Mushroom
Gold Member
Biden goes on and on about white supremacists in the military yet it appears that the real poblem may be criminal blacks in the military....this case may just be the tip of the iceberg.3 soldiers committed a crime...Tone of your postsWhat makes you think I am obsessed with it?No. Nor statistics on any other ideologies. Why the obsession with African Americans in the military?Have you seen any statistics on white supremacists in the u.s. military at any time?I don't know where you get your information from but I have seen no statistics on "white supremacists" in WW2.I do not really need it...I was just curious....I was doing some research on WWII and came across the surprising data that only 800 American Blacks had been killed in that war compared to over 400 thousand White Supremacists......so I began to think about the stats for WWI. A much smaller war....where only 50 thousand White Supremacists were killed....yet surprisingly around 2 to 3 thousand American blacks had been killed...which was considerably more than killed in WWII a much bigger war....turns out they were under French command....and that could explain that....the French command structure was severely lacking.I'm still in the dark about your reason for the information. Can you shed more light on the reason that you need this information?Why does it matter?you missed the post where I said I was opening it up to all comments since no one could post a statistic showing how many blacks died in WWIThe big picture is that extremism should not be part of out military.You need to understand the big picture...............Bishop Garrison: Biden’s Racist Tool for a Military Purge - FrontpagemagI am well aware of all of that but I am not referring specifically to the stolen valor act.a book that has the photographs of every soldier killed in WWI?Yet....there are available statistics regarding the number of Black deaths in WWIIAmerican black soldiers were used for support and logistics during WWi
They mainly were used as manual labor, such as unloading cargo off ships, building projects, and driving supply trucks. Only a tiny number, if any, were assigned to combat units. ...
There were 2 divisions that were totally black. They lost 1,647 and 3,547 men in combat, respectively.
And the men serving in manual labor jobs, such as unloading cargo off ships, building projects, and driving supply trucks were still in the US Army and still serving in the war.
Were they serving under French command?
Yes. Like many multinational military units, the command was given to one nation. The men were still serving in the US Army.
What do you mean by the term multinational military units?
In this case, the French were in desperate need of men. The US sent members of the US Army to give them relief. But the overall area was under French command.
From the article Coyote posted and I posted:
"The situation was desperate in France, and with exhausted and dwindling armies, the French begged the United States for men. GEN John Pershing, commander of the American Expeditionary Force, promised them four American regiments."
From what I am seeing posted on here it appears the only deaths of Black American Soldiers were those under French command.....interesting but not the topic or an answer to my question.....but as it stands it appears there were more American Black Soldiers killed in WWI than in WWII.
In WWII there were approx. 800 American Black Soldiers killed.....why are the stats available for WWII but not for WWI?
The number of American Black soldiers killed in WWI must be out there somewhere???
It is not just "Black Soldiers". There were also Latino and Asian soldiers. The military was simply not obsessed about "Racial Demographics" yet. Nobody was.
You also had American blacks who died when fighting with the Communists in Spain, nobody tracked those either. And the same in the Spanish-American War, or the Indian Wars. This obsession with how many of what race died is a rather recent thing.
Perhaps WWI is just not that significant to the statisticians.
Well, tell you what then, bubba.
I already gave you a reference to a book that has the photographs of every soldier killed in WWI. Or you can go to the VA Archives and sift through hundreds of thousands of records yourself and compile the data that way.
Why don't you do it? Or have the UL, NAACP, BLM, or some other organization go to the cost and time to figure this out?
Myself, I find it rather lazy and silly that you are screaming that it has not been done yet. Well, if this is so important to you, do it yourself. All the records are public information, I gave you a link to a book that had lots of them, just not put in the format you want. Not my problem, if it is that important to you, do the research yourself.
And yes, I might have a curiosity as to how many American Indians died in that war. But ultimately, it is not that important to me. Because I do not classify levels of sacrifice by the color of somebodies skin.
That must be one big book....do you know how many millions died in WWI?
The total number of military and civilian casualties in World War I, was around 40 million. There were 20 million deaths and 21 million wounded. The total number of deaths includes 9.7 million military personnel and about 10 million civilians.
It appears that of all that approx 2 thousand black soldiers were also killed.
Also....approx a little over 50,000 white American soldiers were killed.
I have no idea how many of them were white supremacists.....maybe joe could tell you.
United States military casualties of war - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Also....one other thing comes to mind here......the term 'stolen valor'.....I really hate to mention it....but if you add up the total number of whites killed in all of our wars and then add up the total number of blacks killed in all our wars.....whilst keeping in mind the current attitude in the biden's regime's attitude towards White Soldiers then that term 'stolen valour' jumps up screaming in my mind.
a book that has the photographs of every soldier killed in WWI?Yet....there are available statistics regarding the number of Black deaths in WWIIAmerican black soldiers were used for support and logistics during WWi
They mainly were used as manual labor, such as unloading cargo off ships, building projects, and driving supply trucks. Only a tiny number, if any, were assigned to combat units. ...
There were 2 divisions that were totally black. They lost 1,647 and 3,547 men in combat, respectively.
And the men serving in manual labor jobs, such as unloading cargo off ships, building projects, and driving supply trucks were still in the US Army and still serving in the war.
Were they serving under French command?
Yes. Like many multinational military units, the command was given to one nation. The men were still serving in the US Army.
What do you mean by the term multinational military units?
In this case, the French were in desperate need of men. The US sent members of the US Army to give them relief. But the overall area was under French command.
From the article Coyote posted and I posted:
"The situation was desperate in France, and with exhausted and dwindling armies, the French begged the United States for men. GEN John Pershing, commander of the American Expeditionary Force, promised them four American regiments."
From what I am seeing posted on here it appears the only deaths of Black American Soldiers were those under French command.....interesting but not the topic or an answer to my question.....but as it stands it appears there were more American Black Soldiers killed in WWI than in WWII.
In WWII there were approx. 800 American Black Soldiers killed.....why are the stats available for WWII but not for WWI?
The number of American Black soldiers killed in WWI must be out there somewhere???
It is not just "Black Soldiers". There were also Latino and Asian soldiers. The military was simply not obsessed about "Racial Demographics" yet. Nobody was.
You also had American blacks who died when fighting with the Communists in Spain, nobody tracked those either. And the same in the Spanish-American War, or the Indian Wars. This obsession with how many of what race died is a rather recent thing.
Perhaps WWI is just not that significant to the statisticians.
Well, tell you what then, bubba.
I already gave you a reference to a book that has the photographs of every soldier killed in WWI. Or you can go to the VA Archives and sift through hundreds of thousands of records yourself and compile the data that way.
Why don't you do it? Or have the UL, NAACP, BLM, or some other organization go to the cost and time to figure this out?
Myself, I find it rather lazy and silly that you are screaming that it has not been done yet. Well, if this is so important to you, do it yourself. All the records are public information, I gave you a link to a book that had lots of them, just not put in the format you want. Not my problem, if it is that important to you, do the research yourself.
And yes, I might have a curiosity as to how many American Indians died in that war. But ultimately, it is not that important to me. Because I do not classify levels of sacrifice by the color of somebodies skin.
That must be one big book....do you know how many millions died in WWI?
The total number of military and civilian casualties in World War I, was around 40 million. There were 20 million deaths and 21 million wounded. The total number of deaths includes 9.7 million military personnel and about 10 million civilians.
It appears that of all that approx 2 thousand black soldiers were also killed.
Also....approx a little over 50,000 white American soldiers were killed.
I have no idea how many of them were white supremacists.....maybe joe could tell you.
United States military casualties of war - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Also....one other thing comes to mind here......the term 'stolen valor'.....I really hate to mention it....but if you add up the total number of whites killed in all of our wars and then add up the total number of blacks killed in all our wars.....whilst keeping in mind the current attitude in the biden's regime's attitude towards White Soldiers then that term 'stolen valour' jumps up screaming in my mind.
Stolen Valor is about people claiming to have served when they did not. It has nothing to do with the number of dead.
In WWI there were around 50,000 US casualties from the war itself. Another 63,000 died from other causes, most notably from the Spanish Flu epidemic.
If there were significantly fewer black soldiers killed in WWI it can be traced to two facts.
#1 - Blacks were not allowed in the US Marine Corp in WWI, and only served in labor or service positions in the US Navy.
#2 - Blacks were mostly used in labor and service in the US Army as well. Most never saw combat.
Stolen Valor is about people claiming to have served when they did not. It has nothing to do with the number of dead.
In WWI there were around 50,000 US casualties from the war itself. Another 63,000 died from other causes, most notably from the Spanish Flu epidemic.
If there were significantly fewer black soldiers killed in WWI it can be traced to two facts.
#1 - Blacks were not allowed in the US Marine Corp in WWI, and only served in labor or service positions in the US Navy.
#2 - Blacks were mostly used in labor and service in the US Army as well. Most never saw combat.
Stolen Valor has broader applications than the narrow confines of the particular law addressing the issue.
My contention is that Joe Biden has dishonored all white veterans by his accusations of White Supremacy....which essentially in practical terms equates with stolen valor.
Whilst at the same time he and his party particuarly honors all the minority members of the military at every opportunity....this amounts to stealing the valor of White Soldiers who have overwhelmingly contributed more to the defense of America than any other group yet biden attempts to not only steal their rightful honor but to transfer it to those who did far less.
Thus by his words and actions he has denigrated and dis-honored all white servicemen by attempting to steal their rightful honor and valor and give it to others.
Absolutely disgraceful.
I served 3 years and I have talked with lots of other veterans....I never saw any evidence whatsoever of white supremacy in the military nor has any other veteran I have talked with.
I am not saying there has never been a particular instance of it but it is certainly not a major issue in the military as biden infers.
Congress needs to reprimand him at least for his reprehensible comments on this matter which has become a major fallacious theme of his despicable regime......designed at least to further divide the nation and create more racial problems at a time we are already undergoing extremely high levels of racial tension whilst our foreign threats are higher than at any time in our history and increasing.
Not even to mention how hypocritical he is ----having campaigned on a promise of unity.
Do you have a link to what he said?
And wasn't there a Pentagon report on the issue? If I recall, they found some disturbing things.
Absolutely no evidence that it is.....just a red herring tossed out by radical democrats to allow them to purge the military of patriotic Americans and replace them with politically correct pawns of the democratic party.
I find it amusing that you reported 6 different posts for being off topic when they discussed various things about black serving in WWI. You even reported one that you said you didn't want it politicized.
And now you are way off topic and talking politics. I guess you have rules for you and rules for everyone else.
How many died in Vietnam?
That is easily found.
The reason I asked about WWI....I could not find the statistics on the total number of American blacks killed in WWI....even after several searches....not even to mention---no one else has been able to find any stats on that....the best that anyone has come up with is the number of American blacks killed who were serving under French command.
There were 1,056, 841 African Americans inducted into the various forces in WW2. The compromised roughly 11% of all inductees despite being only 8.4% of the U.S. population. They were 6.4% of all the units serving overseas.
In other news, just another racist soapbox.Like the study I linked to said, they make up some 30% of the military overall, but less than 20% of the combat arms, and because they're under-represented in the combat arms they in turn don't get 30% of the higher level promotions, where some 79% of those promotions originate. Even dumbass Mushhead's own post verifies what I said, but I guess he was too busy trying to suck up to a couple of mod trolls to bother reading posts.'The US Armed Forces officially desegregated in 1948. Over the following 70 years, the military has made great strides in promoting racial integration. We find evidence, however, that Black soldiers’ experience of military service still differs significantly from that of other racial and ethnic groups. Exploiting a database of administrative records for 100,000 Army personnel serving during the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, we find that Blacks were less likely than other service members to have deployed, or to face intense combat if deployed, during the early phases of the campaigns.'Yes, well you're always 'special' and claiming knowledge nobody else ever has, including the military itself.
They go in for job training now and avoid the combat arms, then whine about being under-represented in command positions. They're never happy, always sniveling for no reason.
Sorry, this is pure BS. I served for 15 years in Combat Arms, and saw more than my share of minorities in it, including Blacks.
*laughs in incredulity*
Well, feel free to ask all of the other Veterans in here if they agree with me or not, how about that? Other than your remarks seem to be very racist, and I really have no use or tolerance for racists.
And trust me, I have little doubt that almost all of them would agree with what I said. Having served for over 2 decades, I have quite a good idea what I am talking about.
How long have you served, which gives you the basis to question my service?
But before I leave, some facts. In the US, blacks make up just under 12% of the population (18% in the report I am about to reference). Yet, in "Operations" (that is "Combat Arms", the segment that actually fights) they make up 21% of the force. If what you said as true, there would be a much lower percent in that area.
projections as usual. Your personal anecdotes are just your fantasies, not facts. The majority of higher level promotions come from the combat arms, whether you like that or not isn't relevant, nor is your personal experience loading trucks and cleaning heads for 20 years as a grunt.
In other news, black street gangs encourage members and wanabees to volunteer, and then choose career paths that provide the most opportunities to steal weapons and gear useful to their homies, no doubt another factor in why they choose other career paths in the military. The military of course always makes a big effort to cover that up. They like to snivel about 'white supremacists' and biker gangs to take attention away from the giant black elephants in the room.
Of course you are entitled to your biased opinion hehheh
Irregardless....here is something for you to digest.....https://www.military.com/daily-news/2021/05/12/3-us-army-soldiers-accused-of-illegally-selling-weapons-used-chicago-shootings.html
What is there to digest?
The Navy Made Me into a Race Realist - American Renaissance
3 people...that's all you have to base this claim on?
American Renaissance...a white supremacy site. No thanks.
First of all American Renaissance is not a White Supremacist site.....as a moderator you should not post such propaganda.
Anyhow.....I told you the 3 black soldiers selling weapons in Chicago was just the tip of the iceberg.
FBI: The American Military is Lousy, Through and Through, with (Black and Hispanic) Gangs
Soldier in a combat zone throwing gang signs, circa 2011 Re-posted by Nicholas Stix The Pentagon has been obsessed for years with t...nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com
Actually, it is.
Race is an important aspect of individual and group identity. Of all the fault lines that divide society — language, religion, class, ideology — it is the most prominent and divisive. Race and racial conflict are at the heart of some of the most serious challenges the Western World faces in the 21st century.
The problems of race cannot be solved without adequate understanding. Attempts to gloss over the significance of race or even to deny its reality only make problems worse. Progress requires the study of all aspects of race, whether historical, cultural, or biological. This approach is known as race realism.
And in looking through their "News", it is quite obvious what they are spinning in their presentation.
In fact, if you look through their "news", it seems like listing after listing about crime. However, until you look and each person arrested is Black.
News Archives - American Renaissance
www.amren.com
No, it indeed is a "White Nationalist" site, and supports and endorses other similar sites internationally.
Of course, I will welcome others to read these clips of theirs, and make up their own minds.
The Afrikaners are a truly heroic people, with a history of courage, perseverance, and faithfulness unmatched in modern times. In little more than 300 years, they brought forth a distinctive culture, a national church, a rich literature, and a vivid sense of identity. Known as Africa’s White Tribe, the Afrikaners’ worst threats have always been other whites: first the Dutch, then the British, then the combined forces of all white people everywhere – to the point that they are now at the mercy of blacks. This is their tragic story.
The Heroic White Tribe of Africa - American Renaissance
Afrikaners: a history of triumph and tragedy.
www.amren.com
hile 70 percent of the city’s white students are proficient in math, just 12 percent of black students are, according to statistics released last year. One would think that public officials in such a bastion of progressive politics would jump at the chance to rectify this dismal disparity, but the city’s education establishment has other priorities. On January 26, the school board decided to rename 44 public schools because their namesakes were presumably more evil than Satan—or perhaps even than Donald Trump. Paul Revere, Thomas Edison, Daniel Webster, Abraham Lincoln, Francis Scott Key, and assorted other historical miscreants were guilty of anti-woke crimes. Malcolm X got a pass, however; the elementary school bearing his name will not undergo a change. Why would a one-time drug dealer, thief, and pimp be exempted?
Bonkers on the Bay - American Renaissance
"While 70 percent of [San Francisco's] white students are proficient in math, just 12 percent of black students are."
www.amren.com
Five counties in eastern Oregon voted for becoming a part of Idaho on May 18: Sherman, Lake, Grant, Baker, and Malheur counties. No counties voted against. The average was 62% in favor. Two additional Oregon counties had already voted in favor in November: Union and Jefferson.
In the five counties that voted on this issue, the average turnout was 43%, much higher than the statewide average of 25% for this election.
The ballot measures are a part of an effort to move the Oregon/Idaho border to extend Idaho’s jurisdiction over rural, conservative counties of eastern and southern Oregon. The ballot measures are intended to put pressure on the state legislatures of Oregon and Idaho to negotiate an interstate compact to relocate their common border. “This election proves that rural Oregon wants out of Oregon. If Oregon really believes in liberal values such as self-determination, the Legislature won’t hold our counties captive against our will,” said Mike McCarter, president of Citizens for Greater Idaho, “If we’re allowed to vote for which government officials we want, we should be allowed to vote for which government we want as well.”