How do cops deal with Democrats like this and.....

You are bouncing all over the place, aren't you? Making a complaint against another citizen is an accusation, dumb ass. That accusation is the full basis for the cops to even be talking to her. I said they should have told her what that accusation was, any of the multiple times she asked.
Because cops rarely do that. They want you to say what it is because you might admit to something they didn't even know about.
 
You are bouncing all over the place, aren't you? Making a complaint against another citizen is an accusation, dumb ass. That accusation is the full basis for the cops to even be talking to her. I said they should have told her what that accusation was, any of the multiple times she asked.
I can accuse you of being a genius, but that doesn't stand up to scrutiny. A citizen complaint cannot be ignored. You democrats would be the first to whine about not getting your due process. LOL. She asked what she was accused of. She was not accused of anything at that point in the investigation. You're a fool. If I'd been the cop she would have been jailed until she decided to quit obstructing an INVESTIGATION. There were NO charges.
 
Because cops rarely do that. They want you to say what it is because you might admit to something they didn't even know about.
I know that is what cops do. That doesn't make it right. She had a moral right to know what she was accused of.
 
It was slightly tounge in cheek when I called her a Democrat, but obviously she is political if she went after a stranger for wearing a Trump hat. So what does that tell you? For the sake of brevity, I just called her a Democrat but based on everything we see about her...ok.. she is leaning in that direction. She could be antifa? democratic socialist? Maybe thats better for you.
She voted for the drunk *****.
 
I can accuse you of being a genius, but that doesn't stand up to scrutiny. A citizen complaint cannot be ignored. You democrats would be the first to whine about not getting your due process. LOL. She asked what she was accused of. She was not accused of anything at that point in the investigation. You're a fool. If I'd been the cop she would have been jailed until she decided to quit obstructing an INVESTIGATION. There were NO charges.
Of course she was accused by the guy making the complaint when he claimed she had done something illegal or wrong. A formal accusation by the DA might come later, but the complaint was an accusation.
Ac·cu·sa·tion
noun
  • 1.a charge or claim that someone has done something illegal or wrong:
 

Attachments

  • 1760631029482.webp
    1760631029482.webp
    656 bytes · Views: 13
Of course she was accused by the guy making the complaint when he claimed she had done something illegal or wrong. A formal accusation by the DA might come later, but the complaint was an accusation.
Ac·cu·sa·tion
noun
  • 1.a charge or claim that someone has done something illegal or wrong:
What charge was officially made, moron. That's right--there was none. It was an investigation. Identifying info of witnesses to a POSSIBLE crime is required. She was obviously, maliciously or capriciously obstructing an official investigation and wasting tax $$$. If YOU were assaulted in a public park and you reported it to the authorities, how would YOU react if those authorities just said, "meh, the person you claim assaulted you doesn't want to talk to us." I'll tell you how you'd react. You would be whining to high heaven about how you weren't being protected from violence. You're wrong on all counts on this point and it doesn't take a lawyer to tear your nonsense down.
 
What charge was officially made, moron. That's right--there was none. It was an investigation. Identifying info of witnesses to a POSSIBLE crime is required. She was obviously, maliciously or capriciously obstructing an official investigation and wasting tax $$$. If YOU were assaulted in a public park and you reported it to the authorities, how would YOU react if those authorities just said, "meh, the person you claim assaulted you doesn't want to talk to us." I'll tell you how you'd react. You would be whining to high heaven about how you weren't being protected from violence. You're wrong on all counts on this point and it doesn't take a lawyer to tear your nonsense down.
So now we don't have the right to remain silent? We have no obligation to assist them in their investigation.
 
So now we don't have the right to remain silent? We have no obligation to assist them in their investigation.
And she had every to remain silent, she just didn't have the ability.
 
So now we don't have the right to remain silent? We have no obligation to assist them in their investigation.
How is identifying yourself an admission of anything. Investigate Terry Stop. Now run along, your circuitous attempts to justify this ignoramus' obstruction has run its course. Educate yourself.
 
And conversely, a girl will lay almost anyone if it gets them love or money. :laughing0301:
/----/ Now, if you pretended to be a left-wing Antifa type just to get this girl in the sack, would you do it?
1760646282539.webp
 
Yeah, I mean, if your mentality is "there are two people, Democrats and Republicans, and I be a Republican and I don't look like that"

That's pretty ******* low level thinking, isn't it?
Consider the source.
 
Of course she was accused. Why else would they even be talking to her? Somebody made an accusation, and the police were going on that accusation. She had every right to know what she was suspected of doing.
The police did not accuse her of anything, someone else did, the police are there to investigate what happened and they do not take sides and do not accuse. The got a call about a disturbance and were there to investigate.
 
The police did not accuse her of anything, someone else did, the police are there to investigate what happened and they do not take sides and do not accuse. The got a call about a disturbance and were there to investigate.
Didn't say the police accused her. Somebody did. The cops knew what the accusation was.
 
Not become raging alchoholics? I couldnt do it.




Her: Oh God
God:

i-do-not-83c9ed72c9.webp


I'd say with high confidence she's a Kamala voter -- and an idiot to get emotionally bent out of shape over a hat. Makes you wonder what the normal-looking guy friend sees in her.

I was thinking exactly the same thing.

It could have been worse. George Floyd killed himself acting like that.

Worse for her you mean not our tax dollars.
 
15th post
It was slightly tounge in cheek when I called her a Democrat, but obviously she is political if she went after a stranger for wearing a Trump hat. So what does that tell you? For the sake of brevity, I just called her a Democrat but based on everything we see about her...ok.. she is leaning in that direction. She could be antifa? democratic socialist? Maybe thats better for you.

Perhaps don't call her what you don't know what she is.

Find out, then use that.
 
Didn't say the police accused her. Somebody did. The cops knew what the accusation was.
So what? They are there to gets fact not spread accusations. They are there to resolve, get separate statements not make play games between the two parties. Police have learned long ago not to play silly games and now her game got her arrested.
 
/----/ Now, if you pretended to be a left-wing Antifa type just to get this girl in the sack, would you do it?
View attachment 1174067

Nope. I'm not ******* any chick with a hog ring in her nose. Besides, she's too flat-chested for me, and her arms look filthy. I'd be afraid that shit would rub off on me.
 
Back
Top Bottom