- Mar 31, 2009
- 95,057
- 71,599
- 3,605
This is either going to end with Kavanaugh confirmed or the Ds facing various civil and criminal charges, mostly from the deep state declassification.
Should be both
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
This is either going to end with Kavanaugh confirmed or the Ds facing various civil and criminal charges, mostly from the deep state declassification.
Mocked by a rape enabler. I feel so stung^ Uh oh white grievance peddler whips out the race cardTo a rape enabler it must seem that way. I know conservative women are turned on when a man forces themselves on them, so you’ll never have a problem with this type of thing.I’m just not a rape enabler like you are.
Who raped someone?
See this is your problem, nobody was raped and nobody did rape.
Perhaps you can prove otherwise....Ford cant and what she did say was unadulterated BS
Again, what rape?
Put up some proof or sit your ass down, racist
So you don't have proof you just revert to your racism
You're being mocked
About a job interview? No.Have you? I was more concerned with your ongoing endorsement of violent rape.
Is there anything else, that suggests the exact opposite of blind justice, you would like to present in your defense?
Off the top of my head Trump, Roy Moore, and Rapin’ Brett.10’s of millions. You can’t seriously expect me to list them all.I don’t think the enthusiastic support of rape and rapists by conservatives is going to hurt Dems at all
Which conservatives supported "rape and rapists" ?
When did this happen? and what "rape and rapists" were they "supporting"?
He has no defense...and no proof
A typical day for a left loon
He has no defense...and no proof
A typical day for a left loon
Yeah, he either (as I suggested) doesn't have the ability to understand what I posted, or is just a troll. In which case he is about equally useless.
I'm losing track of the perjuries, civil rights violations, violations of senate rules and plain stupidity demonstrated by the Ds.There are a minimum of 10 D senate seats that have been put at some degree of risk by DiFi and the idiots. Blowing what would have been a gimme again.
Lots of other names on the list partisan special interest groups handed to Trump for SC picks. During most job interviews, a boss will usually go with another candidate than the one exposed as an alcoholic rapist. Seems a pretty easy decision to me.Off the top of my head Trump, Roy Moore, and Rapin’ Brett.10’s of millions. You can’t seriously expect me to list them all.I don’t think the enthusiastic support of rape and rapists by conservatives is going to hurt Dems at all
Which conservatives supported "rape and rapists" ?
When did this happen? and what "rape and rapists" were they "supporting"?
When were any of those jokers convicted of rape?
.. oh wait, I forgot , the presumption of innocence only applies when the accused is a fellow left wing dingbat.
For everybody else we go straight from accusation to the sentencing phase.
I'm losing track of the perjuries, civil rights violations, violations of senate rules and plain stupidity demonstrated by the Ds.There are a minimum of 10 D senate seats that have been put at some degree of risk by DiFi and the idiots. Blowing what would have been a gimme again.
What is this now ---- 692 threads you've started with the desperation prediction fantasies?
.
Lots of other names on the list partisan special interest groups handed to Trump for SC picks. During most job interviews, a boss will usually go with another candidate than the one exposed as an alcoholic rapist. Seems a pretty easy decision to me.Off the top of my head Trump, Roy Moore, and Rapin’ Brett.10’s of millions. You can’t seriously expect me to list them all.Which conservatives supported "rape and rapists" ?
When did this happen? and what "rape and rapists" were they "supporting"?
When were any of those jokers convicted of rape?
.. oh wait, I forgot , the presumption of innocence only applies when the accused is a fellow left wing dingbat.
For everybody else we go straight from accusation to the sentencing phase.
When I sit down to hire someone, I don’t pick the person with multiple rape and sexual assault allegations.Lots of other names on the list partisan special interest groups handed to Trump for SC picks. During most job interviews, a boss will usually go with another candidate than the one exposed as an alcoholic rapist. Seems a pretty easy decision to me.Off the top of my head Trump, Roy Moore, and Rapin’ Brett.10’s of millions. You can’t seriously expect me to list them all.
When did this happen? and what "rape and rapists" were they "supporting"?
When were any of those jokers convicted of rape?
.. oh wait, I forgot , the presumption of innocence only applies when the accused is a fellow left wing dingbat.
For everybody else we go straight from accusation to the sentencing phase.
Once again, when was Kavanaugh convicted of rape ?
What evidence do you have that he's an alcoholic?
I realize the voices in your head are pretty convincing prosecutors but out here in the real world, where rational people live, accusations don't automatically equal guilt, even when the accused is a Washingtonian Douche Bag.
When I sit down to hire someone, I don’t pick the person with multiple rape and sexual assault allegations.Lots of other names on the list partisan special interest groups handed to Trump for SC picks. During most job interviews, a boss will usually go with another candidate than the one exposed as an alcoholic rapist. Seems a pretty easy decision to me.Off the top of my head Trump, Roy Moore, and Rapin’ Brett.When did this happen? and what "rape and rapists" were they "supporting"?
When were any of those jokers convicted of rape?
.. oh wait, I forgot , the presumption of innocence only applies when the accused is a fellow left wing dingbat.
For everybody else we go straight from accusation to the sentencing phase.
Once again, when was Kavanaugh convicted of rape ?
What evidence do you have that he's an alcoholic?
I realize the voices in your head are pretty convincing prosecutors but out here in the real world, where rational people live, accusations don't automatically equal guilt, even when the accused is a Washingtonian Douche Bag.
When I sit down to hire someone, I don’t pick the person with multiple rape and sexual assault allegations.Lots of other names on the list partisan special interest groups handed to Trump for SC picks. During most job interviews, a boss will usually go with another candidate than the one exposed as an alcoholic rapist. Seems a pretty easy decision to me.Off the top of my head Trump, Roy Moore, and Rapin’ Brett.When did this happen? and what "rape and rapists" were they "supporting"?
When were any of those jokers convicted of rape?
.. oh wait, I forgot , the presumption of innocence only applies when the accused is a fellow left wing dingbat.
For everybody else we go straight from accusation to the sentencing phase.
Once again, when was Kavanaugh convicted of rape ?
What evidence do you have that he's an alcoholic?
I realize the voices in your head are pretty convincing prosecutors but out here in the real world, where rational people live, accusations don't automatically equal guilt, even when the accused is a Washingtonian Douche Bag.
I'm losing track of the perjuries, civil rights violations, violations of senate rules and plain stupidity demonstrated by the Ds.There are a minimum of 10 D senate seats that have been put at some degree of risk by DiFi and the idiots. Blowing what would have been a gimme again.
If America has any sense of justice, they will turn out to vote against any Democrat Incumbents. Doing that will ensure that this kind of stuff will be harder to do, and give us a shot at cleaning up DC some more.
About a job interview? No.
what seats are these?I'm losing track of the perjuries, civil rights violations, violations of senate rules and plain stupidity demonstrated by the Ds.There are a minimum of 10 D senate seats that have been put at some degree of risk by DiFi and the idiots. Blowing what would have been a gimme again.
About a job interview? No.
This is what we (you and I) are discussing.
The image represents lady justice being assaulted in a manner similar to that described in Dr. Ford's allegations and Republicans (assuming that's what the "R's" stand for) doing the assaulting.
Lady Justice represents our legal system and is blindfolded as an indication of blind justice. It means there is a base assumption of innocence, and that only unbiased, verifiable evidence is used to determine guilt.
If anyone wanted to suggest that the Republicans are the ones attempting to use the lack of unbiased interpretation, or lack of any verifiable evidence towards the commission of the assault, to determine anyone's guilt, they are too stupid to understand that is exactly what the Democrats are doing, and not the Republicans.
In other words, the props and concepts represented in the image are not only invalid, but reality represents the exact opposite of what it is trying to suggest.