That would be your typical democrat.Yeah, I mean, if your mentality is "there are two people, Democrats and Republicans, and I be a Republican and I don't look like that"
That's pretty ******* low level thinking, isn't it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That would be your typical democrat.Yeah, I mean, if your mentality is "there are two people, Democrats and Republicans, and I be a Republican and I don't look like that"
That's pretty ******* low level thinking, isn't it?
The first thing they want to know is "Who the hell are you and what the hell are you wanted for?"
You're not real big on how the world works, do you?Yeah, I mean, if your mentality is "there are two people, Democrats and Republicans, and I be a Republican and I don't look like that"
That's pretty ******* low level thinking, isn't it?
Not become raging alchoholics? I couldnt do it.
/-----/ democRAT -- Commie --- Liberals are all the same.Where does it say she's a Democrat?
She must give good helmet.I'd say with high confidence she's a Kamala voter -- and an idiot to get emotionally bent out of shape over a hat. Makes you wonder what the normal-looking guy friend sees in her.
Not become raging alchoholics? I couldnt do it.
Of course she was accused. Why else would they even be talking to her? Somebody made an accusation, and the police were going on that accusation. She had every right to know what she was suspected of doing.Because they made it clear she was not accused of anything. They were conducting a criminal investigation that she admitted being a party to. They explained that calmly and clearly multiple times. Personally, I think they molly coddled her and after the third time of her blatant obstruction of justice, she should have been slammed face down on the ground and taken downtown to be questioned in the jail while she awaited charges of obstruction.
Yeah, I mean, if your mentality is "there are two people, Democrats and Republicans, and I be a Republican and I don't look like that"
That's pretty ******* low level thinking, isn't it?
Of course she was accused. Why else would they even be talking to her? Somebody made an accusation, and the police were going on that accusation. She had every right to know what she was suspected of doing.
/——/ True. A guy will pretend to be almost anything if it gets him laid.She must give good helmet.![]()
/——/ True. A guy will pretend to be almost anything if it gets him laid.

Yeah, I mean, if your mentality is "there are two people, Democrats and Republicans, and I be a Republican and I don't look like that"
That's pretty ******* low level thinking, isn't it?
You're acting the fool again-----maybe you're not acting. I watched the video and saw exactly what happened. Your typical democrat gaslighting doesn't work. Clearly you've never been witness to an accident. Witnesses personal info is essential in order to counter ignorant liberal claims that the witness is not credible. Your knowledge of the legal system is non existent.Of course she was accused. Why else would they even be talking to her? Somebody made an accusation, and the police were going on that accusation. She had every right to know what she was suspected of doing.
It was slightly tounge in cheek when I called her a Democrat, but obviously she is political if she went after a stranger for wearing a Trump hat. So what does that tell you? For the sake of brevity, I just called her a Democrat but based on everything we see about her...ok.. she is leaning in that direction. She could be antifa? democratic socialist? Maybe thats better for you.
So did the man in the park accuse her to the cops or not? His accusation is why they were talking to her, right?You're acting the fool again-----maybe you're not acting. I watched the video and saw exactly what happened. Your typical democrat gaslighting doesn't work. Clearly you've never been witness to an accident. Witnesses personal info is essential in order to counter ignorant liberal claims that the witness is not credible. Your knowledge of the legal system is non existent.
So if you make a citizen complaint against another citizen, you believe law enforcement has no right to investigate the complaint? Drench yourself in mustard Mr. Pretzel. You, once again, have proven yourself to be a moron.So did the man in the park accuse her to the cops or not? His accusation is why they were talking to her, right?
You are bouncing all over the place, aren't you? Making a complaint against another citizen is an accusation, dumb ass. That accusation is the full basis for the cops to even be talking to her. I said they should have told her what that accusation was, any of the multiple times she asked.So if you make a citizen complaint against another citizen, you believe law enforcement has no right to investigate the complaint? Drench yourself in mustard Mr. Pretzel. You, once again, have proven yourself to be a moron.