Huckabee-Sanders kicked out of restaurant because of views

According to demographics the main drinkers of Bud Light are 21-34 males and politics don’t matter, however Obama chose Bud Light for his famous Beer Summit.
Young men voted for Trump by a 16 point margin.

When you say “politics don’t matter”, that’s not based on any real data, is it?
Also lattes are also not connected to liberals or conservatives so you are just stereotyping people based on your bigotry, nothing else. You are a stereotypical liberal who thinks they know everything and you don’t. Your ignorance is showing.
Lattes were, but the reference is becoming a little dated reference as they’ve become more mainstream.

I wouldn’t be caught dead at a Starbucks or national coffee chain. Does that code liberal to you?
 
Young men voted for Trump by a 16 point margin.

When you say “politics don’t matter”, that’s not based on any real data, is it?

Lattes were, but the reference is becoming a little dated reference as they’ve become more mainstream.

I wouldn’t be caught dead at a Starbucks or national coffee chain. Does that code liberal to you?
I’m not the idiot that said liberal women drink lattes and that Bud Light buyers were conservative men. Those are ridiculous stereotypes.


Young men voted for Trump by a 16 point margin.

When you say “politics don’t matter”, that’s not based on any real data, is it?

Lattes were, but the reference is becoming a little dated reference as they’ve become more mainstream.

I wouldn’t be caught dead at a Starbucks or national coffee chain. Does that code liberal to you?
This data is older but it is a hell of a lot more data than your bigoted opinion.
 
I’m not the idiot that said liberal women drink lattes and that Bud Light buyers were conservative men. Those are ridiculous stereotypes.
They’re stereotypes, but hardly ridiculous.
This data is older but it is a hell of a lot more data than your bigoted opinion.
Thanks, good info, but highly out of date.

Maybe this:
In a survey from earlier this year, DataQuencher polled 1,500 U.S. adults as a way to get an idea for self-reported party affiliation and drinking habits. High-level results showed what others have in the past: those who identify as conservative drink more macro beer than those who see themselves as liberal (81% to 65% purchase rate) and craft is favored among liberals (59% to 39% purchase rate). In the month leading up to the survey, 42% of conservatives said they bought a craft beer compared to 57% of liberals

 
They’re stereotypes, but hardly ridiculous.

Thanks, good info, but highly out of date.

Maybe this:
In a survey from earlier this year, DataQuencher polled 1,500 U.S. adults as a way to get an idea for self-reported party affiliation and drinking habits. High-level results showed what others have in the past: those who identify as conservative drink more macro beer than those who see themselves as liberal (81% to 65% purchase rate) and craft is favored among liberals (59% to 39% purchase rate). In the month leading up to the survey, 42% of conservatives said they bought a craft beer compared to 57% of liberals

And nothing about Bud Light.

I get it, you have to disparage the other side to feel better about yourself.

Are you still of the belief that black Americans like chicken and watermelon?

If you want to stereotype type, liberals are more emotional in their decisions, which in my mind is not true, but that seems to be a stereotype.
 
And nothing about Bud Light.

I get it, you have to disparage the other side to feel better about yourself.

Are you still of the belief that black Americans like chicken and watermelon?

If you want to stereotype type, liberals are more emotional in their decisions, which in my mind is not true, but that seems to be a stereotype.
The article distinguished between macro beer and craft beer. Macro beer inclusive of Bud Light.

Are liberals more emotional? Trump is currently waging a war in Iran until his bones tell him to stop. That’s pretty emotional.

Obama was widely attacked for being professorial. Liberals have long been attacked for being ivory tower academics.

Emotions run high on both sides. Politicians on both sides appeal to emotion. I don’t see a distinction here.

Data does show that liberals suffer more from anxiety, depression. That’s not disparaging anyone. It is what it is.
 
Cry a ******* river. Jesus.

You're the one whining about MacDonald's poisoning everybody when everybody has the choice not to eat there. You're also whining because I disagree with you on certain points.
You can find outliers in any population but I stand by what I said.

If you’re looking for the best food, the highest culinary art, it’s probably going to come from a liberal in a liberal community.

Even if true, it means nothing. The well dressed CEO of a startup at the next table in Chez Marener may be plotting to kill his wife. It. Means. Nothing.

You say it's not about character but for me, character is paramount in any endeavor. Real character is defined by one's actions, not where they eat or what religion they are or what political party they are affiliated with. It's why I have no use for pretentions of religion, social classes, choice of wines or when a political party professes to be the sole arbiters of virtue.
In general, conservatives do not value new experiences, art or innovation/experimentation.

All you're doing is proving my point. You're making character judgments based on food choices for Christ's sake. And all this because a conservative governor was asked to leave a restaurant which has absolutely nothing to do with which political party eats where.
I’ve not seen anything you or anyone else posting that attempts to make a persuasive case otherwise.

You're assuming, of course, that your attempts are persuasive. They are, but not in the way you think.

Your posts in this discussion persuade me to see that you are a conceited, arrogant and pompous ass.

If it was a simple matter of preferring fine foods, I'd simply say, Knock yourself out. I don't give a shit that some prefer the finer things in life. But you have made a point of making it about politics and about conservatives being unsophisticated and uncultured.
 
You're the one whining about MacDonald's poisoning everybody when everybody has the choice not to eat there. You're also whining because I disagree with you on certain points
Struth was trolling me, so I was trolling back, reflecting MAHA rhetoric about processed foods "poisoning" America while failing to deal with the contrast between Trump and right wing support of placed like McDonalds.
Even if true, it means nothing. The well dressed CEO of a startup at the next table in Chez Marener may be plotting to kill his wife. It. Means. Nothing.

You say it's not about character but for me, character is paramount in any endeavor. Real character is defined by one's actions, not where they eat or what religion they are or what political party they are affiliated with. It's why I have no use for pretentions of religion, social classes, choice of wines or when a political party professes to be the sole arbiters of virtue.
Who or what are you arguing against? I wasn't impugning character. You seem to be easily offended.
All you're doing is proving my point. You're making character judgments based on food choices for Christ's sake. And all this because a conservative governor was asked to leave a restaurant which has absolutely nothing to do with which political party eats where.
You're all caught up in being offended. This has nothing to do with good character.
You're assuming, of course, that your attempts are persuasive. They are, but not in the way you think.

Your posts in this discussion persuade me to see that you are a conceited, arrogant and pompous ass.

If it was a simple matter of preferring fine foods, I'd simply say, Knock yourself out. I don't give a shit that some prefer the finer things in life. But you have made a point of making it about politics and about conservatives being unsophisticated and uncultured.
Just personal experience and anecdotal data summarized to make an opinion.

Conservatives spend a lot of time attacking art. Sorry that makes them seem unsophisticated and uncultured. That's not my fault.
 
Struth was trolling me, so I was trolling back, reflecting MAHA rhetoric about processed foods "poisoning" America while failing to deal with the contrast between Trump and right wing support of placed like McDonalds.

Who or what are you arguing against? I wasn't impugning character. You seem to be easily offended.

You're all caught up in being offended. This has nothing to do with good character.

Just personal experience and anecdotal data summarized to make an opinion.

Conservatives spend a lot of time attacking art. Sorry that makes them seem unsophisticated and uncultured. That's not my fault.
Hardly was trolling you, you brought up your issues

Was just engaged in convo about it

It’s obvious, Columbia was still 100 percent about you
 
It all started when toobfreak said in Post #3, : "Can you imagine if MAGA had refused to serve Biden or Obumma and thrown one of them out?"

To which candycorn quipped: "There are no MAGA restaurants anyone wants to eat at."

Then you jumped in with a response to a post by mudwhistle where you said: "Like McDonald's". And then to Struth you said: "That’s the restaurant (MacDonald's) that’s killing people by serving heavily processed toxic food and costing this country trillions in healthcare costs and lost work. Isn’t it?

Later, to Struth: "MAGA restaurants are out there poisoning people and you think it’s funny. Why do you want Americans to suffer? Again to Struth: "I’ll eat the good food served in the high quality non-MAGA restaurants instead."

More: "You’re defending drug dealers (MAGA chain restaurants) who are killing Americans. Why?"

"I hate to break it to you, but conservatives are not known for their culinary skills. They’re afraid of trying new things, don’t like other cultures, and don’t respect art and creativity."

"Art is not valued by conservatives."

"Conservatives are generally avoidant of new experiences."

"I don’t have to do anything, especially when it comes to trying convince Trump worshiping cultists of something they don’t want to agree to."

"Conservatism doesn’t value multiculturalism, it doesn’t value new experiences."


You say you it has nothing to do with individual character and that you're not judging someone’s worth but that is exactly what you've been doing and you've been doing it since your first post in this discussion. You've been denigrating conservatives for their alleged lack of sophistication and culture since you joined the discussion and even went as far as claiming chain (MAGA) restaurants are poisoning and killing people.

This has been about MAGA and individual character for you the whole time. Everyone knows you think less of them as moral beings. It so consumes you that you assumed (incorrectly) that I'm a MAGA cultist simply because I challenged your claims about food. That is not critical thinking and suggests that your individual character is lacking objectivity.

Moroner is a complete and total ******* idiot, better to put it on ignore and not waste your time reading its drivel. Moroner thought it was just fine for Biden to shower with his daughter and tried to defend it, that's how much of an out of touch whacko that idiot is. It lives in its own little bubble of 'reality' and couldn't understand anything else but leftism, even if you paid it to try.
 
How to tell a poster has been repeatedly taken to school and back by Marener ^^

:auiqs.jpg:

I've had moroner on ignore as soon as it defended Bidumb showering with his prepubescent daughter right after it joined the board. Someone that defends a pedophile is not worth my time in any way. Neither are you, but you at least bring me amusement. :dunno:
 
15th post
How do you prove it’s because of skin color? If the person is wearing propaganda that offends the owner chef and happens to be a minority, you can’t prove that the person was removed for skin color. You can try but it will be difficult…. Especially if there are other minority patrons not being thrown out.
It's not easy but it is possible. In a civil suit, you only have to show it's more likely than not.

You'd use witness testimony, statements they've made, patterns of behavior.

Hell, a lot of time the racists and bigots just come out and say it .
 
:auiqs.jpg:

I've had moroner on ignore as soon as it defended Bidumb showering with his prepubescent daughter right after it joined the board. Someone that defends a pedophile is not worth my time in any way. Neither are you, but you at least bring me amusement. :dunno:
While that was sick, you are missing out on comedy gold on this thread

He’s apparently very unhealthy and can’t control him and been blaming McDonalds the entire thread

He thinks the only way he can be healthy again is if the govt bans McDonalds cause it’s poison
 
While that was sick, you are missing out on comedy gold on this thread

He’s apparently very unhealthy and can’t control him and been blaming McDonalds the entire thread

He thinks the only way he can be healthy again is if the govt bans McDonalds cause it’s poison

Thanks but no thanks, lunatics aren't worth 'debating' with, I have zero desire to read any of its comments, it just sucks your time away from more important things. If I find myself doing a 'scroll by', where I see the name and never read what they have to say because it's so stupid or repetitive every time I read it, then I just put them on ignore, makes life easier. lol
 
Back
Top Bottom