How does the Trump administration threaten women's rights?

You know the answer. Trump has worked hard to restrict women's ability to get birth control and restricted their ability to end an unwanted pregnancy rendering them to breeding machines.

You have trolled to create yet another abortion thread. Im sure this will be ground breaking.
.

With the very rare exception, becoming a "breeding machine" is a woman's choice.




.
 
Pfft….”breeding machine” was their choice when they told their partner not to use a condom…
.

It's just insulting to women that our culture has convinced them that not having sex is not a choice.


.
 
you need to note the word CONTRACEPTION WAS INCLUDED.
Absolutely — and that inclusion proves the point. Contraception was mentioned, not as part of a revoked right, but as an area where access is being quietly choked off through funding cuts and destroyed stockpiles. It’s not that the legal right disappeared — it’s that the infrastructure supporting it was pulled out from under people. That's exactly how rights vanish without technically being revoked.
 
Know what? A redirected page to nowhere? Probably tried to give me a virus you spiteful *****….I didn’t click on that fake looking shit…🙄
.

I never click on one of those unidentified links from a leftist. Last time I did, I was sorry.


.
 
Know what? A redirected page to nowhere? Probably tried to give me a virus you spiteful *****….I didn’t click on that fake looking shit…🙄



 
Honestly, I think the POTUS has been far too nice to woman as his second term begins. Far too many females in the administration and the White House staff. Far too little movement on returning to a society based around traditional values and the nuclear family. Just my two cents.
 
It's just insulting to women that our culture has convinced them that not having sex is not a choice.
No one is going to "not have sex" unless they're highly unusual.

And there are plenty of ways of reducing the likelihood of pregnancy when having sex.

So it doesn't matter whether they have sex or not. They're not obligated not to.
 
Honestly, I think the POTUS has been far too nice to woman as his second term begins. Far too many females in the administration and the White House staff.
Nope, not at all

Far too little movement on returning to a society based around traditional values and the nuclear family. Just my two cents.
What many refer to as "traditional values" are outdated garbage that have no place in modern society. People who want those things are free to move 3rd world countries such as Saudi Arabia or Iran.

The "nuclear family" is a feminist institution. Traditionally, men practiced polygamy, which allowed them to procreate with multiple women at the same time, and allowed "powerful men" to take all of the women for themselves, and leave the "weak" men with none.

The invention of the nuclear family feminized marriage by requiring men to limit themselves to just one woman, in order to better preserve the welfare of the woman and the children, and allow "weaker" men more of a chance of finding a partner.
 
You know the answer. Trump has worked hard to restrict women's ability to get birth control and restricted their ability to end an unwanted pregnancy rendering them to breeding machines.

You have trolled to create yet another abortion thread. Im sure this will be ground breaking.

The only "right" you care about is abortion. It's ghoulish.
 
People lose their minds over Abortion. My policy on abortion would be - "Safe, Legal, and Rare". I don't want Federal funds going towards it, a National Ban on it would be too extreme for most people. I don't lose my mind over Abortion, its not some hill I'll die on. What I don't like is Feminists and leftists bragging about it as some political issue. It shouldn't be considered a political issue.

Safe legal and rare went out the window about a decade ago.

ShoutYourAbortion - Wikipedia

Lily Allen ‘can’t remember’ how many abortions she’s had
 
The only "right" you care about is abortion. It's ghoulish.
.

They have forgotten something women used to know by instinct -- that we have to right to avoid getting pregnant in the first place if we didn't want to have children.

It is ghoulish and very sad.

It is the devil himself.

.
 
15th post
.

They have forgotten something women used to know by instinct -- that we have to right to avoid getting pregnant in the first place if we didn't want to have children.

It is ghoulish and very sad.

It is the devil himself.

.

Plus if they want to ask someone about how to "not have sex", ask men who aren't rapists and aren't dating/married/have a fuckbuddy.
 
.

They have forgotten something women used to know by instinct -- that we have to right to avoid getting pregnant in the first place if we didn't want to have children.

It is ghoulish and very sad.

It is the devil himself.

.
It doesn't matter. There's no obligation not to abort a zygote. So, if a person is willing and able to do that, there's certainly no obligation not to have sex, nor is there any need for there to be a consequence for doing so.

Expecting people not to have sex is rather outdated, and isn't relevant in the modern world, in which birth control and abortion are available.

I won't say there are "no risks" to having sex, especially without protection, but it's apparent that your hang-up is just about "sex", with an emphasis on women in particular. That's rather archaic.
 
The only "right" you care about is abortion. It's ghoulish.
You’ll need to link evidence of that or I’d like an apology. There are many rights I care about, including the right to govern your bodily functions, but certainly not exclusively.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom