Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Robotics is progressing rapidly and there are some that are getting fairly close to matching human maneuverability. Once we have that, what would be the purpose of sending humans into space especially for missions such as exploring the surface of Mars?Many studies have shown that space travel is not good for Humans beings. We are Earth bound creatures not born to travel into the zero gravity of space. All the money being spent on space travel, could be best spent on Earth. We still have world hunger and many problems here on Earth. Lets stop all this Mars rover missions, and spaceEX launches now.!!
The only means of propulsion we have now is chemical energy and that ain't gonna get us very far.
The only means of propulsion we have now is chemical energy and that ain't gonna get us very far.
NASA has bought the VASIMIR plasma propulsion engine in order to reach Mars in less than 40 days. Can they build a space craft to do it? Can it bring the astronauts back? Will it have a radiation shield?
NASA’S New VASIMR PLASMA ENGINE could reach MARS in less than 40 days - Newfoxy
ETA: Remember I told you about it years ago Fort Fun Indiana?
The only means of propulsion we have now is chemical energy and that ain't gonna get us very far.
NASA has bought the VASIMIR plasma propulsion engine in order to reach Mars in less than 40 days. Can they build a space craft to do it? Can it bring the astronauts back? Will it have a radiation shield?
NASA’S New VASIMR PLASMA ENGINE could reach MARS in less than 40 days - Newfoxy
ETA: Remember I told you about it years ago Fort Fun Indiana?
Why? Thats not the only alternative to them dominating us. Your logic is childlike. As in, not good.Why don't you explain how they dominate us?
Of course i can. Anyone with even an intermediate grasp of evolution can. And only someone who knows less than nothing about evolution would say evolution does not explain it (hint: that's you).I doubt you can explain how evolution explains good bacteria
This is a science thread in the science section. Please go pollute the religion section with your magical incantations, shaman.And science backs up the Bible exactly.
By what standard? That's horrible... Can you imagine a chemistry textbook with 70% accuracy? Haha...we would beUmmm, right now modern archaeology is giving the Bible a 70% accuracy rate. Still pretty good.
Of course i can. Anyone with even an intermediate grasp of evolution can. And only someone who knows less than nothing about evolution would say evolution does not explain it (hint: that's you).I doubt you can explain how evolution explains good bacteria
considering evolution has a 0% rating its pretty goodBy what standard? That's horrible...Ummm, right now modern archaeology is giving the Bible a 70% accuracy rate. Still pretty good.
By what standard? That's horrible...Ummm, right now modern archaeology is giving the Bible a 70% accuracy rate. Still pretty good.
No. I remember reading about it for myself, though.ETA: Remember I told you about it years ago Fort Fun Indiana?
considering evolution has a 0% rating its pretty goodBy what standard? That's horrible...Ummm, right now modern archaeology is giving the Bible a 70% accuracy rate. Still pretty good.
not that i've seen,,,,considering evolution has a 0% rating its pretty goodBy what standard? That's horrible...Ummm, right now modern archaeology is giving the Bible a 70% accuracy rate. Still pretty good.
Not zero. Evolutionary theory has loads of observed data to support it.
Haha, that's silly. Even the most illetarate goat herder can tell you what town he is in.By the standard that it is a very old book, and it was written by primitive people who had no idea of how to write a proper history book.
not that i've seen,,,,considering evolution has a 0% rating its pretty goodBy what standard? That's horrible...Ummm, right now modern archaeology is giving the Bible a 70% accuracy rate. Still pretty good.
Not zero. Evolutionary theory has loads of observed data to support it.
Haha, that's silly. Even the most illetarate goat herder can tell you what town he is in.By the standard that it is a very old book, and it was written by primitive people who had no idea of how to write a proper history book.
And there were history texts written contemporary with the bible that dont suffer from the same amount of errors. That is because the bible is chock full of myths. Obviously.
This is the science section, not the conspiracy theory section.Far better than the climatologists have been able to muster
But not a kernel of magic.However, any historian will also tell you that pretty much all myths have a kernel of fact at their origin.
I have to see it first to ignore it,,,not that i've seen,,,,considering evolution has a 0% rating its pretty goodBy what standard? That's horrible...Ummm, right now modern archaeology is giving the Bible a 70% accuracy rate. Still pretty good.
Not zero. Evolutionary theory has loads of observed data to support it.
That is because you choose to ignore it.
