Carl Sagan and Hawkins and Tyson explain why you are wrong. They haven't perverted science you just cherry pick from them.
No sir. They've given their
OPINIONS.
Science has no evidence that God is not possible or doesn't exist.
NONE!
In fact, it amazes me how often Science pulls back a curtain to find some astounding new information which seems to point to some divine intervention. Over and over, you look under a rock and find God, then proceed to explain away how you can dismiss God.
I absolutely LOVE science, but the Atheist Scientist is a constant source of entertainment for me. See... I already know "God did it!" So when science reveals that subatomic particles can instantly communicate across billions of light years with their entangled counterpart (see quantum entanglement), they are miffed by this but I am not surprised. When science discovers that every physics book is wrong and the universe is NOT mostly comprised of atoms as we once believed, but 96% of it is this dark energy/matter that we don't understand... the atheist scientists scratch their heads, but I am not surprised. When science discovers there are 40-some-odd constants, weights, ratios and forces which had to be precise to within .00000000000000000001 or the entire physical universe we know could not exist... they are perplexed, I am not surprised.
It's like watching your favorite sit-com to see what the atheist scientists are going to have to refute next, to keep their disbelief alive. I wondered the other day... what would happen IF science somehow had this earth-shattering breakthrough and discovered the key to spiritual nature, confirmed it exists and is quantifiable but difficult to physically detect in our dimensional reality.... How long would it take for you brainiac atheists to completely abandon Science as a bunch of superstitious nonsense?
I bet it wouldn't take long at all.