with Hunter?

It’s a political hit job it’s not about evidence. Same as it was with Trump.

I disagree. Trumps situations involved many more legit actions and reasons to accuse and investigate. I will say that there are also many lies and hyperbole aimed at trump as well, which is wrong

Many more? Nope. Dossier paid for by opposition research. Pretty blatantly biased.

So? What does that have to do with anything?

That the media is biased but you only care when it impacts your candidate. Stop playing coy. Unbecoming

 

[colfax_m]

Yet that’s what the election interference is based on. FB ads. Who is the goof? You British? Yes or
No?

No, the election interference goes well beyond FB ads. You can read more about the involvement in the campaign here:

https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Report_Volume2.pdf

I prefer the Lawfare podcast, last year they did a really great in depth review of the Mueller report.

Introducing “The Report”: A Podcast Series from Lawfare

For the past several weeks, a group of us has been working on a project to tell the story of the Mueller Report in an accessible form. The Mueller Report tells a heck of a story, a bunch of incredible stories, actually. But it does so in a form that’s hard for a lot of people to take in. It’s...

www.lawfareblog.com

And this doesn't even have anything to do with the topic.

 

[colfax_m]

Yet the dossier and the FISA was used to spy. Interesting.

It was, in part, to spy on one person, the existence of which was not made public until well after the election as part of a much larger counterintelligence investigation into a very real involvement of Russia in our political system.

But the point being that your complaint of the news media not being very reliable is contradicted by the fact that something like the Russia dossier was never published by them.

 

[bripat9643]

What legitimate news media? Name it. FB and Twitter are blatantly biased

FB and Twitter aren't news media, goof. Anyone who gets their news from Facebook is not terribly sophisticated.

Twitter is a more credible source than CNN, but that isn't saying much.

 

[Redcurtain]

just have a look.....have a look at that pathetic loser......money for nothing should be his song!

LOSER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! like his corrupt, greedy, demented father


what a POS!


View attachment 401734

What a loser family

 

[Slade3200]

There is no crime. Lying is not a crime. The crime is hypocrisy. If this were Trump and Don Jr. Twitter and FB would not block this. Colfax and his ilk would believe it and defend it. That’s the crux behind my laughter.

But this story isn’t about Trump and Don Jr. because credible news sources wouldn’t publish this story in the first place. This is coming via Giuliani, Bannon and through the NY Post. Not exactly the A list of integrity.

Again NYT is not any more or less credible than the NYP and again why would the informant lie? He reported this a year ago, before Biden was the nominee. How do you explain that?

The informant said that he was pissed about the impeachment of Trump. Since he is legally blind he can’t confirm that it was actually hunter Biden who dropped off the computer. Yet he took it upon himself to read through the emails and copy the data and then give it to political actors who held it until mid October before an election, which they then leaked to the press.

It doesn’t get any more obvious than that. Are we supposed to take this crap seriously?! Haha. Can you say yes with a straight face???

He is biased but that doesn’t change the fact that emails and pictures are legit. Picture says a 1000 words.

You do recognize this as a political hit job right? Not a serious crime or wrong doing??

This is the exact purpose of the disinformation campaigns that have been spreading all over the place. You get that right?

Yes. Yet when it happened to Trump no one cared. During the election or after he won. My issue is the hypocrisy. How many times do I have to repeat that to you? Please tell. How many times must I use the word hypocrisy? Honest question.

I think if your main complaint is hypocrisy when talking politics then you are in for a lot of complaining

Hypocrisy in people like you, Faun and Colfax

I really don’t care if you call me a hypocrite. I’d much rather talk about the subject at hand. So if you need to divert to make the point that I’m a hypocrite then can I just concede that argument to you now? State I’m a hypocrite. And then be done with that diversion for future conversations so we can stay on point?

 

[skye]

just have a look.....have a look at that pathetic loser......money for nothing should be his song!

LOSER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! like his corrupt, greedy, demented father


what a POS!


View attachment 401734

What a loser family

I agree! They hardly come worse than them.

 

[Slade3200]

just have a look.....have a look at that pathetic loser......money for nothing should be his song!

LOSER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! like his corrupt, greedy, demented father


what a POS!


View attachment 401734

Get a life Skye, there are much better things to talk about and much better photos to look at than bathtub photos of Hunter.

 

[Redcurtain]

just have a look.....have a look at that pathetic loser......money for nothing should be his song!

LOSER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! like his corrupt, greedy, demented father


what a POS!


View attachment 401734

Get a life Skye, there are much better things to talk about and much better photos to look at than bathtub photos of Hunter.

Bias much? You know if that don jr you would be posting it

 

[skye]

just have a look.....have a look at that pathetic loser......money for nothing should be his song!

LOSER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! like his corrupt, greedy, demented father


what a POS!


View attachment 401734

Get a life Skye, there are much better things to talk about and much better photos to look at than bathtub photos of Hunter.

oh yes, but this IS a Hunter thread.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Yet that’s what the election interference is based on. FB ads. Who is the goof? You British? Yes or
No?

No, the election interference goes well beyond FB ads. You can read more about the involvement in the campaign here:

https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Report_Volume2.pdf

I prefer the Lawfare podcast, last year they did a really great in depth review of the Mueller report.

Introducing “The Report”: A Podcast Series from Lawfare

For the past several weeks, a group of us has been working on a project to tell the story of the Mueller Report in an accessible form. The Mueller Report tells a heck of a story, a bunch of incredible stories, actually. But it does so in a form that’s hard for a lot of people to take in. It’s...

www.lawfareblog.com

And this doesn't even have anything to do with the topic.

Yes or no? Are you British?

 

[Slade3200]

like i said - a troll with a few options added into the base model. but you still a troll.

have a day.

What benefit have you provided to this topic?

What benefit are you providing?

Really wanna play that game, troll boy?

Posting articles talking about reasons to be skeptical of this very fishy story.

It’s an attempt at a discussion.

I ask again, hypocrite, why did you believe the same questionable data on Trump?

In Internet slang, a troll is a person who starts flame wars or intentionally upsets people on the Internetby posting inflammatory and digressive,[1]extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into displaying emotional responses[2] and normalizing tangential discussion,[3] either for the troll's amusement or a specific gain.

A trolls someone who posts stupid shit they know is stupid to get a reaction and satisfy their sick jollies.

Mostly correct. It isn’t stupid to point out the odd characteristics of this story.

Biden put a lid on his campaign and they have admitted the emails are authentic. Everyone knows that Hunter got the gig because of his dad. I dont care. I do care that hypocrites vilify Trump and turn a blind eye to Biden. Weak sauce. Just admit you’re a hypocrite.

Can you show me where they have admitted the emails are authentic?

I don’t think Hunter Biden is a good person, but Joe Biden is. I’m not turning a blind eye to him, but the Russian driven narrative of political corruption doesn’t work on me. It’s not true. And it’s not because or a blind eye, it’s because I’ve read far more about this than the average person.

The Biden campaign does not dispute the authenticity of the emails published by the New York Post, which serves to confirm that they are real....

Emails are real but not sure what that really proves. We all knew Hunter was sketchy.

Joe Biden's campaign DENIES he met Hunter's Ukrainian business partner

Ukrainian gas executive Vadym Pozharskyi thanked Hunter Biden for 'an opportunity to meet your father' in an email sent in 2015, according to a stash of emails.

www.google.com

I’m still not seeing the crime here. What’s the supposed revelation? This all sounds like repackaged old news that amounted to nothing

There is no crime. Lying is not a crime. The crime is hypocrisy. If this were Trump and Don Jr. Twitter and FB would not block this. Colfax and his ilk would believe it and defend it. That’s the crux behind my laughter.

Ok fair statement. What’s the lie exactly?

Lie is that he never met with anyone from Burisma or ever discussed Hunters business dealings. Dorsey just came out and said that Twitter fucked up in blocking the NYP site. This is going to be huge. Big tech censorship

Not only did Biden never deny meeting with anyone from Burisma, we know he did...

... so you’re lying claiming he's denied meeting employees of Burisma.

And you’re lying about him lying about discussing Burisma with others as you've already admitted you don't know what they talked about, assuming they actually met.

He is on video denying discussing business dealings of Hunter Biden.

Ok good. What evidence is now out there that shows he discussed business dealings with Hunter?

It’s a political hit job it’s not about evidence. Same as it was with Trump.

I disagree. Trumps situations involved many more legit actions and reasons to accuse and investigate. I will say that there are also many lies and hyperbole aimed at trump as well, which is wrong

Many more? Nope. Dossier paid for by opposition research. Pretty blatantly biased.

So? What does that have to do with anything?

That the media is biased but you only care when it impacts your candidate. Stop playing coy. Unbecoming

I haven’t said a word about media bias. This is the first I’m hearing of it so why are you claiming I care about that. I’ve assumed the media is fake and biased for years. I’ve never trusted it. I think for myself. You seem to be bouncing around topics. What’s going on with you tonight?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Yet the dossier and the FISA was used to spy. Interesting.

It was, in part, to spy on one person, the existence of which was not made public until well after the election as part of a much larger counterintelligence investigation into a very real involvement of Russia in our political system.

But the point being that your complaint of the news media not being very reliable is contradicted by the fact that something like the Russia dossier was never published by them.

But they vilified Trump as guilty and you know it’s true

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

There is no crime. Lying is not a crime. The crime is hypocrisy. If this were Trump and Don Jr. Twitter and FB would not block this. Colfax and his ilk would believe it and defend it. That’s the crux behind my laughter.

But this story isn’t about Trump and Don Jr. because credible news sources wouldn’t publish this story in the first place. This is coming via Giuliani, Bannon and through the NY Post. Not exactly the A list of integrity.

Again NYT is not any more or less credible than the NYP and again why would the informant lie? He reported this a year ago, before Biden was the nominee. How do you explain that?

The informant said that he was pissed about the impeachment of Trump. Since he is legally blind he can’t confirm that it was actually hunter Biden who dropped off the computer. Yet he took it upon himself to read through the emails and copy the data and then give it to political actors who held it until mid October before an election, which they then leaked to the press.

It doesn’t get any more obvious than that. Are we supposed to take this crap seriously?! Haha. Can you say yes with a straight face???

He is biased but that doesn’t change the fact that emails and pictures are legit. Picture says a 1000 words.

You do recognize this as a political hit job right? Not a serious crime or wrong doing??

This is the exact purpose of the disinformation campaigns that have been spreading all over the place. You get that right?

Yes. Yet when it happened to Trump no one cared. During the election or after he won. My issue is the hypocrisy. How many times do I have to repeat that to you? Please tell. How many times must I use the word hypocrisy? Honest question.

I think if your main complaint is hypocrisy when talking politics then you are in for a lot of complaining

Hypocrisy in people like you, Faun and Colfax

I really don’t care if you call me a hypocrite. I’d much rather talk about the subject at hand. So if you need to divert to make the point that I’m a hypocrite then can I just concede that argument to you now? State I’m a hypocrite. And then be done with that diversion for future conversations so we can stay on point?

You are and so is our media and so are FB and Twitter. That’s the problem