How long before this administration acknowledges this as the terror attack that it is?

[Coyote]

The democrat voting base is waiting to see what they are suppose to call it, cause they have no ability to think for themselves.

The law enforcement authorities investigating this have not yet called it terrorism. Don't you think it's best to wait for the facts to come out?

 

[BlindBoo]

Partisans are looking for ways to exploit the tragic situation to their advantage and denigrate the other side.

muslim terrorists killed 14 people and had the means to kill many many more if they hadn't been stopped...What's partisan about wanting to protect our homeland from terrorists?

...and what if (when) it happens again?...will you still be looking for ways to deflect and sympathize with them?

White Christian terrorist have been targeting Abortion clinics and killing innocent law biding citizens.....and if(well when) it happens again...........

Did a Muslim blow up the Murrow Building?

See how that works, we can all play phartisan phools.

give me the total count of "white" christian murders versus the total count of muslim murders in, say, the last 20 years, terrorist sympathizer....

".....blaming democrats for being soft on Muslim terrorist"

Do go on sir partisan.......

You brought it up.
Got those stats yet or are you just going to keep dodging and trying to change the subject?

[/QUOTE]

The thing is my original comment is as ambiguous as I could make it. Read it and put Republican or Democrat in front of Partisans and it mean the very same thing. It came from the coverage I saw last night on both MSNBC and Fox. With little or no information one side was yammering for more gun control while the other was yapping on about the threat from Syrian refugee terrorist. Highly partisan, disgustingly opportunist exploitation of a tragedy, just like this thread.

 

[Muhammed]

How about we wait to find out that it actually WAS a terror attack.

...and what are they supposed to call it in the meanwhile?

 

[Arianrhod]

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/04/us/san-bernardino-shooting.html?_r=0

“We do not yet know the motive; we cannot rule anything out at this point,” said David Bowdich, the assistant F.B.I. director in charge of the Los Angeles office. “We don’t know if this was the intended target or there was something that triggered him to do this immediately.”

"The married couple who police say killed 14 people at a social services center had built more than a dozen pipe bombs and stockpiled thousands of rounds of ammunition, officials said Thursday, and they fired as many as 150 bullets at victims and police officers in a rampage that shattered a quiet day and ended in their own deaths.
"The F.B.I. is treating the shooting as a potential terrorist act, though they are far from concluding that it was, two law enforcement officials said Thursday. The suspects’ extensive arsenal, their recent Middle East travels and evidence that one had been in touch with people with Islamist extremist views, both in the United States and abroad, all contributed to the decision to refocus the investigation. "
Lol. Yeah, it's not terrorism.
******* traitors. You should all die screaming.

Link?

 

[Theowl32]

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/04/us/san-bernardino-shooting.html?_r=0

“We do not yet know the motive; we cannot rule anything out at this point,” said David Bowdich, the assistant F.B.I. director in charge of the Los Angeles office. “We don’t know if this was the intended target or there was something that triggered him to do this immediately.”

"The married couple who police say killed 14 people at a social services center had built more than a dozen pipe bombs and stockpiled thousands of rounds of ammunition, officials said Thursday, and they fired as many as 150 bullets at victims and police officers in a rampage that shattered a quiet day and ended in their own deaths.
"The F.B.I. is treating the shooting as a potential terrorist act, though they are far from concluding that it was, two law enforcement officials said Thursday. The suspects’ extensive arsenal, their recent Middle East travels and evidence that one had been in touch with people with Islamist extremist views, both in the United States and abroad, all contributed to the decision to refocus the investigation. "
Lol. Yeah, it's not terrorism.
******* traitors. You should all die screaming.

Link?

Investigators search for motive in California mass shooting
The Latest: Female shooter underwent background checks to get U.S. visa | News | Eugene, Oregon
Arsenal of explosives, ammunition found at home of San Bernardino attackers as FBI seeks motive
Attackers in deadly California shooting had thousands of bullets, numerous pipe bombs - 12/3/2015 6:03:35 PM | Newser

Is that good for you?

Hey, here is a question for you. How the **** have you not heard about this? Huh? How, the ****, did you not know about this.

It is only ALL OVER THE ******* NEWS and you ask her for a link?

Holy shit you leftists are such useless pouches of shit.

 

[Coyote]

How about we wait to find out that it actually WAS a terror attack.

...and what are they supposed to call it in the meanwhile?

What we know for a fact - a mass shooting.

 

[bripat9643]

How about we wait to find out that it actually WAS a terror attack.

How about answering it before we find out? We already know.

Holy shit.

You pretend to but you don't.

It is by and large the most likely scenario. It is very likely that it is an Islamic Extremism terrorist act. We, however, do not KNOW for a fact that it is. Until then I certainly am not going to crone on about how long it is going to take the democrats to say it is one. You look like just as big an idiot declaring it so before we have good information than those that refuse to call it what it is after the information is in.

here what distinguishes us Dems/liberals we wait for the facts ... not like our republican counter parts that shout out the first thing that comes to their mind .... then defends it to the max ...

Ya don't say. Did these assholes wait for the facts?

1. Senator Tim Kaine saying the atrocity proves America is addicted to guns.
2. Former FBI assistant director, Tom Fuentes – later joined by CNN's Harry Houck – speculating an anti-government "right-wing group" is behind the attack.
3. MSNBC reporting (almost as soon as the shooting began) that the city of San Bernardino houses a Planned Parenthood.
4. A gun-control activist insisting Congress could stop these tragedies, it simply chooses not to.
5. George Stephanopoulos portraying President Obama as another victim in the tragedy.
6. President Obama arguing the feds are powerless to stop suspected terrorists from buying guns. (Which is untrue.)
7. An MSNBC guest arguing armed self defense, including armed guards, provides no security benefit.
8. Chris Matthews wondering if the attack can be traced back to the American revolution.
9. NBC's Kerry Saunders suggesting the Christmas party that was attacked could have served as a "trigger" for the gunmen.
10. Senator Tim Kaine arguing that, much like terrorists themselves, critics of increased gun control are the "voice of evil."

 

[Theowl32]

How about we wait to find out that it actually WAS a terror attack.

How about answering it before we find out? We already know.

Holy shit.

You pretend to but you don't.

It is by and large the most likely scenario. It is very likely that it is an Islamic Extremism terrorist act. We, however, do not KNOW for a fact that it is. Until then I certainly am not going to crone on about how long it is going to take the democrats to say it is one. You look like just as big an idiot declaring it so before we have good information than those that refuse to call it what it is after the information is in.

here what distinguishes us Dems/liberals we wait for the facts ... not like our republican counter parts that shout out the first thing that comes to their mind .... then defends it to the max ...

Ya don't say. Did these assholes wait for the facts?

1. Senator Tim Kaine saying the atrocity proves America is addicted to guns.
2. Former FBI assistant director, Tom Fuentes – later joined by CNN's Harry Houck – speculating an anti-government "right-wing group" is behind the attack.
3. MSNBC reporting (almost as soon as the shooting began) that the city of San Bernardino houses a Planned Parenthood.
4. A gun-control activist insisting Congress could stop these tragedies, it simply chooses not to.
5. George Stephanopoulos portraying President Obama as another victim in the tragedy.
6. President Obama arguing the feds are powerless to stop suspected terrorists from buying guns. (Which is untrue.)
7. An MSNBC guest arguing armed self defense, including armed guards, provides no security benefit.
8. Chris Matthews wondering if the attack can be traced back to the American revolution.
9. NBC's Kerry Saunders suggesting the Christmas party that was attacked could have served as a "trigger" for the gunmen.
10. Senator Tim Kaine arguing that, much like terrorists themselves, critics of increased gun control are the "voice of evil."

Not to mention every single stupid ******* democrat coming out and blaming the ******* NRA and there were the dumb ******* liberal voters clapping like the stupid monkeys they are.

I remember ABC reporting that James Holmes was a member of the Tea Party right after the theater shooting.

I ******* hate liberals. There have been more than enough facts showing this was a jihadist terror ******* attack.

**** liberals. Fuckem ALL!!

 

[Manonthestreet]

FBI has officially classified it as terrorism

 

[Roudy]

Have you ever uttered the words Radical Christian Terrorism?

The answer is no.

Why not?

Because Islam is the current religion of rest in peace.

Nope. Because it's stupid. The terrorism is not Islamic. It's simply perpetrated by people who call themselves Muslims. They are not accepted by the Islamic community any more than Westboro os accepted by the Christian community.

It's enough to call them terrorists. The rest is just bullshit fodder for bigots.

“Three lions made us proud,” one user Tweeted. “California streets are full with soldiers with heavy weapons. The Unites States is burning #America_Burning.”
“Let America know a new era #California #America_burning,” said another hateful Tweet.
ثلاث ليوث اثلجوا صدورنا بفضل الله مازالوا أحياء ويتجولون شوارع كاليفورنيا بالزى العسكرى وبأسلحة ثقيلة #أمريكا_تشتعل #تكبيـر
— ﺳ̲ﻟ̲آﻣ̲يےﻋ ﺂ̲ﻟ̲ﺩ̲ۆﻟة (@Neran_Da3shya) December 2, 2015
“God is the greatest,” a third Tweet cited by Vocativ said. “May God spread fear in the homes of the Crusaders.”

Please show where Christians worldwide were shrieking their support and approval of Dear.

ISIS users Tweet ‘#America_Burning’ to celebrate shooting

But wait! It has nothing to do with Islam, right?

And there is no meaningful support among muslims!

You can't judge all Muslims by the actions of just half a billion.

 

[Arianrhod]

Investigators search for motive in California mass shooting
The Latest: Female shooter underwent background checks to get U.S. visa | News | Eugene, Oregon
Arsenal of explosives, ammunition found at home of San Bernardino attackers as FBI seeks motive
Attackers in deadly California shooting had thousands of bullets, numerous pipe bombs - 12/3/2015 6:03:35 PM | Newser

Is that good for you?

Yes, especially the first one:
Investigators search for motive in California mass shooting
So if you knew that, it was pretty silly to start this thread, wasn’t it?

Hey, here is a question for you. How the **** have you not heard about this? Huh? How, the ****, did you not know about this.

It is only ALL OVER THE ******* NEWS and you ask her for a link?

koshergrl’s spittle-flecked rants are all over the news? Who knew?

Here’s the thing: Anyone here can claim any damn thing. If you expect credibility, you post a link. If you don’t, the implication is that you’re either making up shit, or you’re getting your talking points from some “reputable source” like Weasel Zippers.

And it’s pretty damn funny that you’re shrieking at me after posting a link that answers exactly the question you built this thread around.

 

[SwimExpert]

How about answering it before we find out? We already know.

Holy shit.

Isn't that a bit like saying we have to pass the bill so we can read it?

 

[FA_Q2]

FBI has officially classified it as terrorism

Link.

From 15 hours ago:
FBI: Still 'premature' to call San Bernardino shooting terrorism

It appears the FBI has not sussed out the complete motive as of yet.

 

[FA_Q2]

How about we wait to find out that it actually WAS a terror attack.

?

Do you not have access to the Internet?

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/04/us/san-bernardino-shooting.html?_r=0

Yes I do.

And we still do not know for sure. I don't know how many damn times I have to repeat the blatantly obvious - it is MOST LIKELY Islamic Extreme Terrorism but that does not mean that we have managed to conclusively find the motivation.

 

[FA_Q2]

How about we wait to find out that it actually WAS a terror attack.

How about answering it before we find out? We already know.

Holy shit.

You pretend to but you don't.

It is by and large the most likely scenario. It is very likely that it is an Islamic Extremism terrorist act. We, however, do not KNOW for a fact that it is. Until then I certainly am not going to crone on about how long it is going to take the democrats to say it is one. You look like just as big an idiot declaring it so before we have good information than those that refuse to call it what it is after the information is in.

here what distinguishes us Dems/liberals we wait for the facts ... not like our republican counter parts that shout out the first thing that comes to their mind .... then defends it to the max ...

Ya don't say. Did these assholes wait for the facts?

1. Senator Tim Kaine saying the atrocity proves America is addicted to guns.
2. Former FBI assistant director, Tom Fuentes – later joined by CNN's Harry Houck – speculating an anti-government "right-wing group" is behind the attack.
3. MSNBC reporting (almost as soon as the shooting began) that the city of San Bernardino houses a Planned Parenthood.
4. A gun-control activist insisting Congress could stop these tragedies, it simply chooses not to.
5. George Stephanopoulos portraying President Obama as another victim in the tragedy.
6. President Obama arguing the feds are powerless to stop suspected terrorists from buying guns. (Which is untrue.)
7. An MSNBC guest arguing armed self defense, including armed guards, provides no security benefit.
8. Chris Matthews wondering if the attack can be traced back to the American revolution.
9. NBC's Kerry Saunders suggesting the Christmas party that was attacked could have served as a "trigger" for the gunmen.
10. Senator Tim Kaine arguing that, much like terrorists themselves, critics of increased gun control are the "voice of evil."

Not to mention every single stupid ******* democrat coming out and blaming the ******* NRA and there were the dumb ******* liberal voters clapping like the stupid monkeys they are.

I remember ABC reporting that James Holmes was a member of the Tea Party right after the theater shooting.

I ******* hate liberals. There have been more than enough facts showing this was a jihadist terror ******* attack.

**** liberals. Fuckem ALL!!

Yup. They are so ******* terrible. YET, you, acting JUST LIKE THEM, are much better than liberals because you only jump to conclusions when it involves Islamic Terrorism.

Me, OTOH, prefer NOT to act just like those that I criticize for doing idiotic things.

 

[FA_Q2]

How about we wait to find out that it actually WAS a terror attack.

How about answering it before we find out? We already know.

Holy shit.

You pretend to but you don't.

It is by and large the most likely scenario. It is very likely that it is an Islamic Extremism terrorist act. We, however, do not KNOW for a fact that it is. Until then I certainly am not going to crone on about how long it is going to take the democrats to say it is one. You look like just as big an idiot declaring it so before we have good information than those that refuse to call it what it is after the information is in.

here what distinguishes us Dems/liberals we wait for the facts ... not like our republican counter parts that shout out the first thing that comes to their mind .... then defends it to the max ...

Ya don't say. Did these assholes wait for the facts?

1. Senator Tim Kaine saying the atrocity proves America is addicted to guns.
2. Former FBI assistant director, Tom Fuentes – later joined by CNN's Harry Houck – speculating an anti-government "right-wing group" is behind the attack.
3. MSNBC reporting (almost as soon as the shooting began) that the city of San Bernardino houses a Planned Parenthood.
4. A gun-control activist insisting Congress could stop these tragedies, it simply chooses not to.
5. George Stephanopoulos portraying President Obama as another victim in the tragedy.
6. President Obama arguing the feds are powerless to stop suspected terrorists from buying guns. (Which is untrue.)
7. An MSNBC guest arguing armed self defense, including armed guards, provides no security benefit.
8. Chris Matthews wondering if the attack can be traced back to the American revolution.
9. NBC's Kerry Saunders suggesting the Christmas party that was attacked could have served as a "trigger" for the gunmen.
10. Senator Tim Kaine arguing that, much like terrorists themselves, critics of increased gun control are the "voice of evil."

Nope, they didn't.

Now, do you really want to act just like them and jump to conclusions?

How does that make waiting wrong?

How long did #fucktardObama and #crookHillary wait before climbing atop the bodies of the victims to promote their anti-liberty agenda?

Did they wait for the facts?

Ditto. Do you really want to use those particular people in defense of your actions?

Are you really suggesting that it is a good defense of character to do the same thing that Hillary has done? Really?

 

[Dr Grump]

I think it is obvious this was a terrorist attack. Looks like an American-born Muslim was radicalised and the shooting was the end result. Expect more.

 

[FA_Q2]

You pretend to but you don't.

It is by and large the most likely scenario. It is very likely that it is an Islamic Extremism terrorist act. We, however, do not KNOW for a fact that it is. Until then I certainly am not going to crone on about how long it is going to take the democrats to say it is one. You look like just as big an idiot declaring it so before we have good information than those that refuse to call it what it is after the information is in.

Yes we do;

{The suspects’ extensive arsenal, their recent Middle East travels and evidence that one had been in touch with people with Islamist extremist views, both in the United States and abroad, all contributed to the decision to refocus the investigation.}

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/04/us/san-bernardino-shooting.html?_r=0

We also know that #fucktardObama will lie and claim it was something else, as he did with the Ft. Hood terror attack. Obama is a ******* pile of shit. The DNC press will try to cover for their party, but the Internet makes it hard to get away with it.

He may very well. It would not surprise me. That, however, has no bearing on the fact that the actual motivations of the assailants are still unknown no matter how much circumstantial bits and pieces are coming to the surface.

They very well could have been radical Muslims. You are not making that statement though - you are demanding that such is already fact.

 

[Meathead]

It's America's fault because Bush bombed Iraq. Obama and his minions are trying to find a way to say that a little less directly. Don't worry, Susan Rice is working on it.

 

[FA_Q2]

How about we wait to find out that it actually WAS a terror attack.

Yeah right. If the guy was white you wouldn't wait.

You really want to make that asinine conjecture?
Perhaps you can go fourth and find where I made such statements?

Or maybe you just cannot see anything past your asinine black and white world. I guess it is not possible that another person might not pass instant judgement on a scenario that has many unknown variables.