Onyx
Gold Member
- Dec 17, 2015
- 7,887
- 499
- 155
Claiming a self-made billionaire is not successful enough to be the president.
Self made? What bullshit.
He had a helping hand from his daddy, the mafia, and US taxpayers.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Claiming a self-made billionaire is not successful enough to be the president.
Look the rainbow brigade think they have another Trump talking point. $1 billion is a rounding error compared to the $$$ trillions Hillary and government idiots have pissed away. Go lick your wounds leftwit.
It is a lot to Trump, whose net worth is 3 billion. Basically they are saying he has no money left outside his fixed assets, which is not news to me considering I have said this for awhile.
If Trump loses this election, he will be a broke ass ***** getting ass raped in the ghetto. That would be some poetic justice.
We are not talking about a country here (although there are some whose GDP is just about $1 billion), but we are talking about an individual who is running for president on the mantra of "the best businessman on the planet.....ever......trust him, believe in him....he's the greatest, etc."
Yes, our tax system is seriously flawed in allowing someone, like Trump, to not only list losses of $916 million in ONE single year (and the repercussions that such a loss may have also caused on others)....BUT to turn around and be exempt from any tax burden for 18 subsequent years...........AND, the clincher, is to carry on in your lifestyle after such a loss, to STILL be living in a penthouse, have a private plane and still be able to walk into most banks and get additional risky loans.
I know that many of us have written Trump's eulogy over many other discovered flaws in Trump's character and history, but surely the average voter must place aside any hatred of Clinton and REJECT this charlatan who could seriously damage not only our economy, but who is thin-skinned enough to even risk our world standing.
Did Trump pile up $20 trillion in debt like Hillary? $20,000 billion vs $1 billion proof nobody should vote for Hillary.
When did Hillary Clinton ever have any control over the national debt?
Did Trump pile up $20 trillion in debt like Hillary? $20,000 billion vs $1 billion proof nobody should vote for Hillary.
GoP runs the house and senate. They have the purse strings. Don't lie like your hero Trumpie..
or Bill & Monica... . hehDid Trump pile up $20 trillion in debt like Hillary? $20,000 billion vs $1 billion proof nobody should vote for Hillary.
When did Hillary Clinton ever have any control over the national debt?
i think the kennedys might have had that arrangement..Claiming a self-made billionaire is not successful enough to be the president.
Self made? What bullshit.
He had a helping hand from his daddy, the mafia, and US taxpayers.
Assets= wealthbut you said national wealth. what is that ?national wealth ??Did they check under the sofa cushions?
Obama lost trillions.
We added $50 trillion to our national wealth under Obama
More than any president in history
Currently at $123.6 trillion
Thanks President Obama
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time
national wealth - Google Search
You are an intentional liar and dishonest, go apologize to your mother.
Assets= wealthbut you said national wealth. what is that ?national wealth ??Did they check under the sofa cushions?
Obama lost trillions.
We added $50 trillion to our national wealth under Obama
More than any president in history
Currently at $123.6 trillion
Thanks President Obama
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time
national wealth - Google Search
there is no such thing as control of any of the branches. obama reid and pelosi are living proof of that.You are an intentional liar and dishonest, go apologize to your mother.
So the GoP don't control the house and senate.
^^^ possibly the dumbest thing posted today.
You are an intentional liar and dishonest, go apologize to your mother.
So the GoP don't control the house and senate.
Wake up dummy she's the one bragging about her 30 years experience in government.
^^^ possibly the dumbest thing posted today.
The fact that you gave a deflectionary responce tells me different.

Obviously you’re unaware of the fact that this fails as a red herring fallacy.We are not talking about a country here (although there are some whose GDP is just about $1 billion), but we are talking about an individual who is running for president on the mantra of "the best businessman on the planet.....ever......trust him, believe in him....he's the greatest, etc."
Yes, our tax system is seriously flawed in allowing someone, like Trump, to not only list losses of $916 million in ONE single year (and the repercussions that such a loss may have also caused on others)....BUT to turn around and be exempt from any tax burden for 18 subsequent years...........AND, the clincher, is to carry on in your lifestyle after such a loss, to STILL be living in a penthouse, have a private plane and still be able to walk into most banks and get additional risky loans.
I know that many of us have written Trump's eulogy over many other discovered flaws in Trump's character and history, but surely the average voter must place aside any hatred of Clinton and REJECT this charlatan who could seriously damage not only our economy, but who is thin-skinned enough to even risk our world standing.
Obviously, youre ignorant of tax law and liability. You'll also note that the nyt defrauded the IRS out of millions due to some shuck and jive accounting.
i think the kennedys might have had that arrangement..[/QUO
Perhaps. I do not have insider knowledge in that regard.
Wake up dummy she's the one bragging about her 30 years experience in government.
In positions with no influence on the national debt.
Who do you believe the best secretary of state was?
in Trump's case it meant adding three extra zeros at the end of their name.Self made doesn't mean he didn't have any help. It means he made it himself instead of inheriting the money. That's the context here.