How long until the Climate Cult re-appears, now that there's hot weather?

Unfortunately for your claim, you have zero evidence to support it. I and several other posters here, on the other hand, have repeatedly demonstrated that you have not even begun to present actual evidence supporting your claims and have instead demonstrated over and over again a complete failure understanding how basic science, logic, reason or statistics actually work.
Could disruption of heat circulation from the Atlantic to the Arctic have caused D-O events?

Can you think of any other phenomenon which could have caused D-O events?

There's my evidence.

1721511893770.png
 
Could disruption of heat circulation from the Atlantic to the Arctic have caused D-O events?

Can you think of any other phenomenon which could have caused D-O events?

There's my evidence.

View attachment 980591
Do you now claim we are undergoing a D-O event?
 
Do you now claim we are undergoing a D-O event?
No. I'm claiming that D-O events are direct evidence of the ocean affecting the climate at each pole and everything in between.

And if you want to disprove it then you will need to explain what caused D-O events to happen. Why did temperatures fluctuate 5C to 8C over the course of several DECADES.
 
No. I'm claiming that D-O events are direct evidence of the ocean affecting the climate at each pole and everything in between.

And if you want to disprove it then you will need to explain what caused D-O events to happen. Why did temperatures fluctuate 5C to 8C over the course of several DECADES.
D-O events do not support your claim that interruptions in ocean currents are responsible for the glacial cycle nor your claim that the current warming is simply part of the glacial cycle. The dominant theory as to the cause of D-O events is an interaction between the atmosphere and ice pack, not the oceans.

So, another in a long, long, long line of Ding MISTAKES.
 
D-O events do not support your claim that interruptions in ocean currents are responsible for the glacial cycle nor your claim that the current warming is simply part of the glacial cycle. The dominant theory as to the cause of D-O events is an interaction between the atmosphere and ice pack, not the oceans.

So, another in a long, long, long line of Ding MISTAKES.
How did the interaction between the atmosphere and ice packs cause temperatures to rise and fall by 5C to 8C?

What interaction?
 
The dominant theory as to the cause of D-O events is an interaction between the atmosphere and ice pack, not the oceans.
What interaction?

I think you are making this up
 
What interaction?

I think you are making this up
YOU are the one who brought D-O events into this forum in the first place and into this conversation. Have YOU not read up on the theories as to their cause?
 
YOU are the one who brought D-O events into this forum in the first place and into this conversation. Have YOU not read up on the theories as to their cause?
Yes, I did bring up D-O events and I have read up on the causes which is why I believe changing ocean currents is responsible for glacial cycles. Because that is what has been written.

Your explanation - which wasn't an explanation at all - was bullshit arm waving. Please prove me wrong and explain your nebulous BS interface argument.
 
You are disagreeing with NOAA.

Ocean currents act much like a conveyor belt, transporting warm water and precipitation from the equator toward the poles and cold water from the poles back to the tropics. Thus, ocean currents regulate global climate, helping to counteract the uneven distribution of solar radiation reaching Earth’s surface. Without currents in the ocean, regional temperatures would be more extreme — super hot at the equator and frigid toward the poles — and much less of Earth’s land would be habitable.

How does the ocean affect climate and weather on land? : Ocean Exploration Facts: NOAA Ocean Exploration
I’m not disagreeing with NOAA. NOAA has affirmed the climate scientists and their conclusion the human caused activity is causing our warming.

Why do you disregard that?
 
I’m not disagreeing with NOAA. NOAA has affirmed the climate scientists and their conclusion the human caused activity is causing our warming.

Why do you disregard that?
Because they (i.e. IPCC) are attributing all warming to CO2 when it's not.
 
Yes, I did bring up D-O events and I have read up on the causes which is why I believe changing ocean currents is responsible for glacial cycles. Because that is what has been written.

Your explanation - which wasn't an explanation at all - was bullshit arm waving. Please prove me wrong and explain your nebulous BS interface argument.
1721580773644.webp


Suggestions of solar and oceanic causes have been made, but no clear proof is yet available. In addition, some studies suggest that D-O events may be triggered by complex interactions between the atmosphere, the polar ice pack, and the oceans that affect how heat energy is transported toward the poles.May 31, 2024

Dansgaard-Oeschger event | Definition, Causes, & Facts​

1721580801129.webp
Britannica
https://www.britannica.com › ... › Earth Sciences

What caused Heinrich and Dansgaard–Oeschger events? The cause of these glacial events is still under debate. During the last glacial time, large ice sheets rimmed the North Atlantic. At certain times, these ice sheets released large amounts of freshwater into the North Atlantic. Heinrich events are an extreme example of this, when the Laurentide ice sheet disgorged excessively large amounts of freshwater into the Labrador Sea in the form of icebergs. Scientists have hypothesized that these freshwater dumps reduced ocean salinity enough to slow deepwater formation and the thermohaline circulation. Since the thermohaline circulation plays an important role in transporting heat northward, a slowdown would cause the North Atlantic to cool. Later, as the addition of freshwater decreased, ocean salinity and deepwater formation increased and climate conditions recovered. Evidence for changes in deepwater formation supports the freshwater forcing hypothesis. Measurements from deep-sea sediments in the North Atlantic indicate reduction of deepwater formation during Heinrich events (McManus et al. 2004). Evidence for freshwater forcing and reduced deepwater formation during D-O events is more ambiguous. The initial trigger for freshwater releases has not yet been identified. One suggestion is that small, gradual changes in solar output could have influenced the timing of abrupt changes. Other ideas call upon natural oscillations of the ice sheets themselves or of ocean processes.


Causes​

The processes behind the timing and amplitude of these events (as recorded in ice cores) are still unclear. The pattern in the Southern Hemisphere is different, with slow warming and much smaller temperature fluctuations. Indeed, the Vostok ice core was drilled before the Greenland cores, and the existence of Dansgaard–Oeschger events was not widely recognised until the Greenland (GRIP/GISP2) cores were done; after which there was some reexamination of the Vostok core to see if these events had somehow been "missed".[citation needed]


A closeup near 40 kyr BP, showing reproducibility between cores
The events appear to reflect changes in the North Atlantic Ocean circulation, perhaps triggered by an influx of fresh water[8] or rain.[12]

The events may be caused by an amplification of solar forcings, or by a cause internal to the earth system – either a "binge-purge" cycle of ice sheets accumulating so much mass they become unstable, as postulated for Heinrich events, or an oscillation in deep ocean currents (Maslin et al.. 2001, p25).

These events have been attributed to changes in the size of the ice sheets[13] and atmospheric carbon dioxide.[14] The former determines the strength of the Atlantic Ocean circulation via altering the northern hemisphere westerly winds, gulf stream, and sea-ice systems. The latter modulates atmospheric inter-basin freshwater transport across Central America, which changes the freshwater budget in the North Atlantic and thus the circulation. These studies corroborate the previously suggested existence of a "D-O window"[15] of AMOC bistability ('sweet spot' for abrupt climate changes) associated with ice volume and atmospheric CO2, accounting for the occurrences of D-O type events under intermediate glacial conditions in the late Pleistocene.

 
View attachment 981096

Suggestions of solar and oceanic causes have been made, but no clear proof is yet available. In addition, some studies suggest that D-O events may be triggered by complex interactions between the atmosphere, the polar ice pack, and the oceans that affect how heat energy is transported toward the poles.May 31, 2024

Dansgaard-Oeschger event | Definition, Causes, & Facts

View attachment 981097
Britannica
https://www.britannica.com › ... › Earth Sciences

What caused Heinrich and Dansgaard–Oeschger events? The cause of these glacial events is still under debate. During the last glacial time, large ice sheets rimmed the North Atlantic. At certain times, these ice sheets released large amounts of freshwater into the North Atlantic. Heinrich events are an extreme example of this, when the Laurentide ice sheet disgorged excessively large amounts of freshwater into the Labrador Sea in the form of icebergs. Scientists have hypothesized that these freshwater dumps reduced ocean salinity enough to slow deepwater formation and the thermohaline circulation. Since the thermohaline circulation plays an important role in transporting heat northward, a slowdown would cause the North Atlantic to cool. Later, as the addition of freshwater decreased, ocean salinity and deepwater formation increased and climate conditions recovered. Evidence for changes in deepwater formation supports the freshwater forcing hypothesis. Measurements from deep-sea sediments in the North Atlantic indicate reduction of deepwater formation during Heinrich events (McManus et al. 2004). Evidence for freshwater forcing and reduced deepwater formation during D-O events is more ambiguous. The initial trigger for freshwater releases has not yet been identified. One suggestion is that small, gradual changes in solar output could have influenced the timing of abrupt changes. Other ideas call upon natural oscillations of the ice sheets themselves or of ocean processes.


Causes​

The processes behind the timing and amplitude of these events (as recorded in ice cores) are still unclear. The pattern in the Southern Hemisphere is different, with slow warming and much smaller temperature fluctuations. Indeed, the Vostok ice core was drilled before the Greenland cores, and the existence of Dansgaard–Oeschger events was not widely recognised until the Greenland (GRIP/GISP2) cores were done; after which there was some reexamination of the Vostok core to see if these events had somehow been "missed".[citation needed]


A closeup near 40 kyr BP, showing reproducibility between cores
The events appear to reflect changes in the North Atlantic Ocean circulation, perhaps triggered by an influx of fresh water[8] or rain.[12]

The events may be caused by an amplification of solar forcings, or by a cause internal to the earth system – either a "binge-purge" cycle of ice sheets accumulating so much mass they become unstable, as postulated for Heinrich events, or an oscillation in deep ocean currents (Maslin et al.. 2001, p25).

These events have been attributed to changes in the size of the ice sheets[13] and atmospheric carbon dioxide.[14] The former determines the strength of the Atlantic Ocean circulation via altering the northern hemisphere westerly winds, gulf stream, and sea-ice systems. The latter modulates atmospheric inter-basin freshwater transport across Central America, which changes the freshwater budget in the North Atlantic and thus the circulation. These studies corroborate the previously suggested existence of a "D-O window"[15] of AMOC bistability ('sweet spot' for abrupt climate changes) associated with ice volume and atmospheric CO2, accounting for the occurrences of D-O type events under intermediate glacial conditions in the late Pleistocene.

Yep. Changes in ocean currents. Shouldn't be a surprise to anyone.
 
Because they (i.e. IPCC) are attributing all warming to CO2 when it's not.
Post the proof which would convince anyone that the oceans are causing our current rapid warming.
 
Post the proof which would convince anyone that the oceans are causing our current rapid warming.
The majority of heat from the sun is stored in the ocean.
The ocean is warming up naturally because of the sun.
The NH is still thawing from the last glacial phase.
The combination of the sun heating the ocean and the NH thawing from the last glacial period is the primary reason the earth is warming.
CO2 has only added 0.22C to 0.5C of the warming since the industrial revolution.
 
15th post
The majority of heat from the sun is stored in the ocean.
The ocean is warming up naturally because of the sun.
The NH is still thawing from the last glacial phase.
The combination of the sun heating the ocean and the NH thawing from the last glacial period is the primary reason the earth is warming.
Post the evidence which would convince anyone that the oceans are causing our current climate change.

Show your work internet climate scientist…
 
Post the evidence which would convince anyone that the oceans are causing our current climate change.

Show your work internet climate scientist…
I just did.
 
Back
Top Bottom