How can this be copacetic?

[Crepitus]

Defense: " Justice Thomas directed us to raise this issue..."

Judge Chutkan interjects: "He directed you to do it?"

Defense: " Well.. he didn't direct us to"

Seriously people, how much of this bullshit are we expected to stand for?

 

[BackAgain]

Oh nozies. They took some line from the Thomas opinion as constituting a “direction” to raise an issue — and what??

Why would it matter that they took it in such a way?

 

[roderick]

Link?

 

[1srelluc]

And?

I would think that it would be a lawyer's job to quote SCOTUS opinions if it helps the client or the state.

 

[MarcATL]

It's not OP.

We do not currently have a SCOTUS.

What we have is the legal defense team and lawfare warriors of an extreme far rightwing organization called The Heritage Foundation.

It has to stop.

 

[Dragonlady]

And?

I would think that it would be a lawyer's job to quote SCOTUS opinions if it helps the client or the state.

It wasn't an "opinion". It was one judge's addendum to the immunity verdict, that no other judge concurred with.

And it was Thomas who no longer has any credibility whatsoever, given that his wife participated in the insurrection.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Defense: " Justice Thomas directed us to raise this issue..."

Judge Chutkan interjects: "He directed you to do it?"

Defense: " Well.. he didn't direct us to"

Seriously people, how much of this bullshit are we expected to stand for?

Defense slipped up.

Too funny...and scary.

 

[Dreadnaught1968]

It'd be nice to have an actual link as opposed to a post on X (formerly known as Twitter)...

 

[ThisIsMe]

It's not OP.

We do not currently have a SCOTUS.

What we have is the legal defense team and lawfare warriors of an extreme far rightwing organization called The Heritage Foundation.

It has to stop.

I know, we need to add about 5 more liberal justices so you lefties can strongarm your ideology into law, then it will be ok, right ?

 

[MarcATL]

I know, we need to add about 5 more liberal justices so you lefties can strongarm your ideology into law, then it will be ok, right ?

It will be CLOSER to being OK.

 

[Dragonlady]

It'd be nice to have an actual link as opposed to a post on X (formerly known as Twitter)...

We have to wait for the transcripts which at the earliest would be tomorrow. The tapes of the day's proceedings are taken for transcription as soon as court ends.

 

[TheYellowKing]

Defense: " Justice Thomas directed us to raise this issue..."

Judge Chutkan interjects: "He directed you to do it?"

Defense: " Well.. he didn't direct us to"

Seriously people, how much of this bullshit are we expected to stand for?

You do know how federal rulings work right and why SCOTUS decisions are the law of the land

Of course you don't cause you're a fucking drool on chin retard

 

[struth]

Defense: " Justice Thomas directed us to raise this issue..."

Judge Chutkan interjects: "He directed you to do it?"

Defense: " Well.. he didn't direct us to"

Seriously people, how much of this bullshit are we expected to stand for?

Yeah, if you read his opinion you can. See where he directed everyone to the issueb

 

[j-mac]

Defense: " Justice Thomas directed us to raise this issue..."

Judge Chutkan interjects: "He directed you to do it?"

Defense: " Well.. he didn't direct us to"

Seriously people, how much of this bullshit are we expected to stand for?

Don’t understand why you people are clinging to this…Hell, just drop the charade and go full on communist, and screw the fake due process…you POS’s

 

[Crepitus]

You do know how federal rulings work right and why SCOTUS decisions are the law of the land

Of course you don't cause you're a fucking drool on chin retard

YOu're deflecting.

Poorly.

 

[Crepitus]

Don’t understand why you people are clinging to this…Hell, just drop the charade and go full on communist, and screw the fake due process…you POS’s

Why are you in my thread babbling nonsense again?

 

[Crepitus]

Oh, sorry, let me react the way you are.

View attachment 1007668

Show me where you see panic.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It's not a conspiracy, when you do it out loud, in broad daylight.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Oh nozies. They took some line from the Thomas opinion as constituting a “direction” to raise an issue — and what??

Why would it matter that they took it in such a way?

Why don't you articulate an answer for us, so we don't need to tolerate your derp for any longer than necessary?

 

[TheYellowKing]

YOu're deflecting.

Poorly.

Not a defection at all

Clearly you don't know what SCOTUS rulings mean or how they work