How Simple Is It To Hide The Truth....?

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Oct 6, 2008
126,753
62,573
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
Amazingly simple, when huge swaths of voters are trained to look at the truth and simply ignore it.
This is the result of Leftists control of the media and the education industry.
Sadly.

But.....holding up the fabrication and the truth together.....one can only hope that truth wills out.
Today.....the cage match between Dalton Trumbo and Joseph McCarthy.




1. There are dozens of Leftist propaganda lies that are purveyed by the Liberals, and Progressives....and, often, it is astoundingly simple to shred them.

Yet, all too often....their Janissaries, acolytes, Lock-Step cadres simply nod their empty heads and mutter "duh...yup,yup....."
...and accept the lies.
They wail "is not.....isss noottttttt!" and off they go.


One of the simplest fabrications to dismember is the slander and contumely heaped on the true American hero, Senator Joseph McCarthy.

The basis of the hatred is that he exposed the manufacturer of Liberal collectivism....Joseph Stalin, via his control of the Roosevelt administration.


This is the typical theme: "Senator Joseph McCarthy, the most prominent Communist-hunter of the period, was a reckless alcoholic demagogue. Unknown numbers of innocents had their lives ruined...."
McCarthyism & Red Scare

The unintended humor is the word 'unknown,' because there are no known "innocents whose lives were ruined..."



I said it was an easy lie to shred: When the vituperation begins.....all one has to do is ask the parrots to name one single innocent...meaning non-communist or supporter of Stalin, - whose life was "ruined" by Senator McCarthy.
When the debate is joined, I ask that very question.....and there has never been one such individual to be found.


Yet....the lie persists.



2. Recently, Leftist Hollywood attempted to raise Dalton Trumbo from the infamous, and hold him up as some hero of free speech and victim of 'the Hollywood Blacklist.'
They gave the lead actor, Bryan Cranston 'Best Actor' at the Academy Awards, proving that Hollywood is the either the home of Leftist propaganda and deserves its own award as "the Abode of Abject Stupidity."


Perhaps we can regain Senator McCarthy's reputation by turning the tables.....
Here's the plan: if Dalton Trumbo is a hero....then Joseph McCarthy is a villain.
But.....if Trumbo is a villain.......guess what?




3. The accolades for Trumbo suggests that this nation's elites see the American public as ignorant, easily led, drones.....and, unfortunately, the last presidential election seems to be proof of same.

"Hollywood relishes making anti-American movies, but maybe even more, loves to lavish fulsome tributes on full-blown Communists, those fellows who swooned at Joe Stalin’s feet, teamed up with Hitler as he bombed the hell out of London at the beginning of World War II and worked overtime to inflict deadly harm on America.


[In 1997, at] the Samuel Goldwyn Theater in Beverly Hills, ... Hollywood was honoring several long-time Stalinists, including Hollywood Ten celebrity Ring Lardner Jr. and the former head of the Communist Party in Hollywood, Paul Jarrico. They received First Amendment awards, no less, for refusing to tell the House Un-American Activities Committee whether they were conspiring with the Kremlin leader to impose a Soviet-style government in America.

Tinseltown is at it again, insisting that Dalton Trumbo, a major Hollywood Ten figure and longtime Stalin enthusiast, must, first and foremost, be honored as a courageous champion of our constitutional liberties." http://media.glennbeck.com/blaze/mag/august2015theblazemag.pdf


Hollywood, Leftist central.....and Dalton Trumbo is their champion.
 
The left doesn't control the media.
You know, NYCarbinated, you just made her point.......

Playbook.jpg
 
4. Standing truth and reality on its head, the Hollywood hagiography goes like this:

" ....that Dalton [Trumbo] bravely took a “stand against the Communist witch-hunt at the height of the Cold War” and was “punished for his principled stand for free speech and the Constitution.” (Yes, we all know how Communists worldwide have revealed their deep commitment to the freedoms we enjoy in America.).... homage to this iconic figure on the Left."
http://media.glennbeck.com/blaze/mag/august2015theblazemag.pdf

More:
a. ".... was jailed for valiantly refusing to tell HUAC in those famous 1947 hearings whether he was a Red, claiming the First Amendment shielded him from being required to answer “political” questions. He was cited for contempt, served 11 months in jail and spent a lot of dark days on the blacklist, meaning he couldn’t openly work for the studios because he refused to tell a congressional committee whether or not he was a party member."
Ibid.


5. Ready for the parts that have been left out of the Left's tributes to this Stalinist?
I'm gonna show that:
a. He was far from a principled patriot standing up for free speech.
b. His 'blacklisting' was far from the penalty it implies.....that he couldn't work or earn a living. He did both.



So....if the Hollywood Leftist description of Trumbo is correct,,,,then Senator Joseph McCarthy is a villain.
If I can show that Trumbo was the very antithesis of praises heaped on him.....well, you get the point.


Hold on tight.
 
4. Standing truth and reality on its head, the Hollywood hagiography goes like this:

" ....that Dalton [Trumbo] bravely took a “stand against the Communist witch-hunt at the height of the Cold War” and was “punished for his principled stand for free speech and the Constitution.” (Yes, we all know how Communists worldwide have revealed their deep commitment to the freedoms we enjoy in America.).... homage to this iconic figure on the Left."
http://media.glennbeck.com/blaze/mag/august2015theblazemag.pdf

More:
a. ".... was jailed for valiantly refusing to tell HUAC in those famous 1947 hearings whether he was a Red, claiming the First Amendment shielded him from being required to answer “political” questions. He was cited for contempt, served 11 months in jail and spent a lot of dark days on the blacklist, meaning he couldn’t openly work for the studios because he refused to tell a congressional committee whether or not he was a party member."
Ibid.


5. Ready for the parts that have been left out of the Left's tributes to this Stalinist?
I'm gonna show that:
a. He was far from a principled patriot standing up for free speech.
b. His 'blacklisting' was far from the penalty it implies.....that he couldn't work or earn a living. He did both.



So....if the Hollywood Leftist description of Trumbo is correct,,,,then Senator Joseph McCarthy is a villain.
If I can show that Trumbo was the very antithesis of praises heaped on him.....well, you get the point.


Hold on tight.

She's hijacking her own thread.
Amazingly simple, when huge swaths of voters are trained to look at the truth and simply ignore it.
This is the result of Leftists control of the media and the education industry.
Sadly.

But.....holding up the fabrication and the truth together.....one can only hope that truth wills out.
Today.....the cage match between Dalton Trumbo and Joseph McCarthy.




1. There are dozens of Leftist propaganda lies that are purveyed by the Liberals, and Progressives....and, often, it is astoundingly simple to shred them.

Yet, all too often....their Janissaries, acolytes, Lock-Step cadres simply nod their empty heads and mutter "duh...yup,yup....."
...and accept the lies.
They wail "is not.....isss noottttttt!" and off they go.


One of the simplest fabrications to dismember is the slander and contumely heaped on the true American hero, Senator Joseph McCarthy.

The basis of the hatred is that he exposed the manufacturer of Liberal collectivism....Joseph Stalin, via his control of the Roosevelt administration.


This is the typical theme: "Senator Joseph McCarthy, the most prominent Communist-hunter of the period, was a reckless alcoholic demagogue. Unknown numbers of innocents had their lives ruined...."
McCarthyism & Red Scare

The unintended humor is the word 'unknown,' because there are no known "innocents whose lives were ruined..."



I said it was an easy lie to shred: When the vituperation begins.....all one has to do is ask the parrots to name one single innocent...meaning non-communist or supporter of Stalin, - whose life was "ruined" by Senator McCarthy.
When the debate is joined, I ask that very question.....and there has never been one such individual to be found.


Yet....the lie persists.



2. Recently, Leftist Hollywood attempted to raise Dalton Trumbo from the infamous, and hold him up as some hero of free speech and victim of 'the Hollywood Blacklist.'
They gave the lead actor, Bryan Cranston 'Best Actor' at the Academy Awards, proving that Hollywood is the either the home of Leftist propaganda and deserves its own award as "the Abode of Abject Stupidity."


Perhaps we can regain Senator McCarthy's reputation by turning the tables.....
Here's the plan: if Dalton Trumbo is a hero....then Joseph McCarthy is a villain.
But.....if Trumbo is a villain.......guess what?




3. The accolades for Trumbo suggests that this nation's elites see the American public as ignorant, easily led, drones.....and, unfortunately, the last presidential election seems to be proof of same.

"Hollywood relishes making anti-American movies, but maybe even more, loves to lavish fulsome tributes on full-blown Communists, those fellows who swooned at Joe Stalin’s feet, teamed up with Hitler as he bombed the hell out of London at the beginning of World War II and worked overtime to inflict deadly harm on America.


[In 1997, at] the Samuel Goldwyn Theater in Beverly Hills, ... Hollywood was honoring several long-time Stalinists, including Hollywood Ten celebrity Ring Lardner Jr. and the former head of the Communist Party in Hollywood, Paul Jarrico. They received First Amendment awards, no less, for refusing to tell the House Un-American Activities Committee whether they were conspiring with the Kremlin leader to impose a Soviet-style government in America.

Tinseltown is at it again, insisting that Dalton Trumbo, a major Hollywood Ten figure and longtime Stalin enthusiast, must, first and foremost, be honored as a courageous champion of our constitutional liberties." http://media.glennbeck.com/blaze/mag/august2015theblazemag.pdf


Hollywood, Leftist central.....and Dalton Trumbo is their champion.

Is Glen Beck your intellectual superior?
 
The left doesn't control the media.

1) In 2008 85% of media donated money to Democrats!
1,160 (85%) of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters

And then the MSM responded to Romney with these BIASED stories.
2) 130,213 stories can't be swept under the rug that show that the Democrat Bias is very evident!
Study of 130,213 stories shows Obama bias in 2012 election BY PAUL BEDARD | MARCH 16, 2015 | 10:49 AM
A sweeping study of some 130,213 news articles on the 2012 presidential match between President Obama and Mitt Romney has proven anew
that there was a strong pro-Democratic bias in the U.S. and international press.
The study, published in the authoritative journal Big Data Society, also tested the campaign themes the media focused on and determined that Obama succeeded in stealing the economic issue from Republican Romney.
"Overall, media reporting contained more frequently positive statements about the Democrats than the Republicans.
Overall, the Republicans were more frequently the object of negative statements," wrote the study authors, Their conclusion:
"The Republican Party is the most divisive subject in the campaign, and is portrayed in a more negative fashion than the Democrats."
Paul Bedard, the Washington Examiner's "Washington Secrets" columnist, can be contacted at [email protected].
Smooch: Study of 130,213 stories shows Obama bias in 2012 election
 
4. Standing truth and reality on its head, the Hollywood hagiography goes like this:

" ....that Dalton [Trumbo] bravely took a “stand against the Communist witch-hunt at the height of the Cold War” and was “punished for his principled stand for free speech and the Constitution.” (Yes, we all know how Communists worldwide have revealed their deep commitment to the freedoms we enjoy in America.).... homage to this iconic figure on the Left."
http://media.glennbeck.com/blaze/mag/august2015theblazemag.pdf

More:
a. ".... was jailed for valiantly refusing to tell HUAC in those famous 1947 hearings whether he was a Red, claiming the First Amendment shielded him from being required to answer “political” questions. He was cited for contempt, served 11 months in jail and spent a lot of dark days on the blacklist, meaning he couldn’t openly work for the studios because he refused to tell a congressional committee whether or not he was a party member."
Ibid.


5. Ready for the parts that have been left out of the Left's tributes to this Stalinist?
I'm gonna show that:
a. He was far from a principled patriot standing up for free speech.
b. His 'blacklisting' was far from the penalty it implies.....that he couldn't work or earn a living. He did both.



So....if the Hollywood Leftist description of Trumbo is correct,,,,then Senator Joseph McCarthy is a villain.
If I can show that Trumbo was the very antithesis of praises heaped on him.....well, you get the point.


Hold on tight.

She's hijacking her own thread.
Amazingly simple, when huge swaths of voters are trained to look at the truth and simply ignore it.
This is the result of Leftists control of the media and the education industry.
Sadly.

But.....holding up the fabrication and the truth together.....one can only hope that truth wills out.
Today.....the cage match between Dalton Trumbo and Joseph McCarthy.




1. There are dozens of Leftist propaganda lies that are purveyed by the Liberals, and Progressives....and, often, it is astoundingly simple to shred them.

Yet, all too often....their Janissaries, acolytes, Lock-Step cadres simply nod their empty heads and mutter "duh...yup,yup....."
...and accept the lies.
They wail "is not.....isss noottttttt!" and off they go.


One of the simplest fabrications to dismember is the slander and contumely heaped on the true American hero, Senator Joseph McCarthy.

The basis of the hatred is that he exposed the manufacturer of Liberal collectivism....Joseph Stalin, via his control of the Roosevelt administration.


This is the typical theme: "Senator Joseph McCarthy, the most prominent Communist-hunter of the period, was a reckless alcoholic demagogue. Unknown numbers of innocents had their lives ruined...."
McCarthyism & Red Scare

The unintended humor is the word 'unknown,' because there are no known "innocents whose lives were ruined..."



I said it was an easy lie to shred: When the vituperation begins.....all one has to do is ask the parrots to name one single innocent...meaning non-communist or supporter of Stalin, - whose life was "ruined" by Senator McCarthy.
When the debate is joined, I ask that very question.....and there has never been one such individual to be found.


Yet....the lie persists.



2. Recently, Leftist Hollywood attempted to raise Dalton Trumbo from the infamous, and hold him up as some hero of free speech and victim of 'the Hollywood Blacklist.'
They gave the lead actor, Bryan Cranston 'Best Actor' at the Academy Awards, proving that Hollywood is the either the home of Leftist propaganda and deserves its own award as "the Abode of Abject Stupidity."


Perhaps we can regain Senator McCarthy's reputation by turning the tables.....
Here's the plan: if Dalton Trumbo is a hero....then Joseph McCarthy is a villain.
But.....if Trumbo is a villain.......guess what?




3. The accolades for Trumbo suggests that this nation's elites see the American public as ignorant, easily led, drones.....and, unfortunately, the last presidential election seems to be proof of same.

"Hollywood relishes making anti-American movies, but maybe even more, loves to lavish fulsome tributes on full-blown Communists, those fellows who swooned at Joe Stalin’s feet, teamed up with Hitler as he bombed the hell out of London at the beginning of World War II and worked overtime to inflict deadly harm on America.


[In 1997, at] the Samuel Goldwyn Theater in Beverly Hills, ... Hollywood was honoring several long-time Stalinists, including Hollywood Ten celebrity Ring Lardner Jr. and the former head of the Communist Party in Hollywood, Paul Jarrico. They received First Amendment awards, no less, for refusing to tell the House Un-American Activities Committee whether they were conspiring with the Kremlin leader to impose a Soviet-style government in America.

Tinseltown is at it again, insisting that Dalton Trumbo, a major Hollywood Ten figure and longtime Stalin enthusiast, must, first and foremost, be honored as a courageous champion of our constitutional liberties." http://media.glennbeck.com/blaze/mag/august2015theblazemag.pdf


Hollywood, Leftist central.....and Dalton Trumbo is their champion.

Is Glen Beck your intellectual superior?
Is the Vagina Candidate(who was totally clueless about her husband cheating) your intellectual superior? The same Vagina Candidate who used a private server to send out TOP SECRET messages that were intercepted by China? The same Vagina Candidate that allowed Ambassador Stevens and 3 other Americans to die at the hands of Al Qaeda, even after 300 appeals for more security? When you know how a liberal thinks, you understand why people like the Obamaphone lady vote for Obama.

democrats_head-up-ass.jpg
 
The left doesn't control the media.

1) In 2008 85% of media donated money to Democrats!
1,160 (85%) of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters

And then the MSM responded to Romney with these BIASED stories.
2) 130,213 stories can't be swept under the rug that show that the Democrat Bias is very evident!
Study of 130,213 stories shows Obama bias in 2012 election BY PAUL BEDARD | MARCH 16, 2015 | 10:49 AM
A sweeping study of some 130,213 news articles on the 2012 presidential match between President Obama and Mitt Romney has proven anew
that there was a strong pro-Democratic bias in the U.S. and international press.
The study, published in the authoritative journal Big Data Society, also tested the campaign themes the media focused on and determined that Obama succeeded in stealing the economic issue from Republican Romney.
"Overall, media reporting contained more frequently positive statements about the Democrats than the Republicans.
Overall, the Republicans were more frequently the object of negative statements," wrote the study authors, Their conclusion:
"The Republican Party is the most divisive subject in the campaign, and is portrayed in a more negative fashion than the Democrats."
Paul Bedard, the Washington Examiner's "Washington Secrets" columnist, can be contacted at [email protected].
Smooch: Study of 130,213 stories shows Obama bias in 2012 election

If you were right, and you're not,

1. whose fault is it that liberals control the media?

2. what does that control consist of, and how would one political philosophy obtain that control over another?

3. where is the illegality in liberals 'controlling' the media, as you claim?
 
The left doesn't control the media.

1) In 2008 85% of media donated money to Democrats!
1,160 (85%) of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters

And then the MSM responded to Romney with these BIASED stories.
2) 130,213 stories can't be swept under the rug that show that the Democrat Bias is very evident!
Study of 130,213 stories shows Obama bias in 2012 election BY PAUL BEDARD | MARCH 16, 2015 | 10:49 AM
A sweeping study of some 130,213 news articles on the 2012 presidential match between President Obama and Mitt Romney has proven anew
that there was a strong pro-Democratic bias in the U.S. and international press.
The study, published in the authoritative journal Big Data Society, also tested the campaign themes the media focused on and determined that Obama succeeded in stealing the economic issue from Republican Romney.
"Overall, media reporting contained more frequently positive statements about the Democrats than the Republicans.
Overall, the Republicans were more frequently the object of negative statements," wrote the study authors, Their conclusion:
"The Republican Party is the most divisive subject in the campaign, and is portrayed in a more negative fashion than the Democrats."
Paul Bedard, the Washington Examiner's "Washington Secrets" columnist, can be contacted at [email protected].
Smooch: Study of 130,213 stories shows Obama bias in 2012 election
Did you just notice how NYCarbinated just ignored your FACTS? I repeat myself, by posting picture once again.

Playbook.jpg
 
liberals control the media ... just another poor excuse to cover up how totally inept the right really is.
 
The left doesn't control the media.

1) In 2008 85% of media donated money to Democrats!
1,160 (85%) of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters

And then the MSM responded to Romney with these BIASED stories.
2) 130,213 stories can't be swept under the rug that show that the Democrat Bias is very evident!
Study of 130,213 stories shows Obama bias in 2012 election BY PAUL BEDARD | MARCH 16, 2015 | 10:49 AM
A sweeping study of some 130,213 news articles on the 2012 presidential match between President Obama and Mitt Romney has proven anew
that there was a strong pro-Democratic bias in the U.S. and international press.
The study, published in the authoritative journal Big Data Society, also tested the campaign themes the media focused on and determined that Obama succeeded in stealing the economic issue from Republican Romney.
"Overall, media reporting contained more frequently positive statements about the Democrats than the Republicans.
Overall, the Republicans were more frequently the object of negative statements," wrote the study authors, Their conclusion:
"The Republican Party is the most divisive subject in the campaign, and is portrayed in a more negative fashion than the Democrats."
Paul Bedard, the Washington Examiner's "Washington Secrets" columnist, can be contacted at [email protected].
Smooch: Study of 130,213 stories shows Obama bias in 2012 election
Did you just notice how NYCarbinated just ignored your FACTS? I repeat myself, by posting picture once again.

View attachment 66630

His facts don't prove anything.

Let's start here:

Who controls AM radio?
 
liberals control the media ... just another poor excuse to cover up how totally inept the right really is.


For your education:

  1. The radicals of the sixties did not remain within the universities…They realized that the apocalypse never materialized. “…they were dropping off into environmentalism and consumerism and fatalism…I watched many of my old comrades apply to graduate school in universities they had failed to burn down, so they could get advanced degrees and spread the ideas that had been discredited in the streets under an academic cover.” Collier and Horowitz, “Destructive Generation: Second Thoughts About The Sixties,” p. 294-295.
  2. The radicals were not likely to go into business or the conventional practice of the professions. They were part of the chattering class, talkers interested in policy, politics, culture. They went into politics, print and electronic journalism, church bureaucracies, foundation staffs, Hollywood careers, public interest organizations, anywhere attitudes and opinions could be influenced. And they are exerting influence.” Robert H. Bork, “Slouching Toward Gomorrah,” p. 51
  3. “[The radicals] did not go away or change their minds; the New Left shattered into a multitude of single-issue groups. We now have, to name a few, radical feminists, black extremists, animal rights groups, radical environmentalists, activist homosexual organizations, multiculturalists, organizations such as People for the American Way, the American Civil Liberties Union, the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL), the National Organization for Women (NOW), and Planned Parenthood.” Ibid p. 53
 
liberals control the media ... just another poor excuse to cover up how totally inept the right really is.


For your education:

  1. The radicals of the sixties did not remain within the universities…They realized that the apocalypse never materialized. “…they were dropping off into environmentalism and consumerism and fatalism…I watched many of my old comrades apply to graduate school in universities they had failed to burn down, so they could get advanced degrees and spread the ideas that had been discredited in the streets under an academic cover.” Collier and Horowitz, “Destructive Generation: Second Thoughts About The Sixties,” p. 294-295.
  2. The radicals were not likely to go into business or the conventional practice of the professions. They were part of the chattering class, talkers interested in policy, politics, culture. They went into politics, print and electronic journalism, church bureaucracies, foundation staffs, Hollywood careers, public interest organizations, anywhere attitudes and opinions could be influenced. And they are exerting influence.” Robert H. Bork, “Slouching Toward Gomorrah,” p. 51
  3. “[The radicals] did not go away or change their minds; the New Left shattered into a multitude of single-issue groups. We now have, to name a few, radical feminists, black extremists, animal rights groups, radical environmentalists, activist homosexual organizations, multiculturalists, organizations such as People for the American Way, the American Civil Liberties Union, the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL), the National Organization for Women (NOW), and Planned Parenthood.” Ibid p. 53


for your information, I don't give a crap.
 
liberals control the media ... just another poor excuse to cover up how totally inept the right really is.


For your education:

  1. The radicals of the sixties did not remain within the universities…They realized that the apocalypse never materialized. “…they were dropping off into environmentalism and consumerism and fatalism…I watched many of my old comrades apply to graduate school in universities they had failed to burn down, so they could get advanced degrees and spread the ideas that had been discredited in the streets under an academic cover.” Collier and Horowitz, “Destructive Generation: Second Thoughts About The Sixties,” p. 294-295.
  2. The radicals were not likely to go into business or the conventional practice of the professions. They were part of the chattering class, talkers interested in policy, politics, culture. They went into politics, print and electronic journalism, church bureaucracies, foundation staffs, Hollywood careers, public interest organizations, anywhere attitudes and opinions could be influenced. And they are exerting influence.” Robert H. Bork, “Slouching Toward Gomorrah,” p. 51
  3. “[The radicals] did not go away or change their minds; the New Left shattered into a multitude of single-issue groups. We now have, to name a few, radical feminists, black extremists, animal rights groups, radical environmentalists, activist homosexual organizations, multiculturalists, organizations such as People for the American Way, the American Civil Liberties Union, the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL), the National Organization for Women (NOW), and Planned Parenthood.” Ibid p. 53
Is this Glenn Beck regurgitating Ann Coulter?
 

Forum List

Back
Top