How Liberals really feel about black people

[Soggy in NOLA]

Actually, I find it funny that the Democrats consider blacks to be too stupid or lazy to go to the DMV and get a free ID...

Go figure...

Thats right! You set up hoops and then claim someone is weak because they wont jump through them!

If a person is too "weak" to be able to prove that they are eligible to vote in the district they wish to vote in, then they should not be allowed to vote. I don't care what type of "ID" is required, be it photo ID issued by the state (available for a pretty small fee, in some cases even free) or a recent utility bill establishing residence in said district, some sort of "ID" or proof of eligibility to vote in said district should be required. How is this an undue hardship?

It isn't. You can barely function in modern society without an ID.... who doesn't have an ID? That's right, everyone has an ID.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Actually, I find it funny that the Democrats consider blacks to be too stupid or lazy to go to the DMV and get a free ID...

Go figure...

Thats right! You set up hoops and then claim someone is weak because they wont jump through them!

What hoops?

Going to the DMV or getting another ID because the one you have suddenly doesnt count now. Or closing DMV's in certain areas then say "All you have to do is get to this other DMV"

Of course when someone says "Why do I have to do all this new shit?" you think by responding with "What? Are you too stupid?" doesnt answer the question.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Actually, I find it funny that the Democrats consider blacks to be too stupid or lazy to go to the DMV and get a free ID...

Go figure...

Thats right! You set up hoops and then claim someone is weak because they wont jump through them!

If a person is too "weak" to be able to prove that they are eligible to vote in the district they wish to vote in, then they should not be allowed to vote. I don't care what type of "ID" is required, be it photo ID issued by the state (available for a pretty small fee, in some cases even free) or a recent utility bill establishing residence in said district, some sort of "ID" or proof of eligibility to vote in said district should be required. How is this an undue hardship?

Using "weak" as a characterization is akin to double dog daring. It means nothing

 

[PoliticalChic]

This stuff is so funny......Liberals.

I listen to WBLS....107.5 in NYC....Black Liberation Station....and every time they have a dance party they remind all to bring their ID.

 

[ClosedCaption]

This stuff is so funny......Liberals.

I listen to WBLS....107.5 in NYC....Black Liberation Station....and every time they have a dance party they remind all to bring their ID.

Har har har and dancing is a protected right in the constitution

 

[Timmy]

It's an obvious attempt to disenfranchise.

Funny , righties are against gun registration because the big bad gov will take their guns away . They believe that but don't think state issued voter ID is an attempt to stop legit voters .

Why are these othe IDS accepted by the DMV to get a fancy voter ID but NOT be good enough to use at the poll station?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Seems to depends on of whom the question is asked.


In the video, the question, when asked of white Liberals in Berkeley, California, received exactly the response on would expect of brain-washed zombies.....e.g., white Liberals.
You can hear the propaganda being rolled out like the message on an answering machine.


You have to see the response when the same query was posed to blacks here in the Big Apple, in Harlem...


"Do voter ID laws suppress the black vote?"




This is hysterical!

If voter ID laws are designed to disproportionately affect a certain race negatively, then yes of course they're racist.

 

[PoliticalChic]

It's an obvious attempt to disenfranchise.

Funny , righties are against gun registration because the big bad gov will take their guns away . They believe that but don't think state issued voter ID is an attempt to stop legit voters .

Why are these othe IDS accepted by the DMV to get a fancy voter ID but NOT be good enough to use at the poll station?

" They believe that but don't think state issued voter ID is an attempt to stop legit voters."



And right on cue, a Liberal dunce shows up to spew the usual talking points.

And now for reality:

“The findings of this analysis suggest that voter identification requirements, such as requiring non-photo and photo identification, have virtually no suppressive effect on reported voter turnout.

Controlling for factors that influence voter turn¬out, states with stricter voter identification laws largely do not have the claimed negative impact on voter turnout when compared to states with more lenient voter identification laws.

Based on the Eagleton Institute's findings, some members of the media have claimed that voter identification law suppress voter turnout, especially among minorities.[80] Their conclusion is unfounded. When statistically significant and negative relationships are found in our analysis, the effects are so small that the findings offer little policy significance.

More important, minority respondents in states that required photo identification are just as likely to report voting as are minority respondents from states that only required voters to say their name.”

For a thorough statistical analysis of the effect of voter identification requirements:
New Analysis Shows Voter Identification Laws Do Not Reduce Turnout

New Analysis Shows Voter Identification Laws Do Not Reduce Turnout

You may find information about the Eagleton Institution here:
Eagleton Institute of Politics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia




In summary,

a. photo ID requirements prevent voter fraud to a greater degree than without said requirements.

b. any thinking individual realizes the basis for denial of the above: to allow for fraud.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

Seems to depends on of whom the question is asked.


In the video, the question, when asked of white Liberals in Berkeley, California, received exactly the response on would expect of brain-washed zombies.....e.g., white Liberals.
You can hear the propaganda being rolled out like the message on an answering machine.


You have to see the response when the same query was posed to blacks here in the Big Apple, in Harlem...


"Do voter ID laws suppress the black vote?"




This is hysterical!

It depends on where you live.

 

[ClosedCaption]

"The record makes clear that the historical origin of the challenged provisions in this statute is not the innocuous back-and-forth of routine partisan struggle that the State suggests and that the district court accepted," Judge Diana Motz wrote on behalf of Judges James Wynn and Henry Floyd. "Rather, the General Assembly enacted them in the immediate aftermath of unprecedented African American voter participation in a state with a troubled racial history and racially polarized voting. The district court clearly erred in ignoring or dismissing this historical background evidence, all of which supports a finding of discriminatory intent."

The court's opinion bluntly described the legislation as a clear effort to suppress the black vote.

"We cannot ignore the record evidence that, because of race, the legislature enacted one of the largest restrictions of the franchise in modern North Carolina history," Motz added.

Court strikes down North Carolina voter ID law

 

[PoliticalChic]

Seems to depends on of whom the question is asked.


In the video, the question, when asked of white Liberals in Berkeley, California, received exactly the response on would expect of brain-washed zombies.....e.g., white Liberals.
You can hear the propaganda being rolled out like the message on an answering machine.


You have to see the response when the same query was posed to blacks here in the Big Apple, in Harlem...


"Do voter ID laws suppress the black vote?"




This is hysterical!

It depends on where you live.

What depends on where you live????

 

[Slade3200]

On the surface you can make a very simplistic argument like what was presented in the OP video. But when you dig deeper into the stats you see things like the Wisconsin case that showed 300,000 registered voters who did not have the acceptable form of ID to vote. And multiple court rulings against voter ID laws because of motive to suppress minority vote.

There is an agenda behind many of these laws. Pretending that there isn't doesn't help the issue.

Analysis: New Wisconsin Voter ID Rules Expose Law's Real Aim

 

[ClosedCaption]

I'd like to ask the OP Is burning a cross in someones yard racist?

 

[PoliticalChic]

I believe it speaks volumes that not one of our Liberal colleagues wish to comment on the "Berkeley Manifesto"....


1. Voter ID Laws are pretty racist....they're bad!

2. Voter ID Laws are a way to perpetuate racism

3. Racist...fer sure! Definitely suppresses the African-American vote!

4. ...blacks are less likely to have state IDs.

5. Minorities are less likely to have the kind of IDs that are required.

6. Blacks don't live in areas that have easy access to DMVs or places where they can get identification.

7. They don't have access to the internet, they have to pay internet providers certain fees.....

8. Black people don't have the knowledge of how to go on line, of how it works.

9. Blacks may not have smart phones, the may not have data....

10 The don't know what is out there....they are not aware....they're not informed.

11. There is a repression of like felons...and that is a huge population of African-Americans.



Are these Liberal folks lying?

Are they racists?

Is this what they truly believe.....and...if so....
....where and how did they learn these "facts"?

 

[Wyld Kard]

How come we don't hear liberals bitching about these other things that require an ID?

Elections matter.

 

[tycho1572]

Seems to depends on of whom the question is asked.


In the video, the question, when asked of white Liberals in Berkeley, California, received exactly the response on would expect of brain-washed zombies.....e.g., white Liberals.
You can hear the propaganda being rolled out like the message on an answering machine.


You have to see the response when the same query was posed to blacks here in the Big Apple, in Harlem...


"Do voter ID laws suppress the black vote?"




This is hysterical!

That vid is another great example of how damn dumb libs are. Thanks for sharing it, PoliticalChic. :hugs:

 

[ptbw forever]

It's an obvious attempt to disenfranchise.

Funny , righties are against gun registration because the big bad gov will take their guns away . They believe that but don't think state issued voter ID is an attempt to stop legit voters .

Why are these othe IDS accepted by the DMV to get a fancy voter ID but NOT be good enough to use at the poll station?

Except anti-gun laws are the global norm, so.....

 

[Rozman]

I am for voter ID....
I am against a government that makes it extremely
difficult to get the paperwork in order....

I have heard stories of an elderly black women who was forced to make multiple
trips to various government agency's in order to satisfy the many requirements....

Seems like the goal is to discourage voters of color....

Every election we hear the stories where American voters don't turn up in big numbers....

Then we also here how cities and county's cut the number of polling places
and cut the hours ....

What the hell.....

 

[Zoom-boing]

Voter ID laws are not racist. Those who say these laws are racist are racist. They think black people are too stupid to get an id, or to know where to vote.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Voter ID laws are not racist. Those who say these laws are racist are racist. They think black people are too stupid to get an id, or to know where to vote.

"Those who say these laws are racist are racist."

Sounds like you saw the video in the OP, Zb