How liars create the ‘illusion of truth’

That's reality, not the addled construct in your dime store head.

Meanwhile we get "we won't take your ICE vehicles from you, but you can't buy a new one" from the left.

Never happened.
 

No, they have just been allowed to change clothes, wear binders, tuck, and use a different name all without their parents knowing about it.

Some have even been referred to clinics that can provide them with puberty blockers or hormones.

So you fixate on the surgery claim, and ignore the actual harm going on.

The problem the left has these days is people now see through this bullshit, as there is too much raw information out there for you to gaslight.

Can't stop the signal,
 
One obstacle is what you already know (trump lost in 2020). Even if a lie (trump won in 2020) sounds plausible, why would you set what you know aside just because you heard the lie repeatedly?
Recently, a team led by Lisa Fazio of Vanderbilt University set out to test how the illusion of truth effect interacts with our prior knowledge. Would it affect our existing knowledge? They used paired true and un-true statements, but also split their items according to how likely participants were to know the truth (so "The Pacific Ocean is the largest ocean on Earth" is an example of a "known" items, which also happens to be true, and "The Atlantic Ocean is the largest ocean on Earth" is an un-true item, for which people are likely to know the actual truth).
Their results show that the illusion of truth effect worked just as strongly for known as for unknown items, suggesting that prior knowledge won’t prevent repetition from swaying our judgements of plausibility.
 
No, they have just been allowed to change clothes, wear binders, tuck, and use a different name all without their parents knowing about it.

Some have even been referred to clinics that can provide them with puberty blockers or hormones.

So you fixate on the surgery claim, and ignore the actual harm going on.

The problem the left has these days is people now see through this bullshit, as there is too much raw information out there for you to gaslight.

Can't stop the signal,
So Trump lied. To your face. But you liked the lie so you make excuses for him.

That’s exactly what just happened here.
 
So Trump lied. To your fade. But you liked the lie so you make excuses for him.

That’s exactly what just happened here.

he exaggerated. Unlike the left who hides their ACTUAL lies in weaselly language.

It doesn't remove the problems with illegal immigration, or trans insanity, or any other causes the left has.

The exaggeration doesn't eliminate the problem and the crux of his argument.

Meanwhile you twats hide things like drugging and mutilating under terms like gender affirming care, which also includes purely cosmetic things to hide said drugging and mutilating.
 
It's never going to happen. I condemned Newsome's stupid empty political rhetoric but you felt a pressing need to defend Trump's lie.

Exhibit a-3003.

Exaggeration, not lie. Schools are hiding stuff from parents as well as exposing these kids to outside sources of "treatment"

If it's not going to happen, why fucking pass the fucking laws you fucking gullible dolt?
 
Exaggeration, not lie. Schools are hiding stuff from parents as well as exposing these kids to outside sources of "treatment"

If it's not going to happen, why fucking pass the fucking laws you fucking gullible dolt?

LOL, I'm gullible for condemning his stupid political rhetoric that is never going to happen? LOL
 
he exaggerated. Unlike the left who hides their ACTUAL lies in weaselly language.

It doesn't remove the problems with illegal immigration, or trans insanity, or any other causes the left has.

The exaggeration doesn't eliminate the problem and the crux of his argument.

Meanwhile you twats hide things like drugging and mutilating under terms like gender affirming care, which also includes purely cosmetic things to hide said drugging and mutilating.
What’s the difference between exaggerating and lying?

Other than when your hack politics wants to forgive the speaker, obviously.
 
He lied.

Exhibit a-3004

And yet that doesn't mean the problem doesn't exist, even though you want it to go away.

Same thing with the eating pets, there is still a huge problem with migrants in that area, but keep harping on the pets thing and pretend it means the issue doesn't exist at all.

That's what your damaged brain cannot comprehend.
 
The Biden economy is strong. Joe Biden is energetic and engaged. Kamala is a brilliant woman.
Trump is Hitler. Trump will end democracy.
over and over and over on channel after channel after channel, over and over and over again. They don't seem to recognize things in reality. I don't know. This one is really quite conflicted in their own self.
 
What’s the difference between exaggerating and lying?

Other than when your hack politics wants to forgive the speaker, obviously.

What's the difference between not doing bottom surgery on minors, but still doing top surgery and giving them puberty blockers and hormones?
 
And yet that doesn't mean the problem doesn't exist, even though you want it to go away.

Same thing with the eating pets, there is still a huge problem with migrants in that area, but keep harping on the pets thing and pretend it means the issue doesn't exist at all.

That's what your damaged brain cannot comprehend.

You are the one spinning lies, not me.
 
One obstacle is what you already know (trump lost in 2020). Even if a lie (trump won in 2020) sounds plausible, why would you set what you know aside just because you heard the lie repeatedly?
Recently, a team led by Lisa Fazio of Vanderbilt University set out to test how the illusion of truth effect interacts with our prior knowledge. Would it affect our existing knowledge? They used paired true and un-true statements, but also split their items according to how likely participants were to know the truth (so "The Pacific Ocean is the largest ocean on Earth" is an example of a "known" items, which also happens to be true, and "The Atlantic Ocean is the largest ocean on Earth" is an un-true item, for which people are likely to know the actual truth).
Their results show that the illusion of truth effect worked just as strongly for known as for unknown items, suggesting that prior knowledge won’t prevent repetition from swaying our judgements of plausibility.
Where the FUCK are your MILLIONS of PHANTOM BIDEN VOTERS FROM 2020, Stalinberg?????????????????????????????????
Fucking retarded PSYCHOPATH.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom