how gravity works

[james bond]

No he did not. Here is what he said and you are wrong. Admit it or go away.

Gravity: From Apples to the Universe

How our ideas of gravity have changed from Aristotle to the present day.

www.britannica.com

More SFE and POS from you. Aristotle was prolly an atheist. He's adored by the likes of you, but said some stupid shat. Is that why you guys/gals adore him?

"The ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle said that objects fall because each of the four elements (earth, air, fire, and water) had their natural place, and these elements had a tendency to move back toward their natural place. Thus, objects that were made of earth wanted to return to Earth, whereas fire, for example, rose toward heaven."

As usual, atheists were wrong.

 

[james bond]

Fast Forward

Postmodern science gives you an out for explaining the discrepancy between the measured age of the Earth and its Biblical age. God accelerated all the processes, which follows from the orthodox idea that time is relative.

The measured age of the Earth from meteors/space rocks in 1956 was wrong. The atheist geochemist made assumptions that were wrong and didn't know radioactive decay doesn't fit calendar year. OTOH, the creationists just used radiocarbon dating on organic materials and discovered dinosaur fossils still had C14 remaining and soft tissue inside. That's hard evidence.

 

[rupol2000]

More SFE and POS from you. Aristotle was prolly an atheist. He's adored by the likes of you, but said some stupid shat. Is that why you guys/gals adore him?

"The ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle said that objects fall because each of the four elements (earth, air, fire, and water) had their natural place, and these elements had a tendency to move back toward their natural place. Thus, objects that were made of earth wanted to return to Earth, whereas fire, for example, rose toward heaven."

As usual, atheists were wrong.

Usually illiterate people who did not read Aristotle and do not understand the context, think that he used words like "earth" or "fire" in the literal sense, but they mean heaviness and density.

Also, illiterate people are most often confused in the concepts of atheism and materialism. You can be a materialist and a theist, like the Jews and Christian nominalists, you can deny God, but to be an idealist, these are not related concepts.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Science is just study. It invites investigating things in logical, practical ways. Explaining things is never what it does. But you could attempt explaining "the how" of gravity at least..

See classical physics and relativity. Best we got.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Show the link from whoever proved it wrong? Put your money where your mouth is.
I'll bet you can't and you are as dumb as a stump.

Frannie the sock troll will waste your time for as long as you let him.

 

[Hollie]

The measured age of the Earth from meteors/space rocks in 1956 was wrong. The atheist geochemist made assumptions that were wrong and didn't know radioactive decay doesn't fit calendar year. OTOH, the creationists just used radiocarbon dating on organic materials and discovered dinosaur fossils still had C14 remaining and soft tissue inside. That's hard evidence.

Creationer frauds did nothing of the kind.

 

[rupol2000]

Idealists are distinguished by the materialists not by the fact that they believe in "God", but by the fact that they assert that reality exists beyond sensibility and is intelligible (which was also accept by correct physicists)

 

[Hollie]

More SFE and POS from you. Aristotle was prolly an atheist. He's adored by the likes of you, but said some stupid shat. Is that why you guys/gals adore him?

"The ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle said that objects fall because each of the four elements (earth, air, fire, and water) had their natural place, and these elements had a tendency to move back toward their natural place. Thus, objects that were made of earth wanted to return to Earth, whereas fire, for example, rose toward heaven."

As usual, atheists were wrong.

Science has progressed since the time of Aristotle. Religioners have not.

 

[rupol2000]

In fact, physics and idealism are identical concepts, because the physicist speaks of intelligible forces, unlike the priest Newton and the materialists, who tried to reduce everything to mathematics

 

[Rigby5]

Interesting theory but I prefer my own.

In my theory, Gravity is simply the result of the cumulative magnetic properties of all of the atoms contained in matter. The more mass, the more atoms, the higher the concentration, the more gravity, etc.

Gravity and magnetism both are proportional to inverse distance squared, but Magnetism is a property of matter, while according to general theory of relativity, gravity is the property of space time itself. Magnetism depends on the electronic configuration, temperature and orientation of atoms of a material, while the force of gravitation only depends on the mass of the material.

 

[rupol2000]

There are traces of scholastic manipulation in the languages. The words heaven and heaviness in English have the same root, and this completely contradicts the ideas of the ancient physicists about the lightest ether, and human experience, from which it follows that the lung things always rises up. This is an inversion, which is typical, just as the words devil and god were reversed, and the first to do this in the pre-Abrahamic Zoroastrian tradition((Devs and Assurs)).

 

[rupol2000]

Something similar, although not exactly the same, is in the Slavic languages, where the word sky("ne-bo" that is "not being") means literally nothingness

 

[rupol2000]

The Indo-European root for heaven is "div" and its flexive variations, which include the words "devil" and "divine"
The very word "divine" meant the same as "heavenly", "from sky"

 

[james bond]

Frannie the sock troll will waste your time for as long as you let him.

Aww jeez. I thought he was banned .

 

[james bond]

Science has progressed since the time of Aristotle. Religioners have not.

What can you tell me about Aristotle? And the four elements or were there more?

Who are Religioners? No such word oh ignorant one, Flattie Hollie .

 

[rupol2000]

And the words "god" and the Slavic "bog" come from the name of reptiles and chthonic gods (for example, Hades, the lord of the undergound, in variant "gades" just reduct to "god", in fonetic just "gad", this word in slavic means "reptilia")

 

[rupol2000]

Thus, the names of gods and properties of nature are inverted in modern language.

 

[rupol2000]

Light comes from the heaven, but the heaven is heavy. It is grammatical oxymoron.
Who needed it and why?

 

[rupol2000]

By the way, the words light and Lucifer are also the same root in the sense of origin.

 

[rupol2000]

Grammatically logical the name of the sky is "lighten" instead "heaven". Is it clear?

So, how Neutonianism and Atomism releative here?