Inevitable
Deist.
- Jun 16, 2014
- 1,809
- 113
- 85
They don't.Dictionaries don't define words...
What a ******* moron.
Don't be mad because your argument is stupid and wrong. Just learn from your stupidity and try not to look foolish in the future.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They don't.Dictionaries don't define words...
What a ******* moron.
No, not necessarily. Sorry dude.Victor Strenger and Fred C Adams don't. In fact they argue against it. They are both astrophysics.Every astrophysicist on the planet agrees the universe is finely tuned. ~Boss
Find one who disputes it.
They argue against a finely tuned universe by claiming our finely tuned universe is but one of many universes and it coincidentally happens to be fine tuned.
Setting aside the various criticisms of religious beliefs for a moment, and pretending the whimsical dismissal of God is perfectly 'natural' for man and all... how do the non-spiritualists explain the following....
Astral projection experiences.
Near-death experiences.
Transcendental meditation.
ESP and telepathy.
Ghost stories and paranormal experiences.
Other unexplained supernatural phenomenon.
Spells, curses and black magic.
Edgar Cayce.
Nostradamus.
Prophecy in general.
Is every single bit of it a bunch of hooey caused by our fears and imagination?
To me, it just seems as if there might be something more here. Especially in the case of people like Edgar Cayce. If you've never studied up on him, it's worth a search and read... fascinating man. His uncanny ability to predict the future was beyond anything we've ever known. He gave over 14k readings but that includes a brief period where he didn't do them because he was getting headaches. People were exploiting his power to win horse races and trade stock and he believed this was why he was getting the headaches. After some time, he did more readings but only his trusted wife was allowed to ask him questions.
Can our physical sciences understand this?
no merely that you can't come up with an astrophysicist that doesn't acknowledge our universe is finely tuned and that our part of it is finely tuned for the carbon based life that exists on it......that we can agree on.......So we can agree your goofy comment was pointless and a waste of time.though they admittedly have to presume non-carbon based life forms to get around its necessity.......Victor Strenger and Fred C Adams don't. In fact they argue against it. They are both astrophysics.Every astrophysicist on the planet agrees the universe is finely tuned. ~Boss
Find one who disputes it.
upon what do you base this "probability"?......So you believe a fairytale without proof but doubt the high probability that life is not rare in the universe?
no, that would be the realm of science fiction......Science evaluates many phenomenon which are not observable.
upon what do you base this "probability"?......So you believe a fairytale without proof but doubt the high probability that life is not rare in the universe?
and "probably" there is no life at all on almost all of them.......upon what do you base this "probability"?......So you believe a fairytale without proof but doubt the high probability that life is not rare in the universe?
The billions of other suns and planets in our universe
Well that lets you out, since all you have is an ad hominem.Here let's see if I can break it down:
Astral projection experiences - hallucination of the mind
Near-death experiences - hallucination of the mind
Transcendental meditation - just smoke weed. It's easier.
ESP and telepathy - as you put it... "hooey"
Ghost stories and paranormal experiences - also "hooey"
Other unexplained supernatural phenomenon - more hooey
Spells, curses and black magic - a buttload of hooey
Edgar Cayce - see "Miss Cleo"
Nostradamus - hooey
Prophecy in general - hooey
Thanks, Corky... now can we hear from those who still have living brain cells?
- Barton ZwiebachSeems like there are no angels devils ghosts or witches. Nothing that can't or hasn't been outside of our physical world.
"...one must therefore imagine scenarios in which these extra dimensions would not be observed in experiments." ~Quantum Physics
Well, that is probably the only true miracle! Jesus miraculously got people to SHARE.How does he hide? Scientifically. How did he turn 5 loaves and 3 fish into a feast for 5000.
Why? The majority of scientists who specialize in this say you are wrong. Based on facts. Don't tell me that the majority of priests agree with you because their studying an out dated text book.and "probably" there is no life at all on almost all of them.......upon what do you base this "probability"?......So you believe a fairytale without proof but doubt the high probability that life is not rare in the universe?
The billions of other suns and planets in our universe
How pointless, as usual. Bossy made a completely bogus argument wherein he claimed all astrophysicists agree the universe is finely tuned. He failed to support that argument just as you have failed to support it.no merely that you can't come up with an astrophysicist that doesn't acknowledge our universe is finely tuned and that our part of it is finely tuned for the carbon based life that exists on it......that we can agree on.......So we can agree your goofy comment was pointless and a waste of time.though they admittedly have to presume non-carbon based life forms to get around its necessity.......Victor Strenger and Fred C Adams don't. In fact they argue against it. They are both astrophysics.Every astrophysicist on the planet agrees the universe is finely tuned. ~Boss
Find one who disputes it.
Actually, that would be the realm of science.no, that would be the realm of science fiction......Science evaluates many phenomenon which are not observable.
How pointless, as usual. Bossy made a completely bogus argument wherein he claimed all astrophysicists agree the universe is finely tuned. He failed to support that argument just as you have failed to support it.
Here is the full quote you didn't get the other day when I paraphrased on my smart phone:
Uhm... not really. We can SAY they are "physical dimensions" because they relate to physical sciences, but since these extra dimensions have not been confirmed or observed, we can't define them as anything, physical or not.
But you do make an interesting point... Let's imagine something for a moment... Let's say that somewhere in the future, science and physics confirms some cosmic evidence for spiritual nature and energy... the age old secret is revealed, God is proven scientifically to exist as a form of spiritual energy supported by physics. Is God still a spiritual entity or is God now a physical entity? Would God change or would our perspective of God change?
..Victor Strenger and Fred C Adams don't. In fact they argue against it. They are both astrophysics.Every astrophysicist on the planet agrees the universe is finely tuned. ~Boss
Find one who disputes it.
They argue against a finely tuned universe by claiming our finely tuned universe is but one of many universes and it coincidentally happens to be fine tuned.
bossy: ... and it coincidentally happens to be fine tuned.
![]()
which part, the Garden or the 99.9% universe admired by the sudo-spiritualist ?
.
Why are you quoting Stenger and Adams and attributing it to me?
b: Why are you quoting Stenger and Adams and attributing it to me?