How Is REALLY Different Than ISIS Justifcation To Take Land In The Middle East?

[Masked Dissident]

In this clip, Bryan Fischer implies that Anglo-Americans were justified in taking the land of the Native Americans:


When Bryan Fischer supports terrorism by using Old Testament in The Bible, it is being Christian. When Muslim Jihadists conquer "sinful" Muslims in the Middle East, he calls it terrorism. I hope none of you on The Right support this guy.

 

[pismoe]

just a guy with an OPINION M.D. !!

 

[pismoe]

AND I didn't watch the video M.D..

 

[theHawk]

Never heard of the guy so I don't really care what he has to say.

The fact is Muslims are a danger to Western society and should be rejected. No amount of anti-Christian bullshit you spew is going to change that.

 

[yiostheoy]

The Jews did not want ALL of the middle east for themselves, like the Muslims do. They just wanted their own land back. That's the first big difference.

The Palestinians left in 1948 of their own free will and accord. Now they want back in after the Jews have developed the land into a business and agricultural paradise. That's the second big difference.

Jews are not cutting off heads or setting POWs on fire. That's the third difference.

Jews do not wear rags on their heads and boink camels and goats. That's the final difference.

Do you get the difference yet ?!