Bob, the Constitution isn't a suicide pact.That's a major point of the way our country was set up, and our Constitution written, was to protect certain essential human rights from the tyranny of the majority.
Unless they take the necessary steps to amend the Constitution, it doesn't mean shit if 99% of the people want to take guns away from the remaining 1%. To do so is illegal, and unconstitutional, and anyone who attempts it is a subhuman criminal piece of shit, that fully deserved to be treated as such.
Nor would they need to amend the constitution. Just get SCOTUS to overturn Heller, the 2nd is about Militias as it was for most of our history.
Again, you may not have committed any crimes personally, but it is blatantly obvious that you have the mind and the soul of a dangerous, violent, hardcore criminal, are on the side of criminals against the side of human beings, and that your fantasies revolve around a government of criminals, by criminals, for criminals.
Again, Bob's world.... anyone who doesn't subscribe to his crazy Mormon viewpoint is a "criminal".
It is certainly very obvious why you want law-abiding human beings to be stripped of the ability to defend themselves against your kind. You are an excellent example of why this right needs to be upheld and protected.
Uh, no, guy, we have 21,000 gun murders a year, most of them "law-abiding" citizens who just had a bad day.
On the other hand, we only have about 200 or so gun homicides that are ruled as "justified" by civilians.
YOu leave out the part about a well-regulated militia.Right. That's why it speaks of “the right of the people (not any militia)”, and forbids, in the strongest language, any infringement of that right.
Meaning that not all arms are available to the people.
WHich is why I can't own a howitzer that shoots weaponized anthrax shells.
When the Founding Slave Rapists said, The People, they only meant white, land-owning males, not the rabble.