How is the sound of freedom related to Qanon?

[blackhawk]

When the sound of freedom released recently I saw a lot of headlines like this.

'Sound Of Freedom' Is a Superhero Movie for Dads With Brainworms

'Sound of Freedom': Jim Caviezel child trafficking thriller is a box-office bash, and QAnon believers are celebrating

www.rollingstone.com

https://www.washingtonpost.com/arts-entertainment/2023/07/07/sound-of-freedom-qanon-theories-jim-caviezel/

Sound of Freedom: the QAnon-adjacent thriller seducing America

Jim Caviezel stars as a hero trying to stop child traffickers in a paranoid new movie turning into a surprise box-office hit

www.theguardian.com

And dozens more all saying the movie is tied to Qanon. But after I looked some the movie was written in 2015. And didn't start filming until 2018.

Sound of Freedom (film) - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Qanon thing didn't became a thing until 2017, 2 years after Qanon started.

Who is behind the Qanon conspiracy? We've traced it to three people

Pushing the theory on to bigger platforms proved to be the key to Qanon’s spread — and the originators’ financial gain.

www.nbcnews.com

So how can it be Qanon when the script predates Qanon?

And why is a movie based on real life events of people saving trafficked kids Qanon?

And since when is a movie about child trafficking considered bad?

Anything that doesn't fit their narrative or world view is bad even when it's good.

 

[Mac1958]

Actually…you do

If you are making wild accusations without proof
You have none

This guy is straight up nuts.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Conspiracy Theories have existed long before any of us were born. QAnon capitalizes on those theories and makes sure they are as widely disseminated as possible. So linking a movie that is based around CT to QAnon makes sense.

.




Absolutely wrong. If you're wrong about this, what else are you wrong about?

The phrase, "conspiracy theory" was originated by the CIA to discredit those who did not believe the "media" version of the JFK assassination story.

I was alive on the day JFK was assassinated. I was nine years old and understood what I was hearing on the TV. If you were not alive at that time, your bullshit was true of you, but certainly not of "any of us".

But nice try and I'm sure your ignorant fellow cultists might buy it.




.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Yet you cant identify a single case of grooming
You are making shit up

When you put it that way, all that I have to do to prove you wrong is to cite one such case. Just one.

I'll give you two. There are plenty more, but this is twice what I need to prove you wrong.

• Gender identity education sparks controversy during Rocklin school board vote
• NY teacher forced girl, 9, to use male pronouns — causing suicidal thoughts: suit

 

[AMart]

The pedo leftists don't like this movie. Is anyone surprised?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

The pedo leftists don't like this movie. Is anyone surprised?

Evil prefers to operate in darkness, where it cannot as easily be seen.

Evil hates having the light shined on it.

 

[HeyNorm]

This guy is straight up nuts.

Because he’s got guts enough to spotlight the horror of child sex trafficking?

Not a good look on you Mac.

 

[Mac1958]

Because he’s got guts enough to spotlight the horror of child sex trafficking?

Not a good look on you Mac.

Yes, I know, anyone who isn't Qanon supports child sex trafficking.

I'm so glad I'm not like you.

 

[Oddball]

When the sound of freedom released recently I saw a lot of headlines like this.

'Sound Of Freedom' Is a Superhero Movie for Dads With Brainworms

'Sound of Freedom': Jim Caviezel child trafficking thriller is a box-office bash, and QAnon believers are celebrating

www.rollingstone.com

https://www.washingtonpost.com/arts-entertainment/2023/07/07/sound-of-freedom-qanon-theories-jim-caviezel/

Sound of Freedom: the QAnon-adjacent thriller seducing America

Jim Caviezel stars as a hero trying to stop child traffickers in a paranoid new movie turning into a surprise box-office hit

www.theguardian.com

And dozens more all saying the movie is tied to Qanon. But after I looked some the movie was written in 2015. And didn't start filming until 2018.

Sound of Freedom (film) - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Qanon thing didn't became a thing until 2017, 2 years after Qanon started.

Who is behind the Qanon conspiracy? We've traced it to three people

Pushing the theory on to bigger platforms proved to be the key to Qanon’s spread — and the originators’ financial gain.

www.nbcnews.com

So how can it be Qanon when the script predates Qanon?

And why is a movie based on real life events of people saving trafficked kids Qanon?

And since when is a movie about child trafficking considered bad?

It's not....The shitlibs go all BlueAnon when they can't otherwise 'splain away the popularity of something that isn't full moonbat.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Because he’s got guts enough to spotlight the horror of child sex trafficking?

Not a good look on you Mac.

.

I disagree. It's a great look on Mac. Spotlights brilliantly exactly what the world needs to know about him/her/it.

.

 

[Mac1958]

Yet you cant identify a single case of grooming

You are making shit up

Holy crap, they're really coming out of the woodwork on this thread.

 

[Lesh]

You are confused Moon Bat.

I don't believe in any of the Q stuff but all you stupid uneducated Moon Bats believe that more welfare, open borders, more taxation, higher cost of energy, more trannies and queers, doing away with Constitutional rights and defunding the police makes a country better. You can't get any more crazy than that.

So no deep state

No Feds caused the Jan 6 riot?

No stolen election?

Really?

 

[HeyNorm]

Yes, I know, anyone who isn't Qanon supports child sex trafficking.

I'm so glad I'm not like you.

Again, you look the fool. But you’ve been told that before.

I’ve seen such outrage from the left over someone trying to spotlight the horror of child sex trafficking, but zero from the left over the mob marching in NYC pride parade chanting “we’re here, we’re queer and we’re coming for your children”

And, I guess, that’s to be expected of todays left.

 

[Mac1958]

Again, you look the fool. But you’ve been told that before.

I’ve seen such outrage from the left over someone trying to spotlight the horror of child sex trafficking, but zero from the left over the mob marching in NYC pride parade chanting “we’re here, we’re queer and we’re coming for your children”

And, I guess, that’s to be expected of todays left.

Sure, sure, okay Q.

Where does Mac1958 actually stand on the issues?

 

[Oddball]

Again, you look the fool. But you’ve been told that before.

I’ve seen such outrage from the left over someone trying to spotlight the horror of child sex trafficking, but zero from the left over the mob marching in NYC pride parade chanting “we’re here, we’re queer and we’re coming for your children”

And, I guess, that’s to be expected of todays left.

I'm a tad surprised that Chris Hansen hasn't been Arkancided.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Has any left wrong-leaning user posted anything yet in this thread, that had any apparent purpose other than to give cover in one way or another to those involved in sexually abusing children? I see several posts from several such users, all of them either denying what we all know is going on, or else trying to distract away from it.

 

[HeyNorm]

Sure, sure, okay Q.

Where does Mac1958 actually stand on the issues?

And still no outrage. No I don’t think I want to click a link from you.

 

[Mac1958]

And still no outrage. No I don’t think I want to click a link from you.

Do you think you can get all your bitching out in one post?

Your opinion of me means nothing, sorry.

 

[Oddball]

Do you also believe in the boogey man?

Yes....He's orange and has a goofy haircut.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

People twist themselves into pretzels trying to defend sexual abuse, grooming and manipulation of children.