How is raising taxes on the wealthy going to create jobs?

[Mr. Shaman]

Your favorite Americans ( the top wealthiest) have not created many jobs in the Decade they have had these tax cuts.

Why do you people want to do more of what hasnt worked?

.....'Cause that's what creates jobs....

....for COMPETENT-people?????

​

 

[LibocalypseNow]

I am an American Patriot and i will not allow our Government to scapegoat the Taxpayers. The Taxpayers had no control over how the Government spent their Money. Spending a shocking $16 Trillion more than they took in is all on them. I will not allow them a Free Pass on this. They are responsible for this awful mess,not the American Taxpayer. So please join the Constitutional Conservative Movement and as many we will triumph. Government has to be held accountable. The Taxpayers are not to blame.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

why have these "job creators" you people keep giving tax cuts to not created any jobs?

Keep giving?

What......you thought BUSHCO's tax-cut$ were a one-shot/one-year deal??????

(Lemme guess......you're a construction-worker, too, huh??

)​

 

[LibocalypseNow]

And seriously,how many Jobs has The One's "Jobs Czar" GE CEO Jeffrey Immelt created? All i've seen is him creating more Jobs in China. How can anyone argue The One has been a successful President? I just don't see it.

 

[Seawytch]

Clinton increased taxes and balanced the budget and didn't harm job creation.

Indeed he did. He raised taxes and we had the BIGGEST job growth in Presidential history. Funny that the RWers don't mention that when whining that the "job creators" getting "taxed too much" ( even though they are taxed at the lowest rate in decades).

If you increase the income tax paid by the wealthy, you actually give them incentive to invest in their business instead of sitting on it.

OF COURSE YOU DO RELIZE REAGANONICS HAD A BIG PART IN HELPING CLINTON GET A GREAT ECONOMY.

But in no way did Clinton have a surplus

Oh I see. Reagan is responsible for Clinton's economy. You guys do know how to spin. Does that mean you agree that Bush is responsible for our current economy?

 

[LibocalypseNow]

The Taxpayers cannot and should not be scapegoated. Our Government is the problem. Blaming the Taxpayers is just a convenient distraction from the usual suspects. Force them to Balance the Budget first. No discussion of Tax-Hikes should be considered till this happens. Period,end of story.

 

[J.E.D]

Cleaning up after the Hopey Changey One is going to be even rougher. So WTG Dems. You've managed to make things much worse. Thanks a lot for that. Yes we will see you in 2012. Better believe it.

But the GOP has been in control of the House for 7 months. They have done nothing about jobs. Only abortion, PP, NPR and gays. And they're even less popular than Obama and congressional Dems. Good luck in 2012.

becasue they can't get anything past the obstructionist democrats in the senate

That's no excuse. It's called governing. It's called compromise. If the House GOP can't get anything through the Senate, then perhaps they should try working with Dems to craft legislation that both can agree upon, instead of passing far-right dream bills that only the farthest of the right will support.

 

[LibocalypseNow]

But the GOP has been in control of the House for 7 months. They have done nothing about jobs. Only abortion, PP, NPR and gays. And they're even less popular than Obama and congressional Dems. Good luck in 2012.

becasue they can't get anything past the obstructionist democrats in the senate

That's no excuse. It's called governing. It's called compromise. If the House GOP can't get anything through the Senate, then perhaps they should try working with Dems to craft legislation that both can agree upon, instead of passing far-right dream bills that only the farthest of the right will support.

Uh,they just did that with the Debt Limit increase yet you Hopey Changeys called em "Racists" and "Terrorists." So why should they work with you guys in the future?

 

[J.E.D]

becasue they can't get anything past the obstructionist democrats in the senate

That's no excuse. It's called governing. It's called compromise. If the House GOP can't get anything through the Senate, then perhaps they should try working with Dems to craft legislation that both can agree upon, instead of passing far-right dream bills that only the farthest of the right will support.

Uh,they just did that with the Debt Limit increase yet you Hopey Changeys called em "Racists" and "Terrorists." So why should they work with you guys in the future?

So they got their feelings hurt and now they want to take their toys and go home? And I'm supposed to be impressed by the Tea Party how? Like I said, that's no excuse. If they can't work with the Senate to craft legislation that can be agreed upon by both sides and signed by the POTUS, then they have no business being in DC. If they just want to be partisan ideologues, they can do so easily enough by being Faux News contributors or sitting in front of their computer calling Dems socialists on some political forum.

And BTW, the debt ceiling deal was no compromise. It was the GOP holding the economy hostage until they got their way. According to Boehner, he got 98% of what he wanted. I don't call that a compromise.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Indeed he did. He raised taxes and we had the BIGGEST job growth in Presidential history. Funny that the RWers don't mention that when whining that the "job creators" getting "taxed too much" ( even though they are taxed at the lowest rate in decades).

If you increase the income tax paid by the wealthy, you actually give them incentive to invest in their business instead of sitting on it.

OF COURSE YOU DO RELIZE REAGANONICS HAD A BIG PART IN HELPING CLINTON GET A GREAT ECONOMY.

But in no way did Clinton have a surplus

Oh I see. Reagan is responsible for Clinton's economy. You guys do know how to spin. Does that mean you agree that Bush is responsible for our current economy?

Yes Reaganoics where a chief cause that help Clinton have a stronge economy his first term not so good after his secoind.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

the dems will be hammering the pubs on not creating jobs while whining about the debt then blocking efforts for a real solution. The tea party is plummeting because of that, and the gop is trying to figure how to harness their 15% of the electorate without pissing off the other 85%.

Will be an interesting election.

rino

 

[bigrebnc1775]

why have these "job creators" you people keep giving tax cuts to not created any jobs?

Uncertainty from the government will as always make those who have money take it some where else.

For.....

10 YEARS??!!!!

(Whatta bunch o' fuckin' candy-ass weenies.)

​

FUZZY MATH bUSH HAD OVER 5 MILLION NEWS JOBS CREATED, HOW MUCH DID OBAMAS BAILOUT CREATE AGAIN? Even obama said it didn't work.

 

[oreo]

I have been thinking about this for quite some time. So I want someone who thinks it's a good thing to raise taxes on those who create jobs (the wealthy). What exactly do you think obama wants to do with the money? Give more money to the super poor? Increase payouts to the welfare crowd? None of that actually creates anything but more of an entitlement generation. It actually kills the real American dream for those who want to be rich and have money. It kills any type of a dream that a person can actually achieve home ownership they can afford and things they may want.

Here's the cold hard truth giving to the poor just makes more poor, when you take from those who have you're actually killing the American dream. Poor people do not hire people to work for them The wealthy do.

I think it's obama's goal not to create anything but equality in the poor house.

Agreed:

"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance,and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."Winston Churchill

 

[LibocalypseNow]

That's no excuse. It's called governing. It's called compromise. If the House GOP can't get anything through the Senate, then perhaps they should try working with Dems to craft legislation that both can agree upon, instead of passing far-right dream bills that only the farthest of the right will support.

Uh,they just did that with the Debt Limit increase yet you Hopey Changeys called em "Racists" and "Terrorists." So why should they work with you guys in the future?

So they got their feelings hurt and now they want to take their toys and go home? And I'm supposed to be impressed by the Tea Party how? Like I said, that's no excuse. If they can't work with the Senate to craft legislation that can be agreed upon by both sides and signed by the POTUS, then they have no business being in DC. If they just want to be partisan ideologues, they can do so easily enough by being Faux News contributors or sitting in front of their computer calling Dems socialists on some political forum.

And BTW, the debt ceiling deal was no compromise. It was the GOP holding the economy hostage until they got their way. According to Boehner, he got 98% of what he wanted. I don't call that a compromise.

Well if working with you guys makes them "Racists & "Terrorists",why would they work with you guys again in the future? You haven't exactly given any incentive for compromise huh? I guess they'll just have to move on and fix the Country without you. You've left them no choice.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Look at the title of your own post, spinmeister.

Sinmaster?

Here's the title

How is raising taxes on the wealthy going to create jobs?

It's a question you do know what a question is don't you?

You claimed that people said that tax hikes create jobs. What person has said that spinmeister?

Then you ended your original rant with, "I think it's obama's goal not to create anything but equality in the poor house." However, the overall tax burden in the US is lowest in decades, hack.

Here's two from the first page asshole, are you too fucking lazy to even look on the first page?

It gives us money to do projects we need like infrastructure fwhich also creates lots of jobs

The government levies taxes in order to support spending. When the government uses spending to create jobs for people (police, air traffic controllers, soldiers, etc.) who otherwise wouldn't have had them, those people, in turn, use their salaries to buy goods and services.

When those people buy goods and services, that creates demand, which in turns creates more jobs for more people. Demand is responsible for job creation.

The rich, on the other hand, are not "job creators". That's simply a lie to fool simple people.

 

[J.E.D]

Uh,they just did that with the Debt Limit increase yet you Hopey Changeys called em "Racists" and "Terrorists." So why should they work with you guys in the future?

So they got their feelings hurt and now they want to take their toys and go home? And I'm supposed to be impressed by the Tea Party how? Like I said, that's no excuse. If they can't work with the Senate to craft legislation that can be agreed upon by both sides and signed by the POTUS, then they have no business being in DC. If they just want to be partisan ideologues, they can do so easily enough by being Faux News contributors or sitting in front of their computer calling Dems socialists on some political forum.

And BTW, the debt ceiling deal was no compromise. It was the GOP holding the economy hostage until they got their way. According to Boehner, he got 98% of what he wanted. I don't call that a compromise.

Well if working with you guys makes them "Racists & "Terrorists",why would they work with you guys again in the future? You haven't exactly given any incentive for compromise huh? I guess they'll just have to move on and fix the Country without you. You've left them no choice.

So, wanting to fix the country for the sake of fixing the country isn't enough incentive for the GOP to work with Dems? And how exactly are they going to fix the country on their own when they only control one house of congress?

 

[Maple]

I have been thinking about this for quite some time. So I want someone who thinks it's a good thing to raise taxes on those who create jobs (the wealthy). What exactly do you think obama wants to do with the money? Give more money to the super poor? Increase payouts to the welfare crowd? None of that actually creates anything but more of an entitlement generation. It actually kills the real American dream for those who want to be rich and have money. It kills any type of a dream that a person can actually achieve home ownership they can afford and things they may want.

Here's the cold hard truth giving to the poor just makes more poor, when you take from those who have you're actually killing the American dream. Poor people do not hire people to work for them The wealthy do.

I think it's obama's goal not to create anything but equality in the poor house.

Taking money from anyone to give to the government takes money out of the private sector economy- anytime that happens with any group of people we see a slowdown in the private sector and that means less jobs, not more. People spend, save and invest more when they have more of their own money, this creates jobs, as with people who have more to spend, do, which creates demands for goods and services, which creates demand for people to make the goods and provide the services. It's that simple.

 

[Full-Auto]

Indeed he did. He raised taxes and we had the BIGGEST job growth in Presidential history. Funny that the RWers don't mention that when whining that the "job creators" getting "taxed too much" ( even though they are taxed at the lowest rate in decades).

If you increase the income tax paid by the wealthy, you actually give them incentive to invest in their business instead of sitting on it.

OF COURSE YOU DO RELIZE REAGANONICS HAD A BIG PART IN HELPING CLINTON GET A GREAT ECONOMY.

But in no way did Clinton have a surplus

Oh I see. Reagan is responsible for Clinton's economy. You guys do know how to spin. Does that mean you agree that Bush is responsible for our current economy?

Deregulation sparked the tech boom. Funny how you leave out the other branches. actually not funny, pitiful.

 

[Maple]

So they got their feelings hurt and now they want to take their toys and go home? And I'm supposed to be impressed by the Tea Party how? Like I said, that's no excuse. If they can't work with the Senate to craft legislation that can be agreed upon by both sides and signed by the POTUS, then they have no business being in DC. If they just want to be partisan ideologues, they can do so easily enough by being Faux News contributors or sitting in front of their computer calling Dems socialists on some political forum.

And BTW, the debt ceiling deal was no compromise. It was the GOP holding the economy hostage until they got their way. According to Boehner, he got 98% of what he wanted. I don't call that a compromise.

Well if working with you guys makes them "Racists & "Terrorists",why would they work with you guys again in the future? You haven't exactly given any incentive for compromise huh? I guess they'll just have to move on and fix the Country without you. You've left them no choice.

So, wanting to fix the country for the sake of fixing the country isn't enough incentive for the GOP to work with Dems? And how exactly are they going to fix the country on their own when they only control one house of congress?

Here's the remedy that is coming your way Nov 2012, a Republican President along with a Republican senate and a Republican congress. Then it does get fixed. I can hardly wait.

 

[Full-Auto]

So they got their feelings hurt and now they want to take their toys and go home? And I'm supposed to be impressed by the Tea Party how? Like I said, that's no excuse. If they can't work with the Senate to craft legislation that can be agreed upon by both sides and signed by the POTUS, then they have no business being in DC. If they just want to be partisan ideologues, they can do so easily enough by being Faux News contributors or sitting in front of their computer calling Dems socialists on some political forum.

And BTW, the debt ceiling deal was no compromise. It was the GOP holding the economy hostage until they got their way. According to Boehner, he got 98% of what he wanted. I don't call that a compromise.

Well if working with you guys makes them "Racists & "Terrorists",why would they work with you guys again in the future? You haven't exactly given any incentive for compromise huh? I guess they'll just have to move on and fix the Country without you. You've left them no choice.

So, wanting to fix the country for the sake of fixing the country isn't enough incentive for the GOP to work with Dems? And how exactly are they going to fix the country on their own when they only control one house of congress?

Dems came to the table with conference call directives. EXTREME.

NOW HOW DOES THAT SHOW ANY WILLINGNESS TO COMPROMISE?