Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
CNN, or maybe it was MSNBC said today, that it was a religious version of Texas Chainsaw Massacre.
I also read that the film is basically "religious void"...not only is the word God never said throughout the entire film, but the religious aspect is almost completely absent.
Also that they portrayed Noah as a homicidal maniac, chopping people up and even trying to kill his own family.
Then to top it off, they put in this giant "rock monsters" that helped Noah build the ark.
WTF??
Have you seen it or do you always take someone elses word for it?
Noah is supposedly portrayed as an animal rights activist and ecofreak.
Hence, the usual suspects can safely declare it to be part of the liberal Hollywood conspiracy.
Do you always close your eyes and swallow whatever is put in your mouth? I mean, you dont even bother to find out. Rumors are enough?
Noah is supposedly portrayed as an animal rights activist and ecofreak.
Hence, the usual suspects can safely declare it to be part of the liberal Hollywood conspiracy.
Do you always close your eyes and swallow whatever is put in your mouth? I mean, you dont even bother to find out. Rumors are enough?
Sorry, I assumed you weren't too lazy to use a search engine yourself.
Atheist 'Noah' director brags film is least biblical Bible movie ever - Washington Times
Noah is supposedly portrayed as an animal rights activist and ecofreak.
Hence, the usual suspects can safely declare it to be part of the liberal Hollywood conspiracy.
Do you always close your eyes and swallow whatever is put in your mouth? I mean, you dont even bother to find out. Rumors are enough?
Sorry, I assumed you weren't too lazy to use a search engine yourself.
Atheist 'Noah' director brags film is least biblical Bible movie ever - Washington Times
Do you always close your eyes and swallow whatever is put in your mouth? I mean, you dont even bother to find out. Rumors are enough?
Sorry, I assumed you weren't too lazy to use a search engine yourself.
Atheist 'Noah' director brags film is least biblical Bible movie ever - Washington Times
Flat out he is an idiot.
Not much deeper than Truthsmatters
This Year, Biblical Films Are Fruitful And Multiplying
This Year, Biblical Films Are Fruitful And Multiplying : NPR
How could this be? I thought Hollywood was anti-religion and punished those who were christians (which is 90% of the population in America)
How were they able to make these films without bursting into flames?
This Year, Biblical Films Are Fruitful And Multiplying
This Year, Biblical Films Are Fruitful And Multiplying : NPR
How could this be? I thought Hollywood was anti-religion and punished those who were christians (which is 90% of the population in America)
How were they able to make these films without bursting into flames?
Hollywood IS anti-religion (or at least anti-Christian). The new movie "Noah" was directed by an atheist and completely deviates from the actual, biblical account. It's basically a mockery of the biblical story and totally misses the point and purpose of Noah's flood. The idiotic directer is trying to say that the flood occurred because of violence to the environment. The Bible says that it occurred because of abject rejection of God and mankind's sinful decline.
Does Noah follow the biblical story or not?
There are really two questions here: First, what does the film add to the biblical story? Second, what does the film take away from the biblical story?
Adding to the story is normal and expected in any biblical adaptation or any adaptation of any literary source material. Virtually all Bible movies add or elaborate upon characters, dialogue, motivations and other elements, either to help clarify the story, to imagine how it could have been or for other artistic reasons.
Read more: The ?Noah? Movie Controversies: Questions and Answers | Daily News | NCRegister.com
This Year, Biblical Films Are Fruitful And Multiplying
This Year, Biblical Films Are Fruitful And Multiplying : NPR
How could this be? I thought Hollywood was anti-religion and punished those who were christians (which is 90% of the population in America)
How were they able to make these films without bursting into flames?
Hollywood IS anti-religion (or at least anti-Christian). The new movie "Noah" was directed by an atheist and completely deviates from the actual, biblical account. It's basically a mockery of the biblical story and totally misses the point and purpose of Noah's flood. The idiotic directer is trying to say that the flood occurred because of violence to the environment. The Bible says that it occurred because of abject rejection of God and mankind's sinful decline.
Jeez you would think that people who are so anti religion would reflect that by not making these films (for decade after decade).
Every movie will deviate from the biblical account because the bible isnt a script. Let these guys tell you
Does Noah follow the biblical story or not?
There are really two questions here: First, what does the film add to the biblical story? Second, what does the film take away from the biblical story?
Adding to the story is normal and expected in any biblical adaptation or any adaptation of any literary source material. Virtually all Bible movies add or elaborate upon characters, dialogue, motivations and other elements, either to help clarify the story, to imagine how it could have been or for other artistic reasons.
Read more: The ?Noah? Movie Controversies: Questions and Answers | Daily News | NCRegister.com
Now either we are dealing with reality or dealing with what you want reality to be. But not both...which do you prefer?
Hollywood IS anti-religion (or at least anti-Christian). The new movie "Noah" was directed by an atheist and completely deviates from the actual, biblical account. It's basically a mockery of the biblical story and totally misses the point and purpose of Noah's flood. The idiotic directer is trying to say that the flood occurred because of violence to the environment. The Bible says that it occurred because of abject rejection of God and mankind's sinful decline.
Jeez you would think that people who are so anti religion would reflect that by not making these films (for decade after decade).
Every movie will deviate from the biblical account because the bible isnt a script. Let these guys tell you
Does Noah follow the biblical story or not?
There are really two questions here: First, what does the film add to the biblical story? Second, what does the film take away from the biblical story?
Adding to the story is normal and expected in any biblical adaptation or any adaptation of any literary source material. Virtually all Bible movies add or elaborate upon characters, dialogue, motivations and other elements, either to help clarify the story, to imagine how it could have been or for other artistic reasons.
Read more: The ?Noah? Movie Controversies: Questions and Answers | Daily News | NCRegister.com
Now either we are dealing with reality or dealing with what you want reality to be. But not both...which do you prefer?
The MOST anti-religious folks are the ones who distort and rewrite biblical history. The Bible specifically states (in no less that 3 places) that we are not to "add to" or "take away" from Scripture.
Then every movie made by Hollywood about the Bible is out of order. Charlton "From My Dead Cold Hands" Heston is burning in hell.
Hollywood IS anti-religion (or at least anti-Christian). The new movie "Noah" was directed by an atheist and completely deviates from the actual, biblical account. It's basically a mockery of the biblical story and totally misses the point and purpose of Noah's flood. The idiotic directer is trying to say that the flood occurred because of violence to the environment. The Bible says that it occurred because of abject rejection of God and mankind's sinful decline.
Jeez you would think that people who are so anti religion would reflect that by not making these films (for decade after decade).
Every movie will deviate from the biblical account because the bible isnt a script. Let these guys tell you
Does Noah follow the biblical story or not?
There are really two questions here: First, what does the film add to the biblical story? Second, what does the film take away from the biblical story?
Adding to the story is normal and expected in any biblical adaptation or any adaptation of any literary source material. Virtually all Bible movies add or elaborate upon characters, dialogue, motivations and other elements, either to help clarify the story, to imagine how it could have been or for other artistic reasons.
Read more: The ?Noah? Movie Controversies: Questions and Answers | Daily News | NCRegister.com
Now either we are dealing with reality or dealing with what you want reality to be. But not both...which do you prefer?
The MOST anti-religious folks are the ones who distort and rewrite biblical history. The Bible specifically states (in no less that 3 places) that we are not to "add to" or "take away" from Scripture.
"The Bible specifically states (in no less that 3 places) that we are not to "add to" or "take away" from Scripture."
The Bible (from Koine Greek τὰ βιβλία, tà biblía, "the books") is a canonical collection of texts considered sacred in Judaism and Christianity. There is no single "Bible" and many Bibles with varying contents exist.[1] The term Bible is shared between Judaism and Christianity, although the contents of each of their collections of canonical texts is not the same. Different religious groups include different books within their Biblical canons, in different orders, and sometimes divide or combine books, or incorporate additional material into canonical books.
The Hebrew Bible, or Tanakh, contains twenty-four books divided into three parts: the five books of the Torah ("teaching" or "law"), the Nevi'im ("prophets"), and the Ketuvim ("writings").
Christian Bibles range from the sixty-six books of the Protestant canon to the eighty-one books of the Ethiopian Orthodox Church canon. The first part of Christian Bibles is the Old Testament, which contains, at minimum, the twenty-four books of the Hebrew Bible divided into thirty-nine books and ordered differently from the Hebrew Bible. The Catholic Church and Eastern Christian churches also hold certain deuterocanonical books and passages to be part of the Old Testament canon. The second part is the New Testament, containing twenty-seven books: the four Canonical gospels, Acts of the Apostles, twenty-one Epistles or letters, and the Book of Revelation.
Wiki
Yeah except its happened in every biblical movie that ever existed because the bible isnt a script.
So what is different about this one that makes any changes worst than every other one?
"The Bible specifically states (in no less that 3 places) that we are not to "add to" or "take away" from Scripture."
The Bible (from Koine Greek τὰ βιβλία, tà biblía, "the books") is a canonical collection of texts considered sacred in Judaism and Christianity. There is no single "Bible" and many Bibles with varying contents exist.[1] The term Bible is shared between Judaism and Christianity, although the contents of each of their collections of canonical texts is not the same. Different religious groups include different books within their Biblical canons, in different orders, and sometimes divide or combine books, or incorporate additional material into canonical books.
The Hebrew Bible, or Tanakh, contains twenty-four books divided into three parts: the five books of the Torah ("teaching" or "law"), the Nevi'im ("prophets"), and the Ketuvim ("writings").
Christian Bibles range from the sixty-six books of the Protestant canon to the eighty-one books of the Ethiopian Orthodox Church canon. The first part of Christian Bibles is the Old Testament, which contains, at minimum, the twenty-four books of the Hebrew Bible divided into thirty-nine books and ordered differently from the Hebrew Bible. The Catholic Church and Eastern Christian churches also hold certain deuterocanonical books and passages to be part of the Old Testament canon. The second part is the New Testament, containing twenty-seven books: the four Canonical gospels, Acts of the Apostles, twenty-one Epistles or letters, and the Book of Revelation.
Wiki
Folks (and Wiki) have been trying to discredit the Bible for centuries. Nothing new there. A careful study of the Bible's history (from a believer's perspective) paints a much different picture. You're certainly free to reject it but I (and millions of others) believe it on faith and believe it was providentially preserved by God for man's benefit.
This Year, Biblical Films Are Fruitful And Multiplying
This Year, Biblical Films Are Fruitful And Multiplying : NPR
How could this be? I thought Hollywood was anti-religion and punished those who were christians (which is 90% of the population in America)
How were they able to make these films without bursting into flames?
Noah is supposedly portrayed as an animal rights activist and ecofreak.
Hence, the usual suspects can safely declare it to be part of the liberal Hollywood conspiracy.
