He already addressed that one particular point in a way that is pretty balanced.
That has been a slow progression. Don't forget we needed the 19th amendment to allow them to vote in federal elections.
Legal rights are only meaningful if the legal system is working as it should. The legal system can be overpowered by cultural attitudes. Women have suffered under that at various times. In fact, the legal system was often used to keep them oppressed.
Always the fly in the ointment.
Clearly a purposeful fallacy in terms of connecting the dots. But whoever thought the Guardian was useful for anything but toilet paper clearly doesn't get out enough.
Well, you'll open up a can of worms there. Rights are not rights unless universally enjoyed. By definition, there is no such thing as "women's rights" outside of those enjoyed by everyone else. If they don't qualify as rights, they are then some kind of favoritism.
Be prepared to hear the infamous tape......
He just abandoned every promise he made about IVF. Trump loves the con. He hates helping people. It’s crazy.
The issue is that, at some point in the pregnancy, a fetus has its own brain and individual consciousness, so it's entirely arguable that it isn't just a matter of governing one's bodily functions.
Did you forget your ADD meds this morning. What are you talking about.
.
Fox, CNN, NBC... any outlet will tell you.
www.foxnews.com
www.msnbc.com
.Fox, CNN, NBC... any outlet will tell you.
Andrew Schulz rips Trump for IVF campaign pledge 'flip-flop'
Comedian Andrew Schulz criticized President Trump for not following through on his campaign promise to provide universal IVF coverage for families.
Why Trump’s retreat on his IVF pledge was entirely predictable
A year ago, the president claimed that if he won, his administration would be "paying for that treatment." Guess what happened next?
The party that cant define what woman is complains about Trump who has put more women in postions of power that actually can do the job. Democrats gave us Harris and these two
First of all, it's apparent that women are citizens under the law, and well-integrated into positions of power in society. Their fundamental legal rights aren't going away, unless one counts abortion (which is an issue about when human life begins, not solely an issue of reproductive rights).
This article from the Guardian accuses the Trump admin of threatening women's rights in a variety of ways, such as by appointing men to cabinet positions who have been accused of violence against women. The problem here is that this doesn't indicate a significant legal change to the status of women in America, and its effects on the ambiguous concept of "women's rights" are hard to approximate.
If someone believes that Trump is a threat to women's rights, I'd like to hear them extrapolate on the issue more, such as how they're defining a "woman's right" to begin with.
Trump is tearing up the rights of women. The message from your sisters in the Arab world? Don’t give up: resistance works | Hibaaq Osman
The new administration threatens to undo decades of progress in America, but as North Africa and the Middle East have shown, there is power in female solidaritywww.theguardian.com
You dipshit. More women vote democrat than republican regardless of your obsession and self-loathing homoerotic need to focus on a few people you are obsessed with.
Lets see the democrats who opened the border and allowed thousands of illegal rapists, and killers who target women, and gang wife beaters in the country, support and advocate minor girls have breasts removed in the name of gender affirming care, want men in womens bathrooms and sports, who cant define a woman but believe a man can change ito one are a pro woman party.
So why did Trump not join Sen Duckworth's IVF bill mandating insurance companies cover IVF treatments which was, word for word, Trump's pledge?
www.booker.senate.gov
.So why did Trump not join Sen Duckworth's IVF bill mandating insurance companies cover IVF treatments which was, word for word, Trump's pledge?
Senate Republicans Block Booker-Duckworth Amendment to Help Make IVF More Affordable for Middle-Class Families | U.S. Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey
<p><strong>WASHINGTON, D.C. –</strong> Despite claiming to support IVF, Senate Republicans blocked an amendment led by U.S. Senators Cory Booker (D-NJ) and Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) from being included in the Senate’s budget proposal that would mirror their <em><a...
Only CNN liesSo why did Trump not join Sen Duckworth's IVF bill mandating insurance companies cover IVF treatments which was, word for word, Trump's pledge?
Senate Republicans Block Booker-Duckworth Amendment to Help Make IVF More Affordable for Middle-Class Families | U.S. Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey
<p><strong>WASHINGTON, D.C. –</strong> Despite claiming to support IVF, Senate Republicans blocked an amendment led by U.S. Senators Cory Booker (D-NJ) and Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) from being included in the Senate’s budget proposal that would mirror their <em><a...
Not a CNN link genius.
