How long until the Climate Cult re-appears, now that there's hot weather?

[ding]

When?

38 minutes ago.

 

[otto105]

38 minutes ago.

I checked. Didn’t see anything that would qualify is proof to convince.

 

[ding]

I checked. Didn’t see anything that would qualify is proof to convince.

That's because it's political for you.

 

[otto105]

That's because it's political for you.

Hilarious

Just what I would expect from an internet climate scientist

 

[ding]

Hilarious

Just what I would expect from an internet climate scientist

And that's exactly what I would expect from a political propagandist.

 

[otto105]

And that's exactly what I would expect from a political propagandist.

Hilarious

Right on cue with another stupid political answer

 

[ding]

Hilarious

Right on cue with another stupid political answer

You are here only because this is a political issue. Everyone knows it. Even you.

 

[Crick]

You are here only because this is a political issue. Everyone knows it. Even you.

What makes you think it's a political issue?

 

[ding]

What makes you think it's a political issue?

It's self evident.

 

[otto105]

You are here only because this is a political issue. Everyone knows it. Even you.

It’s a climate scientific issue.

That’s your problem.

It's self evident.

Has to be for you since no scientific organization backs your idiotic position.

 

[ding]

It’s a climate scientific issue.

That’s your problem.

Has to be for you since no scientific organization backs your idiotic position.

It's political for you. You know nothing about science. You probably barely graduated high school.

 

[otto105]

It's political for you. You know nothing about science. You probably barely graduated high school.

I rely on subject matter experts.

You rely on denier websites and lord muckington.

 

[Crick]

It's self evident.

Jesus ******* christ are you stupid.

Another ding mistake.

 

[ding]

I rely on subject matter experts.

You rely on denier websites and lord muckington.

Who are wrong and politically motivated like you.

Can you show which link I've provided that you believe is from a so called denier website. Cause I've been posting from NOAA who you say you agree with but don't really do.

 

[ding]

Jesus ******* christ are you stupid.

Another ding mistake.

You have been so brainwashed (i.e. politicized) that you can't admit that AGW is a political issue. AGW is no less of a political issue than abortion, gay marriage, banning guns, single payer health insurance and wealth redistribution.

 

[Crick]

You have been so brainwashed (i.e. politicized) that you can't admit that AGW is a political issue. AGW is no less of a political issue than abortion, gay marriage, banning guns, single payer health insurance and wealth redistribution.

AGW is a scientific theory. It has no political components at all. That it has come to be accepted more widely by liberals than conservatives is primarily the result of the fossil fuel industry's disinformation campaign.

 

[ding]

AGW is a scientific theory. It has no political components at all. That it has come to be accepted more widely by liberals than conservatives is primarily the result of the fossil fuel industry's disinformation campaign.

Keep telling yourself that while you shit all over the common sense approach of the ocean is what controls the climate of the planet, not the atmosphere.

 

[Crick]

Keep telling yourself that while you shit all over the common sense approach of the ocean is what controls the climate of the planet, not the atmosphere.

By repeatedly asking you what is causing the changes in ocean currents that you give all the credit and your COMPLETE failure to even attempt an answer, I have clearly and undeniably shown you to be an ignorant fool. Doubling down on a strategy that everyone here can see has failed you completely, doesn't rehab your image in the slightest. That you keep coming back with the same line of utter bullshit seems real close to the classic definition of insanity.

 

[ding]

By repeatedly asking you what is causing the changes in ocean currents that you give all the credit and your COMPLETE failure to even attempt an answer, I have clearly and undeniably shown you to be an ignorant fool. Doubling down on a strategy that everyone here can see has failed you completely, doesn't rehab your image in the slightest. That you keep coming back with the same line of utter bullshit seems real close to the classic definition of insanity.

The heat the earth receives from the the sun is remarkably constant with respect to similar stars. So what's coming in is pretty constant whether the planet is in an interglacial period like today or a glacial period yet the planet's mean temperature changes quite drastically. The reason it changes quite drastically is that glacial periods are triggered by a disruption of heat from the Atlantic to the Arctic which triggers glaciation in the Arctic. This glaciation increases albedo which serves as a negative feedback amplifying the initial cooling such that it eventually affects the climate of the entire planet. Eventually though, heat circulation from the Atlantic to the Arctic is eventually restored starting the long process of thawing and warming up. The sun during all of this continued to crank out what it always cranks out. This means that absent a change in how the ocean distributes that heat the earth would naturally continue warming even more than it has in any interglacial period before it. The native state of the planet's current landmass distribution and resulting ocean currents is warmer than it has been at any point since the planet became bipolar glaciated but ocean currents are constantly seeking not only equilibrium in temperature but in density as well. As such changes in ocean currents will continue to happen as a result of uneven warming. But you're a political hack and don't give two shits about the science.

 

[Crick]

The heat the earth receives from the the sun is remarkably constant with respect to similar stars. So what's coming in is pretty constant whether the planet is in an interglacial period like today or a glacial period yet the planet's mean temperature changes quite drastically. The reason it changes quite drastically is that glacial periods are triggered by a disruption of heat from the Atlantic to the Arctic which triggers glaciation in the Arctic. This glaciation increases albedo which serves as a negative feedback amplifying the initial cooling such that it eventually affects the climate of the entire planet. Eventually though, heat circulation from the Atlantic to the Arctic is eventually restored starting the long process of thawing and warming up. The sun during all of this continued to crank out what it always cranks out. This means that absent a change in how the ocean distributes that heat the earth would naturally continue warming even more than it has in any interglacial period before it. The native state of the planet's current landmass distribution and resulting ocean currents is warmer than it has been at any point since the planet became bipolar glaciated but ocean currents are constantly seeking not only equilibrium in temperature but in density as well. As such changes in ocean currents will continue to happen as a result of uneven warming. But you're a political hack and don't give two shits about the science.

We already went through this answer and its numerous failings.