Huffington Post: Eric Holder Must Go
- Thread starter tooAlive
- Start date
Lakhota
Diamond Member
Boy are you lost..
The HuffPo link has been posted and reposed half a dozen times and you're still complaining.
Even Lakhota has agreed with us!
No, Lakhota doesn't agree. I think you "lied" in your title.
Obamanation
Silver Member
- Sep 6, 2012
- 1,856
- 251
- 98
Boy are you lost..
The HuffPo link has been posted and reposed half a dozen times and you're still complaining.
Even Lakhota has agreed with us!
No, Lakhota doesn't agree. I think you "lied" in your title.
You said Holder was just like ZERO! ...and that you didn't like Holder! lol
CaféAuLait
This Space for Rent
Boy are you lost..
The HuffPo link has been posted and reposed half a dozen times and you're still complaining.
Even Lakhota has agreed with us!
No, Lakhota doesn't agree. I think you "lied" in your title.
If you go to the Huffpost home page you will see a headline about Sherriff Joe, it says " 'SHERIFF JOE' SLAPPED DOWN" click on that headline and it takes you to a differently titled article, called "Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio Racially Profiled Latinos, Federal Judge Rules" one that links to a Reuters article.
Earlier today that title was TIME TO GO HOLDER OKAY'D PRESS PROBE! and when you clicked the headline it took you to a different titled article just like the Sherrif Joe headline does now.
The OP contains the screen grab.
Lakhota
Diamond Member
CaféAuLait;7285464 said:Boy are you lost..
The HuffPo link has been posted and reposed half a dozen times and you're still complaining.
Even Lakhota has agreed with us!
No, Lakhota doesn't agree. I think you "lied" in your title.
If you go to the Huffpost home page you will see a headline about Sherriff Joe, it says " 'SHERIFF JOE' SLAPPED DOWN" click on that headline and it takes you to a differently titled article, called "Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio Racially Profiled Latinos, Federal Judge Rules" one that links to a Reuters article.
Earlier today that title was TIME TO GO HOLDER OKAY'D PRESS PROBE! and when you clicked the headline it took you to a different titled article just like the Sherrif Joe headline does now.
The OP contains the screen grab.
Duh, I get it - but who said "Eric Holder MUST Go"?
tooAlive
Silver Member
- Thread starter
- #46
God Bless them. I really think they still don't get it.
Lets see if you can understand now, for the last time. Because I'm not posting it again.
You know how HuffPo regularly changes through a big image and headline on their homepage? Well this is what it was this morning:
That picture linked to this article:
Eric Holder Vetted Search Warrant For James Rosen Emails, DOJ Confirms
It's different now because they change it every few hours.
And here's an article on the Washington Examiner that is talking about HuffPos earlier headline.
Huffington Post: Time for Eric Holder to go | WashingtonExaminer.com
Do you guys get it now?
[MENTION=32338]francoHFW[/MENTION] [MENTION=31132]Lakhota[/MENTION]
Lets see if you can understand now, for the last time. Because I'm not posting it again.
You know how HuffPo regularly changes through a big image and headline on their homepage? Well this is what it was this morning:
That picture linked to this article:
Eric Holder Vetted Search Warrant For James Rosen Emails, DOJ Confirms
It's different now because they change it every few hours.
And here's an article on the Washington Examiner that is talking about HuffPos earlier headline.
Huffington Post: Time for Eric Holder to go | WashingtonExaminer.com
Do you guys get it now?
[MENTION=32338]francoHFW[/MENTION] [MENTION=31132]Lakhota[/MENTION]
Last edited:
asterism
Congress != Progress
"Take down Obama?" Um, he won the election and the Senate is Democrat. Even if he personally ordered Chris Stevens' murder his impeachment would not result in a conviction.
But you personify the problem and that's why your criticism rings hollow. This mess is what you voted for so this mess is on you. It'd be one thing if things were better now than they were in 2008, but they aren't. When a plane is in a nosedive and a new pilot is put in to stop the downward spiral, he isn't considered successful if the reason the downward motion stopped is because it hit the ground.
That's illustrative hyperbole, but the point is valid. NONE of the progressives were promising extended high unemployment, the housing market still in the shitter 5 years later, and escalating terrorist activity. The current situation of our country is very bad, and your people were supposed to prevent that. Your vision failed.
I don't know if McCain would have been any better but I don't think he would have appointed Holder and tasked him to act as he has. I'm not sure if Romney would have us in full recovery now he certainly wouldn't have started 2013 by rehashing old ideas about just needing more government involvement in the economy to fix the economy. And he wouldn't have "fired" an interim IRS commissioner already on the way out and claimed it as some sort of solution.
Government bureaucrats were emboldened by this Administration and the results are more stifling of the free market and "gimme what's mine" by the drones. Even the group tasked with keeping government excesses to a minimum spent money like drunken sailors, except drunken sailors don't get to have penthouse suites on the taxpayers' dime.
Your version of government just sucks, plain and simple. So go ahead and say that you don't like Holder while supporting the guy that appointed him, supports him, and tasks him. We'll just say that you don't give a shit about this stuff because you don't.
jon_berzerk
Platinum Member
- Mar 5, 2013
- 31,401
- 7,370
- 1,130
God Bless them. I really think they still don't get it.
Lets see if you can understand now, for the last time. Because I'm not posting it again.
You know how HuffPo regularly changes through a big image and headline on their homepage? Well this is what it was this morning:
That picture linked to this article:
Eric Holder Vetted Search Warrant For James Rosen Emails, DOJ Confirms
It's different now because they change it every few hours.
And here's an article on the Washington Examiner that is talking about HuffPos earlier headline.
Huffington Post: Time for Eric Holder to go | WashingtonExaminer.com
Do you guys get it now?
it is quite apparent that holder has been lying to congress
but that was just a matter of time
now it is appropriate to establish an independent investigation
into the various matters
Lakhota
Diamond Member
The HuffPo screenshot said "Time to go" - not "Eric Holder MUST Go"...
jon_berzerk
Platinum Member
- Mar 5, 2013
- 31,401
- 7,370
- 1,130
Obamanation
Silver Member
- Sep 6, 2012
- 1,856
- 251
- 98
ZERO has a tee time --- TIME TO GO!!!!
Lakhota
Diamond Member
I just think honesty is important.
tooAlive
Silver Member
- Thread starter
- #54
BTW, if [MENTION=32338]francoHFW[/MENTION] still believes this is RW-Pub propaganda, tomorrow when the HuffPo web archives are ready, I'm gonna post the cached version of the HufPo site with the Holder "Time to Go" homepage.
Internet Archive Wayback Machine
Internet Archive Wayback Machine
Last edited:
CaféAuLait
This Space for Rent
Do you think they were suggesting it was "time to go potty"?
If the headline read:
TIME TO GO: NIXON OKAY'd WATERGATE!
What would you derive from that?
asterism
Congress != Progress
Do you really think the President first heard of the IRS issue from the news reports a couple of weeks ago?
Lakhota
Diamond Member
Absolutely!!!!! What do you think Obama is?
Obamanation
Silver Member
- Sep 6, 2012
- 1,856
- 251
- 98
No way can you type that with a straight face and still support this Admin!!!
NO WAY!!!
Lakhota
Diamond Member
Darkwind
Diamond Member
- Jun 18, 2009
- 41,886
- 30,398
- 3,615
Similar threads
New Topics
-
If we can bomb iran and remove its leader from the gene pool
- Started by Hurricanelover
- Replies: 0
-
-
Russia Remade Its Economy for War, but It’s Come at a Huge Cost - The New York Times- Started by peacefan
- Replies: 0
-
Latest Discussions
-
-
If we can bomb iran and remove its leader from the gene pool
- Latest: Hurricanelover
