ClosedCaption
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2010
- 53,233
- 6,719
- 1,830
Then why did you use it? I was merely using the term you used. Also, please answer the question I posed or admit that it is not an undue hardship.If a person is too "weak" to be able to prove that they are eligible to vote in the district they wish to vote in, then they should not be allowed to vote. I don't care what type of "ID" is required, be it photo ID issued by the state (available for a pretty small fee, in some cases even free) or a recent utility bill establishing residence in said district, some sort of "ID" or proof of eligibility to vote in said district should be required. How is this an undue hardship?Actually, I find it funny that the Democrats consider blacks to be too stupid or lazy to go to the DMV and get a free ID...
Go figure...
Thats right! You set up hoops and then claim someone is weak because they wont jump through them!
Using "weak" as a characterization is akin to double dog daring. It means nothing
I already did...Try reading this thread. Someone asked me what hoops? and this was my response
Going to the DMV or getting another ID because the one you have suddenly doesnt count now. Or closing DMV's in certain areas then say "All you have to do is get to this other DMV"
Of course when someone says "Why do I have to do all this new shit?" you think by responding with "What? Are you too stupid?" doesnt answer the question.