HUGE: House Speaker McCarthy Handed Over 41,000 Hours of Jan 6 Video to Tucker Carlson

[Skylar]

Last time someone posted proof of mismatched signatures, only they were from 2016.

Just like when they posted more votes than registered voters by citing a town in a different state. A state that allows same day registration.

Or they were just wrong. They cited the registered voters in a town, and mistook it for the registered voters in an entire county.

Having dealt with Birthers, Truthers and Flat Earthers, they just make shit up...and ignore their failures. Even when using the EXACT same process of making shit up for their newest claims.

You can't use evidence to convince people who were convinced without evidence.

 

[Lastamender]

Says you, citing 'future evidence'.

You make the same mistake over and over: you make up your conspiracy without evidence. And then try (and fail) to back your claims after.

It is not future evidence. The envelopes and signatures are there. A judge did not allow Lake's campaign look at them. I wonder why?

 

[Lastamender]

They already did.

Next......

Maricopa did, not Lake.

 

[Lastamender]

Or they were just wrong. They cited the registered voters in a town, and mistook it for the registered voters in an entire county.

Having dealt with Birthers, Truthers and Flat Earthers, they just make shit up...and ignore their failures. Even when using the EXACT same process of making shit up for their newest claims.

You can't use evidence to convince people who were convinced without evidence.

You can't hide the evidence and then say there is none. Fail.

 

[Skylar]

It is not future evidence. The envelopes and signatures are there. A judge did not allow that. I wonder why?

Sure it is. Take your 'mismatched signatures', for example. You keep citing them as proof the election was stolen.

But you don't have mismatched signatures in the 2022 election. You have the PROMISE of mismatched signatures in the future, if we only do what you demand. You can't factually establish even ONE fraudulent ballot.

And you need at least 17,000 of them. And likely, orders of magnitude more of than that.

You're literally offering us your imagination and hope as evidence. You're citing a fantasy, not evidence.

You do this all the time. You make up a fantasy conspiracy. And then demand we 'prove you wrong', despite the fact that you've never proven yourself right, nor have evidence to back your claim.

Laughing....how's the working out for you, tinfoil?

 

[meaner gene]

It is not future evidence. The envelopes and signatures are there. A judge did not allow Lake's campaign look at them. I wonder why?

Such requests need a legitimate purpose, proof that errors were made, not a fishing expedition.

 

[Lastamender]

Sure it is. Take your 'mismatched signatures', for example. You keep citing them as proof the election was stolen.

But you don't have mismatched signatures in the 2022 election. You have the PROMISE of mismatched signatures in the future, if we only do what you demand. You can't factually establish even ONE fraudulent ballot.

And you need at least 17,000 of them. And likely, orders of magnitude more of than that.

You're literally offering us your imagination and hope as evidence. You're citing a fantasy, not evidence.

You do this all the time. You make up a fantasy conspiracy. And then demand we 'prove you wrong', despite the fact that you've never proven yourself right, nor have evidence to back your claim.

Laughing....how's the working out for you, tinfoil?

Again, just the machine errors are enough to throw out the election. It had 0 integrity.

 

[Lastamender]

Such requests need a legitimate purpose, proof that errors were made, not a fishing expedition.

But you cannot do that if there is no transparency. If there was no fraud what is the fucking problem?

 

[meaner gene]

Again, just the machine errors are enough to throw out the election. It had 0 integrity.

Wrong. Elections do not get thrown out lightly. As the judges in Pennsylvania said, they didn't present enough evidence to throw out a single vote, and certainly not to overturn an election.

 

[Skylar]

Again, just the machine errors are enough to throw out the election. It had 0 integrity.

Laughing....so you have no 'mismatched signatures' from 2022, but promise us them in the future if we only 'prove your conspiracy wrong'.

And when faced with this, you change the topic to 'machine errors'.

Thank you for proving my point, tinfoil. Your 'future evidence' is just your hopes and dreams.

 

[meaner gene]

But you cannot do that if there is no transparency. If there was no fraud what is the fucking problem?

Money, time, manpower.

It's a waste of all three.

 

[Lastamender]

Laughing....so you have no 'mismatched signatures' from 2022, but promise us them in the future if we only 'prove your conspiracy wrong'.

And when faced with this, you change the topic to 'machine errors'.

Thank you for proving my point, tinfoil. Your 'future evidence' is just your hopes and dreams.

Did the machine errors happen? Do mismatched signatures get counted? They did in 2020.

 

[meaner gene]

Did the machine errors happen? Do mismatched signatures get counted? They did in 2020.

As Meryll Lynch says. Past performance is no indicator of future performance.

 

[Delldude]

Why has McCarthy not released the 40,000 hours to the public?

He clearly has the power. Why won't he?

J6 had the power for well over a year, why was it they fought tooth and nail to keep them from the public?

McCarthy hasn't released anything....He hasn't even acknowledged what the left has been wigging out about.

 

[Skylar]

Did the machine errors happen? Do mismatched signatures get counted? They did in 2020.

Did you just switch topics when faced with your promises of future 'mismatched signatures' to 'machine errors'?

Say 'yes' and I'll happily discuss the machine errors with you.

 

[Delldude]

As Meryll Lynch says. Past performance is no indicator of future performance.

What she said......

 

[meaner gene]

This is the "future evidence" position.

That evidence from 2020, to provide the basis for evidence in 2022. When there is no evidence from 2022.

 

[Skylar]

J6 had the power for well over a year, why was it they fought tooth and nail to keep them from the public?

McCarthy hasn't released anything....He hasn't even acknowledged what the left has been wigging out about.

Why won't McCarthy release the videos to the public?

You keep trying to avoid the question. But its not going away.

 

[Lastamender]

Money, time, manpower.

It's a waste of all three.

Letting people flaunt and abuse their power is the waste of time. These assholes are criminals. The fact is that election was run like shit. There are so many solid reasons to question the results. Sweeping it under the rug just means elections will never be trusted until we get answers. And it will change America into a dictatorship before you know it.

Putz.

 

[Skylar]

Letting people flaunt and abuse their power is the waste of time. These assholes are criminals. The fact is that election was run like shit. There are so many solid reasons to question the results. Sweeping it under the rug just means elections will never be trusted until we get answers. And it will change America into a dictatorship before you know it.

Putz.

What abuse of power?

Again, you start with the conspiracy......and then demand we 'disprove' whatever you make up. Its like watching a dog chase its own tail.

You need to prove yourself right....with more than imaginary promises of 'future evidence'.