Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Government estimates suggest there may be 77,000 empty or underutilized buildings across the country. Taxpayers own them, and even vacant, they're expensive. The Office of Management and Budget says these buildings could be costing taxpayers $1.7 billion a year.
Of course you people want to tar it down. lol
1.7 billion? Let's know when it starts to cost us real money.
The article refers to:
Government's Empty Buildings Are Costing Taxpayers Billions
by LAURA SULLIVAN, March 12, 2014
From the article:
Government estimates suggest there may be 77,000 empty or underutilized buildings across the country. Taxpayers own them, and even vacant, they're expensive. The Office of Management and Budget says these buildings could be costing taxpayers $1.7 billion a year.
Read more @ Government's Empty Buildings Are Costing Taxpayers Billions : NPR and ask yourself, why? Why doesn't the government raze or sell of these sites? What's the reason for continuing to use taxpayer money for them when they are vacant?
1.7 billion? Let's know when it starts to cost us real money.
The article refers to:
Government's Empty Buildings Are Costing Taxpayers Billions
by LAURA SULLIVAN, March 12, 2014
From the article:
Government estimates suggest there may be 77,000 empty or underutilized buildings across the country. Taxpayers own them, and even vacant, they're expensive. The Office of Management and Budget says these buildings could be costing taxpayers $1.7 billion a year.
Read more @ Government's Empty Buildings Are Costing Taxpayers Billions : NPR and ask yourself, why? Why doesn't the government raze or sell of these sites? What's the reason for continuing to use taxpayer money for them when they are vacant?
Look on the bright side.
There are no liberals inside, spending our money and trying to restrict us.
1.7 billion? Let's know when it starts to cost us real money.
The article refers to:
Government's Empty Buildings Are Costing Taxpayers Billions
by LAURA SULLIVAN, March 12, 2014
From the article:
Government estimates suggest there may be 77,000 empty or underutilized buildings across the country. Taxpayers own them, and even vacant, they're expensive. The Office of Management and Budget says these buildings could be costing taxpayers $1.7 billion a year.
Read more @ Government's Empty Buildings Are Costing Taxpayers Billions : NPR and ask yourself, why? Why doesn't the government raze or sell of these sites? What's the reason for continuing to use taxpayer money for them when they are vacant?
1.7 billion? Let's know when it starts to cost us real money.
The article refers to:
Government's Empty Buildings Are Costing Taxpayers Billions
by LAURA SULLIVAN, March 12, 2014
From the article:
Read more @ Government's Empty Buildings Are Costing Taxpayers Billions : NPR and ask yourself, why? Why doesn't the government raze or sell of these sites? What's the reason for continuing to use taxpayer money for them when they are vacant?
at $50.00 a coat, 1.7 Billion will buy 34 million winter coats for children.
So what you refer to as a "nothing" can be used to ensure 34 million underprivileged children are warm.
Why do you hate poor children?
Funny thing, we can afford the coats as well. Heck, China might even cut us a deal? Do we have 34 million kids without coats? I sure hope not.1.7 billion? Let's know when it starts to cost us real money.
The article refers to:
Government's Empty Buildings Are Costing Taxpayers Billions
by LAURA SULLIVAN, March 12, 2014
From the article:
Read more @ Government's Empty Buildings Are Costing Taxpayers Billions : NPR and ask yourself, why? Why doesn't the government raze or sell of these sites? What's the reason for continuing to use taxpayer money for them when they are vacant?
at $50.00 a coat, 1.7 Billion will buy 34 million winter coats for children.
So what you refer to as a "nothing" can be used to ensure 34 million underprivileged children are warm.
Why do you hate poor children?
Ouch...1.7 billion? Let's know when it starts to cost us real money.
at $50.00 a coat, 1.7 Billion will buy 34 million winter coats for children.
So what you refer to as a "nothing" can be used to ensure 34 million underprivileged children are warm.
Why do you hate poor children?
If we wanted to buy 34 million coats for children we could do it
I just don't think Conservatives would let us
1.7 billion? Let's know when it starts to cost us real money.
at $50.00 a coat, 1.7 Billion will buy 34 million winter coats for children.
So what you refer to as a "nothing" can be used to ensure 34 million underprivileged children are warm.
Why do you hate poor children?
If we wanted to buy 34 million coats for children we could do it
I just don't think Conservatives would let us
1.7 billion? Let's know when it starts to cost us real money.
at $50.00 a coat, 1.7 Billion will buy 34 million winter coats for children.
So what you refer to as a "nothing" can be used to ensure 34 million underprivileged children are warm.
Why do you hate poor children?
If we wanted to buy 34 million coats for children we could do it
I just don't think Conservatives would let us
In a Federal Budget as big as ours, it's a rounding error. That's not to say you couldn't do some very nice things with it. It would buy a lot of sides of bacon at the Waffle House.at $50.00 a coat, 1.7 Billion will buy 34 million winter coats for children.
So what you refer to as a "nothing" can be used to ensure 34 million underprivileged children are warm.
Why do you hate poor children?
If we wanted to buy 34 million coats for children we could do it
I just don't think Conservatives would let us
Diversion...typical shit from you........
The point is that $1.7 trillion was "excused" by the idiot as a nominal number..
SO I pointed out what can be done with it.
The Government also owns one third of the land in the US
In Federal Budget as big as ours, it's a rounding error. That's not to say you couldn't do some very nice things with it. It would buy a lot of sides of bacon at the Waffle House.If we wanted to buy 34 million coats for children we could do it
I just don't think Conservatives would let us
Diversion...typical shit from you........
The point is that $1.7 trillion was "excused" by the idiot as a nominal number..
SO I pointed out what can be done with it.
In a Federal Budget as big as ours, it's a rounding error. That's not to say you couldn't do some very nice things with it. It would buy a lot of sides of bacon at the Waffle House.If we wanted to buy 34 million coats for children we could do it
I just don't think Conservatives would let us
Diversion...typical shit from you........
The point is that $1.7 trillion was "excused" by the idiot as a nominal number..
SO I pointed out what can be done with it.
1.7 billion? Let's know when it starts to cost us real money.
at $50.00 a coat, 1.7 Billion will buy 34 million winter coats for children.
So what you refer to as a "nothing" can be used to ensure 34 million underprivileged children are warm.
Why do you hate poor children?
If we wanted to buy 34 million coats for children we could do it
I just don't think Conservatives would let us
