How do cops deal with Democrats like this and.....

Yeah, I mean, if your mentality is "there are two people, Democrats and Republicans, and I be a Republican and I don't look like that"

That's pretty ******* low level thinking, isn't it?
You're not real big on how the world works, do you?

You act a certain way, you get labeled that way UNTIL You stop acting that way.
 
Because they made it clear she was not accused of anything. They were conducting a criminal investigation that she admitted being a party to. They explained that calmly and clearly multiple times. Personally, I think they molly coddled her and after the third time of her blatant obstruction of justice, she should have been slammed face down on the ground and taken downtown to be questioned in the jail while she awaited charges of obstruction.
Of course she was accused. Why else would they even be talking to her? Somebody made an accusation, and the police were going on that accusation. She had every right to know what she was suspected of doing.
 
Yeah, I mean, if your mentality is "there are two people, Democrats and Republicans, and I be a Republican and I don't look like that"

That's pretty ******* low level thinking, isn't it?

How are your core values any different than a Democrat? You support abortion, gun restrictions, free healthcare, open borders, taxing the rich, race and gender as being a "social construct"...

Those are all platforms embraced by the Democrat Party. Even if you don't vote for them, you support what they stand for.
 
Of course she was accused. Why else would they even be talking to her? Somebody made an accusation, and the police were going on that accusation. She had every right to know what she was suspected of doing.

Once again, she was only being detained. You usually aren't informed of what you're being arrested for until right before your Miranda rights are read.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I mean, if your mentality is "there are two people, Democrats and Republicans, and I be a Republican and I don't look like that"

That's pretty ******* low level thinking, isn't it?


It was slightly tounge in cheek when I called her a Democrat, but obviously she is political if she went after a stranger for wearing a Trump hat. So what does that tell you? For the sake of brevity, I just called her a Democrat but based on everything we see about her...ok.. she is leaning in that direction. She could be antifa? democratic socialist? Maybe thats better for you.
 
Of course she was accused. Why else would they even be talking to her? Somebody made an accusation, and the police were going on that accusation. She had every right to know what she was suspected of doing.
You're acting the fool again-----maybe you're not acting. I watched the video and saw exactly what happened. Your typical democrat gaslighting doesn't work. Clearly you've never been witness to an accident. Witnesses personal info is essential in order to counter ignorant liberal claims that the witness is not credible. Your knowledge of the legal system is non existent.
 
15th post
It was slightly tounge in cheek when I called her a Democrat, but obviously she is political if she went after a stranger for wearing a Trump hat. So what does that tell you? For the sake of brevity, I just called her a Democrat but based on everything we see about her...ok.. she is leaning in that direction. She could be antifa? democratic socialist? Maybe thats better for you.

Democratic Socialists/Antifa are desperately trying to separate themselves from the Democratic Party and yet, the Democratic Party is being assimilated by their Dem Soc/Antifa element, while adamantly denying they have anything to do with them.

It's almost like a dog chasing his tail. :laughing0301:

dog-chasing-tail-33.gif
 
You're acting the fool again-----maybe you're not acting. I watched the video and saw exactly what happened. Your typical democrat gaslighting doesn't work. Clearly you've never been witness to an accident. Witnesses personal info is essential in order to counter ignorant liberal claims that the witness is not credible. Your knowledge of the legal system is non existent.
So did the man in the park accuse her to the cops or not? His accusation is why they were talking to her, right?
 
So did the man in the park accuse her to the cops or not? His accusation is why they were talking to her, right?
So if you make a citizen complaint against another citizen, you believe law enforcement has no right to investigate the complaint? Drench yourself in mustard Mr. Pretzel. You, once again, have proven yourself to be a moron.
 
So if you make a citizen complaint against another citizen, you believe law enforcement has no right to investigate the complaint? Drench yourself in mustard Mr. Pretzel. You, once again, have proven yourself to be a moron.
You are bouncing all over the place, aren't you? Making a complaint against another citizen is an accusation, dumb ass. That accusation is the full basis for the cops to even be talking to her. I said they should have told her what that accusation was, any of the multiple times she asked.
 
Back
Top Bottom